, , , , , ,
search relation.
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
 

AMD A4-7210 vs AMD A8-7410

AMD A4-7210

► remove from comparison AMD A4-7210

The AMD A4-7210 is a mobile quad-core SoC (codenamed "Carrizo-L") for entry-level devices and subnotebooks, which has been presented in May 2015. In addition to 4 CPU cores clocked at up to 2.2 GHz (boost clock), the 28 nanometer chip also integrates a Radeon R3 GPU, a single-channel DDR3L-1600 memory controller and the southbridge with various I/O-ports. The TDP of the A4-7210 can be configured from 12 to 25 Watt. The predecessor AMD A4-6210 features similar specifications except the slower clock speed (at least boost), the configurable TDP, and the new FP4 package (compatible to the mainstream Carrizo SoCs). 

Architecture

Carrizo-L, Beema (for notebooks) and Mullins (for tablets and compact subnotebooks, same die) are based on AMD's Puma+ architecture, which is the successor to the previous Jaguar design (Kabini and Temash APUs). Neither the performance per clock nor the feature set (including SSE up to 4.2, AVX and AES) have been modified. However, AMD managed to reduce the leakage current, enabling significantly higher (boost) clock speeds. This leads to a more responsive system and better overall performance. As its predecessor, the chip is manufactured in 28 nm.

Performance

The processor performance depends on the configured TDP of the SoC. Set to 25 Watt, the CPU should be faster than the old A6-6210.

Graphics

The integrated Radeon R3 should be similar to the Beema based Radeon R3 GPU with 128 shaders. In our first review sample the GPU was clocked at 686 MHz and therefore 86 MHz faster than in the A4-6210. Only a few current games (as of 2014) are thus playable in low settings.

Power Consumption

The power consumption of the entire SoC is rated at 12 to 25 watts. Thus, the APU is also suitable for small subnotebooks.

AMD A8-7410

► remove from comparison AMD A8-7410

The AMD A8-7410 is a mobile quad-core SoC (codenamed "Carrizo-L") for entry-level devices and subnotebooks, which has been presented in May 2015. In addition to 4 CPU cores clocked at up to 2.5 GHz (boost clock), the 28 nanometer chip also integrates a Radeon R5 GPU, a single-channel DDR3L-1866 memory controller and the southbridge with various I/O-ports. The TDP of the A8-7410 can be configured from 12 to 25 Watt. The predecessor AMD A8-6410 features similar specifications except the increased Boost clock (2.5 vs 2.4 GHz), maybe a changed base clock, the configurable TDP, and the new FP4 package (compatible to the mainstream Carrizo SoCs).

Architecture

Carrizo-L, Beema (for notebooks) and Mullins (for tablets and compact subnotebooks, same die) are based on AMD's Puma+ architecture, which is the successor to the previous Jaguar design (Kabini and Temash APUs). Neither the performance per clock nor the feature set (including SSE up to 4.2, AVX and AES) have been modified. However, AMD managed to reduce the leakage current, enabling significantly higher (boost) clock speeds. This leads to a more responsive system and better overall performance. As its predecessor, the chip is manufactured in 28 nm.

Performance

The processor performance depends on the configured TDP of the SoC. Set to 25 Watt, the CPU should be slightly faster than the old A8-6410 and therefore similar performance to a Haswell-based Pentium or ULV Core i3.

Graphics

The integrated Radeon R5 should be similar to the Beema based Radeon R5 GPU with 128 shaders. Only a few current games (as of 2014) are thus playable in low settings, but older and less demanding titels should run flawlessly.

Power Consumption

The power consumption of the entire SoC is rated at 12 to 25 watts. Thus, the APU is also suitable for small subnotebooks.

AMD A4-7210AMD A8-7410
AMD A-SeriesAMD A-Series
Carrizo-LCarrizo-L
Series: A-Series Carrizo-L
AMD A8-74102.2 - 2.5 GHz4 / 4
AMD A6-7310 compare2 - 2.4 GHz4 / 4
» AMD A4-72101.8 - 2.2 GHz4 / 4
» AMD A8-74102.2 - 2.5 GHz4 / 4
AMD A6-7310 compare2 - 2.4 GHz4 / 4
AMD A4-72101.8 - 2.2 GHz4 / 4
1800 - 2200 MHz2200 - 2500 MHz
256 KB256 KB
2 MB2 MB
4 / 44 / 4
12-25 12 - 25
930 930
28 28
FP4 BGAFP4 BGA
MMX, SSE4.2, AES, AVX, BMI1, F16C, AMD64, VTMMX, SSE4.2, AES, AVX, BMI1, F16C, AMD64, VT, AMD-V
iGPUAMD Radeon R3 (Mullins/Beema) ( - 686 MHz)AMD Radeon R5 (Beema/Carrizo-L) (300 - 850 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
AMD A-Series A4-7210

Benchmarks

Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
157 Points (2%)
min: 166     avg: 172     median: 174 (2%)     max: 174 Points
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170166.34131.72126.83152.34171.29171.94171.74171.22171.26170.13169.45171.09168.96172.89170.59171.34171.93171.48170.65Tooltip
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
46 Points (17%)
min: 50     avg: 51.5     median: 52 (19%)     max: 52 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
2 Points (4%)
min: 1.57     avg: 1.9     median: 1.9 (3%)     max: 2.16 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
0.6 Points (18%)
min: 0.6     avg: 0.6     median: 0.6 (19%)     max: 0.62 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
1732 (15%)
min: 1642     avg: 2126     median: 1917 (17%)     max: 2818
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
5593 (9%)
min: 4428     avg: 5087     median: 4665 (8%)     max: 6169
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
856 s (10%)
900 s (11%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
26.9 s (5%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
1236 (8%)
1292 (8%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
10.9 fps (5%)
9.7 fps (4%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
51.3 fps (15%)
45.5 fps (13%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
0.1 GB/s (5%)
0.1 GB/s (4%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
0.2 GB/s (5%)
0.2 GB/s (5%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
1.2 GB/s (4%)
0.9 GB/s (4%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
2681 Points (15%)
2936 Points (16%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
36.9 s (8%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
79.7 s (3%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
1608 s (7%)
1557 s (7%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
5547 Points (6%)
6480 Points (7%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 1800     avg: 1886     median: 1885.8 (7%)     max: 1971.5 Points
min: 1753     avg: 1853     median: 1835 (7%)     max: 1989 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
21617 Points (14%)
16800 Points (11%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
100%
1 A4-7210 +
24223 Points (25%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 1881     avg: 1915     median: 1914.5 (5%)     max: 1948 Points
2075 Points (5%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
2301 Points (6%)
3002 Points (8%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Multi-Core
3524 (6%)
min: 3456     avg: 3687     median: 3687 (7%)     max: 3918
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Single-Core
1207 (25%)
min: 1205     avg: 1256     median: 1256 (26%)     max: 1307
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Single-Core
100%
1 A8-7410 +
1356 (21%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
100%
1 A8-7410 +
3460 (8%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
100%
1 A8-7410 +
7454 ms (13%)
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
265 ms (3%)
293 ms (3%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
100%
1 A8-7410 +
4913 Points (7%)

Average Benchmarks AMD A4-7210 → 100% n=26

Average Benchmarks AMD A8-7410 → 101% n=26

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2021, 2020
v1.16
log 21. 15:47:46

#0 checking url part for id 6864 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 6860 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Mon, 20 Sep 2021 13:09:15 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#4 composed specs +0.009s ... 0.01s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.01s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 6864 +0s ... 0.01s

#7 got single benchmarks 6864 +0.008s ... 0.018s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 6860 +0s ... 0.018s

#9 got single benchmarks 6860 +0.011s ... 0.029s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.029s

#11 min, max, avg, median took s +0.025s ... 0.054s

#12 return log +0.004s ... 0.058s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)