, , , , , ,
search relation.
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
 

AMD A6-5345M vs AMD A10-5757M vs AMD A4-5145M

AMD A6-5345M

► remove from comparison AMD A6-5345M

The AMD A6-5345M is a mobile ultra-low-voltage dual-core processor based on the Richland architecture. The APU integrates one module with 2.2 to 2.8 GHz, a Radeon HD 8410G graphics card and a DDR3(L)-1333 memory controller.

Compared to Trinity, Richland has been modified just slightly. Therefore, no changes in the feature set or the Pro-MHz performance can be reported. The design of the chip is still based on the Bulldozer architecture, which consists of so-called modules. Each module integrates 2 integer units, but only one FPU. Just like Trinity, Richland supports nearly all current techniques such as AVX (including FMA), AES or Turbo Core.

The CPU performance of the A6-5345M should be slightly above the A6-4455M and similar to the Pentium 987. For everyday tasks such as Internet or Office the performance is adequate, but not for very complex software or modern games.

The graphics unit called Radeon HD 8410G offers 192 shader units (VLIW4) and is slightly slower than the HD Graphics 4000. The core is clocked at 450-600 MHz (turbo).

The power consumption of the entire APU is rated at 17 watts, which is similar to other ULV CPUs. Therefore, the APU is suitable for 12-inch ultraportables or bigger.

AMD A10-5757M

► remove from comparison AMD A10-5757M

The AMD A10-5757M is a mobile quad-core processor based on the Richland-architecture. In contrast to the A10-5750M, the 5757M is a BGA version. As the successor of the A10-4600M, the A10-5750M/5757M offers a slightly higher CPU and graphics performance and represents the new top model of the A-series (March 2013).

Compared to Trinity, Richland has been modified just slightly. Therefore, no changes in the feature set or the Pro-MHz performance can be reported. The design of the chip is still based on the Bulldozer architecture, which consists of so-called modules. Each of the two modules integrates 2 integer units, but only one FPU. Just like Trinity, Richland supports nearly all current techniques such as AVX (including FMA), AES or Turbo Core.

Our benchmarks show a performance increase of around 10 percent on the A10-4600M. Thus, the A10-5757M performs at the level of a Core i3-2330M (Sandy Bridge).

The graphics unit called Radeon HD 8650G offers 384 shader units (VLIW4) and clocks at 533 - 720 MHz (slightly higher than the HD 7660G). With fast dual-channel memory, performance is similar to a dedicated HD 7670M.

The power consumption of the entire APU is rated at 35 watts, which is comparable to conventional middle-class models of competition. Thus, the APU is best suited for 14 inch notebooks or bigger.

AMD A4-5145M

► remove from comparison AMD A4-5145M

The AMD A4-5145M is a mobile ultra-low-voltage dual-core processor based on the Richland architecture. The APU integrates one module with 2.0 to 2.6 GHz, a Radeon HD 8310G graphics card and a DDR3(L)-1333 memory controller.

Compared to Trinity, Richland has been modified just slightly. Therefore, no changes in the feature set or the Pro-MHz performance can be reported. The design of the chip is still based on the Bulldozer architecture, which consists of so-called modules. Each module integrates 2 integer units, but only one FPU. Just like Trinity, Richland supports nearly all current techniques such as AVX (including FMA), AES or Turbo Core.

The CPU performance of the A4-5145M should be similar to the A6-4455M and the Pentium 977. For everyday tasks such as Internet or Office the performance is adequate, but not for very complex software or modern games.

The graphics unit called Radeon HD 8310G offers 128 shader units (VLIW4) and is slightly faster than the HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge). The core is clocked at 424-554 MHz (turbo).

The power consumption of the entire APU is rated at 17 watts, which is similar to other ULV CPUs. Therefore, the APU is suitable for 12-inch ultraportables or bigger.

AMD A6-5345MAMD A10-5757MAMD A4-5145M
AMD A-SeriesAMD A-SeriesAMD A-Series
RichlandRichlandRichland
Series: A-Series Richland
AMD A10-5750M2.5 - 3.5 GHz4 / 4
AMD A10-5757M2.5 - 3.5 GHz4 / 4
AMD A10-5745M2.1 - 2.9 GHz4 / 4
AMD A8-5550M2.1 - 3.1 GHz4 / 4
AMD A8-5557M2.1 - 3.1 GHz4 / 4
AMD A8-5545M1.7 - 2.7 GHz4 / 4
AMD A6-5350M2.9 - 3.5 GHz2 / 2
AMD A6-5357M2.9 - 3.5 GHz2 / 2
AMD A4-5150M2.7 - 3.3 GHz2 / 2
» AMD A6-5345M2.2 - 2.8 GHz2 / 2
AMD A4-5145M2 - 2.6 GHz2 / 2
AMD A10-5750M2.5 - 3.5 GHz4 / 4
» AMD A10-5757M2.5 - 3.5 GHz4 / 4
AMD A10-5745M2.1 - 2.9 GHz4 / 4
AMD A8-5550M2.1 - 3.1 GHz4 / 4
AMD A8-5557M2.1 - 3.1 GHz4 / 4
AMD A8-5545M1.7 - 2.7 GHz4 / 4
AMD A6-5350M2.9 - 3.5 GHz2 / 2
AMD A6-5357M2.9 - 3.5 GHz2 / 2
AMD A4-5150M2.7 - 3.3 GHz2 / 2
AMD A6-5345M2.2 - 2.8 GHz2 / 2
AMD A4-5145M2 - 2.6 GHz2 / 2
AMD A10-5750M2.5 - 3.5 GHz4 / 4
AMD A10-5757M2.5 - 3.5 GHz4 / 4
AMD A10-5745M2.1 - 2.9 GHz4 / 4
AMD A8-5550M2.1 - 3.1 GHz4 / 4
AMD A8-5557M2.1 - 3.1 GHz4 / 4
AMD A8-5545M1.7 - 2.7 GHz4 / 4
AMD A6-5350M2.9 - 3.5 GHz2 / 2
AMD A6-5357M2.9 - 3.5 GHz2 / 2
AMD A4-5150M2.7 - 3.3 GHz2 / 2
AMD A6-5345M2.2 - 2.8 GHz2 / 2
» AMD A4-5145M2 - 2.6 GHz2 / 2
2200 - 2800 MHz2500 - 3500 MHz2000 - 2600 MHz
1 MB4 MB1 MB
2 / 24 / 42 / 2
17 35 17
32 32 32
SSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A), x86-64, AES, AVX, FMA, DDR3-1333 ControllerSSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A), x86-64, AES, AVX, FMA, DDR3-1600 ControllerSSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A), x86-64, AES, AVX, FMA, DDR3-1333 Controller
iGPUAMD Radeon HD 8410G (450 - 600 MHz)AMD Radeon HD 8650G (600 - 720 MHz)AMD Radeon HD 8310G (424 - 554 MHz)
Architecturex86x86x86
BGA

Benchmarks

Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 2.14     avg: 2.2     median: 2.2 (4%)     max: 2.31 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 0.87     avg: 0.9     median: 0.9 (28%)     max: 0.89 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
2182 (19%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
3774 (6%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
8232 Points (8%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
3247 Points (23%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
901 s (11%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
28.7 s (6%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
1266 (8%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
7.6 fps (3%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
39.2 fps (12%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
0.1 GB/s (4%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
0.2 GB/s (5%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
1.1 GB/s (4%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
2986 Points (17%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
39 s (8%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
86 s (4%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
2237 s (10%)
SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS) - SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS)
33372 MIPS (16%)
SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS) - SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS)
22906 MFLOPS (18%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
6493 Points (8%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 2533     avg: 2709     median: 2772 (10%)     max: 2823 Points

Average Benchmarks AMD A10-5757M → NAN% n=

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.16
log 27. 13:16:29

#0 checking url part for id 4159 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 3747 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 4160 +0s ... 0s

#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sat, 25 Sep 2021 13:09:19 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.017s ... 0.017s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.017s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 4159 +0s ... 0.017s

#8 got single benchmarks 4159 +0s ... 0.017s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 3747 +0s ... 0.018s

#10 got single benchmarks 3747 +0.008s ... 0.026s

#11 getting avg benchmarks for device 4160 +0s ... 0.026s

#12 got single benchmarks 4160 +0s ... 0.027s

#13 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.027s

#14 min, max, avg, median took s +0.006s ... 0.033s

#15 return log +0s ... 0.033s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)