Notebookcheck Logo

AMD A10-4655M vs AMD A6-4455M vs AMD A10-4600M

AMD A10-4655M

► remove from comparison AMD A10-4655M

The AMD A10-4655M is a mobile low-voltage (LV) quad-core processor based on the Trinity architecture. Officially introduced in Q2 2012, it is the direct successor to the Llano A-series of APUs (Accelerated Processing Unit). The processing unit is manufactured in 32nm SOI and integrates a 2.0 GHz CPU (up to 2.8 GHz w/ Turbo Core) with a relatively fast Radeon HD 7620G GPU alongside a dual-channel memory controller, video de- and encoders and a northbridge.

The CPU cores are based on a reworked Bulldozer architecture, called Piledriver. Although marketed as a quad-core processor, the A10-4655M includes only two modules with four integer-cores and two floating-point cores total. As a result, the CPU is not a true quad-core processor.

When compared to previous Bulldozer cores, AMD has managed to improve upon the IPC (instructions per clock) performance of Trinity cores while allowing for higher clock frequencies. However, when compared to its Llano predecessor, the multithreaded performance of Trinity has only been slightly improved. The enhanced Turbo Core 3.0 feature functions well in speeding up single threaded performance, although it is still not on the same level as Intel’s Turbo Boost equivalent. Regardless, AMD has managed to include other features as well, such as the AVX extension (including FMA) and support for AES encryption.

In terms of raw general performance, the A10-4655M performs similar to the A8-4500M and the Llano-based A8-3500M. Single-threaded workloads can especially benefit from the new architecture and the updated Turbo Core functionality. If compared to Intels Core-i3-series, the A10-4655M offers less performance in most cases. Nonetheless, CPU performance from the AMD processor is sufficient for all daily workloads like Office, Internet browsing and even light video editing or gaming.

The integrated DirectX 11-compatible Radeon HD 7620G offers all 384 shader cores of the Trinity chip and, thanks to Turbo Core, will operate anywhere between 360 to 497 MHz depending on the current application demand. On average, the performance of the HD 7620G GPU is comparable to a dedicated Radeon HD 7610M and even faster than the HD Graphics 4000 as found in Intel’s Ivy Bridge.

The power consumption of the A10-4655M APU is rated at 25 Watt TDP and is therefore comparable to previous LV-processors. Consequently, the A10-4655M is best suited for 12-inch notebooks or larger.

AMD A6-4455M

► remove from comparison AMD A6-4455M

The AMD A6-4455M is a mobile ultra-low-voltage (ULV) dual-core processor based on the Trinity architecture. Officially introduced in Q2 2012, it is the direct successor to the Llano A-series of APUs (Accelerated Processing Unit). The processing unit is manufactured in 32nm SOI and integrates a 2.1 GHz CPU (up to 2.6 GHz w/ Turbo Core) with a Radeon HD 7500G GPU alongside a dual-channel memory controller, video de- and encoders and a northbridge.

The CPU cores are based on a reworked Bulldozer architecture, called Piledriver. Although marketed as a dual-core processor, the A6-4455M includes only one module with two integer-cores and and floating-point core. As a result, the CPU is not a true dual-core processor.

When compared to previous Bulldozer cores, AMD has managed to improve upon the IPC (instructions per clock) performance of Trinity cores while allowing for higher clock frequencies. However, when compared to its Llano predecessor, the multithreaded performance of Trinity has only been slightly improved. The enhanced Turbo Core 3.0 feature functions well in speeding up single threaded performance, although it is still not on the same level as Intel’s Turbo Boost equivalent. Regardless, AMD has managed to include other features as well, such as the AVX extension (including FMA) and support for AES encryption.

In terms of raw general performance, the A6-4455M performs significantly faster than the E-Series (e.g. E2-1800), but cannot compete with Intels ULV processors. Nonetheless, CPU performance from the AMD processor should be sufficient for all daily workloads like Office and Internet browsing, but will reach its limits in more demanding applications and multitasking.

The integrated DirectX 11-compatible Radeon HD 7500G offers only 256 shader cores of the Trinity chip (7660G: 384) and, thanks to Turbo Core, will operate anywhere between 360 to 497 MHz depending on the current application demand. On average, the performance of the HD 7500G GPU should be somewhere between the Llano-based Radeon HD 6620G and the HD Graphics 4000 as found in Intel’s Ivy Bridge.

The power consumption of the A6-4455M APU is rated at 17 Watt TDP and is therefore comparable to Intels ULV-processors. Consequently, the A6-4455M is best suited for thin-and-light notebooks.

AMD A10-4600M

► remove from comparison AMD A10-4600M

The AMD A10-4600M is a mobile quad-core processor based on the Trinity architecture. Officially introduced in Q2 2012, it is the direct successor to the Llano A-series of APUs (Accelerated Processing Unit) and is currently the fastest mobile Trinity APU on the market. The processing unit is manufactured in 32nm SOI and integrates a 2.3 GHz CPU (up to 3.2 GHz w/ Turbo Core) with a relatively fast Radeon HD 7660G GPU alongside a dual-channel memory controller, video de- and encoders and a northbridge.

The CPU cores are based on a reworked Bulldozer architecture, called Piledriver. Although marketed as a quad-core processor, the A10-4600M includes only two modules with four integer-cores and two floating-point cores total. As a result, the CPU is not a true quad-core processor.

When compared to previous Bulldozer cores, AMD has managed to improve upon the IPC (instructions per clock) performance of Trinity cores while allowing for higher clock frequencies. However, when compared to its Llano predecessor, the multithreaded performance of Trinity has only been slightly improved. The enhanced Turbo Core 3.0 feature functions well in speeding up single threaded performance, although it is still not on the same level as Intel’s Turbo Boost equivalent. Regardless, AMD has managed to include other features as well, such as the AVX extension (including FMA) and support for AES encryption.

In terms of raw general performance, the A10-4600M can perform anywhere from 0 to 25% faster than the Llano-based A8-3520M. Single-threaded workloads can especially benefit from the new architecture and the updated Turbo Core functionality. If compared to Intel, a Sandy Bridge Core i3-2310M is roughly on a similar level to the A10-4600M, but results can still differ greatly from benchmark to benchmark. Nonetheless, CPU performance from the AMD processor should be sufficient for all daily workloads like Office, Internet browsing and even light video editing or gaming.

The integrated DirectX 11-compatible Radeon HD 7660G offers all 384 shader cores of the Trinity chip and, thanks to Turbo Core, will operate anywhere between 497 to 686 MHz depending on the current application demand. On average, the performance of the HD 7660G GPU is comparable to a dedicated Radeon HD 6650M and is even noticeably faster than the HD Graphics 4000 as found in Intel’s Ivy Bridge.

The power consumption of the A10-4600M APU is rated at 35 Watt TDP and is therefore comparable to mid-range dual-core Ivy Bridge processors. Consequently, the A10-4600M is best suited for 14-inch notebooks or larger.

ModelAMD A10-4655MAMD A6-4455MAMD A10-4600M
SeriesAMD A-SeriesAMD A-SeriesAMD A-Series
CodenameTrinityTrinityTrinity
Series: A-Series Trinity
AMD A10-4600M2.3 - 3.2 GHz4 / 4
AMD A10-4657M2.3 - 3.2 GHz4 / 4
» AMD A10-4655M2 - 2.8 GHz4 / 4
AMD A8-4500M1.9 - 2.8 GHz4 / 4
AMD A8-4557M1.9 - 2.8 GHz4 / 4
AMD A8-4555M1.6 - 2.4 GHz4 / 4
AMD A6-4400M2.7 - 3.2 GHz2
AMD A4-4300M2.5 - 3 GHz2
AMD A6-4455M2.1 - 2.6 GHz2
AMD A4-4355M1.9 - 2.4 GHz2
AMD A10-4600M2.3 - 3.2 GHz4 / 4
AMD A10-4657M2.3 - 3.2 GHz4 / 4
AMD A10-4655M2 - 2.8 GHz4 / 4
AMD A8-4500M1.9 - 2.8 GHz4 / 4
AMD A8-4557M1.9 - 2.8 GHz4 / 4
AMD A8-4555M1.6 - 2.4 GHz4 / 4
AMD A6-4400M2.7 - 3.2 GHz2
AMD A4-4300M2.5 - 3 GHz2
» AMD A6-4455M2.1 - 2.6 GHz2
AMD A4-4355M1.9 - 2.4 GHz2
» AMD A10-4600M2.3 - 3.2 GHz4 / 4
AMD A10-4657M2.3 - 3.2 GHz4 / 4
AMD A10-4655M2 - 2.8 GHz4 / 4
AMD A8-4500M1.9 - 2.8 GHz4 / 4
AMD A8-4557M1.9 - 2.8 GHz4 / 4
AMD A8-4555M1.6 - 2.4 GHz4 / 4
AMD A6-4400M2.7 - 3.2 GHz2
AMD A4-4300M2.5 - 3 GHz2
AMD A6-4455M2.1 - 2.6 GHz2
AMD A4-4355M1.9 - 2.4 GHz2
Clock2000 - 2800 MHz2100 - 2600 MHz2300 - 3200 MHz
L2 Cache4 MB2 MB4 MB
Cores / Threads4 / 424 / 4
TDP25 Watt17 Watt35 Watt
Transistors1303 Million1303 Million1303 Million
Technology32 nm32 nm32 nm
Die Size246 mm2246 mm2246 mm2
FeaturesSSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A), x86-64, AES, AVX, FMASSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A), x86-64, AES, AVX, FMASSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A), x86-64, AES, AVX, FMA
iGPUAMD Radeon HD 7620G (360 - 497 MHz)AMD Radeon HD 7500G (327 - 424 MHz)AMD Radeon HD 7660G (497 - 686 MHz)
Architecturex86x86x86
Announced

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - A10-4600M
17.1 pt (19%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
62.6 Points (7%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
148 Points (1%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 185     avg: 187     median: 187 (2%)     max: 189 Points
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180Tooltip
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 62     avg: 65.1     median: 63 (19%)     max: 70.4 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
1.7 Points (2%)
min: 0.85     avg: 0.9     median: 0.9 (1%)     max: 0.87 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
0.5 Points (2%)
min: 0.53     avg: 0.6     median: 0.6 (2%)     max: 0.63 Points
min: 0.61     avg: 0.7     median: 0.7 (2%)     max: 0.74 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
1137 Points (9%)
min: 1594     avg: 1742     median: 1689 (14%)     max: 1943 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
4530 Points (5%)
min: 2578     avg: 2594     median: 2601 (3%)     max: 2602 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
6495 Points (5%)
min: 3578     avg: 3596     median: 3593.5 (3%)     max: 3620 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
2280 Points (12%)
min: 2172     avg: 2459     median: 2602 (14%)     max: 2603 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
1280 s (15%)
min: 1950     avg: 2010     median: 1975 (23%)     max: 2104 s
min: 786     avg: 850     median: 852 (10%)     max: 901 s
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
40 s (8%)
min: 58.9     avg: 62     median: 61.8 (12%)     max: 65.2 s
min: 24.1     avg: 26.1     median: 26.5 (5%)     max: 26.92 s
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
1263 Points (7%)
865 Points (5%)
min: 1844     avg: 1884     median: 1891.5 (11%)     max: 1910 Points
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multli Thread 4 runs
6898 MIPS (4%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
2699 MIPS (32%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
5.7 fps (2%)
min: 4.47     avg: 11     median: 13.1 (5%)     max: 13.44 fps
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
30.7 fps (7%)
min: 21.54     avg: 52.8     median: 57.5 (14%)     max: 74.6 fps
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
1.2 fps (3%)
00.10.20.40.50.60.70.911.11.21.31.51.61.71.822.12.22.3Tooltip
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
0.1 GB/s (0%)
0.1 GB/s (0%)
min: 0.138     avg: 0.1     median: 0.1 (0%)     max: 0.143 GB/s
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
0.2 GB/s (0%)
0.1 GB/s (0%)
min: 0.248     avg: 0.3     median: 0.3 (0%)     max: 0.266 GB/s
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
0.9 GB/s (0%)
0.5 GB/s (0%)
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
3004 Seconds (21%)
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
1.6 sec (35%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 2153     avg: 2161     median: 2160.5 (5%)     max: 2168 Points
min: 1348     avg: 1359     median: 1358.5 (3%)     max: 1372 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
22 s (5%)
min: 37.11     avg: 39.8     median: 37.3 (8%)     max: 45 s
min: 34.3     avg: 35     median: 35.1 (8%)     max: 35.38 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
80 s (3%)
min: 84.5     avg: 90.7     median: 85.7 (4%)     max: 102 s
min: 78.1     avg: 79.9     median: 80.1 (3%)     max: 81 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
2077 s (9%)
min: 2194     avg: 2349     median: 2196 (10%)     max: 2658 s
min: 1928     avg: 2067     median: 2090 (9%)     max: 2133 s
SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS) - SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS)
min: 15.46     avg: 9615     median: 13880 (7%)     max: 14950 MIPS
min: 32000     avg: 33543     median: 34100 (16%)     max: 34530 MIPS
SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS) - SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS)
min: 9.24     avg: 6386     median: 9400 (7%)     max: 9748 MFLOPS
min: 21760     avg: 22243     median: 22340 (17%)     max: 22630 MFLOPS
Windows 7 Experience Index - Win7 CPU
min: 4.7     avg: 4.8     median: 4.8 (61%)     max: 4.8 Points
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
5259 Points (5%)
min: 2596     avg: 2683     median: 2690.5 (3%)     max: 2756 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
2236 Points (6%)
min: 1127     avg: 1184     median: 1212 (3%)     max: 1214 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
19991 Points (13%)
9415 Points (6%)
min: 22271     avg: 22725     median: 22756 (15%)     max: 23147 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
22897 Points (19%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
25218 Points (21%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
1223 Points (3%)
738 Points (2%)
min: 1841     avg: 1877     median: 1882 (5%)     max: 1909 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
2102 Points (4%)
957 Points (2%)
2569 Points (5%)
Geekbench 5.4 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
446 Points (19%)
Geekbench 5.4 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
1162 Points (4%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
378 Points (17%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
1089 Points (3%)
Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1749     avg: 1906     median: 1906 (20%)     max: 2063 Points
Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 4061     avg: 4372     median: 4371.5 (5%)     max: 4682 Points
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Multi-Core
4221 Points (7%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Single-Core
1762 Points (29%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Stream
3442 Points (28%)
3377 Points (27%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Memory
2618 Points (24%)
3109 Points (28%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Floating Point
3030 Points (6%)
6169 Points (12%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Integer
2374 Points (5%)
4603 Points (9%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Total Score
min: 2697     avg: 2728     median: 2728 (7%)     max: 2759 Points
4729 Points (12%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
4242 ms (5%)
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
196.2 ms (2%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
7477 Points (8%)

Average Benchmarks AMD A10-4655M → 100% n=21

Average Benchmarks AMD A6-4455M → 75% n=21

Average Benchmarks AMD A10-4600M → 124% n=21

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.19
log 27. 20:02:31

#0 checking url part for id 3319 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 3320 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 3112 +0s ... 0s

#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 24 Nov 2022 12:15:05 +0100 +0s ... 0s

#5 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.007s ... 0.007s

#6 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.006s ... 0.013s

#7 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.004s ... 0.017s

#8 composed specs +0s ... 0.017s

#9 did output specs +0s ... 0.017s

#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 3319 +0s ... 0.018s

#11 got single benchmarks 3319 +0.008s ... 0.026s

#12 getting avg benchmarks for device 3320 +0s ... 0.027s

#13 got single benchmarks 3320 +0.014s ... 0.041s

#14 getting avg benchmarks for device 3112 +0.006s ... 0.047s

#15 got single benchmarks 3112 +0.025s ... 0.071s

#16 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.071s

#17 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.072s

#18 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.072s

#19 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.009s ... 0.082s

#20 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.082s

#21 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.083s

#22 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.084s

#23 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.085s

#24 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.004s ... 0.089s

#25 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.03s ... 0.119s

#26 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.119s

#27 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.014s ... 0.133s

#28 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.133s

#29 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.134s

#30 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.002s ... 0.136s

#31 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.136s

#32 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.137s

#33 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.138s

#34 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.139s

#35 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.139s

#36 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.011s ... 0.15s

#37 min, max, avg, median took s +0.003s ... 0.153s

#38 return log +0s ... 0.154s

Please share our article, every link counts!
.170
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)