Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Celeron M 900 vs Intel Celeron M 743 vs Intel Celeron M 763

Intel Celeron M 900

► remove from comparison

The Intel Celeron 900 is a mobile single core processor for cheap laptops. It is based on the Penryn core (as the Core 2 Duo Dual Core processors) but many features and one core are deactivated. The missing power saving features, like Speedstep, lead to a lower battery runtime (compared to Core 2 Duo powered laptops). Furthermore, features like Virtualization and Trusted Execution are deactivated.

The performance of the single core processor is located in the entry level segment. Due to the missing 2nd core, the performance may suffer when using many applications at once. Otherwise (in synthetic benchmarks), the Celeron M 900 is on par with a 1.3 GHz Athlon II Neo K325. The similar clocked AMD V-Series V120 should be slower due to the smaller Cache and different architecture. On contrast it usually features the faster chipset graphics card by ATI leading to a better overall performance.

Intel Celeron M 743

► remove from comparison

The Intel Celeron M ULV 743 is an ultra low voltage single core processor for small sub-notebooks / laptops. It performs slightly above the Atom single core lineup and is intended to power cheap CULV laptops.

The Celeron M 743 is based on the Penryn core but support only a stripped down feature set. For example Speedstep is not supported leading to a higher idle power consumption than other laptops with Core 2 / Pentium processors in this TDP range. Furthermore, 64 Bit support and Virtualization in hardware are not supported.

 

Intel Celeron M 763

► remove from comparison

The Intel Celeron M ULV 763 is an ultra low voltage single core processor for small sub-notebooks / laptops. It performs slightly above the Atom single core lineup and is intended to power cheap CULV laptops.

The Celeron M 763 is based on the Penryn core but support only a stripped down feature set. For example Speedstep is not supported leading to a higher idle power consumption than other laptops with Core 2 / Pentium processors in this TDP range. Furthermore, 64 Bit support and Virtualization in hardware are not supported.

show full text
ModelIntel Celeron M 900Intel Celeron M 743Intel Celeron M 763
SeriesIntel Celeron MIntel Celeron MIntel Celeron M
CodenamePenrynPenrynPenryn
Series: Celeron M Penryn
Intel Celeron M 9252.3 GHz1 / 1 cores
Intel Celeron M 900 « 2.2 GHz1 / 1 cores
Intel Celeron M 7631.4 GHz1 / 1 cores
Intel Celeron M 7431.3 GHz1 / 1 cores
Intel Celeron M 7231.2 GHz1 / 1 cores
Intel Celeron M 7221.2 GHz1 / 1 cores
Intel Celeron M 9252.3 GHz1 / 1 cores
Intel Celeron M 9002.2 GHz1 / 1 cores
Intel Celeron M 7631.4 GHz1 / 1 cores
Intel Celeron M 743 « 1.3 GHz1 / 1 cores
Intel Celeron M 7231.2 GHz1 / 1 cores
Intel Celeron M 7221.2 GHz1 / 1 cores
Intel Celeron M 9252.3 GHz1 / 1 cores
Intel Celeron M 9002.2 GHz1 / 1 cores
Intel Celeron M 763 « 1.4 GHz1 / 1 cores
Intel Celeron M 7431.3 GHz1 / 1 cores
Intel Celeron M 7231.2 GHz1 / 1 cores
Intel Celeron M 7221.2 GHz1 / 1 cores
Clock2200 MHz1300 MHz1400 MHz
FSB800800800
L2 Cache1 MB1 MB1 MB
Cores / Threads1 / 11 / 11 / 1
TDP35 Watt10 Watt10 Watt
Transistors410 Million410 Million410 Million
Technology45 nm45 nm, 0.775 - 1.1 V45 nm
Die Size107 mm2107 mm2107 mm2
max. Temp.105 °C100 °C100 °C
SocketPGA478BGA965BGA965
FeaturesVT, 64 Bit, EIST, eX Bit
Architecturex86x86x86
$70 U.S.$107 U.S.$107 U.S.
Announced
ManufacturerIntel Celeron M 900Intel Celeron M 743Intel Celeron M 763
L1 Cache64 KB64 KB

Benchmarks

Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
100%
1 900 +
min: 2062     avg: 2101     median: 2101 (13%)     max: 2140 Points
63%
1 743 +
min: 1230     avg: 1303     median: 1324 (8%)     max: 1356 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
100%
1 743 +
1398 Points (8%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
100%
1 743 +
3886 s (46%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
100%
1 743 +
121.8 s (25%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
100%
1 900 +
1000 Points (2%)
58%
1 743 +
min: 557     avg: 582     median: 581.5 (1%)     max: 606 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
100%
1 900 +
min: 27.8     avg: 33.9     median: 33.9 (7%)     max: 40 s
98%
1 743 +
min: 41     avg: 41.9     median: 41.9 (9%)     max: 42.7 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
100%
1 900 +
min: 67     avg: 81.5     median: 81.5 (3%)     max: 96 s
99%
1 743 +
min: 95     avg: 98.5     median: 98.5 (4%)     max: 102 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
100%
1 900 +
2000 s (9%)
99%
1 743 +
2252 s (10%)
SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS) - SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS)
100%
1 900 +
9400 MIPS (4%)
60%
1 743 +
min: 5120     avg: 5607     median: 5606.5 (3%)     max: 6093 MIPS
SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS) - SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS)
100%
1 900 +
7990 MFLOPS (6%)
57%
1 743 +
min: 4410     avg: 4571     median: 4571 (4%)     max: 4732 MFLOPS
PCMark 05 - PCMark 05 - Standard
100%
1 900 +
2586 Points (5%)
74%
1 743 +
1913 Points (4%)
Windows 7 Experience Index - Win7 CPU
100%
1 743 +
3.1 Points (40%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Celeron M 900 → NAN% n=

Average Benchmarks Intel Celeron M 743 → NAN% n=

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.22
log 07. 10:33:47

#0 checking url part for id 478 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 495 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 1606 +0s ... 0s

#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Fri, 02 Jun 2023 13:55:08 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#5 composed specs +0.024s ... 0.025s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.025s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 478 +0.002s ... 0.027s

#8 got single benchmarks 478 +0.026s ... 0.052s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 495 +0.002s ... 0.054s

#10 got single benchmarks 495 +0.013s ... 0.067s

#11 getting avg benchmarks for device 1606 +0.001s ... 0.069s

#12 got single benchmarks 1606 +0s ... 0.069s

#13 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.069s

#14 min, max, avg, median took s +0.045s ... 0.114s

#15 return log +0s ... 0.114s

Please share our article, every link counts!
.170
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)