, , , , , ,
search relation.
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
 

AMD A6-5345M vs AMD A6-5350M vs AMD A6-5357M

AMD A6-5345M

► remove from comparison AMD A6-5345M

The AMD A6-5345M is a mobile ultra-low-voltage dual-core processor based on the Richland architecture. The APU integrates one module with 2.2 to 2.8 GHz, a Radeon HD 8410G graphics card and a DDR3(L)-1333 memory controller.

Compared to Trinity, Richland has been modified just slightly. Therefore, no changes in the feature set or the Pro-MHz performance can be reported. The design of the chip is still based on the Bulldozer architecture, which consists of so-called modules. Each module integrates 2 integer units, but only one FPU. Just like Trinity, Richland supports nearly all current techniques such as AVX (including FMA), AES or Turbo Core.

The CPU performance of the A6-5345M should be slightly above the A6-4455M and similar to the Pentium 987. For everyday tasks such as Internet or Office the performance is adequate, but not for very complex software or modern games.

The graphics unit called Radeon HD 8410G offers 192 shader units (VLIW4) and is slightly slower than the HD Graphics 4000. The core is clocked at 450-600 MHz (turbo).

The power consumption of the entire APU is rated at 17 watts, which is similar to other ULV CPUs. Therefore, the APU is suitable for 12-inch ultraportables or bigger.

AMD A6-5350M

► remove from comparison AMD A6-5350M

The AMD A6-5350M is a mobile dual-core processor based on the Richland-architecture. As successor to the A6-4400M, the A6-5350M has a slightly higher CPU and graphics performance and settles in the low end segment. The APU integrates 2 CPU cores, a DirectX 11 graphics unit and the Northbridge along with a DDR3 memory controller.

Compared to Trinity, Richland has been modified just slightly. Therefore, no changes in the feature set or the Pro-MHz performance can be reported. The design of the chip is still based on the Bulldozer architecture, which consists of so-called modules. Each module integrates 2 integer units, but only one FPU. Just like Trinity, Richland supports nearly all current techniques such as AVX (including FMA), AES or Turbo Core.

According to the clock rates of 2.9 to 3.5 GHz, the A6-5350M performs about 15 percent faster than the A6-4400M and just reaches a Pentium P6100. Consequently, the performance in less demanding applications and games is sufficient.

The graphics unit called Radeon HD 8450G offers 192 shader units (VLIW4) and clocks slightly higher than the HD 7520G. With fast dual-channel memory, performance matches a dedicated Radeon HD 7470M.

The power consumption of the entire APU is rated at 35 watts, which is comparable to conventional middle-class models of competition. Thus, the APU is best suited for 14 inch notebooks or bigger.

AMD A6-5357M

► remove from comparison AMD A6-5357M

The AMD A6-5357M is a mobile dual-core processor based on the Richland-architecture. In contrast to the A6-5350M, the A6-5357M is a BGA version. As successor to the A6-4400M, the A6-5350M/5357M has a slightly higher CPU and graphics performance and settles in the low end segment. The APU integrates 2 CPU cores, a DirectX 11 graphics unit and the Northbridge along with a DDR3 memory controller.

Compared to Trinity, Richland has been modified just slightly. Therefore, no changes in the feature set or the Pro-MHz performance can be reported. The design of the chip is still based on the Bulldozer architecture, which consists of so-called modules. Each module integrates 2 integer units, but only one FPU. Just like Trinity, Richland supports nearly all current techniques such as AVX (including FMA), AES or Turbo Core.

According to the clock rates of 2.9 to 3.5 GHz, the A6-5357M should perform about 15 percent faster than the A6-4400M and just reach a Pentium P6100. Consequently, the performance in less demanding applications and games is sufficient.

The graphics unit called Radeon HD 8450G offers 192 shader units (VLIW4) and clocks slightly higher than the HD 7520G at 533 - 720 MHz. With fast dual-channel memory, performance is expected to match a dedicated Radeon HD 7470M.

The power consumption of the entire APU is rated at 35 watts, which is comparable to conventional middle-class models of competition. Thus, the APU is best suited for 14 inch notebooks or bigger.

AMD A6-5345MAMD A6-5350MAMD A6-5357M
AMD A-SeriesAMD A-SeriesAMD A-Series
RichlandRichlandRichland
Series: A-Series Richland
AMD A10-5750M2.5 - 3.5 GHz4 / 4
AMD A10-5757M2.5 - 3.5 GHz4 / 4
AMD A10-5745M2.1 - 2.9 GHz4 / 4
AMD A8-5550M2.1 - 3.1 GHz4 / 4
AMD A8-5557M2.1 - 3.1 GHz4 / 4
AMD A8-5545M1.7 - 2.7 GHz4 / 4
AMD A6-5350M2.9 - 3.5 GHz2 / 2
AMD A6-5357M2.9 - 3.5 GHz2 / 2
AMD A4-5150M2.7 - 3.3 GHz2 / 2
» AMD A6-5345M2.2 - 2.8 GHz2 / 2
AMD A4-5145M2 - 2.6 GHz2 / 2
AMD A10-5750M2.5 - 3.5 GHz4 / 4
AMD A10-5757M2.5 - 3.5 GHz4 / 4
AMD A10-5745M2.1 - 2.9 GHz4 / 4
AMD A8-5550M2.1 - 3.1 GHz4 / 4
AMD A8-5557M2.1 - 3.1 GHz4 / 4
AMD A8-5545M1.7 - 2.7 GHz4 / 4
» AMD A6-5350M2.9 - 3.5 GHz2 / 2
AMD A6-5357M2.9 - 3.5 GHz2 / 2
AMD A4-5150M2.7 - 3.3 GHz2 / 2
AMD A6-5345M2.2 - 2.8 GHz2 / 2
AMD A4-5145M2 - 2.6 GHz2 / 2
AMD A10-5750M2.5 - 3.5 GHz4 / 4
AMD A10-5757M2.5 - 3.5 GHz4 / 4
AMD A10-5745M2.1 - 2.9 GHz4 / 4
AMD A8-5550M2.1 - 3.1 GHz4 / 4
AMD A8-5557M2.1 - 3.1 GHz4 / 4
AMD A8-5545M1.7 - 2.7 GHz4 / 4
AMD A6-5350M2.9 - 3.5 GHz2 / 2
» AMD A6-5357M2.9 - 3.5 GHz2 / 2
AMD A4-5150M2.7 - 3.3 GHz2 / 2
AMD A6-5345M2.2 - 2.8 GHz2 / 2
AMD A4-5145M2 - 2.6 GHz2 / 2
2200 - 2800 MHz2900 - 3500 MHz2900 - 3500 MHz
1 MB1 MB1 MB
2 / 22 / 22 / 2
17 35 35
32 32 32
SSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A), x86-64, AES, AVX, FMA, DDR3-1333 ControllerSSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A), x86-64, AES, AVX, FMA, DDR3-1600 ControllerSSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A), x86-64, AES, AVX, FMA, DDR3-1600 Controller
iGPUAMD Radeon HD 8410G (450 - 600 MHz)AMD Radeon HD 8450G (533 - 720 MHz)AMD Radeon HD 8450G (533 - 720 MHz)
Architecturex86x86x86
BGA

Benchmarks

Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 117     avg: 118     median: 117.5 (1%)     max: 118 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 54     avg: 63.5     median: 63.5 (23%)     max: 73 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 1     avg: 1.2     median: 1.2 (2%)     max: 1.34 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 0.64     avg: 0.8     median: 0.7 (24%)     max: 0.87 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
min: 2389     avg: 2490     median: 2480.5 (22%)     max: 2610
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
min: 2990     avg: 3740     median: 3956 (6%)     max: 4057
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
min: 3558     avg: 4653     median: 4823 (5%)     max: 5407 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
min: 2838     avg: 3259     median: 3377 (24%)     max: 3444 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
1324 s (16%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
min: 39.8     avg: 40.9     median: 40.9 (8%)     max: 41.917 s
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
min: 1120     avg: 1169     median: 1169 (7%)     max: 1218
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
min: 7.46     avg: 8.2     median: 8.2 (4%)     max: 9 fps
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
min: 40.25     avg: 43.4     median: 43.4 (13%)     max: 46.5 fps
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
min: 0.0868     avg: 0.1     median: 0.1 (3%)     max: 0.09 GB/s
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
min: 0.163     avg: 0.2     median: 0.2 (3%)     max: 0.164 GB/s
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
min: 0.808     avg: 0.8     median: 0.8 (3%)     max: 0.814 GB/s
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 1581     avg: 1793     median: 1649 (9%)     max: 2148 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
min: 28.9     avg: 29     median: 29 (6%)     max: 29.172 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
69 s (3%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
1657 s (7%)
SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS) - SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS)
17160 MIPS (8%)
SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS) - SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS)
12710 MFLOPS (10%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
min: 2764     avg: 3371     median: 3404 (4%)     max: 3946 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 942     avg: 1357     median: 1414.5 (5%)     max: 1656 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
min: 11808     avg: 14488     median: 15493 (10%)     max: 15980 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
16269 Points (17%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
17364 Points (18%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 907     avg: 1117     median: 1220 (3%)     max: 1294 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 1185     avg: 1539     median: 1713 (4%)     max: 1804 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Stream
3509 Points (28%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Memory
3223 Points (29%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Floating Point
3891 Points (8%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Integer
3103 Points (6%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Total Score
3443 Points (9%)
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
min: 164     avg: 223     median: 247 (3%)     max: 258 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 8944     avg: 11205     median: 10252 (15%)     max: 14419 Points

Average Benchmarks AMD A6-5350M → NAN% n=

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.16
log 21. 14:25:18

#0 checking url part for id 4159 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 3780 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 4157 +0s ... 0s

#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Mon, 20 Sep 2021 13:09:15 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.017s ... 0.017s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.017s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 4159 +0s ... 0.017s

#8 got single benchmarks 4159 +0s ... 0.017s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 3780 +0.001s ... 0.018s

#10 got single benchmarks 3780 +0.01s ... 0.028s

#11 getting avg benchmarks for device 4157 +0s ... 0.028s

#12 got single benchmarks 4157 +0s ... 0.029s

#13 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.029s

#14 min, max, avg, median took s +0.015s ... 0.043s

#15 return log +0s ... 0.043s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)