Notebookcheck Logo

AMD A4-5145M vs AMD A10-5745M vs AMD A4-5150M

AMD A4-5145M

► remove from comparison AMD A4-5145M

The AMD A4-5145M is a mobile ultra-low-voltage dual-core processor based on the Richland architecture. The APU integrates one module with 2.0 to 2.6 GHz, a Radeon HD 8310G graphics card and a DDR3(L)-1333 memory controller.

Compared to Trinity, Richland has been modified just slightly. Therefore, no changes in the feature set or the Pro-MHz performance can be reported. The design of the chip is still based on the Bulldozer architecture, which consists of so-called modules. Each module integrates 2 integer units, but only one FPU. Just like Trinity, Richland supports nearly all current techniques such as AVX (including FMA), AES or Turbo Core.

The CPU performance of the A4-5145M should be similar to the A6-4455M and the Pentium 977. For everyday tasks such as Internet or Office the performance is adequate, but not for very complex software or modern games.

The graphics unit called Radeon HD 8310G offers 128 shader units (VLIW4) and is slightly faster than the HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge). The core is clocked at 424-554 MHz (turbo).

The power consumption of the entire APU is rated at 17 watts, which is similar to other ULV CPUs. Therefore, the APU is suitable for 12-inch ultraportables or bigger.

AMD A10-5745M

► remove from comparison AMD A10-5745M

The AMD A10-5745M is a mobile low-voltage quad-core processor based on the Richland architecture. The APU integrates two modules with 2.1 to 2.9 GHz, a Radeon HD 8610G graphics card and a DDR3(L)-1333 memory controller.

Compared to Trinity, Richland has been modified just slightly. Therefore, no changes in the feature set or the Pro-MHz performance can be reported. The design of the chip is still based on the Bulldozer architecture, which consists of so-called modules. Each of the two modules integrates 2 integer units, but only one FPU. Just like Trinity, Richland supports nearly all current techniques such as AVX (including FMA), AES or Turbo Core.

The CPU performance of the A10-5745M should be similar to a Core i3-2310M. Thus, the APU is sufficiently for most modern applications and many games.

The graphics unit called Radeon HD 8610G offers all 384 shader units (VLIW4) and is slightly faster than the HD 7660G. The core is clocked at 533-626 MHz (turbo).

The power consumption of the entire APU is rated at 25 watts, which is slightly below common middle-class CPUs. Therefore, the APU is suitable for slim 13-inch notebooks or bigger.

AMD A4-5150M

► remove from comparison AMD A4-5150M

The AMD A4-5150M is a mobile dual-core processor based on the Richland-architecture. As successor to the A4-4300M, the A4-5150M has a slightly higher CPU and graphics performance and settles in the low end segment. The APU integrates 2 CPU cores, a DirectX 11 graphics unit and the Northbridge along with a DDR3 memory controller.

Compared to Trinity, Richland has been modified just slightly. Therefore, no changes in the feature set or the Pro-MHz performance can be reported. The design of the chip is still based on the Bulldozer architecture, which consists of so-called modules. Each module integrates 2 integer units, but only one FPU. Just like Trinity, Richland supports nearly all current techniques such as AVX (including FMA), AES or Turbo Core.

According to our benchmarks, the A4-5150M performs similar to the A6-4400M and just matches a Pentium P6000. Consequently, the performance in less demanding applications and games is sufficient.

The graphics unit called Radeon HD 8350G offers 128 shader units (VLIW4) and clocks slightly higher than the similar HD 7420G. With fast dual-channel memory, performance is somewhat below a dedicated Radeon HD 7450M.

The power consumption of the entire APU is rated at 35 watts, which is comparable to conventional middle-class models of competition. Thus, the APU is best suited for 14 inch notebooks or bigger.

ModelAMD A4-5145MAMD A10-5745MAMD A4-5150M
SeriesAMD A-SeriesAMD A-SeriesAMD A-Series
CodenameRichlandRichlandRichland
Series: A-Series Richland
AMD A10-5750M2.5 - 3.5 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD A10-5757M2.5 - 3.5 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD A10-5745M2.1 - 2.9 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD A8-5550M2.1 - 3.1 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD A8-5557M2.1 - 3.1 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD A8-5545M1.7 - 2.7 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD A6-5350M2.9 - 3.5 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD A6-5357M2.9 - 3.5 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD A4-5150M2.7 - 3.3 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD A6-5345M2.2 - 2.8 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD A4-5145M « 2 - 2.6 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD A10-5750M2.5 - 3.5 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD A10-5757M2.5 - 3.5 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD A10-5745M « 2.1 - 2.9 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD A8-5550M2.1 - 3.1 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD A8-5557M2.1 - 3.1 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD A8-5545M1.7 - 2.7 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD A6-5350M2.9 - 3.5 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD A6-5357M2.9 - 3.5 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD A4-5150M2.7 - 3.3 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD A6-5345M2.2 - 2.8 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD A4-5145M2 - 2.6 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD A10-5750M2.5 - 3.5 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD A10-5757M2.5 - 3.5 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD A10-5745M2.1 - 2.9 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD A8-5550M2.1 - 3.1 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD A8-5557M2.1 - 3.1 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD A8-5545M1.7 - 2.7 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD A6-5350M2.9 - 3.5 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD A6-5357M2.9 - 3.5 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD A4-5150M « 2.7 - 3.3 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD A6-5345M2.2 - 2.8 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD A4-5145M2 - 2.6 GHz2 / 2 cores
Clock2000 - 2600 MHz2100 - 2900 MHz2700 - 3300 MHz
L2 Cache1 MB4 MB1 MB
Cores / Threads2 / 24 / 42 / 2
TDP17 Watt25 Watt35 Watt
32 nm32 nm32 nm, 0.925-
FeaturesSSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A), x86-64, AES, AVX, FMA, DDR3-1333 ControllerSSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A), x86-64, AES, AVX, FMA, DDR3-1333 ControllerSSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A), x86-64, AES, AVX, FMA (3, 4), DDR3-1600 Controller
iGPUAMD Radeon HD 8310G (424 - 554 MHz)AMD Radeon HD 8610G (533 - 626 MHz)AMD Radeon HD 8350G (514 - 720 MHz)
Architecturex86x86x86
Announced
L1 Cache96 KB
Transistors1300 Million
Die Size246 mm2
max. Temp.105 °C
SocketFS1r2
Manufacturerproducts.amd.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - A4-5150M
14.4 pt (20%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
144 Points (16%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
186 Points (0%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 176     avg: 177     median: 177 (1%)     max: 178 Points
min: 96.9     avg: 101     median: 101 (1%)     max: 105 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 63     avg: 63.5     median: 63.5 (19%)     max: 64 Points
min: 54     avg: 59.1     median: 59.1 (18%)     max: 64.2 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 1.91     avg: 1.9     median: 1.9 (2%)     max: 1.93 Points
1.2 Points (2%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 0.66     avg: 0.7     median: 0.7 (17%)     max: 0.72 Points
0.7 Points (17%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
min: 2059     avg: 2065     median: 2065 (12%)     max: 2071 Points
2446 Points (15%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
min: 5429     avg: 5480     median: 5480 (4%)     max: 5531 Points
3589 Points (3%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
940 s (11%)
1430 s (17%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
35 s (7%)
43 s (9%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
1585 Points (3%)
1167 Points (2%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multli Thread 4 runs
min: 3740     avg: 3769     median: 3768.5 (2%)     max: 3797 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 2616     avg: 2620     median: 2620 (31%)     max: 2624 MIPS
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
12.7 fps (4%)
8 fps (3%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
62.1 fps (14%)
42 fps (10%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 0.51     avg: 0.6     median: 0.6 (1%)     max: 0.62 fps
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
0.1 GB/s (0%)
min: 0.083     avg: 0.1     median: 0.1 (0%)     max: 0.086 GB/s
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
0.2 GB/s (4%)
min: 0.15     avg: 0.2     median: 0.2 (3%)     max: 0.154 GB/s
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
1.1 GB/s (3%)
min: 0.739     avg: 0.8     median: 0.8 (2%)     max: 0.766 GB/s
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 5364     avg: 5507     median: 5506.5 (39%)     max: 5649 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
1.8 sec (38%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 2744     avg: 2753     median: 2745 (6%)     max: 2770 Points
1881 Points (4%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
34.4 s (7%)
30.3 s (7%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
79 s (3%)
67.2 s (3%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
2040 s (9%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
6082 Points (5%)
3732 Points (3%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 2103     avg: 2190     median: 2155 (6%)     max: 2311 Points
1531 Points (4%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
min: 20181     avg: 21592     median: 21774 (18%)     max: 22821 Points
8366 Points (7%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
9004 Points (8%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 1807     avg: 1843     median: 1831 (5%)     max: 1892 Points
844 Points (2%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 2576     avg: 2615     median: 2619 (5%)     max: 2651 Points
722 Points (1%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
454 Points (19%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
633 Points (1%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
454 Points (2%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
639 Points (2%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 2048     avg: 2050     median: 2050 (20%)     max: 2052 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 2711     avg: 2872     median: 2871.5 (3%)     max: 3032 Points
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Single-Core
1971 Points (27%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
2896 Points (7%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Multi-Core
min: 3647     avg: 3724     median: 3724 (7%)     max: 3801 Points
2528 Points (4%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Single-Core
min: 1460     avg: 1476     median: 1476 (29%)     max: 1492 Points
1739 Points (34%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Multi-Core
2747 Points (4%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Single-Core
1927 Points (29%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Stream
3012 Points (24%)
3968 Points (32%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Memory
2483 Points (23%)
3616 Points (33%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Floating Point
5572 Points (11%)
2993 Points (6%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Integer
4319 Points (9%)
3438 Points (7%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Total Score
4259 Points (11%)
3370 Points (9%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 4634     avg: 5294     median: 5294 (6%)     max: 5954 ms
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
min: 226.8     avg: 243.3     median: 243.3 (3%)     max: 259.8 ms
274 ms (3%)
Sunspider - Sunspider 0.9.1 Total Score *
288 ms (3%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 5708     avg: 6638     median: 6638 (6%)     max: 7568 Points
min: 13144     avg: 13186     median: 13185.5 (12%)     max: 13227 Points

Average Benchmarks AMD A10-5745M → 0% n=

Average Benchmarks AMD A4-5150M → 0% n=

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.26
log 28. 13:57:39

#0 checking url part for id 4160 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 4158 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 3781 +0s ... 0s

#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 28 Mar 2024 05:35:32 +0100 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#5 composed specs +0.037s ... 0.038s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.038s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 4160 +0.002s ... 0.04s

#8 got single benchmarks 4160 +0s ... 0.04s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 4158 +0.002s ... 0.043s

#10 got single benchmarks 4158 +0.014s ... 0.057s

#11 getting avg benchmarks for device 3781 +0.014s ... 0.072s

#12 got single benchmarks 3781 +0.008s ... 0.08s

#13 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.08s

#14 min, max, avg, median took s +0.226s ... 0.306s

#15 return log +0s ... 0.306s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)