Notebookcheck Logo

AMD A4 Micro-6400T vs AMD A10 Micro-6700T

AMD A4 Micro-6400T

► remove from comparison AMD A4 Micro-6400T

The AMD A4 Micro-6400T is a mobile quad-core SoC (codenamed "Mullins") for tablets, which has been presented in April 2014. In addition to 4 CPU cores clocked at 1.0 - 1.6 GHz (boost clock), the 28 nanometer chip also integrates a Radeon R3 GPU, a single-channel DDR3L-1333 memory controller and the Southbridge with various I/O-ports.

Architecture

Both Beema (for notebooks) and Mullins (for tablets and compact subnotebooks, same die) are based on AMD's Puma+ architecture, which is the successor to the previous Jaguar design (Kabini and Temash APUs). Neither the performance per clock nor the feature set (including SSE up to 4.2, AVX and AES) have been modified. However, AMD managed to reduce the leakage current, enabling significantly higher (boost) clock speeds. This leads to a more responsive system and better overall performance. As its predecessor, the chip is manufactured in 28 nm.

Performance

In single thread tasks, the APU performs slightly better than the former A4-5000 (15 W, 1.5 GHz), but clocks and performance will decrease substantially in long-lasting multi-thread benchmarks. Overall, performance is similar to a Celeron N2920. Nonetheless, the Micro-6400T will be sufficient for simple workloads like Office, Internet browsing and multimedia.

Graphics

The SoC integrates a Radeon R3 GPU with 128 shaders, which is based on the GCN architecture and clocked at up to 350 MHz. On average, the graphics performance is similar to Intel's HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge) or a Radeon HD 8250. Current games (as of 2014) are thus hardly playable even in low settings, only a few older and less demanding titels will run fluently.

Power Consumption

The power consumption of the entire SoC is rated at 4.5 watts TDP (SDP: 2.8 W). Thus, the APU is suitable for passively cooled tablets.

AMD A10 Micro-6700T

► remove from comparison AMD A10 Micro-6700T

The AMD A10 Micro-6700T is a mobile quad-core SoC (codenamed "Mullins") for tablets, which has been presented in April 2014. In addition to 4 CPU cores clocked at 1.2 - 2.2 GHz (boost clock), the 28 nanometer chip also integrates a Radeon R6 GPU, a single-channel DDR3L-1333 memory controller and the Southbridge with various I/O-ports.

Architecture

Both Beema (for notebooks) and Mullins (for tablets and compact subnotebooks, same die) are based on AMD's Puma+ architecture, which is the successor to the previous Jaguar design (Kabini and Temash APUs). Neither the performance per clock nor the feature set (including SSE up to 4.2, AVX and AES) have been modified. However, AMD managed to reduce the leakage current, enabling significantly higher (boost) clock speeds. This leads to a more responsive system and better overall performance. As its predecessor, the chip is manufactured in 28 nm.

Performance

In single thread tasks, the APU should be even faster than the former A6-5200 (25 W, 2.0 GHz), but clocks and performance may decrease substantially in long-lasting multi-thread benchmarks. Nonetheless, the Micro-6700T should be sufficient for daily workloads like Office, Internet browsing and multimedia.

Graphics

The SoC integrates a Radeon R6 GPU with 128 shaders, which is based on the GCN architecture and clocked at up to 500 MHz. On average, we expect the graphics performance to be similar to Intel's HD Graphics 4000 (ULV versions) or a Radeon HD 8330. Current games (as of 2014) are thus hardly playable even in low settings, only a few older and less demanding titels should run flawless.

Power Consumption

The power consumption of the entire SoC is rated at 4.5 watts TDP (SDP: 2.8 W). Thus, the APU is suitable for passively cooled tablets.

ModelAMD A4 Micro-6400TAMD A10 Micro-6700T
SeriesAMD A-SeriesAMD A-Series
CodenameMullinsMullins
Series: A-Series Mullins
AMD A10 Micro-6700T1.2 - 2.2 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD A4 Micro-6400T « 1 - 1.6 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD A10 Micro-6700T « 1.2 - 2.2 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD A4 Micro-6400T1 - 1.6 GHz4 / 4 cores
Clock1000 - 1600 MHz1200 - 2200 MHz
L1 Cache256 KB256 KB
L2 Cache2 MB2 MB
Cores / Threads4 / 44 / 4
TDP4.5 Watt4.5 Watt
Technology28 nm28 nm
FeaturesSSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A), x86-64, AES, AVX, Single-Channel DDR3L-1333aSSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A), x86-64, AES, AVX, Single-Channel DDR3L-1333
iGPUAMD Radeon R3 (Mullins/Beema) ( - 350 MHz)AMD Radeon R6 (Mullins) (? - 500 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
Announced

Benchmarks

Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
95 Points (1%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
34 Points (10%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
1.2 Points (2%)
1.5 Points (2%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
0.4 Points (10%)
0.6 Points (14%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
1251 Points (8%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
3380 Points (2%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
4159 Points (3%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
1545 Points (2%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
1457 s (17%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
46.3 s (9%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
820 Points (1%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
6.9 fps (2%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
33.5 fps (8%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
0.1 GB/s (0%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
0.1 GB/s (2%)
0.2 GB/s (3%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
0.7 GB/s (2%)
0.9 GB/s (2%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
1664 Points (4%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
40.5 s (9%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
92.3 s (4%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
2065 s (9%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
3589 Points (3%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
1280 Points (3%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
8597 Points (7%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
15582 Points (13%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
927 Points (2%)
1218 Points (3%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
1336 Points (2%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Multi-Core
2239 Points (4%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Single-Core
882 Points (17%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Stream
2419 Points (20%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Memory
1986 Points (18%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Floating Point
3307 Points (6%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Integer
2513 Points (5%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Total Score
2676 Points (7%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 5976     avg: 7666     median: 7665.5 (9%)     max: 9355 ms
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
min: 393     avg: 545     median: 544.5 (6%)     max: 696 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 3947     avg: 5387     median: 5387 (5%)     max: 6827 Points

Average Benchmarks AMD A4 Micro-6400T → 100% n=5

Average Benchmarks AMD A10 Micro-6700T → 130% n=5

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.26
log 19. 13:12:58

#0 checking url part for id 5912 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 5911 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Fri, 19 Apr 2024 05:38:49 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 composed specs +0.034s ... 0.035s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.035s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 5912 +0.003s ... 0.037s

#7 got single benchmarks 5912 +0.011s ... 0.049s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 5911 +0.003s ... 0.052s

#9 got single benchmarks 5911 +0.007s ... 0.058s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.058s

#11 min, max, avg, median took s +0.136s ... 0.194s

#12 return log +0.021s ... 0.215s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)