Intel Celeron M 900 vs Intel Celeron M 743

Intel Celeron M 900

► remove

The Intel Celeron 900 is a mobile single core processor for cheap laptops. It is based on the Penryn core (as the Core 2 Duo Dual Core processors) but many features and one core are deactivated. The missing power saving features, like Speedstep, lead to a lower battery runtime (compared to Core 2 Duo powered laptops). Furthermore, features like Virtualization and Trusted Execution are deactivated.

The performance of the single core processor is located in the entry level segment. Due to the missing 2nd core, the performance may suffer when using many applications at once. Otherwise (in synthetic benchmarks), the Celeron M 900 is on par with a 1.3 GHz Athlon II Neo K325. The similar clocked AMD V-Series V120 should be slower due to the smaller Cache and different architecture. On contrast it usually features the faster chipset graphics card by ATI leading to a better overall performance.

Intel Celeron M 743

► remove

The Intel Celeron M ULV 743 is an ultra low voltage single core processor for small sub-notebooks / laptops. It performs slightly above the Atom single core lineup and is intended to power cheap CULV laptops.

The Celeron M 743 is based on the Penryn core but support only a stripped down feature set. For example Speedstep is not supported leading to a higher idle power consumption than other laptops with Core 2 / Pentium processors in this TDP range. Furthermore, 64 Bit support and Virtualization in hardware are not supported.

 

Intel Celeron M 900Intel Celeron M 743
Intel Celeron MIntel Celeron M
PenrynPenryn
: Celeron M Penryn
Intel Celeron M 925 (compare)2300 MHz1 / 1
» Intel Celeron M 9002200 MHz1 / 1
Intel Celeron M 763 (compare)1400 MHz1 / 1
Intel Celeron M 7431300 MHz1 / 1
Intel Celeron M 723 (compare)1200 MHz1 / 1
Intel Celeron M 722 (compare)1200 MHz1 / 1
Intel Celeron M 925 (compare)2300 MHz1 / 1
Intel Celeron M 9002200 MHz1 / 1
Intel Celeron M 763 (compare)1400 MHz1 / 1
» Intel Celeron M 7431300 MHz1 / 1
Intel Celeron M 723 (compare)1200 MHz1 / 1
Intel Celeron M 722 (compare)1200 MHz1 / 1
2200 MHz1300 MHz
800800
1 MB1 MB
1 / 11 / 1
35 10
410 410
45 45 0.775 - 1.1 V
107 mm2107 mm2
105 °C100 °C
PGA478BGA965
VT, 64 Bit, EIST, eX Bit
$70 U.S.$107 U.S.
Intel Celeron M 900Intel Celeron M 743
64 KB

Cinebench R10 - Rendering Single 32Bit
100%
900 +
min: 2062     avg: 2101     median: 2101 (23%)     max: 2140 Points
63%
743 +
min: 1230     avg: 1303.3     median: 1324 (14%)     max: 1356 Points
Cinebench R10 - Rendering Single CPUs 64Bit
100%
743 +
1398 Points (14%)
wPrime 2.0x - 1024m *
100%
743 +
3886.4 seconds (46%)
wPrime 2.0x - 32m *
100%
743 +
121.8 seconds (25%)
3DMark 06 - CPU
100%
900 +
1000 Points (7%)
58%
743 +
min: 557     avg: 581.5     median: 581.5 (4%)     max: 606 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
100%
900 +
min: 27.8     avg: 33.9     median: 33.9 (7%)     max: 40 Seconds
98%
743 +
min: 41     avg: 41.9     median: 41.9 (9%)     max: 42.7 Seconds
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
100%
900 +
min: 67     avg: 81.5     median: 81.5 (3%)     max: 96 Seconds
99%
743 +
min: 95     avg: 98.5     median: 98.5 (4%)     max: 102 Seconds
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M *
100%
900 +
2000 Seconds (9%)
99%
743 +
2252 Seconds (10%)
SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS)
100%
900 +
9400 MIPS (4%)
60%
743 +
min: 5120     avg: 5606.5     median: 5606.5 (3%)     max: 6093 MIPS
SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS)
100%
900 +
7990 MFLOPS (6%)
57%
743 +
min: 4410     avg: 4571     median: 4571 (4%)     max: 4732 MFLOPS
PCMark 05 - Standard 1024x768
100%
900 +
2586 Points (16%)
74%
743 +
1913 Points (12%)
Windows 7 Experience Index - Processor
100%
743 +
3.1 points (40%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Celeron M 900 → 100%

Average Benchmarks Intel Celeron M 743 → 84%

-
-
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2019, 2018
v1.8.1a
Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)