Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Celeron 887 vs Intel Celeron 797 vs Intel Celeron B820

Intel Celeron 887

► remove from comparison

The Intel Celeron 887 is an Ultra Low Voltage (ULV) dual core processor for entry-level laptops. It is based on the Sandy Bridge architecture but many of the features like Turbo Boost, AES, VT-d or HyperThreading are deactivated. The Celeron 887 integrates a graphics card called Intel HD Graphics that is based on the HD Graphics 2000 and clocked at 350 to 1000 MHz.

The performance of the Celeron 887 is similar to an identical clocked Pentium CPU like the Pentium 987.

The 17W TDP rating includes the integrated GPU and memory controller and therefore the 877 is suited for small subnotebooks.

Intel Celeron 797

► remove from comparison

The Intel Celeron 797 is a single-core ULV processor for entry level laptops. It is based on the Sandy Bridge architecture (2nd generation Core) and features an integrated graphics card (most likely Intel HD Graphics based on the HD Graphics 2000 at 350-950MHz) and a reduced feature set (compared to the faster Core processors). E.g. Turbo Boost, AES, Hyperthreading, Virtualization VT-d, Quick Sync, Wireless Display and Clear Video HD are deactivated. 

Due to the slow clock speed, the performance is rather limited. Compared to older processors, the 797 should be similar fast as a Celeron M 540 clocked at 1.86 GHz.

Intel Celeron B820

► remove from comparison

The Intel Celeron B820 is a dual core processor for entry level laptops. It is based on the Sandy Bridge architecture (2nd generation Core) and features an integrated graphics card (Intel HD Graphics based on the HD Graphics 2000 at 650-1050MHz) and a reduced feature set (compared to the faster Core processors). E.g. Turbo Boost, AES, Hyperthreading, Virtualization VT-d, Quick Sync, Wireless Display and Clear Video HD are deactivated. Furthermore, some power saving features may be deactivated, leading to a shorter battery runtime compared to Core i3 processors.

Due to the slow clock speed, the performance is rather limited. Compared to an AMD Turion II processor, the B810 should be similar fast as a P520.

The integrated dual channel DDR3-1066/1333 memory controller supports up to 16GB.

ModelIntel Celeron 887Intel Celeron 797Intel Celeron B820
SeriesIntel CeleronIntel CeleronIntel Celeron
CodenameSandy BridgeSandy BridgeSandy Bridge
Series: Celeron Sandy Bridge
Intel Celeron B8401.9 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron B8301.8 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron B8201.7 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron B8151.6 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron B8101.6 GHz2 / 22 MB
» Intel Celeron 8871.5 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron B8001.5 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron 8771.4 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron 8671.3 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron B7301.8 GHz1 / 21.5 MB
Intel Celeron 8471.1 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron 8071.5 GHz1 / 21.5 MB
Intel Celeron B7201.7 GHz1 / 11.5 MB
Intel Celeron B7101.6 GHz1 / 11.5 MB
Intel Celeron 7971.4 GHz1 / 11.5 MB
Intel Celeron B8401.9 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron B8301.8 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron B8201.7 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron B8151.6 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron B8101.6 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron 8871.5 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron B8001.5 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron 8771.4 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron 8671.3 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron B7301.8 GHz1 / 21.5 MB
Intel Celeron 8471.1 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron 8071.5 GHz1 / 21.5 MB
Intel Celeron B7201.7 GHz1 / 11.5 MB
Intel Celeron B7101.6 GHz1 / 11.5 MB
» Intel Celeron 7971.4 GHz1 / 11.5 MB
Intel Celeron B8401.9 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron B8301.8 GHz2 / 22 MB
» Intel Celeron B8201.7 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron B8151.6 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron B8101.6 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron 8871.5 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron B8001.5 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron 8771.4 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron 8671.3 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron B7301.8 GHz1 / 21.5 MB
Intel Celeron 8471.1 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron 8071.5 GHz1 / 21.5 MB
Intel Celeron B7201.7 GHz1 / 11.5 MB
Intel Celeron B7101.6 GHz1 / 11.5 MB
Intel Celeron 7971.4 GHz1 / 11.5 MB
Clock1500 MHz1400 MHz1700 MHz
L1 Cache128 KB64 KB128 KB
L2 Cache512 KB256 KB512 KB
L3 Cache2 MB1.5 MB2 MB
Cores / Threads2 / 21 / 12 / 2
TDP17 Watt35 Watt35 Watt
Technology32 nm32 nm32 nm
max. Temp.100 °C100 °C100 °C
SocketBGA1023BGA1023PGA988
FeaturesHD Graphics, DDR3 Memory Controller, Enhanced Speedstep, Thermal Monitoring, Execute Disable BitHD Graphics, DDR3 Memory Controller, Enhanced Speedstep, Thermal Monitoring, Execute Disable BitIdle States, Enhanced SpeedStep, Thermal Monitoring, Execute Disable Bit
iGPUIntel HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge) (350 - 1000 MHz)Intel HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge) (350 - 950 MHz)Intel HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge) (650 - 1050 MHz)
Architecturex86x86x86
$86 U.S.$86 U.S.
Announced
ManufacturerIntel Celeron 887Intel Celeron 797

Benchmarks

Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
100%
1 887 +
1.1 Points (2%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
100%
1 887 +
0.6 Points (2%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
100%
1 887 +
1877 Points (15%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
100%
1 887 +
3597 Points (4%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
100%
1 887 +
4497 Points (3%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
100%
1 887 +
2362 Points (13%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
100%
1 887 +
1626 s (19%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
100%
1 887 +
48 s (10%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
100%
1 887 +
986 Points (6%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
100%
1 887 +
0 GB/s (0%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
100%
1 887 +
0.1 GB/s (0%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
100%
1 887 +
0.1 GB/s (0%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
100%
1 887 +
1414 Points (3%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
100%
1 887 +
28 s (6%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
100%
1 887 +
64 s (3%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
100%
1 887 +
1343 s (6%)
Windows 7 Experience Index - Win7 CPU
100%
1 887 +
5.1 Points (65%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
100%
1 887 +
3383 Points (3%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Celeron 887 → NAN% n=

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.22
log 09. 03:59:20

#0 checking url part for id 3348 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 3009 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 3362 +0s ... 0s

#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Wed, 07 Dec 2022 16:40:39 +0100 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#5 composed specs +0.021s ... 0.022s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.022s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 3348 +0.002s ... 0.023s

#8 got single benchmarks 3348 +0.008s ... 0.031s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 3009 +0.002s ... 0.033s

#10 got single benchmarks 3009 +0s ... 0.033s

#11 getting avg benchmarks for device 3362 +0.001s ... 0.035s

#12 got single benchmarks 3362 +0.009s ... 0.043s

#13 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.043s

#14 min, max, avg, median took s +0.037s ... 0.081s

#15 return log +0s ... 0.081s

Please share our article, every link counts!
.170
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)