Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core i7-9750H vs AMD Ryzen 7 3700U vs AMD Ryzen 7 3750H

Intel Core i7-9750H

► remove from comparison Intel i7-9750H

The Intel Core i7-9750H is a high-end processor for laptops with six cores based on the Coffee Lake architecture (2019 refresh, CFL-HR). The processor clocks at between 2.6 and 4.5 GHz (4 GHz with 6 cores) and can execute up to twelve threads simultaneously thanks to Hyper-Threading. According to Intel, the CPU is manufactured in an improved 14nm (14nm++) process. Compared to the predecessor, the Core i7-8750H, the 9750H offers improved clock rates and a larger L3 cache.

The Coffee Lake architecture is similar to Kaby Lake and differs only in the amount of cores (now max. eight cores for the high end versions) and the improved 14nm process (14nm++ according to Intel).

Performance

Multi-thread performance is most comparable to the Intel Core i9-8950HK, an expensive hexa-core processor of the previous generation. While performance gains over the outgoing 8th Gen H-class chips are unimpressive to say the least, the average Core i7-9750H in our database is much faster than the Ryzen 7 3750H and other H-class Ryzen chips AMD sells as of mid 2019.

Thanks to its decent cooling solution and a long-term power limit of around 70 W, the Walmart EVOO Gaming 17 is among the fastest laptops powered by the 9750H that we know of. It can be 40% faster in CPU-bound workloads than the slowest system featuring the same chip in our database, as of August 2023.

Graphics

The integrated Intel UHD Graphics 630 is supposed to offer a slightly higher performance as its clock rate has been increased by 50 MHz compared to the UHD 630 of the 8750H CPU. The architecture is identical to that of the Intel HD Graphics 630. We do expect a performance improvement, but as a low-end solution it will probably only display current games smoothly at reduced details - if at all.

Power consumption

This Core i7 series chip has a default TDP (also known as the long-term power limit) of 45 W, a value that laptop makers are allowed to reduce slightly, 35 W being the lowest Intel-recommended value. Doing so would result in lower clock speeds and lower performance. Either way, a proper cooling solution is a must for a CPU like this.

The hexa-core Intel CPU is made with one of the old 14 nm Intel processes for below average, as of late 2022, energy efficiency.

AMD Ryzen 7 3700U

► remove from comparison AMD R7 3700U

The AMD Ryzen 7 3700U is a mobile SoC that was announced in January 2019. It combines four Zen+ cores (8 threads) clocked at 2.3 GHz to 4 GHz with a Radeon RX Vega 10 graphics adapter with 10 CUs (640 shaders) clocked at up to 1,400 MHz. Specified at 15 Watt TDP, the SoC is intended for thin mid-range laptops. In Chromebooks, AMD calles the APU AMD Ryzen 7 3700C, but with the exact same specifications (and performance).

The Picasso SoCs use the Zen+ microarchitecture with slight improvements that should lead to a 3% IPC (performance per clock) improvements.

The integrated dual-channel memory controller supports up to DDR4-2400 memory. As the features of the Picasso APUs are the same compared to the Raven Ridge predecessors, we point to our Raven Ridge launch article.

Performance

The average 3700U in our database is a solid mid-range CPU as of early 2021, its multi-thread benchmark scores matching those of the Core i5-10310U and the Core i5-1035G7 (the Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U is found close nearby as well). This Ryzen 7 is good for more than just binge-watching Netflix and writing e-mails. Just do not expect it to be as fast as a Core i7-11800H.

Thanks to its decent cooling solution and sufficiently high CPU power limits, the ThinkPad E595 is among the fastest laptops powered by the 3700U that we know of. It can be up to 50% faster in CPU-bound workloads than the slowest system featuring the same chip in our database, as of August 2023.

Power consumption

This Ryzen 7 series chip has a default TDP of 15 W (also known as the long-term power limit). This can be changed by a laptop manufacturer to anything between 12 W and 35 W with clock speeds and performance changing accordingly as a result. Either way, that's a little too high to allow for passively cooled designs.

Last but not the least, the Ryzen 7 3700U is manufactured on a 12 nm process for lower-than-average, as of mid-2023, energy efficiency.

AMD Ryzen 7 3750H

► remove from comparison AMD R7 3750H

The AMD Ryzen 7 3750H is a mobile SoC that was announced in January 2019. It combines four Zen+ cores (8 threads) clocked at 2.3 - 4 GHz with a Radeon RX Vega 10 graphics card with 10 CUs (640 Shaders) clocked at up to 1400 MHz. Compared to the similar Ryzen 7 3700U, the 3750H offers a 20 Watt higher TDP and therefore a better performance under long periods of load. The integrated dual-channel memory controller supports up to DDR4-2400 memory. As the features of the Picasso APUs are the same compared to the Raven Ridge predecessors, we point to our Raven Ridge launch article.

Picasso SoCs use the Zen+ microarchitecture with slight improvements that should lead to a 3% IPS (performance per clock) improvements.

Performance

The average 3750H in our database is in the same league as the Core i7-10610U, as far as multi-thread benchmark scores are concerned. This is a fairly good result, as of early 2022.

The ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502DU is among the fastest laptops built around the 3750H that we know of. It can be about 20% faster in CPU-bound workloads than the slowest system featuring the same chip in our database, as of August 2023.

Power consumption

This Ryzen 7 has a default TDP of 35 W (also known as the long-term power limit). Laptop manufacturers are free to change that value to anything between 12 W and 35 W with clock speeds and performance changing accordingly. These values are comparatively high, making an active cooling solution pretty much a necessity.

Last but not the least, this AMD APU is built with a rather old, as of late 2022, 12 nm process for lower-than-average energy efficiency.

ModelIntel Core i7-9750HAMD Ryzen 7 3700UAMD Ryzen 7 3750H
SeriesIntel Coffee LakeAMD Picasso (Ryzen 3000 APU)AMD Picasso (Ryzen 3000 APU)
CodenameCoffee Lake-HPicasso-U (Zen+)Picasso (Zen+)
Series: Picasso (Ryzen 3000 APU) Picasso-U (Zen+)
Intel Core i9-9980HK2.4 - 5 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i9-9880H2.3 - 4.8 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i9-8950HK2.9 - 4.8 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Xeon E-2186M2.9 - 4.8 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Xeon E-2276M2.8 - 4.7 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-9850H2.6 - 4.6 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-9750H « 2.6 - 4.5 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Xeon E-2176M2.7 - 4.4 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-8850H2.6 - 4.3 GHz6 / 12 cores9 MB L3
Intel Core i7-8750H2.2 - 4.1 GHz6 / 12 cores9 MB L3
Intel Core i5-9400H2.5 - 4.3 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-9300HF2.4 - 4.1 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-9300H2.4 - 4.1 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-8400H2.5 - 4.2 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-8300H2.3 - 4 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i3-8100H3 GHz4 / 4 cores8 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 3780U2.3 - 4 GHz4 / 8 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 3700U « 2.3 - 4 GHz4 / 8 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 3550H2.1 - 3.7 GHz4 / 8 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 3500U2.1 - 3.7 GHz4 / 8 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 3450U2.1 - 3.5 GHz4 / 8 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 3580U2.1 - 3.7 GHz4 / 8 cores4 MB L3
Clock2600 - 4500 MHz2300 - 4000 MHz2300 - 4000 MHz
L3 Cache12 MB4 MB4 MB
Cores / Threads6 / 124 / 84 / 8
TDP45 Watt15 Watt35 Watt
Technology14 nm12 nm12 nm
max. Temp.100 °C105 °C105 °C
SocketBGA1440FP5FP5
FeaturesLPDDR3-2133/DDR4-2666 RAM, PCIe 3, 8 GT/s bus, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, VMX, SMEP, SMAP, MPX, EIST, TM1, TM2, Hyper-Threading, Turbo, SST, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SGXDDR4-2400, PCIe 3, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SMEDDR4-2400 RAM, PCIe 3, MMX (+), SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A, AES, AVX, AVX2, FMA3, SHA
iGPUIntel UHD Graphics 630 (350 - 1150 MHz)AMD Radeon RX Vega 10 ( - 1400 MHz)AMD Radeon RX Vega 10 ( - 1400 MHz)
Architecturex86x86x86
Announced
Manufacturerark.intel.comwww.amd.comwww.amd.com
L1 Cache384 KB384 KB
L2 Cache2 MB2 MB
Transistors4500 Million4500 Million

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i7-9750H
32.6 pt (45%)
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - R7 3700U
26 pt (36%)
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - R7 3750H
27 pt (37%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
3897 Points (4%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
971 Points (41%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 416     avg: 442.5     median: 442 (49%)     max: 486 Points
min: 285     avg: 339.2     median: 343 (38%)     max: 368 Points
min: 340     avg: 363.8     median: 364.5 (41%)     max: 386 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 2017     avg: 2564     median: 2599 (6%)     max: 3133 Points
min: 1047     avg: 1344     median: 1499 (4%)     max: 1560 Points
min: 1514     avg: 1691     median: 1713 (4%)     max: 1825 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 952     avg: 1182     median: 1188 (7%)     max: 1306 Points
min: 537     avg: 648     median: 672 (4%)     max: 683 Points
min: 672     avg: 743     median: 734 (5%)     max: 805 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 170     avg: 183.7     median: 185.5 (56%)     max: 194 Points
min: 127     avg: 138     median: 139 (42%)     max: 146 Points
min: 135     avg: 143.9     median: 144 (43%)     max: 157 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 11.26     avg: 13     median: 13.1 (17%)     max: 14.11 Points
min: 5.02     avg: 7     median: 7.6 (10%)     max: 7.71 Points
9.2 Points (12%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 1.96     avg: 2.1     median: 2.1 (53%)     max: 2.19 Points
min: 1.23     avg: 1.5     median: 1.6 (40%)     max: 1.67 Points
1.6 Points (41%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
min: 6659     avg: 6923     median: 6970 (42%)     max: 7214 Points
min: 4045     avg: 4411     median: 4410.5 (27%)     max: 4776 Points
min: 4527     avg: 4732     median: 4770 (29%)     max: 4898 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
min: 28251     avg: 33539     median: 34445 (25%)     max: 36304 Points
min: 12881     avg: 15461     median: 15461 (11%)     max: 18041 Points
min: 19290     avg: 20242     median: 20687 (15%)     max: 20750 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
min: 37188     avg: 40129     median: 38960 (27%)     max: 44238 Points
min: 27166     avg: 27205     median: 27205 (19%)     max: 27244 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
min: 9069     avg: 9165     median: 9081 (11%)     max: 9346 Points
min: 7765     avg: 7767     median: 7767 (9%)     max: 7769 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
154.4 s (2%)
450.4 s (5%)
197.1 s (2%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
4.9 s (1%)
13.5 s (3%)
7.4 s (1%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
min: 6160     avg: 6396     median: 6395.5 (10%)     max: 6631 Points
2392 Points (4%)
2866 Points (5%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multli Thread 4 runs
min: 28512     avg: 32357     median: 33303 (19%)     max: 35174 MIPS
min: 12738     avg: 15166     median: 15386.5 (9%)     max: 17153 MIPS
min: 17077     avg: 18318     median: 18689 (11%)     max: 19187 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 4580     avg: 4846     median: 4865 (58%)     max: 5090 MIPS
min: 3038     avg: 3423     median: 3492.5 (42%)     max: 3668 MIPS
min: 3511     avg: 3641     median: 3659 (44%)     max: 3752 MIPS
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
min: 69.6     avg: 70.3     median: 70.3 (25%)     max: 70.9 fps
27.1 fps (9%)
48.6 fps (17%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
min: 211     avg: 214.8     median: 214.8 (50%)     max: 218.6 fps
104.8 fps (24%)
139.4 fps (32%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 7.1     avg: 8.7     median: 8.8 (16%)     max: 10.7 fps
min: 2.76     avg: 3.3     median: 3.3 (6%)     max: 3.9 fps
min: 4.14     avg: 4.3     median: 4.4 (8%)     max: 4.4 fps
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
min: 0.7     avg: 0.7     median: 0.7 (0%)     max: 0.75 GB/s
0.4 GB/s (0%)
0.5 GB/s (0%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
min: 1.2     avg: 1.3     median: 1.3 (22%)     max: 1.3 GB/s
0.6 GB/s (11%)
0.7 GB/s (12%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
min: 7.3     avg: 7.4     median: 7.4 (19%)     max: 7.4 GB/s
3.8 GB/s (10%)
5 GB/s (13%)
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 342.1     avg: 433.3     median: 435.2 (3%)     max: 494.9 Seconds
min: 671     avg: 797     median: 703 (5%)     max: 1018 Seconds
min: 584     avg: 630     median: 633 (4%)     max: 672 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 0.608     avg: 0.6     median: 0.6 (14%)     max: 0.695 sec
min: 0.6902     avg: 0.7     median: 0.7 (15%)     max: 0.723 sec
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 9618     avg: 10722     median: 10791.5 (23%)     max: 11365 Points
4595 Points (10%)
min: 7187     avg: 7715     median: 7431 (16%)     max: 8812 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
min: 8.3     avg: 8.5     median: 8.4 (2%)     max: 8.96 s
12.6 s (3%)
11 s (2%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
min: 18.4     avg: 18.9     median: 18.5 (1%)     max: 20.09 s
29.6 s (1%)
25.7 s (1%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
min: 450.5     avg: 471.8     median: 467.3 (2%)     max: 502 s
748 s (3%)
650 s (3%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
min: 35262     avg: 41819     median: 42706.5 (37%)     max: 46599 Points
25143 Points (22%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 9704     avg: 12766     median: 13028.5 (35%)     max: 14337 Points
min: 5060     avg: 5955     median: 5416 (15%)     max: 7250 Points
min: 6360     avg: 7609     median: 7878 (21%)     max: 8648 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
min: 15356     avg: 56549     median: 58809 (48%)     max: 60819 Points
min: 30752     avg: 31840     median: 31238.5 (25%)     max: 34132 Points
min: 39182     avg: 48304     median: 48251 (39%)     max: 57479 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
min: 53777     avg: 58538     median: 58661 (48%)     max: 61050 Points
min: 30487     avg: 32042     median: 31393 (25%)     max: 34896 Points
min: 44524     avg: 50874     median: 51438 (42%)     max: 56661 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 56756     avg: 59035     median: 58584 (49%)     max: 61319 Points
min: 24397     avg: 31189     median: 30959.5 (26%)     max: 38440 Points
min: 55479     avg: 58242     median: 55515 (47%)     max: 63731 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 8293     avg: 10689     median: 11022 (28%)     max: 11708 Points
min: 2957     avg: 4954     median: 4978 (13%)     max: 7033 Points
min: 5698     avg: 7447     median: 7716 (20%)     max: 8117 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 12438     avg: 16332     median: 16696.5 (30%)     max: 17788 Points
min: 6380     avg: 8272     median: 8698.5 (16%)     max: 9457 Points
min: 10095     avg: 11205     median: 11316 (20%)     max: 11900 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 4620     avg: 6334     median: 6463.5 (27%)     max: 7171 Points
min: 2012     avg: 2427     median: 2224 (9%)     max: 3044 Points
min: 2861     avg: 3318     median: 3344 (14%)     max: 3574 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1117     avg: 1190     median: 1204 (51%)     max: 1251 Points
874 Points (37%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 4859     avg: 5597     median: 5813 (10%)     max: 6262 Points
3537 Points (6%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1105     avg: 1179     median: 1171 (5%)     max: 1248 Points
min: 853     avg: 895     median: 884 (4%)     max: 959 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 4812     avg: 5575     median: 5635 (18%)     max: 6230 Points
min: 3007     avg: 3467     median: 3571.5 (11%)     max: 3718 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 4440     avg: 5238     median: 5266 (53%)     max: 5511 Points
min: 3445     avg: 3785     median: 3843.5 (38%)     max: 4009 Points
min: 3898     avg: 4104     median: 4166 (42%)     max: 4186 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 17054     avg: 22076     median: 22951 (26%)     max: 25043 Points
min: 8907     avg: 10275     median: 10542 (12%)     max: 11107 Points
min: 11396     avg: 12985     median: 13403.5 (15%)     max: 13738 Points
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 5377     avg: 5570     median: 5569.5 (76%)     max: 5762 Points
3247 Points (44%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 24370     avg: 24660     median: 24659.5 (60%)     max: 24949 Points
9117 Points (22%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Multi-Core
min: 21185     avg: 22450     median: 22711.5 (40%)     max: 23587 Points
10238 Points (18%)
min: 14478     avg: 14749     median: 14748.5 (26%)     max: 15019 Points
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Single-Core
min: 4137     avg: 4243     median: 4252.5 (83%)     max: 4428 Points
3003 Points (59%)
min: 3717     avg: 3768     median: 3768 (74%)     max: 3819 Points
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Multi-Core
10881 Points (17%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Single-Core
3354 Points (50%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Stream
7277 Points (59%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Memory
5738 Points (52%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Floating Point
12851 Points (25%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Integer
10434 Points (21%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Total Score
10025 Points (26%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 0     avg: 1048     median: 1071 (1%)     max: 1713 ms
min: 1285     avg: 1321     median: 1299 (2%)     max: 1405 ms
min: 1132     avg: 1170     median: 1160 (1%)     max: 1228 ms
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
min: 82.6     avg: 84.3     median: 84.1 (1%)     max: 86.6 ms
147.3 ms (2%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 22874     avg: 35814     median: 36178 (33%)     max: 39708 Points
min: 23657     avg: 26597     median: 27490 (25%)     max: 28301 Points
min: 29949     avg: 30479     median: 30626 (28%)     max: 30714 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 199     avg: 211.4     median: 208.5 (43%)     max: 231 Points
min: 152     avg: 154     median: 154 (32%)     max: 156 Points
153 Points (32%)
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 61.4     avg: 75.5     median: 72.3 (12%)     max: 96 Watt
min: 43.3     avg: 106.8     median: 95 (16%)     max: 182 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 57.7     avg: 78.5     median: 80.5 (15%)     max: 95.4 Watt
min: 40.7     avg: 68.1     median: 66.4 (12%)     max: 97.1 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
min: 12.4     avg: 15.2     median: 15.3 (11%)     max: 17.6 Points per Watt
min: 8.29     avg: 12     median: 11 (8%)     max: 16.7 Points per Watt

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i7-9750H → 100% n=38

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 7 3700U → 63% n=38

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 7 3750H → 75% n=38

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.26
log 26. 01:06:27

#0 checking url part for id 11352 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 11141 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 11131 +0s ... 0s

#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 25 Apr 2024 05:38:32 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#5 composed specs +0.058s ... 0.059s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.059s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 11352 +0.024s ... 0.083s

#8 got single benchmarks 11352 +0.409s ... 0.492s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 11141 +0.021s ... 0.512s

#10 got single benchmarks 11141 +0.054s ... 0.566s

#11 getting avg benchmarks for device 11131 +0.018s ... 0.584s

#12 got single benchmarks 11131 +0.051s ... 0.635s

#13 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.635s

#14 min, max, avg, median took s +0.74s ... 1.375s

#15 return log +0s ... 1.375s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)