Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Pentium 997 vs Intel Core i5-470UM vs Intel Core i5-540M

Intel Pentium 997

► remove from comparison Intel 997

The Intel Pentium 997 is an Ultra Low Voltage (ULV) dual core processor for entry-level laptops. It is based on the Sandy Bridge architecture but many of the features like Turbo Boost, Virtualization (VT-x, VT-d), HyperThreading, AES or Trusted Execution are deactivated. The Pentium 997 integrates a graphics card called Intel HD Graphics that is based on the HD Graphics 2000 and clocked from 350 - 1000 MHz.

The performance of the Pentium 997 is somewhat higher than a similar clocked Arrandale Pentium CPU. The Core i3-2357M offers less clock speed but features HyperThreading and a 3MB Last Level Cache.

The 17W TDP rating includes the integrated GPU and memory controller and therefore the 987 is suited for small subnotebooks.

Intel Core i5-470UM

► remove from comparison

The Intel Core i5-470UM is a Ultra Low Voltage dual-core processor for small and light laptops. It is clocked with 1.3 - 1.8 GHz (if Turbo Boost is enabled). Each core is based on the Nehalem (Westmere) micro-architecture. Hyperthreading enables the Dual Core CPU to handle 4 threads at once (for a better usage of the pipeline). AES, VT-d and Trusted Execution are deactivated for the 470UM, compared to the i7 UM CPUs.

The faster i5-560UM and i7-660UM are also clocked at 1.3 GHz but feature a higher TurboBoost frequency.

A feature of the Core i5-470UM is the integrated graphics card (called Intel HD Graphics) and memory controller. Both are on a separate die that is still manufactured in 45nm whereas the CPU die is already manufactured in the new 32nm process.

Due to the integrated memory controller, the HyperThreading and Turbo Boost, the  Core i5-470UM is faster than a similar clocked Core 2 Duo (1.3 GHz) in all (us known) applications and benchmarks. Still the Turbo Boost may not trigger very often (sometimes it is even not activated in the BIOS) and therefore the maximum of 1.8 GHz may not be important.

The integrated Intel Graphics Media Accelerator HD (GMA HD) graphics card is clocked between 166-500 MHz (Turbo Boost) and therefore the base speed is clearly below the non low voltage versions. The performance should still be faster than the old GMA 4500MHD.

The power consumption of 18 Watt TDP (max.) counts for the whole package and therefore it is clearly better than the 17 Watt TDP of the Core 2 Duo SL-series (CPU alone).

Intel Core i5-540M

► remove from comparison Intel 540M

The Intel Core i5-540M is a mid-range dual core CPU for laptops and clocks (due to the Turbo Mode) from 2.53 to 3.06 GHz. Each core is based on the Nehalem (Westmere) micro-architecture. Hyperthreading enables the Dual Core CPU to handle 4 threads at once (for a better usage of the pipeline). Compared to the faster Core i7-620M, the 540M only has 3 MB Level 3 Cache and a lower clock speed.

A feature of the new Core i5-540M is the integrated graphics card called GMA HD and memory controller. Both are on a separate die that is still manufactured in 45nm whereas the CPU die is already manufactured in the new 32nm process.

The performance of the Core i5-540M is on average faster than a 2.8 GHz Core 2 Duo T9800 and in some benchmarks even faster than the fastest Core 2 Duo T9900 (e.g. 3DMark 06 CPU Score). Therefore, the Core i5-540M is a high end dual core cpu which should handle all daily work and gaming tasks. Only the quad core i7 CPUs can be noticeably faster at tasks that require four or more threads (e.g. rendering).

The 32nm cpu cores of the Westmere generation can also process some new instructions to accelerate AES encryptions.

The integrated Intel Graphics Media Accelerator HD (GMA HD) graphics card is known to be clocked up to 500-766 MHz and should be clearly faster than the old GMA 4500MHD. A GeForce 9400M (ION) should still be a faster (especially as Nvidia and ATI cards have a better driver support than Intel up to now). According to rumors, the GMA core will also use the Turbo Mode regulate the clock speed.

The power consumption of 35 Watt TDP (max.) counts for the whole package and therefore it is clearly better than the 35 Watt TDP of the Core 2 Duo T-series (CPU alone). Due to the Turbo Boost, the Core i5 is likely to use the whole TDP of 35 Watt under load and therefore can use more power than a similar specified Core 2 Duo. In Idle mode, the i5 uses clearly less power than the Core 2 Duo CPUs.

ModelIntel Pentium 997Intel Core i5-470UMIntel Core i5-540M
CodenameSandy BridgeArrandaleArrandale
SeriesIntel PentiumIntel Core i5Intel Core i5
Series: Core i5 Arrandale
Intel Pentium B9802.4 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Pentium B9702.3 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Pentium B9602.2 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Pentium B9502.1 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Pentium B9402 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Pentium 997 « 1.6 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Pentium 9871.5 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Pentium 9771.4 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Pentium 9671.3 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Pentium 9571.2 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Core i5-580M2.67 - 3.33 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i5-560M2.67 - 3.2 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i5-480M2.67 - 2.93 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i5-540M2.53 - 3.07 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i5-460M2.53 - 2.8 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i5-520M2.4 - 2.93 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i5-450M2.4 - 2.66 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i5-430M2.26 - 2.53 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i5-560UM1.33 - 2.13 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i5-470UM « 1.33 - 1.87 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i5-540UM1.2 - 2 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i5-520UM1.06 - 1.87 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i5-430UM1.2 - 1.73 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i5-580M2.67 - 3.33 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i5-560M2.67 - 3.2 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i5-480M2.67 - 2.93 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i5-540M « 2.53 - 3.07 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i5-460M2.53 - 2.8 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i5-520M2.4 - 2.93 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i5-450M2.4 - 2.66 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i5-430M2.26 - 2.53 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i5-560UM1.33 - 2.13 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i5-470UM1.33 - 1.87 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i5-540UM1.2 - 2 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i5-520UM1.06 - 1.87 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i5-430UM1.2 - 1.73 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Clock1600 MHz1333 - 1867 MHz2530 - 3066 MHz
L1 Cache128 KB128 KB
L2 Cache512 KB512 KB512 KB
L3 Cache2 MB3 MB3 MB
Cores / Threads2 / 22 / 42 / 4
TDP17 Watt18 Watt35 Watt
Technology32 nm32 nm32 nm
max. Temp.100 °C105 °C
SocketBGA1023BGA1288BGA1288, PGA988
FeaturesHD Graphics, DDR3 Memory Controller, Enhanced Speedstep, Thermal Monitoring, Execute Disable BitIntel HD Graphics 166-500MHz, DDR3-800 Memory Controller, Turbo Boost, Hyper-Threading, Virtualization Technology VT-x, Intel 64, Idle States, Enhanced Speedstep, Thermal Monitoring, Fast Memory Access, Flex Memory Access, Execute Disable BitTurbo Boost, Hyper Threading, Enhanced Speedstep, integrierte GMA HD 733MHz,
iGPUIntel HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge) (350 - 1000 MHz)
Architecturex86x86x86
$134 U.S.$257 U.S.
Announced
Manufacturerark.intel.comark.intel.comark.intel.com
FSB25002500
Transistors382+177 Million382+177 Million
Die Size81+114 mm281+114 mm2

Benchmarks

Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
100%
1 470UM +
min: 1.2     avg: 1.3     median: 1.3 (2%)     max: 1.35 Points
172%
1 540M +
min: 2.16     avg: 2.2     median: 2.2 (3%)     max: 2.29 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
100%
1 470UM +
min: 1906     avg: 1970     median: 1972.5 (12%)     max: 2022 Points
159%
1 540M +
min: 3061     avg: 3141     median: 3132.5 (19%)     max: 3214 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
100%
1 470UM +
min: 3775     avg: 3987     median: 3940 (3%)     max: 4255 Points
178%
1 540M +
min: 6545     avg: 6950     median: 7030.5 (5%)     max: 7211 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
100%
1 470UM +
min: 4611     avg: 4826     median: 4832.5 (3%)     max: 5036 Points
174%
1 540M +
min: 7844     avg: 8349     median: 8408 (5%)     max: 8600 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
100%
1 470UM +
min: 2404     avg: 2459     median: 2455 (3%)     max: 2524 Points
160%
1 540M +
min: 3237     avg: 3785     median: 3938 (5%)     max: 3991 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
100%
1 470UM +
min: 980     avg: 1087     median: 1072.5 (13%)     max: 1222 s
186%
1 540M +
min: 569     avg: 740     median: 577 (7%)     max: 1352 s
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
100%
1 470UM +
min: 31.5     avg: 34.7     median: 34 (7%)     max: 39.34 s
184%
1 540M +
min: 18.1     avg: 18.8     median: 18.5 (4%)     max: 19.9 s
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
100%
1 470UM +
min: 1602     avg: 1684     median: 1689 (4%)     max: 1755 Points
167%
1 540M +
min: 2643     avg: 2814     median: 2826 (6%)     max: 2905 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
100%
1 470UM +
min: 23.95     avg: 25     median: 24 (5%)     max: 28 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
100%
1 470UM +
min: 55     avg: 56.3     median: 55.7 (2%)     max: 58 s
155%
1 540M +
min: 35     avg: 36.2     median: 36 (2%)     max: 37 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
100%
1 470UM +
min: 1297     avg: 1315     median: 1305 (6%)     max: 1353 s
154%
1 540M +
min: 822     avg: 848     median: 850 (4%)     max: 867 s
SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS) - SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS)
100%
1 470UM +
20970 MIPS (10%)
160%
1 540M +
min: 32820     avg: 34953     median: 33495 (16%)     max: 40000 MIPS
SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS) - SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS)
100%
1 470UM +
16180 MFLOPS (12%)
166%
1 540M +
min: 26630     avg: 27546     median: 26815 (21%)     max: 29923 MFLOPS
PCMark 05 - PCMark 05 - Standard
100%
1 470UM +
4329 Points (9%)
150%
1 540M +
min: 6030     avg: 6499     median: 6498.5 (13%)     max: 6967 Points
Windows 7 Experience Index - Win7 CPU
100%
1 470UM +
min: 5.4     avg: 5.5     median: 5.6 (71%)     max: 5.6 Points
119%
1 540M +
min: 5.2     avg: 6.4     median: 6.6 (85%)     max: 6.8 Points
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
100%
1 540M +
min: 7801     avg: 7897     median: 7904 (6%)     max: 7994 Points

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i5-470UM → 0% n=0

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i5-540M → 0% n=0

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.33
log 15. 20:02:15

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 3547 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 1242 +0s ... 0s

#3 checking url part for id 533 +0s ... 0s

#4 redirected to Ajax server, took 1752602535s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#5 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sun, 13 Jul 2025 05:20:07 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#6 composed specs +0.006s ... 0.007s

#7 did output specs +0s ... 0.007s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 3547 +0.001s ... 0.007s

#9 got single benchmarks 3547 +0.004s ... 0.011s

#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 1242 +0.001s ... 0.011s

#11 got single benchmarks 1242 +0.007s ... 0.018s

#12 getting avg benchmarks for device 533 +0.001s ... 0.019s

#13 got single benchmarks 533 +0.009s ... 0.028s

#14 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.029s

#15 min, max, avg, median took s +0.012s ... 0.041s

#16 return log +0s ... 0.041s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)