Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Celeron 927UE vs Intel Celeron 1000M vs Intel Celeron 1047UE

Intel Celeron 927UE

► remove from comparison

The Intel Celeron 927UE is an ultra low voltage single core processor for embedded systems. It is based on the Ivy Bridge architecture (3rd generation Core) and features an integrated graphics card (Intel HD Graphics based on the HD Graphics 2500 at 350-900MHz) and a reduced feature set (compared to the faster Core processors). E.g. Turbo Boost, AES, Hyperthreading, Virtualization VT-d, Quick Sync, Wireless Display and Clear Video HD are deactivated. Furthermore, some power saving features may be deactivated, leading to a shorter battery runtime compared to Core i3 processors.

Due to the slow clock speed, the performance is rather limited. Compared to previous generations, the 927UE should be similar fast as a 2.13 GHz Celeron M 560.

Intel Celeron 1000M

► remove from comparison

The Intel Celeron 1000M is an entry level dual core processor clocked at 1.8 GHz. It is based on the Ivy Bridge architecture (3rd generation Core, 22 nm) and features an integrated graphics card (Intel HD Graphics based on the HD Graphics 2500 at 650-1000MHz) and a reduced feature set (compared to the faster Core processors). E.g. Turbo Boost, AES, Hyperthreading, Virtualization VT-d, Quick Sync, Wireless Display and Clear Video HD are deactivated.

Compared to previous generations, the 1000M is just slightly slower than the 2.0 GHz Pentium B940. Like most Ivy Bridge dual cores, the TDP is specified at 35 W.

Intel Celeron 1047UE

► remove from comparison

The Intel Celeron 1047UE is an ultra low voltage dual core processor for embedded systems. It is based on the Ivy Bridge architecture (3rd generation Core) and features an integrated graphics card (Intel HD Graphics based on the HD Graphics 2500 at 350-900MHz) and a reduced feature set (compared to the faster Core processors). E.g. Turbo Boost, AES, Hyperthreading, Virtualization VT-d, Quick Sync, Wireless Display and Clear Video HD are deactivated. Furthermore, some power saving features may be deactivated, leading to a shorter battery runtime compared to Core i3 processors.

Due to the slow clock speed, the performance is rather limited. Compared to previous generations, the 1047UE should be similar fast as a Pentium 987. A TDP of 17 W allows the 1047UE to fit in small form factors.

ModelIntel Celeron 927UEIntel Celeron 1000MIntel Celeron 1047UE
SeriesIntel CeleronIntel CeleronIntel Celeron
CodenameIvy BridgeIvy BridgeIvy Bridge
Series: Celeron Ivy Bridge
Intel Celeron 1020E2.2 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Celeron 1020M2.1 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Celeron 1005M1.9 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Celeron 1000M1.8 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Celeron 1037U1.8 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Celeron 1017U1.6 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Celeron 1007U1.5 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Celeron 1047UE1.4 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Celeron 1019Y1 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Celeron 927UE « 1.5 GHz1 / 1 cores1 MB L3
Intel Celeron 1020E2.2 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Celeron 1020M2.1 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Celeron 1005M1.9 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Celeron 1000M « 1.8 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Celeron 1037U1.8 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Celeron 1017U1.6 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Celeron 1007U1.5 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Celeron 1047UE1.4 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Celeron 1019Y1 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Celeron 927UE1.5 GHz1 / 1 cores1 MB L3
Intel Celeron 1020E2.2 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Celeron 1020M2.1 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Celeron 1005M1.9 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Celeron 1000M1.8 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Celeron 1037U1.8 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Celeron 1017U1.6 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Celeron 1007U1.5 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Celeron 1047UE « 1.4 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Celeron 1019Y1 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Celeron 927UE1.5 GHz1 / 1 cores1 MB L3
Clock1500 MHz1800 MHz1400 MHz
L1 Cache64 KB128 KB128 KB
L2 Cache256 KB512 KB512 KB
L3 Cache1 MB2 MB2 MB
Cores / Threads1 / 12 / 22 / 2
TDP17 Watt35 Watt17 Watt
Technology22 nm22 nm22 nm
max. Temp.100 °C105 °C105 °C
SocketBGArPGA988BBGA
FeaturesIdle States, Enhanced SpeedStep, Thermal MonitoringHD Graphics (650 - 1000 MHz), DDR3 Memory Controller, Enhanced Speedstep, Thermal Monitoring, Execute Disable BitHD Graphics (350 - 900 MHz), DDR3 Memory Controller, Enhanced Speedstep, Thermal Monitoring, Execute Disable Bit
iGPUIntel HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge) (350 - 900 MHz)Intel HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge) (650 - 1000 MHz)Intel HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge) (350 - 900 MHz)
Architecturex86x86x86
$107 U.S.$86 U.S.$134 U.S.
Announced
Manufacturerark.intel.comark.intel.comark.intel.com
Die Size94 mm2

Benchmarks

Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
100%
1 1000M +
1.5 Points (2%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
100%
1 1000M +
0.7 Points (18%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
100%
1 1000M +
2480 Points (15%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
100%
1 1000M +
4757 Points (3%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
100%
1 1000M +
6023 Points (4%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
100%
1 1000M +
3151 Points (4%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
100%
1 1000M +
1314 s (16%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
100%
1 1000M +
41.6 s (8%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
100%
1 1000M +
1285 Points (2%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
100%
1 1000M +
8.5 fps (3%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
100%
1 1000M +
47.2 fps (11%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
100%
1 1000M +
0.1 GB/s (0%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
100%
1 1000M +
0.1 GB/s (2%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
100%
1 1000M +
0.2 GB/s (0%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
100%
1 1000M +
1923 Points (4%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
100%
1 1000M +
21.3 s (5%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
100%
1 1000M +
47.1 s (2%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
100%
1 1000M +
1076 s (5%)
SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS) - SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS)
100%
1 1000M +
22230 MIPS (11%)
SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS) - SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS)
100%
1 1000M +
13410 MFLOPS (10%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
100%
1 1000M +
4757 Points (4%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
100%
1 1000M +
1779 Points (5%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
100%
1 1000M +
13537 Points (11%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
100%
1 1000M +
1214 Points (3%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
100%
1 1000M +
1648 Points (3%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Stream
100%
1 1000M +
4938 Points (40%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Memory
100%
1 1000M +
4298 Points (39%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Floating Point
100%
1 1000M +
3016 Points (6%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Integer
100%
1 1000M +
2848 Points (6%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Total Score
100%
1 1000M +
3405 Points (9%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Celeron 1000M → 0% n=

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.26
log 28. 21:02:42

#0 checking url part for id 3594 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 3717 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 3596 +0s ... 0s

#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 28 Mar 2024 05:35:32 +0100 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#5 composed specs +0.024s ... 0.026s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.026s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 3594 +0.003s ... 0.029s

#8 got single benchmarks 3594 +0.001s ... 0.03s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 3717 +0.003s ... 0.033s

#10 got single benchmarks 3717 +0.016s ... 0.049s

#11 getting avg benchmarks for device 3596 +0.003s ... 0.052s

#12 got single benchmarks 3596 +0s ... 0.053s

#13 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.053s

#14 min, max, avg, median took s +0.136s ... 0.188s

#15 return log +0s ... 0.188s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)