Intel Core i7-9850H vs Intel Core i7-9750H vs Intel Core i7-8850H

Intel Core i7-9850H

► remove Intel 9850H

The Intel Core i7-9850H is a high-end processor for laptops with six cores based on the Coffee Lake architecture (2019 refresh, CFL-HR). The processor clocks at between 2.6 and 4.6 GHz (4 GHz with 6 cores) and can execute up to twelve threads simultaneously thanks to Hyper-Threading. According to Intel, the CPU is manufactured in an improved 14nm (14nm++) process. Compared to the predecessor, the Core i7-8850H, the 9850H offers only improved clock rates.

The Coffee Lake architecture is similar to Kaby Lake and differs only in the amount of cores (now six cores for the high end versions) and the improved 14nm process (14nm++ according to Intel).

Performance

Due to the two additional cores, performance has increased by almost 50% compared to a similar clocked Kaby Lake processor like the Core i7-7920HQ (3.1 - 4.1 GHz). Single-core performance has not improved since its Kaby Lake predecessor. Compared to the i7-8850H, the performance improved only slightly.

Graphics

The integrated Intel UHD Graphics 630 iGPU is supposed to offer a slightly higher performance as its clock rate has been increased by 50 MHz (rumored). The architecture is identical to that of the Intel HD Graphics 630. We do expect a performance improvement, but as a low-end solution it will probably only display current games smoothly at reduced details - if at all.

Power Consumption

Intel specifies the TDP with 45 watts and therefore the i7 is only suited for big laptops with good cooling solutions. Using cTDP-down, the CPU can also be configured to 35 Watt resulting in a reduced performance.

Intel Core i7-9750H

► remove Intel 9750H

The Intel Core i7-9750H is a high-end processor for laptops with six cores based on the Coffee Lake architecture (2019 refresh, CFL-HR). The processor clocks at between 2.6 and 4.5 GHz (4 GHz with 6 cores) and can execute up to twelve threads simultaneously thanks to Hyper-Threading. According to Intel, the CPU is manufactured in an improved 14nm (14nm++) process. Compared to the predecessor, the Core i7-8750H, the 9750H offers improved clock rates and more L3 cache.

The Coffee Lake architecture is similar to Kaby Lake and differs only in the amount of cores (now max. eight cores for the high end versions) and the improved 14nm process (14nm++ according to Intel).

Performance

Due to the two additional cores, performance has increased by almost 50% compared to a similar clocked Kaby Lake processor like the Core i7-7820HQ (2.9 - 3.9 GHz). Single-core performance has not improved since its Kaby Lake predecessor. As a high-end model, the i7-9850H is suitable for the most demanding applications and games.

Graphics

The integrated Intel UHD Graphics 630 iGPU is supposed to offer a slightly higher performance as its clock rate has been increased by 50 MHz (rumored). The architecture is identical to that of the Intel HD Graphics 630. We do expect a performance improvement, but as a low-end solution it will probably only display current games smoothly at reduced details - if at all.

Power Consumption

Intel specifies the TDP with 45 watts and therefore the i7 is only suited for big laptops with good cooling solutions. Using cTDP-down, the CPU can also be configured to 35 Watt resulting in a reduced performance.

Intel Core i7-8850H

► remove Intel 8850H

The Intel Core i7-8850H is a high-end processor for laptops with six cores based on the Coffee Lake architecture and will be announced early 2018. The processor clocks at between 2.6 and 4.3 GHz (4.1 with 4 cores, 4 GHz with 6 cores) and can execute up to twelve threads simultaneously thanks to Hyper-Threading. According to Intel, the CPU is manufactured in an improved 14nm (14nm++) process.

The Coffee Lake architecture is similar to Kaby Lake and differs only in the amount of cores (now six cores for the high end versions) and the improved 14nm process (14nm++ according to Intel).

Performance

Due to the two additional cores, performance has increased by almost 50% compared to a similar clocked Kaby Lake processor like the Core i7-7920HQ (3.1 - 4.1 GHz). Single-core performance has not improved since its Kaby Lake predecessor. As a high-end model, the i7-8850H is suitable for the most demanding applications and games.

Graphics

The integrated Intel UHD Graphics 630 iGPU is supposed to offer a slightly higher performance as its clock rate has been increased by 50 MHz (rumored). The architecture is identical to that of the Intel HD Graphics 630. We do expect a performance improvement, but as a low-end solution it will probably only display current games smoothly at reduced details - if at all.

Power Consumption

Intel specifies the TDP with 45 watts and therefore the i7 is only suited for big laptops with good cooling solutions. Using cTDP-down, the CPU can also be configured to 35 Watt resulting in a reduced performance.

Intel Core i7-9850HIntel Core i7-9750HIntel Core i7-8850H
Intel Core i7Intel Core i7Intel Core i7
Coffee LakeCoffee LakeCoffee Lake
: Core i7 Coffee Lake
» Intel Core i7-9850H2600 - 4600 MHz6 / 1212 MB
Intel Core i7-9750H2600 - 4500 MHz6 / 1212 MB
Intel Core i7-8850H2600 - 4300 MHz6 / 129 MB
Intel Core i7-8750H2200 - 4100 MHz6 / 129 MB
Intel Core i7-8559U2700 - 4500 MHz4 / 88 MB
Intel Core i7-8557U1700 - 4500 MHz4 / 88 MB
Intel Core i7-9850H2600 - 4600 MHz6 / 1212 MB
» Intel Core i7-9750H2600 - 4500 MHz6 / 1212 MB
Intel Core i7-8850H2600 - 4300 MHz6 / 129 MB
Intel Core i7-8750H2200 - 4100 MHz6 / 129 MB
Intel Core i7-8559U2700 - 4500 MHz4 / 88 MB
Intel Core i7-8557U1700 - 4500 MHz4 / 88 MB
Intel Core i7-9850H2600 - 4600 MHz6 / 1212 MB
Intel Core i7-9750H2600 - 4500 MHz6 / 1212 MB
» Intel Core i7-8850H2600 - 4300 MHz6 / 129 MB
Intel Core i7-8750H2200 - 4100 MHz6 / 129 MB
Intel Core i7-8559U2700 - 4500 MHz4 / 88 MB
Intel Core i7-8557U1700 - 4500 MHz4 / 88 MB
2600 - 4600 MHz2600 - 4500 MHz2600 - 4300 MHz
384 KB384 KB
1.5 MB1.5 MB
12 MB12 MB9 MB
6 / 126 / 126 / 12
45 45 45
14 14 14
FCBGA1440FCBGA1440FCBGA1440
Dual-Channel DDR4 Memory Controller, HyperThreading, AVX, AVX2, Quick Sync, Virtualization, AES-NIDual-Channel DDR4 Memory Controller, HyperThreading, AVX, AVX2, Quick Sync, Virtualization, AES-NIDual-Channel DDR4 Memory Controller, HyperThreading, AVX, AVX2, Quick Sync, Virtualization, AES-NI
iGPUIntel UHD Graphics 630 (350 - 1150 MHz)Intel UHD Graphics 630 (350 - 1150 MHz)Intel UHD Graphics 630 (350 - 1150 MHz)
100 °C
$395 U.S.
Intel Core i7 8850H

Cinebench R15 - CPU Multi 64Bit
min: 961     avg: 1113.9     median: 1108 (25%)     max: 1272 Points
min: 964     avg: 1187.5     median: 1188 (27%)     max: 1306 Points
min: 929     avg: 1127.2     median: 1090 (25%)     max: 1276 Points
Cinebench R15 - CPU Single 64Bit
min: 192     avg: 193.8     median: 193 (89%)     max: 196 Points
min: 170     avg: 183.1     median: 183 (84%)     max: 194 Points
min: 176     avg: 180.4     median: 181 (83%)     max: 185 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - CPU Multi 64Bit
12.5 Points (28%)
min: 11     avg: 12.8     median: 13 (30%)     max: 14 Points
min: 10     avg: 12.9     median: 13 (30%)     max: 14 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - CPU Single 64Bit
2.1 Points (107%)
min: 1     avg: 2.1     median: 2 (100%)     max: 2 Points
min: 1     avg: 1.9     median: 2 (100%)     max: 2 Points
Cinebench R10 - Rendering Single 32Bit
7169 Points (74%)
min: 6659     avg: 6918.7     median: 6970 (72%)     max: 7214 Points
min: 6658     avg: 6757.8     median: 6766 (70%)     max: 6841 Points
Cinebench R10 - Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
31938 Points (49%)
min: 29665     avg: 34246.7     median: 34445 (53%)     max: 36304 Points
min: 31284     avg: 34134     median: 34216 (52%)     max: 36819 Points
Cinebench R10 - Rendering Multiple CPUs 64Bit
42090 Points (55%)
min: 37188     avg: 38074     median: 38074 (50%)     max: 38960 Points
Cinebench R10 - Rendering Single CPUs 64Bit
9224 Points (89%)
min: 9069     avg: 9075     median: 9075 (88%)     max: 9081 Points
wPrime 2.0x - 1024m *
278 seconds (3%)
wPrime 2.0x - 32m *
8.3 seconds (2%)
WinRAR - Result
5621 KB/s (66%)
6631 KB/s (78%)
5922 KB/s (70%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7z b 4
min: 25786     avg: 29713.7     median: 31087 (30%)     max: 32268 MIPS
min: 28512     avg: 32754     median: 33910 (33%)     max: 35174 MIPS
min: 30761     avg: 31802     median: 30851 (30%)     max: 33794 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7z b 4 -mmt1
min: 5020     avg: 5066     median: 5086 (74%)     max: 5092 MIPS
min: 4719     avg: 4918.2     median: 4941 (71%)     max: 5042 MIPS
min: 4558     avg: 4683.7     median: 4689 (68%)     max: 4804 MIPS
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - Pass 2
68.3 fps (2%)
69.6 fps (2%)
min: 64     avg: 71.4     median: 71 (2%)     max: 77 fps
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - Pass 1
201.3 fps (75%)
218.6 fps (81%)
min: 214     avg: 216.1     median: 216 (80%)     max: 218 fps
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - 4k Preset
min: 7     avg: 8.4     median: 9 (30%)     max: 9 fps
min: 7     avg: 8.8     median: 9 (30%)     max: 9 fps
min: 7     avg: 8.1     median: 7 (23%)     max: 9 fps
TrueCrypt - Serpent Mean 100MB
0.8 GB/s (38%)
0.8 GB/s (38%)
0.7 GB/s (37%)
TrueCrypt - Twofish Mean 100MB
1.2 GB/s (40%)
1.3 GB/s (43%)
1.2 GB/s (40%)
TrueCrypt - AES Mean 100MB
7.4 GB/s (37%)
7.3 GB/s (37%)
7.4 GB/s (37%)
Blender 2.79 *
min: 411     avg: 459.3     median: 415 (4%)     max: 552 Seconds
min: 391     avg: 430.5     median: 412 (4%)     max: 486 Seconds
min: 401     avg: 461.7     median: 490 (5%)     max: 494 Seconds
3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 9137     avg: 10056     median: 10056 (67%)     max: 10975 Points
min: 10352     avg: 10923.5     median: 10944 (73%)     max: 11365 Points
min: 7821     avg: 9758.3     median: 10516 (70%)     max: 10938 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
8.2 Seconds (2%)
8.5 Seconds (2%)
8.7 Seconds (2%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
18.1 Seconds (1%)
min: 18     avg: 18.9     median: 18 (1%)     max: 20 Seconds
19.6 Seconds (1%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M *
467.6 Seconds (2%)
min: 450     avg: 471.8     median: 467 (2%)     max: 502 Seconds
483 Seconds (2%)
3DMark Vantage - P CPU no PhysX 1280x1024
min: 26292     avg: 34763.3     median: 37665 (53%)     max: 40333 Points
min: 42226     avg: 44004     median: 43187 (60%)     max: 46599 Points
43508 Points (61%)
3DMark 11 - Performance Physics 1280x720
min: 9987     avg: 11361.3     median: 11512 (59%)     max: 12585 points
min: 9745     avg: 12918.6     median: 13130 (67%)     max: 14337 points
min: 10412     avg: 11788.8     median: 11475 (59%)     max: 13258 points
3DMark - Ice Storm Standard Physics 1280x720
min: 54664     avg: 57802     median: 56870 (37%)     max: 61872 Points
min: 56410     avg: 59125.4     median: 59122 (38%)     max: 60819 Points
min: 49043     avg: 56647.5     median: 58913 (38%)     max: 59720 Points
3DMark - Ice Storm Extreme Physics 1920x1080
min: 56625     avg: 59133.6     median: 59061 (70%)     max: 60985 Points
min: 49398     avg: 53724     median: 53724 (64%)     max: 58050 Points
3DMark - Ice Storm Unlimited Physics 1280x720 offscreen
min: 57195     avg: 59295.6     median: 59517 (69%)     max: 61319 Points
min: 38527     avg: 46152.5     median: 46152 (53%)     max: 53778 Points
3DMark - Cloud Gate Standard Physics 1280x720
min: 8390     avg: 9853     median: 9841 (25%)     max: 11328 Points
min: 8745     avg: 10747.2     median: 11122 (28%)     max: 11708 Points
min: 7210     avg: 9823.4     median: 9689 (25%)     max: 11359 Points
3DMark - Fire Strike Physics 1920x1080
min: 14059     avg: 15801.7     median: 15330 (47%)     max: 18016 Points
min: 14019     avg: 16527.2     median: 16784 (52%)     max: 17788 Points
min: 11232     avg: 15306.8     median: 16278 (50%)     max: 17107 Points
Geekbench 3 - 32 Bit Multi-Core Score
min: 21849     avg: 22850.8     median: 22937 (28%)     max: 23587 Points
Geekbench 3 - 32 Bit Single-Core Score
min: 4143     avg: 4256.7     median: 4252 (87%)     max: 4428 Points
Geekbench 4.0 - Compute OpenCL Score
93883 Points (32%)
Geekbench 4.0 - 64 Bit Multi-Core Score
20077 Points (67%)
min: 24370     avg: 24659.5     median: 24659 (82%)     max: 24949 Points
Geekbench 4.0 - 64 Bit Single-Core Score
5376 Points (90%)
min: 5377     avg: 5569.5     median: 5569 (93%)     max: 5762 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - 64 Bit Single-Core Score
min: 5320     avg: 5509.3     median: 5594 (88%)     max: 5614 Points
min: 4440     avg: 5203.6     median: 5266 (83%)     max: 5476 Points
min: 5153     avg: 5328.7     median: 5369 (85%)     max: 5464 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - 64 Bit Multi-Core Score
min: 18098     avg: 22010.3     median: 23715 (41%)     max: 24218 Points
min: 17054     avg: 22025.5     median: 23223 (40%)     max: 25043 Points
min: 22348     avg: 23020     median: 22915 (40%)     max: 23797 Points
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score *
min: 1009     avg: 1017.4     median: 1014 (2%)     max: 1028 ms
min: 1018     avg: 1106.1     median: 1072 (2%)     max: 1713 ms
min: 1032     avg: 1092     median: 1070 (2%)     max: 1220 ms
Sunspider - 1.0 Total Score *
min: 82     avg: 84.3     median: 84 (1%)     max: 86 ms
76.1 ms (1%)
Octane V2 - Total Score
min: 38630     avg: 39089.7     median: 39091 (75%)     max: 39548 Points
min: 22874     avg: 36049.7     median: 36378 (69%)     max: 39708 Points
min: 33685     avg: 35132.7     median: 35232 (67%)     max: 36544 Points

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i7-9850H → 100%

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i7-9750H → 103%

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i7-8850H → 99%

-
-
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.8.1a
Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)