Notebookcheck Logo

AMD A10-5750M vs AMD A8-5557M

AMD A10-5750M

► remove from comparison AMD A10-5750M

The AMD A10-5750M is a mobile quad-core processor based on the Richland-architecture. As the successor of the A10-4600M, the A10-5750M offers a slightly higher CPU and graphics performance and represents the new top model of the A-series (March 2013).

Compared to Trinity, Richland has been modified just slightly. Therefore, no changes in the feature set or the Pro-MHz performance can be reported. The design of the chip is still based on the Bulldozer architecture, which consists of so-called modules. Each of the two modules integrates 2 integer units, but only one FPU. Just like Trinity, Richland supports nearly all current techniques such as AVX (including FMA), AES or Turbo Core.

Our benchmarks show a performance increase of around 10 percent on the A10-4600M. Thus, the A10-5750M performs at the level of a Core i3-2330M (Sandy Bridge).

The graphics unit called Radeon HD 8650G offers 384 shader units (VLIW4) and clocks at 533 - 720 MHz (slightly higher than the HD 7660G). With fast dual-channel memory, performance is similar to a dedicated HD 7670M.

The power consumption of the entire APU is rated at 35 watts, which is comparable to conventional middle-class models of competition. Thus, the APU is best suited for 14 inch notebooks or bigger.

AMD A8-5557M

► remove from comparison AMD A8-5557M

The AMD A8-5557M is a mobile quad-core processor based on the Richland-architecture. In contrast to the A8-5550M, the 5557M is a BGA version. As successor to the A8-4500M, the A8-5550M/5557M has a slightly higher CPU and graphics performance and settles in the lower middle class. The APU integrates 4 CPU cores, a DirectX 11 graphics unit and the Northbridge along with a DDR3 memory controller.

Compared to Trinity, Richland has been modified just slightly. Therefore, no changes in the feature set or the Pro-MHz performance can be reported. The design of the chip is still based on the Bulldozer architecture, which consists of so-called modules. Each of the two modules integrates 2 integer units, but only one FPU. Just like Trinity, Richland supports nearly all current techniques such as AVX (including FMA), AES or Turbo Core.

According to the clock rates of 2.1 to 3.1 GHz, the A8-5557M should perform about 15 percent slower than the A10-5750M and just reach a Core i3-2310M. Consequently, the performance in current applications and games is sufficient.

The graphics unit called Radeon HD 8550G offers 256 shader units (VLIW4) and clocks slightly higher than the HD 7640G at 554 -  720 MHz. With fast dual-channel memory, performance is expected to match a dedicated Radeon HD 7570M.

The power consumption of the entire APU is rated at 35 watts, which is comparable to conventional middle-class models of competition. Thus, the APU is best suited for 14 inch notebooks or bigger.

ModelAMD A10-5750MAMD A8-5557M
SeriesAMD A-SeriesAMD A-Series
CodenameRichlandRichland
Series: A-Series Richland
AMD A10-5750M « 2.5 - 3.5 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD A10-5757M compare2.5 - 3.5 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD A10-5745M compare2.1 - 2.9 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD A8-5550M compare2.1 - 3.1 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD A8-5557M2.1 - 3.1 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD A8-5545M compare1.7 - 2.7 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD A6-5350M compare2.9 - 3.5 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD A6-5357M compare2.9 - 3.5 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD A4-5150M compare2.7 - 3.3 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD A6-5345M compare2.2 - 2.8 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD A4-5145M compare2 - 2.6 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD A10-5750M2.5 - 3.5 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD A10-5757M compare2.5 - 3.5 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD A10-5745M compare2.1 - 2.9 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD A8-5550M compare2.1 - 3.1 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD A8-5557M « 2.1 - 3.1 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD A8-5545M compare1.7 - 2.7 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD A6-5350M compare2.9 - 3.5 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD A6-5357M compare2.9 - 3.5 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD A4-5150M compare2.7 - 3.3 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD A6-5345M compare2.2 - 2.8 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD A4-5145M compare2 - 2.6 GHz2 / 2 cores
Clock2500 - 3500 MHz2100 - 3100 MHz
L2 Cache4 MB4 MB
Cores / Threads4 / 44 / 4
TDP35 Watt35 Watt
Technology32 nm32 nm
SocketFS1r2BGA
FeaturesSSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A), x86-64, AES, AVX, FMA, DDR3-1866 ControllerSSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A), x86-64, AES, AVX, FMA, DDR3-1600 Controller
iGPUAMD Radeon HD 8650G (533 - 720 MHz)AMD Radeon HD 8550G (554 - 720 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
Announced

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - A10-5750M
18.2 pt (25%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 154     avg: 162.5     median: 162.5 (18%)     max: 171 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 428     avg: 434.5     median: 434.5 (1%)     max: 441 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 198     avg: 207.2     median: 209 (1%)     max: 212 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 72     avg: 75.5     median: 76 (23%)     max: 78.6 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 2.19     avg: 2.3     median: 2.3 (3%)     max: 2.32 Points
1.9 Points (2%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 0.81     avg: 0.8     median: 0.9 (21%)     max: 0.88 Points
0.8 Points (19%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
min: 2451     avg: 2549     median: 2579 (16%)     max: 2672 Points
2115 Points (13%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
min: 6114     avg: 6418     median: 6451 (5%)     max: 6633 Points
5259 Points (4%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
min: 8603     avg: 8977     median: 9015 (6%)     max: 9342 Points
7373 Points (5%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
min: 3203     avg: 3447     median: 3483 (4%)     max: 3617 Points
2871 Points (3%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
min: 780     avg: 784     median: 784 (9%)     max: 788 s
903 s (11%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
min: 22.1     avg: 22.5     median: 22.5 (5%)     max: 22.9 s
26.8 s (5%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
min: 1992     avg: 2035     median: 2035 (3%)     max: 2078 Points
1860 Points (3%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multli Thread 4 runs
min: 7475     avg: 7608     median: 7608 (4%)     max: 7741 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 2948     avg: 2956     median: 2955.5 (35%)     max: 2963 MIPS
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
min: 15     avg: 15.1     median: 15 (5%)     max: 15.37 fps
12.4 fps (4%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
min: 75.5     avg: 77.6     median: 76 (18%)     max: 81.2 fps
62.5 fps (14%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 1.26     avg: 1.7     median: 1.7 (3%)     max: 2.08 fps
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
min: 0.164     avg: 0.2     median: 0.2 (0%)     max: 0.171 GB/s
0.1 GB/s (0%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
min: 0.297     avg: 0.3     median: 0.3 (5%)     max: 0.306 GB/s
0.2 GB/s (4%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
1.5 GB/s (4%)
1.1 GB/s (3%)
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
2754 Seconds (19%)
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
1.5 sec (33%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 2464     avg: 3070     median: 3238 (7%)     max: 3273 Points
2747 Points (6%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
min: 27.97     avg: 28.5     median: 28.1 (6%)     max: 29.67 s
31.6 s (7%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
min: 63.6     avg: 65     median: 63.9 (3%)     max: 68.8 s
71.9 s (3%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
min: 1651     avg: 1693     median: 1666.5 (7%)     max: 1788 s
1884 s (8%)
SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS) - SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS)
min: 32320     avg: 33980     median: 33980 (16%)     max: 35640 MIPS
29520 MIPS (14%)
SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS) - SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS)
min: 24800     avg: 24955     median: 24955 (19%)     max: 25110 MFLOPS
21160 MFLOPS (16%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
min: 5544     avg: 7097     median: 7250 (6%)     max: 7803 Points
6116 Points (5%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 1445     avg: 2482     median: 2658 (7%)     max: 2790 Points
2318 Points (6%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
min: 13311     avg: 23944     median: 25232 (21%)     max: 28306 Points
21396 Points (17%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
24996 Points (20%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
29277 Points (25%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 1008     avg: 1952     median: 2070 (5%)     max: 2326 Points
1760 Points (4%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 1488     avg: 2785     median: 2946 (5%)     max: 3230 Points
2441 Points (4%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
493 Points (21%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
1326 Points (2%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
495 Points (2%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
1320 Points (4%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
2260 Points (23%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
5292 Points (6%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Single-Core
2175 Points (30%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
4963 Points (12%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Multi-Core
min: 4776     avg: 4787     median: 4787 (8%)     max: 4798 Points
3498 Points (6%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Single-Core
min: 1800     avg: 1816     median: 1816 (35%)     max: 1832 Points
1591 Points (31%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Stream
min: 3865     avg: 4282     median: 4281.5 (35%)     max: 4698 Points
3331 Points (27%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Memory
min: 3251     avg: 3354     median: 3354 (30%)     max: 3457 Points
2913 Points (26%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Floating Point
min: 4907     avg: 4926     median: 4925.5 (10%)     max: 4944 Points
5444 Points (11%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Integer
min: 5469     avg: 5484     median: 5483.5 (11%)     max: 5498 Points
4222 Points (8%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Total Score
min: 4691     avg: 4742     median: 4741.5 (12%)     max: 4792 Points
4298 Points (11%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
2402 ms (3%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
80.1 Points (17%)

Average Benchmarks AMD A10-5750M → 100% n=32

Average Benchmarks AMD A8-5557M → 86% n=32

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.26
log 16. 07:44:47

#0 checking url part for id 4154 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 4156 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Tue, 16 Apr 2024 05:37:29 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 composed specs +0.034s ... 0.035s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.036s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 4154 +0.021s ... 0.056s

#7 got single benchmarks 4154 +0.026s ... 0.083s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 4156 +0.003s ... 0.085s

#9 got single benchmarks 4156 +0.01s ... 0.095s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.095s

#11 min, max, avg, median took s +0.258s ... 0.353s

#12 return log +0.024s ... 0.377s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)