Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Pentium 967 vs Intel Pentium B940

Intel Pentium 967

► remove from comparison

The Intel Pentium 967 is an Ultra Low Voltage (ULV) dual core processor for entry-level laptops. It is based on the Sandy Bridge architecture but many of the features like Turbo Boost, Virtualization (VT-x, VT-d), HyperThreading, AES or Trusted Execution are deactivated. The Pentium 967 integrates a graphics card called Intel HD Graphics that is based on the HD Graphics 2000 and clocked from 350 - 1000 MHz.

The performance of the Pentium 967 should be faster than a similar clocked Arrandale Pentium CPU and therefore faster than a 1.3 GHz Pentium U5600.

The 17W TDP rating includes the integrated GPU and memory controller and therefore the 967 is suited for small subnotebooks.

Intel Pentium B940

► remove from comparison Intel B940

The Intel Pentium B940 is a dual core processor for entry-level laptops. It is based on the Sandy Bridge architecture but many of the features like Turbo Boost for the CPU part, HyperThreading, AES, Virtualization (VT-x and VT-d), Trusted Execution or Intel Quick Sync are deactivated. The Pentium B940 integrates a graphics card called Intel HD Graphics that is based on the HD Graphics 2000 clocked at 650 / 1100 (with Turbo Boost).

The performance of the Pentium B940 should be faster than a similar clocked Arrandale Pentium CPU like the Intel Pentium P6100 due to the architectural changes in the core. In our benchmarks, the B940 was even faster than an old P6200 with 2,1 GHz.

The 35W TDP rating includes the integrated GPU and memory controller.

ModelIntel Pentium 967Intel Pentium B940
SeriesIntel PentiumIntel Pentium
CodenameSandy BridgeSandy Bridge
Series: Pentium Sandy Bridge
Intel Pentium B980 compare2.4 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Pentium B970 compare2.3 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Pentium B960 compare2.2 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Pentium B950 compare2.1 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Pentium B9402 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Pentium 997 compare1.6 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Pentium 987 compare1.5 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Pentium 977 compare1.4 GHz2 / 22 MB
» Intel Pentium 9671.3 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Pentium 957 compare1.2 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Pentium B980 compare2.4 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Pentium B970 compare2.3 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Pentium B960 compare2.2 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Pentium B950 compare2.1 GHz2 / 22 MB
» Intel Pentium B9402 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Pentium 997 compare1.6 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Pentium 987 compare1.5 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Pentium 977 compare1.4 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Pentium 9671.3 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Pentium 957 compare1.2 GHz2 / 22 MB
Clock1300 MHz2000 MHz
L1 Cache128 KB128 KB
L2 Cache512 KB512 KB
L3 Cache2 MB2 MB
Cores / Threads2 / 22 / 2
TDP17 Watt35 Watt
Technology32 nm32 nm
max. Temp.100 °C85 °C
SocketBGA1023rPGA988B
FeaturesHD Graphics, DDR3 Memory Controller, Enhanced Speedstep, Thermal Monitoring, Execute Disable BitHD Graphics, DDR3 Memory Controller
iGPUIntel HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge) (350 - 1000 MHz)Intel HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge) (650 - 1100 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
Announced
ManufacturerIntel Pentium 967Intel Pentium B940
Transistors624 Million
Die Size149 mm2

Benchmarks

Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
100%
967 +
1 Points (1%)
164%
B940 +
1.6 Points (2%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
100%
967 +
1640 Points (13%)
159%
B940 +
min: 2597     avg: 2610     median: 2609.5 (21%)     max: 2622 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
100%
967 +
3038 Points (3%)
167%
B940 +
min: 5047     avg: 5067     median: 5066.5 (6%)     max: 5086 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
100%
967 +
3816 Points (3%)
163%
B940 +
6227 Points (5%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
100%
967 +
2116 Points (12%)
155%
B940 +
3278 Points (18%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
100%
1 967 +
1872 s (22%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
100%
1 967 +
58.6 s (12%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
100%
967 +
1319 Points (3%)
154%
B940 +
min: 2031     avg: 2034     median: 2034 (4%)     max: 2037 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
100%
967 +
30.4 s (7%)
102%
B940 +
19.9 s (4%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
100%
967 +
67.1 s (3%)
101%
B940 +
45.7 s (2%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
100%
1 967 +
1534 s (7%)
SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS) - SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS)
100%
967 +
16130 MIPS (8%)
186%
B940 +
30000 MIPS (14%)
SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS) - SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS)
100%
967 +
9310 MFLOPS (7%)
149%
B940 +
13830 MFLOPS (11%)
Windows 7 Experience Index - Win7 CPU
100%
967 +
4.3 Points (55%)
136%
B940 +
min: 5.8     avg: 5.9     median: 5.9 (75%)     max: 5.9 Points
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
100%
1 B940 +
5071 Points (5%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Pentium 967 → 100% n=11

Average Benchmarks Intel Pentium B940 → 149% n=11

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2022, 2021
v1.19
log 28. 22:08:35

#0 checking url part for id 3334 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 2370 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 24 Nov 2022 12:15:05 +0100 +0s ... 0s

#4 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.003s ... 0.004s

#5 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.006s ... 0.01s

#6 composed specs +0s ... 0.01s

#7 did output specs +0s ... 0.01s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 3334 +0s ... 0.01s

#9 got single benchmarks 3334 +0.007s ... 0.018s

#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 2370 +0s ... 0.018s

#11 got single benchmarks 2370 +0.009s ... 0.027s

#12 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.027s

#13 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.028s

#14 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.028s

#15 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.028s

#16 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.028s

#17 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.029s

#18 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.029s

#19 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.03s

#20 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.031s

#21 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.002s ... 0.032s

#22 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.032s

#23 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.033s

#24 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.034s

#25 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.035s

#26 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.035s

#27 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.036s

#28 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.036s

#29 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.036s

#30 min, max, avg, median took s +0s ... 0.036s

#31 return log +0.004s ... 0.041s

Please share our article, every link counts!
.170
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)