Notebookcheck Logo

AMD A10-5750M vs AMD A6-5350M vs AMD A4-5145M

AMD A10-5750M

► remove from comparison AMD A10-5750M

The AMD A10-5750M is a mobile quad-core processor based on the Richland-architecture. As the successor of the A10-4600M, the A10-5750M offers a slightly higher CPU and graphics performance and represents the new top model of the A-series (March 2013).

Compared to Trinity, Richland has been modified just slightly. Therefore, no changes in the feature set or the Pro-MHz performance can be reported. The design of the chip is still based on the Bulldozer architecture, which consists of so-called modules. Each of the two modules integrates 2 integer units, but only one FPU. Just like Trinity, Richland supports nearly all current techniques such as AVX (including FMA), AES or Turbo Core.

Our benchmarks show a performance increase of around 10 percent on the A10-4600M. Thus, the A10-5750M performs at the level of a Core i3-2330M (Sandy Bridge).

The graphics unit called Radeon HD 8650G offers 384 shader units (VLIW4) and clocks at 533 - 720 MHz (slightly higher than the HD 7660G). With fast dual-channel memory, performance is similar to a dedicated HD 7670M.

The power consumption of the entire APU is rated at 35 watts, which is comparable to conventional middle-class models of competition. Thus, the APU is best suited for 14 inch notebooks or bigger.

AMD A6-5350M

► remove from comparison AMD A6-5350M

The AMD A6-5350M is a mobile dual-core processor based on the Richland-architecture. As successor to the A6-4400M, the A6-5350M has a slightly higher CPU and graphics performance and settles in the low end segment. The APU integrates 2 CPU cores, a DirectX 11 graphics unit and the Northbridge along with a DDR3 memory controller.

Compared to Trinity, Richland has been modified just slightly. Therefore, no changes in the feature set or the Pro-MHz performance can be reported. The design of the chip is still based on the Bulldozer architecture, which consists of so-called modules. Each module integrates 2 integer units, but only one FPU. Just like Trinity, Richland supports nearly all current techniques such as AVX (including FMA), AES or Turbo Core.

According to the clock rates of 2.9 to 3.5 GHz, the A6-5350M performs about 15 percent faster than the A6-4400M and just reaches a Pentium P6100. Consequently, the performance in less demanding applications and games is sufficient.

The graphics unit called Radeon HD 8450G offers 192 shader units (VLIW4) and clocks slightly higher than the HD 7520G. With fast dual-channel memory, performance matches a dedicated Radeon HD 7470M.

The power consumption of the entire APU is rated at 35 watts, which is comparable to conventional middle-class models of competition. Thus, the APU is best suited for 14 inch notebooks or bigger.

AMD A4-5145M

► remove from comparison AMD A4-5145M

The AMD A4-5145M is a mobile ultra-low-voltage dual-core processor based on the Richland architecture. The APU integrates one module with 2.0 to 2.6 GHz, a Radeon HD 8310G graphics card and a DDR3(L)-1333 memory controller.

Compared to Trinity, Richland has been modified just slightly. Therefore, no changes in the feature set or the Pro-MHz performance can be reported. The design of the chip is still based on the Bulldozer architecture, which consists of so-called modules. Each module integrates 2 integer units, but only one FPU. Just like Trinity, Richland supports nearly all current techniques such as AVX (including FMA), AES or Turbo Core.

The CPU performance of the A4-5145M should be similar to the A6-4455M and the Pentium 977. For everyday tasks such as Internet or Office the performance is adequate, but not for very complex software or modern games.

The graphics unit called Radeon HD 8310G offers 128 shader units (VLIW4) and is slightly faster than the HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge). The core is clocked at 424-554 MHz (turbo).

The power consumption of the entire APU is rated at 17 watts, which is similar to other ULV CPUs. Therefore, the APU is suitable for 12-inch ultraportables or bigger.

ModelAMD A10-5750MAMD A6-5350MAMD A4-5145M
SeriesAMD A-SeriesAMD A-SeriesAMD A-Series
CodenameRichlandRichlandRichland
Series: A-Series Richland
AMD A10-5750M « 2.5 - 3.5 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD A10-5757M2.5 - 3.5 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD A10-5745M2.1 - 2.9 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD A8-5550M2.1 - 3.1 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD A8-5557M2.1 - 3.1 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD A8-5545M1.7 - 2.7 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD A6-5350M2.9 - 3.5 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD A6-5357M2.9 - 3.5 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD A4-5150M2.7 - 3.3 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD A6-5345M2.2 - 2.8 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD A4-5145M2 - 2.6 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD A10-5750M2.5 - 3.5 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD A10-5757M2.5 - 3.5 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD A10-5745M2.1 - 2.9 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD A8-5550M2.1 - 3.1 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD A8-5557M2.1 - 3.1 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD A8-5545M1.7 - 2.7 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD A6-5350M « 2.9 - 3.5 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD A6-5357M2.9 - 3.5 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD A4-5150M2.7 - 3.3 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD A6-5345M2.2 - 2.8 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD A4-5145M2 - 2.6 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD A10-5750M2.5 - 3.5 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD A10-5757M2.5 - 3.5 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD A10-5745M2.1 - 2.9 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD A8-5550M2.1 - 3.1 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD A8-5557M2.1 - 3.1 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD A8-5545M1.7 - 2.7 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD A6-5350M2.9 - 3.5 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD A6-5357M2.9 - 3.5 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD A4-5150M2.7 - 3.3 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD A6-5345M2.2 - 2.8 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD A4-5145M « 2 - 2.6 GHz2 / 2 cores
Clock2500 - 3500 MHz2900 - 3500 MHz2000 - 2600 MHz
L2 Cache4 MB1 MB1 MB
Cores / Threads4 / 42 / 22 / 2
TDP35 Watt35 Watt17 Watt
Technology32 nm32 nm32 nm
SocketFS1r2
FeaturesSSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A), x86-64, AES, AVX, FMA, DDR3-1866 ControllerSSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A), x86-64, AES, AVX, FMA, DDR3-1600 ControllerSSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A), x86-64, AES, AVX, FMA, DDR3-1333 Controller
iGPUAMD Radeon HD 8650G (533 - 720 MHz)AMD Radeon HD 8450G (533 - 720 MHz)AMD Radeon HD 8310G (424 - 554 MHz)
Architecturex86x86x86
Announced

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - A10-5750M
18.2 pt (25%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 154     avg: 162.5     median: 162.5 (18%)     max: 171 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 428     avg: 434.5     median: 434.5 (1%)     max: 441 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 198     avg: 207.2     median: 209 (1%)     max: 212 Points
min: 117     avg: 117.5     median: 117.5 (1%)     max: 118 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 72     avg: 75.5     median: 76 (23%)     max: 78.6 Points
min: 54     avg: 63.5     median: 63.5 (19%)     max: 73 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 2.19     avg: 2.3     median: 2.3 (3%)     max: 2.32 Points
min: 1     avg: 1.2     median: 1.2 (2%)     max: 1.34 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 0.81     avg: 0.8     median: 0.9 (21%)     max: 0.88 Points
min: 0.64     avg: 0.8     median: 0.7 (19%)     max: 0.87 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
min: 2451     avg: 2549     median: 2579 (16%)     max: 2672 Points
min: 2389     avg: 2490     median: 2480.5 (15%)     max: 2610 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
min: 6114     avg: 6418     median: 6451 (5%)     max: 6633 Points
min: 2990     avg: 3740     median: 3956 (3%)     max: 4057 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
min: 8603     avg: 8977     median: 9015 (6%)     max: 9342 Points
min: 3558     avg: 4653     median: 4823 (3%)     max: 5407 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
min: 3203     avg: 3447     median: 3483 (4%)     max: 3617 Points
min: 2838     avg: 3259     median: 3377 (4%)     max: 3444 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
min: 780     avg: 784     median: 784 (9%)     max: 788 s
1324 s (16%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
min: 22.1     avg: 22.5     median: 22.5 (5%)     max: 22.9 s
min: 39.8     avg: 40.9     median: 40.9 (8%)     max: 41.92 s
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
min: 1992     avg: 2035     median: 2035 (3%)     max: 2078 Points
min: 1120     avg: 1169     median: 1169 (2%)     max: 1218 Points
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multli Thread 4 runs
min: 7475     avg: 7608     median: 7608 (4%)     max: 7741 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 2948     avg: 2956     median: 2955.5 (35%)     max: 2963 MIPS
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
min: 15     avg: 15.1     median: 15 (5%)     max: 15.37 fps
min: 7.46     avg: 8.2     median: 8.2 (3%)     max: 9 fps
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
min: 75.5     avg: 77.6     median: 76 (18%)     max: 81.2 fps
min: 40.25     avg: 43.4     median: 43.4 (10%)     max: 46.5 fps
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 1.26     avg: 1.7     median: 1.7 (3%)     max: 2.08 fps
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
min: 0.164     avg: 0.2     median: 0.2 (0%)     max: 0.171 GB/s
min: 0.0868     avg: 0.1     median: 0.1 (0%)     max: 0.09 GB/s
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
min: 0.297     avg: 0.3     median: 0.3 (5%)     max: 0.306 GB/s
min: 0.163     avg: 0.2     median: 0.2 (3%)     max: 0.164 GB/s
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
1.5 GB/s (4%)
min: 0.808     avg: 0.8     median: 0.8 (2%)     max: 0.814 GB/s
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
2754 Seconds (19%)
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
1.5 sec (33%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 2464     avg: 3070     median: 3238 (7%)     max: 3273 Points
min: 1581     avg: 1793     median: 1649 (4%)     max: 2148 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
min: 27.97     avg: 28.5     median: 28.1 (6%)     max: 29.67 s
min: 28.9     avg: 29     median: 29 (6%)     max: 29.17 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
min: 63.6     avg: 65     median: 63.9 (3%)     max: 68.8 s
69 s (3%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
min: 1651     avg: 1693     median: 1666.5 (7%)     max: 1788 s
1657 s (7%)
SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS) - SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS)
min: 32320     avg: 33980     median: 33980 (16%)     max: 35640 MIPS
17160 MIPS (8%)
SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS) - SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS)
min: 24800     avg: 24955     median: 24955 (19%)     max: 25110 MFLOPS
12710 MFLOPS (10%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
min: 5544     avg: 7097     median: 7250 (6%)     max: 7803 Points
min: 2764     avg: 3371     median: 3404 (3%)     max: 3946 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 1445     avg: 2482     median: 2658 (7%)     max: 2790 Points
min: 942     avg: 1357     median: 1414.5 (4%)     max: 1656 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
min: 13311     avg: 23944     median: 25232 (21%)     max: 28306 Points
min: 11808     avg: 14488     median: 15493 (13%)     max: 15980 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
24996 Points (20%)
16269 Points (13%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
29277 Points (25%)
17364 Points (15%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 1008     avg: 1952     median: 2070 (5%)     max: 2326 Points
min: 907     avg: 1117     median: 1220 (3%)     max: 1294 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 1488     avg: 2785     median: 2946 (5%)     max: 3230 Points
min: 1185     avg: 1539     median: 1713 (3%)     max: 1804 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
493 Points (21%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
1326 Points (2%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
495 Points (2%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
1320 Points (4%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
2260 Points (23%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
5292 Points (6%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Single-Core
2175 Points (30%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
4963 Points (12%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Multi-Core
min: 4776     avg: 4787     median: 4787 (8%)     max: 4798 Points
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Single-Core
min: 1800     avg: 1816     median: 1816 (35%)     max: 1832 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Stream
min: 3865     avg: 4282     median: 4281.5 (35%)     max: 4698 Points
3509 Points (28%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Memory
min: 3251     avg: 3354     median: 3354 (30%)     max: 3457 Points
3223 Points (29%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Floating Point
min: 4907     avg: 4926     median: 4925.5 (10%)     max: 4944 Points
3891 Points (8%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Integer
min: 5469     avg: 5484     median: 5483.5 (11%)     max: 5498 Points
3103 Points (6%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Total Score
min: 4691     avg: 4742     median: 4741.5 (12%)     max: 4792 Points
3443 Points (9%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
2402 ms (3%)
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
min: 164     avg: 223     median: 247 (3%)     max: 258 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 8944     avg: 11205     median: 10252 (9%)     max: 14419 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
80.1 Points (17%)

Average Benchmarks AMD A10-5750M → 0% n=

Average Benchmarks AMD A6-5350M → 0% n=

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.26
log 28. 18:09:28

#0 checking url part for id 4154 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 3780 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 4160 +0s ... 0s

#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 28 Mar 2024 05:35:32 +0100 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#5 composed specs +0.046s ... 0.047s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.047s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 4154 +0.021s ... 0.068s

#8 got single benchmarks 4154 +0.03s ... 0.097s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 3780 +0.003s ... 0.101s

#10 got single benchmarks 3780 +0.013s ... 0.114s

#11 getting avg benchmarks for device 4160 +0.003s ... 0.116s

#12 got single benchmarks 4160 +0s ... 0.117s

#13 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.117s

#14 min, max, avg, median took s +0.264s ... 0.381s

#15 return log +0s ... 0.381s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)