Notebookcheck Logo

Apple A5 vs Texas Instruments OMAP 4430

Apple A5

► remove from comparison

The Apple A5 is a dual-core processor that contains two Cortex A9 cores. Each core is max. clocked at 900 MHz. Furthermore, the A5 integrates a relative fast PowerVR SGX 543MP2 graphics card and 512MB ram (in the same package for the iPad 2). Apple states a maximum of 2x the performance compared to the previous single core Apple A4.

Texas Instruments OMAP 4430

► remove from comparison OMAP 4430

The Texas Instruments (TI) OMAP 4430 is a SoC with two ARM Cortex-A9 cores including NEON SIMD engine, two Cortex M3 cores (to save power), a PowerVR SGX540 graphics card (304-365 MHz) and a dual channel LPDDR2 memory controller (max 400 MHz).

show full text
ModelApple A5Texas Instruments OMAP 4430
SeriesApple
CodenameCortex A9Cortex A9
Series: Cortex A9
Texas Instruments OMAP 4470 compare1.5 GHz2 / 2 Cortex A9
Texas Instruments OMAP 4460 compare1.2 GHz2 / 2 Cortex A9
Broadcom BCM28155 compare1.2 GHz2 / 2 Cortex A9
Texas Instruments OMAP 44301 GHz2 / 2 Cortex A9
Apple A5x compare1 GHz2 Cortex A9
» Apple A51 GHz2 Cortex A9
Texas Instruments OMAP 4470 compare1.5 GHz2 / 2 Cortex A9
Texas Instruments OMAP 4460 compare1.2 GHz2 / 2 Cortex A9
Broadcom BCM28155 compare1.2 GHz2 / 2 Cortex A9
» Texas Instruments OMAP 44301 GHz2 / 2 Cortex A9
Apple A5x compare1 GHz2 Cortex A9
Apple A51 GHz2 Cortex A9
Clock1000 MHz1000 MHz
Cores / Threads22 / 2
Technology40, 32 nm45 nm
ArchitectureARMARM
Announced
L1 Cache1 MB
TDP0.6 Watt
FeaturesDual Channel LPDDR 400MHz Memory Controller, IVA 3 Multimedia Accelerator, PowerVR SGX 540 Graphics Core, Image Signal Processor
Manufacturer OMAP 4430

Benchmarks

Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Stream
100%
A5 +
min: 297     avg: 317.7     median: 323 (3%)     max: 333 Points
191 Points (2%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Memory
100%
A5 +
min: 751     avg: 807     median: 833 (8%)     max: 838 Points
923 Points (8%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Floating Point
100%
A5 +
min: 737     avg: 855     median: 906 (2%)     max: 923 Points
183 Points (0%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Integer
100%
A5 +
min: 552     avg: 638     median: 671 (1%)     max: 691 Points
449 Points (1%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Total Score
100%
A5 +
min: 631     avg: 715     median: 750 (2%)     max: 764 Points
424 Points (1%)
Linpack Android / IOS - Linpack Multi Thread
100%
A5 +
min: 124.4     avg: 127.1     median: 127.1 (4%)     max: 129.8 MFLOPS
min: 38.78     avg: 59.5     median: 63.7 (2%)     max: 71.9 MFLOPS
Linpack Android / IOS - Linpack Single Thread
100%
A5 +
min: 78.1     avg: 81.8     median: 81.8 (8%)     max: 85.4 MFLOPS
min: 36.48     avg: 40.8     median: 40.6 (4%)     max: 45.39 MFLOPS
Sunspider - Sunspider 0.9.1 Total Score *
100%
A5 +
min: 1557     avg: 1863     median: 1888.5 (18%)     max: 2118 ms
min: 1761     avg: 1955     median: 1895.5 (18%)     max: 2269 ms
Quadrant Standard Edition 2.0 - Quadrant Standard 2.0 Total Score
min: 2475     avg: 2571     median: 2571 (6%)     max: 2666 points

Average Benchmarks Apple A5 → 100% n=8

Average Benchmarks Texas Instruments OMAP 4430 → 64% n=8

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2022, 2021
v1.17
log 01. 01:39:58

#0 checking url part for id 2331 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 3004 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Mon, 27 Jun 2022 13:12:58 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#4 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.002s

#5 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.047s ... 0.049s

#6 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.002s ... 0.051s

#7 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.051s

#8 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.051s

#9 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.051s

#10 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.051s

#11 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.051s

#12 composed specs +0s ... 0.051s

#13 did output specs +0s ... 0.051s

#14 getting avg benchmarks for device 2331 +0s ... 0.052s

#15 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.052s

#16 got single benchmarks 2331 +0.007s ... 0.06s

#17 getting avg benchmarks for device 3004 +0s ... 0.06s

#18 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.061s

#19 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.003s ... 0.064s

#20 got single benchmarks 3004 +0.006s ... 0.07s

#21 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.07s

#22 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.07s

#23 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.071s

#24 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.071s

#25 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.071s

#26 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.071s

#27 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.071s

#28 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.071s

#29 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.071s

#30 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.072s

#31 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.072s

#32 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.072s

#33 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.072s

#34 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.072s

#35 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.072s

#36 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.073s

#37 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.073s

#38 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.073s

#39 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.073s

#40 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.073s

#41 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.074s

#42 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.074s

#43 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.075s

#44 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.075s

#45 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.075s

#46 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.075s

#47 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.075s

#48 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.075s

#49 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.075s

#50 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.075s

#51 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.075s

#52 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.076s

#53 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.076s

#54 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.076s

#55 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.076s

#56 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.076s

#57 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.076s

#58 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.076s

#59 min, max, avg, median took s +0s ... 0.076s

#60 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.077s

#61 return log +0.003s ... 0.08s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)