Samsung Exynos 9810 vs Samsung Exynos 9825

Samsung Exynos 9810

► remove Samsung 9810

The Samsung Exynos 9 9810 is a mobile SoC for smartphones and tablets. It was announced early 2018 and should be integrated in the upcoming Samsung Galaxy S9 series (at least partly). It integrates eight CPU cores (octa core) in two clusters. The performance cluster integrates four Samsung M3 at 2.9 GHz and the power efficiency cluster four small ARM Cortex-A55 cores at 1.9 GHz. The Samsung M3 cores are based on Samsungs own design and now offer a wider pipeline, improved cache memory and bigger caches. This leads to a twice as fast single-core performance and a 40 percent improved multi-core performance according to Samsung (most likely compared to the previous Exynos 8898).

The integrated LTE modem also got a siginifcant upgrade and now supports Cat.18/13 LTE for up to 1.2 Gbps download and 200 Mbps upload. This is achieved with 6x20 MHz CA, 256-QAM in download and 2x20 MHz in upload.

As a GPU, Samsung integrates a ARM Mali G72MP18 (only 18 clusters, compared to the 20 clusters of the predecessor G71MP20). Most likely Samsung increases performance due to a higher core clock of the graphics card.

The memory controller looks similar to the 8898 and supports LPDDR4x 1800 MHz. The video engine now also supports 10 bit videos (as before 4k120 H.265/HEVC, H.264 and VP9 de- and encoding). 

The SoC is produced at Samsung in the new 10nm LPP process (the Exynos 8898 still used the 10nm LPE process) that should also help with some of the performance gains.

Samsung Exynos 9825

► remove Samsung 9825

The Samsung Exynos 9 9825 is a mobile SoC for smartphones and tablets. It was announced in the Samsung Note 10 line in August 2019. The processor integrates three clusters of processor cores with different architectures. Two big Samsung custom M4 cores clock up to 2.73 GHz and deliver peak performance. Two additional ARM Cortex-A75 are also for performance tasks and clock at up to 2.4 GHz (up from 2.3 GHz in the 9820). Finally, four small and power efficient ARM-Cortex A55 cores clock at up to 1.9 GHz are in the third cluster. The different clusters can run simultaneously thanks to DinamIQ.

The integrated LTE modem supports LTE-Advanced Pro Cat.20 (8CA 2 Gbps download, 3CA 316 Mbps upload). The integrated graphics card is a ARM Mali G76MP12 with 12 cores. Thanks to higher clock rates, the G76 is now a bit faster compared to the Exynos 9820.

The performance of the CPU part is positioned in the high end segment for smartphone processors. Due to the slight changes in clock rates, it is very comparable to the older Eynos 9 9820. Maybe in longer load phases, the improved 7nm process helps to maintain clock speeds a bit better. The direct competitor Snapdragon 855 can be left behind in single-core benchmarks like Geekbench and operates on par in multi-core benchmarks.

The SoC is produced at Samsung in the new 7nm LPP (with EUV) process that should improve power efficiency compared to the Exynos 9820.

Samsung Exynos 9810Samsung Exynos 9825
Samsung ExynosSamsung Exynos
Exynos M3 / Cortex-A55Exynos M3 / Cortex-A55
: Exynos Exynos M3 / Cortex-A55
Samsung Exynos 98251900 - 2730 MHz8 / 8
Samsung Exynos 9820 (compare)1900 - 2700 MHz8 / 8
» Samsung Exynos 9810 - 2900 MHz8 / 8
» Samsung Exynos 98251900 - 2730 MHz8 / 8
Samsung Exynos 9820 (compare)1900 - 2700 MHz8 / 8
Samsung Exynos 9810 - 2900 MHz8 / 8
<=2900 MHz1900 - 2730 MHz
8 / 88 / 8
10 7
ARM Mali-G72MP18 GPU , 4x Exynos M3 (max 2.9 GHz), 4x Cortex-A55 (max 1.9 GHz) big.LITTLE, LPDDR4x Memory ControllerARM Mali-G76MP12 GPU , 2x Samsung Mongoose Custom CPU, 2x Cortex-A75, 4x Cortex-A55 big.LITTLE, LPDDR4x Memory Controller
iGPUARM Mali-G72 MP18ARM Mali-G76 MP12
Samsung Exynos 9810Samsung Exynos 9825

3DMark - Ice Storm Unlimited Physics 1280x720 offscreen
100%
9810 +
min: 18756     avg: 23944.3     median: 26226 (30%)     max: 26851 Points
124%
9825 +
min: 31908     avg: 32588     median: 32588 (38%)     max: 33268 Points
3DMark - Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics 2560x1440
100%
9810 +
min: 2546     avg: 2583     median: 2590 (33%)     max: 2613 Points
136%
9825 +
min: 3389     avg: 3519     median: 3519 (44%)     max: 3649 Points
3DMark - Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics 2560x1440
100%
9810 +
min: 2561     avg: 2620     median: 2649 (52%)     max: 2650 Points
137%
9825 +
min: 3498     avg: 3622     median: 3622 (71%)     max: 3746 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Stream
100%
9810 +
min: 895     avg: 1039     median: 1039 (8%)     max: 1183 Points
343%
9825 +
3566 Points (29%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Memory
100%
9810 +
min: 1898     avg: 2001.5     median: 2001 (18%)     max: 2105 Points
277%
9825 +
5534 Points (50%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Floating Point
100%
9810 +
min: 10213     avg: 10328     median: 10328 (18%)     max: 10443 Points
135%
9825 +
13991 Points (24%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Integer
100%
9810 +
min: 5651     avg: 5656     median: 5656 (10%)     max: 5661 Points
125%
9825 +
7083 Points (12%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Total Score
100%
9810 +
min: 6025     avg: 6098.5     median: 6098 (14%)     max: 6172 Points
145%
9825 +
8839 Points (20%)
Geekbench 3 - 64 Bit Multi-Core Score
100%
9810 +
min: 5895     avg: 5915     median: 5915 (16%)     max: 5935 Points
126%
9825 +
7453 Points (20%)
Geekbench 3 - 64 Bit Single-Core Score
100%
9810 +
min: 1961     avg: 1965     median: 1965 (40%)     max: 1969 Points
110%
9825 +
2169 Points (44%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Compute RenderScript Score
100%
9810 +
3835 Points (30%)
Geekbench 4.0 - 64 Bit Multi-Core Score
100%
9810 +
8491 Points (28%)
124%
9825 +
10487 Points (35%)
Geekbench 4.0 - 64 Bit Single-Core Score
100%
9810 +
3786 Points (63%)
135%
9825 +
5109 Points (85%)
Geekbench 4.4 - 64 Bit Single-Core Score
100%
9810 +
min: 1698     avg: 3054     median: 3688 (58%)     max: 3776 Points
123%
9825 +
min: 4549     avg: 4550     median: 4550 (72%)     max: 4551 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - 64 Bit Multi-Core Score
100%
9810 +
min: 8786     avg: 8874.3     median: 8874 (15%)     max: 8963 Points
117%
9825 +
min: 10367     avg: 10425.5     median: 10425 (18%)     max: 10484 Points
Geekbench 5 - 64 Bit Single-Core Score
100%
9825 +
min: 805     avg: 813.5     median: 813 (60%)     max: 822 Points
Geekbench 5 - 64 Bit Multi-Core Score
100%
9825 +
min: 2177     avg: 2184     median: 2184 (13%)     max: 2191 Points
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score *
100%
9810 +
min: 2059     avg: 2282.5     median: 2077 (3%)     max: 2710 ms
min: 2478     avg: 2503     median: 2503 (4%)     max: 2527 ms
Octane V2 - Total Score
100%
9810 +
min: 14663     avg: 14885.3     median: 14760 (28%)     max: 15233 Points
129%
9825 +
min: 18908     avg: 19021.5     median: 19021 (36%)     max: 19135 Points
AnTuTu v6 - Total Score
100%
9810 +
min: 214090     avg: 218110     median: 217950 (74%)     max: 222290 Points
134%
9825 +
min: 291772     avg: 292608     median: 292608 (100%)     max: 293444 Points
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - CPU Tests
100%
9810 +
min: 121702     avg: 154312     median: 154312 (20%)     max: 186922 Points
140%
9825 +
215665 Points (28%)
PCMark for Android - Computer Vision score
100%
9810 +
min: 2385     avg: 2407     median: 2407 (19%)     max: 2429 Points
244%
9825 +
5864 Points (47%)
PCMark for Android - Storage score
100%
9810 +
min: 5088     avg: 5341.5     median: 5341 (18%)     max: 5595 Points
425%
9825 +
22707 Points (78%)
PCMark for Android - Work 2.0 performance score
100%
9810 +
min: 5184     avg: 5264.7     median: 5291 (44%)     max: 5319 Points
168%
9825 +
min: 8801     avg: 8914     median: 8914 (75%)     max: 9027 Points
PCMark for Android - Work performance score
100%
9810 +
min: 5736     avg: 5839.3     median: 5822 (30%)     max: 5960 Points
196%
9825 +
min: 11011     avg: 11412     median: 11412 (58%)     max: 11813 Points

Average Benchmarks Samsung Exynos 9810 → 100%

Average Benchmarks Samsung Exynos 9825 → 162%

-
-
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2019, 2018
v1.8.1a
Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)