AMD A4-5150M vs AMD A8-5550M vs AMD A10-5750M

AMD A4-5150M

► remove AMD A4-5150M

The AMD A4-5150M is a mobile dual-core processor based on the Richland-architecture. As successor to the A4-4300M, the A4-5150M has a slightly higher CPU and graphics performance and settles in the low end segment. The APU integrates 2 CPU cores, a DirectX 11 graphics unit and the Northbridge along with a DDR3 memory controller.

Compared to Trinity, Richland has been modified just slightly. Therefore, no changes in the feature set or the Pro-MHz performance can be reported. The design of the chip is still based on the Bulldozer architecture, which consists of so-called modules. Each module integrates 2 integer units, but only one FPU. Just like Trinity, Richland supports nearly all current techniques such as AVX (including FMA), AES or Turbo Core.

According to our benchmarks, the A4-5150M performs similar to the A6-4400M and just matches a Pentium P6000. Consequently, the performance in less demanding applications and games is sufficient.

The graphics unit called Radeon HD 8350G offers 128 shader units (VLIW4) and clocks slightly higher than the similar HD 7420G. With fast dual-channel memory, performance is somewhat below a dedicated Radeon HD 7450M.

The power consumption of the entire APU is rated at 35 watts, which is comparable to conventional middle-class models of competition. Thus, the APU is best suited for 14 inch notebooks or bigger.

AMD A8-5550M

► remove AMD A8-5550M

The AMD A8-5550M is a mobile quad-core processor based on the Richland-architecture. As successor to the A8-4500M, the A8-5550M has a slightly higher CPU and graphics performance and settles in the lower middle class. The APU integrates 4 CPU cores, a DirectX 11 graphics unit and the Northbridge along with a DDR3 memory controller.

Compared to Trinity, Richland has been modified just slightly. Therefore, no changes in the feature set or the Pro-MHz performance can be reported. The design of the chip is still based on the Bulldozer architecture, which consists of so-called modules. Each of the two modules integrates 2 integer units, but only one FPU. Just like Trinity, Richland supports nearly all current techniques such as AVX (including FMA), AES or Turbo Core.

According to the clock rates of 2.1 to 3.1 GHz, the A8-5550M performs about 15 percent slower than the A10-5750M and similar to a Core i3-2310M. Consequently, the performance in current applications and games is sufficient.

The graphics unit called Radeon HD 8550G offers 256 shader units (VLIW4) and clocks slightly higher than the HD 7640G. With fast dual-channel memory, performance matches a dedicated Radeon HD 7570M.

The power consumption of the entire APU is rated at 35 watts, which is comparable to conventional middle-class models of competition. Thus, the APU is best suited for 14 inch notebooks or bigger.

AMD A10-5750M

► remove AMD A10-5750M

The AMD A10-5750M is a mobile quad-core processor based on the Richland-architecture. As the successor of the A10-4600M, the A10-5750M offers a slightly higher CPU and graphics performance and represents the new top model of the A-series (March 2013).

Compared to Trinity, Richland has been modified just slightly. Therefore, no changes in the feature set or the Pro-MHz performance can be reported. The design of the chip is still based on the Bulldozer architecture, which consists of so-called modules. Each of the two modules integrates 2 integer units, but only one FPU. Just like Trinity, Richland supports nearly all current techniques such as AVX (including FMA), AES or Turbo Core.

Our benchmarks show a performance increase of around 10 percent on the A10-4600M. Thus, the A10-5750M performs at the level of a Core i3-2330M (Sandy Bridge).

The graphics unit called Radeon HD 8650G offers 384 shader units (VLIW4) and clocks at 533 - 720 MHz (slightly higher than the HD 7660G). With fast dual-channel memory, performance is similar to a dedicated HD 7670M.

The power consumption of the entire APU is rated at 35 watts, which is comparable to conventional middle-class models of competition. Thus, the APU is best suited for 14 inch notebooks or bigger.

AMD A4-5150MAMD A8-5550MAMD A10-5750M
AMD A-SeriesAMD A-SeriesAMD A-Series
RichlandRichlandRichland
: A-Series Richland
AMD A10-5750M2500 - 3500 MHz4 / 4
AMD A10-5757M2500 - 3500 MHz4 / 4
AMD A10-5745M2100 - 2900 MHz4 / 4
AMD A8-5550M2100 - 3100 MHz4 / 4
AMD A8-5557M2100 - 3100 MHz4 / 4
AMD A8-5545M1700 - 2700 MHz4 / 4
AMD A6-5350M2900 - 3500 MHz2 / 2
AMD A6-5357M2900 - 3500 MHz2 / 2
» AMD A4-5150M2700 - 3300 MHz2 / 2
AMD A6-5345M2200 - 2800 MHz2 / 2
AMD A4-5145M2000 - 2600 MHz2 / 2
AMD A10-5750M2500 - 3500 MHz4 / 4
AMD A10-5757M2500 - 3500 MHz4 / 4
AMD A10-5745M2100 - 2900 MHz4 / 4
» AMD A8-5550M2100 - 3100 MHz4 / 4
AMD A8-5557M2100 - 3100 MHz4 / 4
AMD A8-5545M1700 - 2700 MHz4 / 4
AMD A6-5350M2900 - 3500 MHz2 / 2
AMD A6-5357M2900 - 3500 MHz2 / 2
AMD A4-5150M2700 - 3300 MHz2 / 2
AMD A6-5345M2200 - 2800 MHz2 / 2
AMD A4-5145M2000 - 2600 MHz2 / 2
» AMD A10-5750M2500 - 3500 MHz4 / 4
AMD A10-5757M2500 - 3500 MHz4 / 4
AMD A10-5745M2100 - 2900 MHz4 / 4
AMD A8-5550M2100 - 3100 MHz4 / 4
AMD A8-5557M2100 - 3100 MHz4 / 4
AMD A8-5545M1700 - 2700 MHz4 / 4
AMD A6-5350M2900 - 3500 MHz2 / 2
AMD A6-5357M2900 - 3500 MHz2 / 2
AMD A4-5150M2700 - 3300 MHz2 / 2
AMD A6-5345M2200 - 2800 MHz2 / 2
AMD A4-5145M2000 - 2600 MHz2 / 2
2700 - 3300 MHz2100 - 3100 MHz2500 - 3500 MHz
96 KB
1 MB4 MB4 MB
2 / 24 / 44 / 4
35 35 35
1300
32 0.925-32 32
246 mm2
105 °C
FS1r2FS1r2
SSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A), x86-64, AES, AVX, FMA (3, 4), DDR3-1600 ControllerSSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A), x86-64, AES, AVX, FMA, DDR3-1600 ControllerSSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A), x86-64, AES, AVX, FMA, DDR3-1866 Controller
iGPUAMD Radeon HD 8350G (514 - 720 MHz)AMD Radeon HD 8550G (515 - 720 MHz)AMD Radeon HD 8650G (533 - 720 MHz)
AMD A-Series A4-5150M

Cinebench R20 - CPU (Single Core)
144 Points (28%)
min: 154     avg: 163     median: 162.5 (32%)     max: 171 Points
Cinebench R20 - CPU (Multi Core)
186 Points (2%)
min: 428     avg: 435     median: 434.5 (5%)     max: 441 Points
Cinebench R15 - CPU Multi 64Bit
min: 96.9     avg: 101     median: 101 (2%)     max: 105 Points
0102030405060708090100Tooltip
188 Points (4%)
min: 198     avg: 207     median: 209 (5%)     max: 212 Points
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220Tooltip
Cinebench R15 - CPU Single 64Bit
min: 54     avg: 59.1     median: 59.1 (27%)     max: 64.2 Points
68 Points (31%)
min: 72     avg: 75.5     median: 76 (35%)     max: 78.6 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - CPU Multi 64Bit
1.2 Points (3%)
min: 1.9     avg: 2     median: 2.1 (5%)     max: 2.06 Points
min: 2.19     avg: 2.3     median: 2.3 (6%)     max: 2.32 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - CPU Single 64Bit
0.7 Points (28%)
min: 0.78     avg: 0.8     median: 0.8 (32%)     max: 0.79 Points
min: 0.81     avg: 0.8     median: 0.9 (35%)     max: 0.88 Points
Cinebench R10 - Rendering Single 32Bit
2446 Points (25%)
min: 2139     avg: 2276     median: 2321 (24%)     max: 2368 Points
min: 2451     avg: 2549     median: 2579 (26%)     max: 2672 Points
Cinebench R10 - Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
3589 Points (6%)
min: 5334     avg: 5702     median: 5844 (10%)     max: 5929 Points
min: 6114     avg: 6418     median: 6451 (11%)     max: 6633 Points
Cinebench R10 - Rendering Multiple CPUs 64Bit
min: 7526     avg: 7930     median: 8077 (11%)     max: 8186 Points
min: 8603     avg: 8977     median: 9015 (12%)     max: 9342 Points
Cinebench R10 - Rendering Single CPUs 64Bit
min: 2902     avg: 3081     median: 3155 (29%)     max: 3187 Points
min: 3203     avg: 3447     median: 3483 (32%)     max: 3617 Points
wPrime 2.0x - 1024m *
1430 seconds (17%)
min: 863     avg: 900     median: 890.7 (11%)     max: 947.232 seconds
min: 780     avg: 784     median: 784.2 (9%)     max: 788.456 seconds
wPrime 2.0x - 32m *
43 seconds (9%)
min: 25.3     avg: 26.2     median: 26 (5%)     max: 27.178 seconds
min: 22.1     avg: 22.5     median: 22.5 (5%)     max: 22.901 seconds
WinRAR - Result
1167 KB/s (14%)
min: 1902     avg: 1933     median: 1932.5 (23%)     max: 1963 KB/s
min: 1992     avg: 2035     median: 2035 (24%)     max: 2078 KB/s
7-Zip 18.03 - 7z b 4
min: 3740     avg: 3769     median: 3768.5 (4%)     max: 3797 MIPS
6631 MIPS (7%)
min: 7475     avg: 7608     median: 7608 (8%)     max: 7741 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7z b 4 -mmt1
min: 2616     avg: 2620     median: 2620 (17%)     max: 2624 MIPS
2646 MIPS (17%)
min: 2948     avg: 2956     median: 2955.5 (19%)     max: 2963 MIPS
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - Pass 2
8 fps (5%)
min: 13.3     avg: 13.5     median: 13.5 (9%)     max: 13.67 fps
min: 15     avg: 15.1     median: 15 (10%)     max: 15.37 fps
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - Pass 1
42 fps (15%)
min: 67     avg: 70.6     median: 70.6 (25%)     max: 74.18 fps
min: 75.5     avg: 77.6     median: 76 (27%)     max: 81.23 fps
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - 4k Preset
min: 0.51     avg: 0.6     median: 0.6 (2%)     max: 0.62 fps
010Tooltip
min: 1.26     avg: 1.7     median: 1.7 (6%)     max: 2.08 fps
010Tooltip
TrueCrypt - Serpent Mean 100MB
min: 0.083     avg: 0.1     median: 0.1 (4%)     max: 0.086 GB/s
min: 0.141     avg: 0.1     median: 0.1 (8%)     max: 0.148 GB/s
min: 0.164     avg: 0.2     median: 0.2 (9%)     max: 0.171 GB/s
TrueCrypt - Twofish Mean 100MB
min: 0.15     avg: 0.2     median: 0.2 (0%)     max: 0.154 GB/s
min: 0.256     avg: 0.3     median: 0.3 (0%)     max: 0.269 GB/s
min: 0.297     avg: 0.3     median: 0.3 (0%)     max: 0.306 GB/s
TrueCrypt - AES Mean 100MB
min: 0.739     avg: 0.8     median: 0.8 (4%)     max: 0.766 GB/s
1.3 GB/s (7%)
1.5 GB/s (8%)
Blender 2.79 *
min: 5364     avg: 5507     median: 5506.5 (39%)     max: 5649 Seconds
3223 Seconds (23%)
2754 Seconds (19%)
R Benchmark 2.5 - Overall mean *
1.8 sec (38%)
1.7 sec (37%)
1.5 sec (33%)
3DMark 06 - CPU
1881 Points (13%)
min: 2768     avg: 2854     median: 2795 (19%)     max: 2999 Points
min: 2464     avg: 3070     median: 3238 (22%)     max: 3273 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
30.3 Seconds (7%)
min: 31.4     avg: 31.5     median: 31.4 (7%)     max: 31.606 Seconds
min: 27.97     avg: 28.5     median: 28.1 (6%)     max: 29.672 Seconds
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
67.2 Seconds (3%)
min: 71     avg: 71.2     median: 71 (3%)     max: 71.448 Seconds
min: 63.6     avg: 65     median: 63.9 (3%)     max: 68.84 Seconds
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M *
min: 1848.53     avg: 1851     median: 1851.5 (8%)     max: 1854.41 Seconds
min: 1651     avg: 1693     median: 1666.6 (7%)     max: 1788.25 Seconds
SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS)
29660 MIPS (14%)
min: 32320     avg: 33980     median: 33980 (16%)     max: 35640 MIPS
SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS)
20870 MFLOPS (16%)
min: 24800     avg: 24955     median: 24955 (19%)     max: 25110 MFLOPS
3DMark Vantage - P CPU no PhysX 1280x1024
3732 Points (5%)
min: 6035     avg: 6251     median: 6321 (9%)     max: 6398 Points
min: 5544     avg: 7097     median: 7250 (10%)     max: 7803 Points
3DMark 11 - Performance Physics 1280x720
1531 points (7%)
min: 2274     avg: 2437     median: 2503 (12%)     max: 2535 points
min: 1445     avg: 2482     median: 2658 (13%)     max: 2790 points
3DMark - Ice Storm Standard Physics 1280x720
8366 Points (5%)
min: 19496     avg: 21244     median: 21872 (14%)     max: 22365 Points
min: 13311     avg: 23944     median: 25232 (16%)     max: 28306 Points
3DMark - Ice Storm Extreme Physics 1920x1080
22155 Points (26%)
24996 Points (30%)
3DMark - Ice Storm Unlimited Physics 1280x720 offscreen
9004 Points (10%)
25741 Points (30%)
29277 Points (34%)
3DMark - Cloud Gate Standard Physics 1280x720
844 Points (2%)
min: 1662     avg: 1771     median: 1777 (4%)     max: 1869 Points
min: 1008     avg: 1952     median: 2070 (5%)     max: 2326 Points
3DMark - Fire Strike Physics 1920x1080
722 Points (2%)
min: 2350     avg: 2492     median: 2489 (8%)     max: 2641 Points
min: 1488     avg: 2785     median: 2946 (10%)     max: 3230 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Stream
3968 Points (32%)
4680 Points (38%)
min: 3865     avg: 4282     median: 4281.5 (35%)     max: 4698 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Memory
3616 Points (33%)
3498 Points (32%)
min: 3251     avg: 3354     median: 3354 (30%)     max: 3457 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Floating Point
2993 Points (6%)
4514 Points (9%)
min: 4907     avg: 4926     median: 4925.5 (10%)     max: 4944 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Integer
3438 Points (7%)
4814 Points (10%)
min: 5469     avg: 5484     median: 5483.5 (11%)     max: 5498 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Total Score
3370 Points (9%)
4432 Points (12%)
min: 4691     avg: 4742     median: 4741.5 (12%)     max: 4792 Points
Geekbench 3 - 32 Bit Multi-Core Score
2528 Points (4%)
4417 Points (8%)
min: 4776     avg: 4787     median: 4787 (8%)     max: 4798 Points
Geekbench 3 - 32 Bit Single-Core Score
1739 Points (36%)
1691 Points (35%)
min: 1800     avg: 1816     median: 1816 (38%)     max: 1832 Points
Geekbench 3 - 64 Bit Multi-Core Score
2747 Points (4%)
Geekbench 3 - 64 Bit Single-Core Score
1927 Points (39%)
Geekbench 4.0 - 64 Bit Single-Core Score
1971 Points (31%)
2175 Points (34%)
Geekbench 4.0 - 64 Bit Multi-Core Score
2896 Points (8%)
4963 Points (14%)
Geekbench 4.4 - 64 Bit Single-Core Score
min: 2048     avg: 2050     median: 2050 (32%)     max: 2052 Points
2260 Points (36%)
Geekbench 4.4 - 64 Bit Multi-Core Score
min: 2711     avg: 2872     median: 2871.5 (5%)     max: 3032 Points
5292 Points (9%)
Geekbench 5 - 64 Bit Single-Core Score
454 Points (34%)
495 Points (37%)
Geekbench 5 - 64 Bit Multi-Core Score
639 Points (4%)
1320 Points (8%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score *
min: 2939     avg: 3540     median: 3540 (6%)     max: 4141 ms
Sunspider - 1.0 Total Score *
274 ms (3%)
min: 185.5     avg: 236     median: 235.7 (3%)     max: 285.8 ms
Sunspider - 0.9.1 Total Score *
288 ms (3%)
Octane V2 - Total Score
min: 13144     avg: 13186     median: 13185.5 (25%)     max: 13227 Points
min: 8435     avg: 11020     median: 11019.5 (21%)     max: 13604 Points

Average Benchmarks AMD A4-5150M → 100%

Average Benchmarks AMD A8-5550M → 143%

Average Benchmarks AMD A10-5750M → 164%

-
-
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.10
Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)