Notebookcheck Logo

AMD A10-5745M vs AMD A10-5757M

AMD A10-5745M

► remove from comparison AMD A10-5745M

The AMD A10-5745M is a mobile low-voltage quad-core processor based on the Richland architecture. The APU integrates two modules with 2.1 to 2.9 GHz, a Radeon HD 8610G graphics card and a DDR3(L)-1333 memory controller.

Compared to Trinity, Richland has been modified just slightly. Therefore, no changes in the feature set or the Pro-MHz performance can be reported. The design of the chip is still based on the Bulldozer architecture, which consists of so-called modules. Each of the two modules integrates 2 integer units, but only one FPU. Just like Trinity, Richland supports nearly all current techniques such as AVX (including FMA), AES or Turbo Core.

The CPU performance of the A10-5745M should be similar to a Core i3-2310M. Thus, the APU is sufficiently for most modern applications and many games.

The graphics unit called Radeon HD 8610G offers all 384 shader units (VLIW4) and is slightly faster than the HD 7660G. The core is clocked at 533-626 MHz (turbo).

The power consumption of the entire APU is rated at 25 watts, which is slightly below common middle-class CPUs. Therefore, the APU is suitable for slim 13-inch notebooks or bigger.

AMD A10-5757M

► remove from comparison AMD A10-5757M

The AMD A10-5757M is a mobile quad-core processor based on the Richland-architecture. In contrast to the A10-5750M, the 5757M is a BGA version. As the successor of the A10-4600M, the A10-5750M/5757M offers a slightly higher CPU and graphics performance and represents the new top model of the A-series (March 2013).

Compared to Trinity, Richland has been modified just slightly. Therefore, no changes in the feature set or the Pro-MHz performance can be reported. The design of the chip is still based on the Bulldozer architecture, which consists of so-called modules. Each of the two modules integrates 2 integer units, but only one FPU. Just like Trinity, Richland supports nearly all current techniques such as AVX (including FMA), AES or Turbo Core.

Our benchmarks show a performance increase of around 10 percent on the A10-4600M. Thus, the A10-5757M performs at the level of a Core i3-2330M (Sandy Bridge).

The graphics unit called Radeon HD 8650G offers 384 shader units (VLIW4) and clocks at 533 - 720 MHz (slightly higher than the HD 7660G). With fast dual-channel memory, performance is similar to a dedicated HD 7670M.

The power consumption of the entire APU is rated at 35 watts, which is comparable to conventional middle-class models of competition. Thus, the APU is best suited for 14 inch notebooks or bigger.

ModelAMD A10-5745MAMD A10-5757M
SeriesAMD A-SeriesAMD A-Series
CodenameRichlandRichland
Series: A-Series Richland
AMD A10-5750M compare2.5 - 3.5 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD A10-5757M2.5 - 3.5 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD A10-5745M « 2.1 - 2.9 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD A8-5550M compare2.1 - 3.1 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD A8-5557M compare2.1 - 3.1 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD A8-5545M compare1.7 - 2.7 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD A6-5350M compare2.9 - 3.5 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD A6-5357M compare2.9 - 3.5 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD A4-5150M compare2.7 - 3.3 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD A6-5345M compare2.2 - 2.8 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD A4-5145M compare2 - 2.6 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD A10-5750M compare2.5 - 3.5 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD A10-5757M « 2.5 - 3.5 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD A10-5745M2.1 - 2.9 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD A8-5550M compare2.1 - 3.1 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD A8-5557M compare2.1 - 3.1 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD A8-5545M compare1.7 - 2.7 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD A6-5350M compare2.9 - 3.5 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD A6-5357M compare2.9 - 3.5 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD A4-5150M compare2.7 - 3.3 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD A6-5345M compare2.2 - 2.8 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD A4-5145M compare2 - 2.6 GHz2 / 2 cores
Clock2100 - 2900 MHz2500 - 3500 MHz
L2 Cache4 MB4 MB
Cores / Threads4 / 44 / 4
TDP25 Watt35 Watt
Technology32 nm32 nm
FeaturesSSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A), x86-64, AES, AVX, FMA, DDR3-1333 ControllerSSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A), x86-64, AES, AVX, FMA, DDR3-1600 Controller
iGPUAMD Radeon HD 8610G (533 - 626 MHz)AMD Radeon HD 8650G (600 - 720 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
Announced
SocketBGA

Benchmarks

Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 176     avg: 177     median: 177 (1%)     max: 178 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 63     avg: 63.5     median: 63.5 (19%)     max: 64 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 1.91     avg: 1.9     median: 1.9 (2%)     max: 1.93 Points
min: 2.14     avg: 2.2     median: 2.2 (3%)     max: 2.31 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 0.66     avg: 0.7     median: 0.7 (17%)     max: 0.72 Points
min: 0.87     avg: 0.9     median: 0.9 (22%)     max: 0.89 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
min: 2059     avg: 2065     median: 2065 (12%)     max: 2071 Points
2182 Points (13%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
min: 5429     avg: 5480     median: 5480 (4%)     max: 5531 Points
3774 Points (3%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
8232 Points (6%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
3247 Points (4%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
940 s (11%)
901 s (11%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
35 s (7%)
28.7 s (6%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
1585 Points (3%)
1266 Points (2%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
12.7 fps (4%)
7.6 fps (3%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
62.1 fps (14%)
39.2 fps (9%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
0.1 GB/s (0%)
0.1 GB/s (0%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
0.2 GB/s (4%)
0.2 GB/s (4%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
1.1 GB/s (3%)
1.1 GB/s (3%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 2744     avg: 2753     median: 2745 (6%)     max: 2770 Points
2986 Points (6%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
34.4 s (7%)
39 s (8%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
79 s (3%)
86 s (4%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
2040 s (9%)
2237 s (10%)
SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS) - SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS)
33372 MIPS (16%)
SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS) - SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS)
22906 MFLOPS (18%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
6082 Points (5%)
6493 Points (6%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 2103     avg: 2190     median: 2155 (6%)     max: 2311 Points
min: 2533     avg: 2709     median: 2772 (7%)     max: 2823 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
min: 20181     avg: 21592     median: 21774 (18%)     max: 22821 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 1807     avg: 1843     median: 1831 (5%)     max: 1892 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 2576     avg: 2615     median: 2619 (5%)     max: 2651 Points
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Multi-Core
min: 3647     avg: 3724     median: 3724 (7%)     max: 3801 Points
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Single-Core
min: 1460     avg: 1476     median: 1476 (29%)     max: 1492 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Stream
3012 Points (24%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Memory
2483 Points (23%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Floating Point
5572 Points (11%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Integer
4319 Points (9%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Total Score
4259 Points (11%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 4634     avg: 5294     median: 5294 (6%)     max: 5954 ms
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
min: 226.8     avg: 243.3     median: 243.3 (3%)     max: 259.8 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 5708     avg: 6638     median: 6638 (6%)     max: 7568 Points

Average Benchmarks AMD A10-5745M → 100% n=18

Average Benchmarks AMD A10-5757M → 98% n=18

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.26
log 19. 19:35:07

#0 checking url part for id 4158 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 3747 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Fri, 19 Apr 2024 05:38:49 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 composed specs +0.03s ... 0.031s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.031s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 4158 +0.003s ... 0.034s

#7 got single benchmarks 4158 +0.019s ... 0.053s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 3747 +0.003s ... 0.056s

#9 got single benchmarks 3747 +0.011s ... 0.067s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.067s

#11 min, max, avg, median took s +0.173s ... 0.239s

#12 return log +0.022s ... 0.261s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)