Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Celeron M 925 vs Intel Celeron M 743

Intel Celeron M 925

► remove from comparison

The Intel Celeron 925 is a mobile single core processor for cheap laptops. It is based on the Penryn core (as the Core 2 Duo Dual Core processors) but many features and one core are deactivated. The missing power saving features, like Speedstep, lead to a lower battery runtime (compared to Core 2 Duo powered laptops). Furthermore, features like Virtualization and Trusted Execution are deactivated.

The performance of the single core processor is located in the entry level segment. Due to the missing 2nd core, the performance may suffer when using many applications at once. Otherwise (in synthetic benchmarks), the Celeron M 925 is on par with a low clocked dual core at 1.3 - 1.4 GHz. Compared to current AMD single core versions, like the AMD V-Series V160, the Celeron 925 should be faster due to the larger Level 2 cache and different architecture. On contrast it usually features the faster chipset graphics card by ATI leading to a better overall performance.

Intel Celeron M 743

► remove from comparison

The Intel Celeron M ULV 743 is an ultra low voltage single core processor for small sub-notebooks / laptops. It performs slightly above the Atom single core lineup and is intended to power cheap CULV laptops.

The Celeron M 743 is based on the Penryn core but support only a stripped down feature set. For example Speedstep is not supported leading to a higher idle power consumption than other laptops with Core 2 / Pentium processors in this TDP range. Furthermore, 64 Bit support and Virtualization in hardware are not supported.

 

show full text
ModelIntel Celeron M 925Intel Celeron M 743
SeriesIntel Celeron MIntel Celeron M
CodenamePenrynPenryn
Series: Celeron M Penryn
Intel Celeron M 925 « 2.3 GHz1 / 1 cores
Intel Celeron M 900 compare2.2 GHz1 / 1 cores
Intel Celeron M 763 compare1.4 GHz1 / 1 cores
Intel Celeron M 7431.3 GHz1 / 1 cores
Intel Celeron M 723 compare1.2 GHz1 / 1 cores
Intel Celeron M 722 compare1.2 GHz1 / 1 cores
Intel Celeron M 9252.3 GHz1 / 1 cores
Intel Celeron M 900 compare2.2 GHz1 / 1 cores
Intel Celeron M 763 compare1.4 GHz1 / 1 cores
Intel Celeron M 743 « 1.3 GHz1 / 1 cores
Intel Celeron M 723 compare1.2 GHz1 / 1 cores
Intel Celeron M 722 compare1.2 GHz1 / 1 cores
Clock2300 MHz1300 MHz
FSB800800
L2 Cache1 MB1 MB
Cores / Threads1 / 11 / 1
TDP35 Watt10 Watt
Transistors410 Million410 Million
45 nm45 nm, 0.775 - 1.1 V
Die Size107 mm2107 mm2
max. Temp.105 °C100 °C
SocketPGA478BGA965
FeaturesVT, 64 Bit, EIST, eX Bit
Architecturex86x86
$70 U.S.$107 U.S.
Announced
Manufacturerark.intel.comark.intel.com
L1 Cache64 KB

Benchmarks

Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
100%
1 743 +
min: 1230     avg: 1303     median: 1324 (8%)     max: 1356 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
100%
1 743 +
1398 Points (2%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
100%
1 743 +
3886 s (46%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
100%
1 743 +
121.8 s (25%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
100%
1 743 +
min: 557     avg: 582     median: 581.5 (1%)     max: 606 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
100%
1 743 +
min: 41     avg: 41.9     median: 41.9 (9%)     max: 42.7 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
100%
1 743 +
min: 95     avg: 98.5     median: 98.5 (4%)     max: 102 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
100%
1 743 +
2252 s (10%)
SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS) - SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS)
100%
1 743 +
min: 5120     avg: 5607     median: 5606.5 (3%)     max: 6093 MIPS
SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS) - SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS)
100%
1 743 +
min: 4410     avg: 4571     median: 4571 (4%)     max: 4732 MFLOPS
PCMark 05 - PCMark 05 - Standard
100%
1 743 +
1913 Points (4%)
Windows 7 Experience Index - Win7 CPU
100%
1 743 +
3.1 Points (40%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Celeron M 743 → 0% n=

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.26
log 25. 14:50:33

#0 checking url part for id 1604 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 495 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 25 Apr 2024 05:38:32 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 composed specs +0.013s ... 0.014s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.014s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 1604 +0.002s ... 0.017s

#7 got single benchmarks 1604 +0.008s ... 0.025s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 495 +0.003s ... 0.028s

#9 got single benchmarks 495 +0.016s ... 0.044s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.044s

#11 min, max, avg, median took s +0.04s ... 0.084s

#12 return log +0.025s ... 0.109s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)