ERROR: No CPU found with the ID:840

getCPUInfos: Perhaps the translation is missing or the German CPU is not selected in the page header (or a wrong one is selected) Intel Core i7-840QM vs vs HiSilicon k3v2 Hi3620
Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core i7-840QM vs vs HiSilicon k3v2 Hi3620

Intel Core i7-840QM

► remove from comparison Intel 840QM

The Intel Core i7 840QM is a high end quad core CPU in 2010. It features 4 cores (quad core CPU) and Hyperthreading. Therefore, 8 threads can be worked on simultaneously.

Because of the Turbo Mode, the CPU is clocked with up to 3.2 GHz (if only one core is used, 2.93 for two cores, and 2 ghz with 4 cores) and therefore can perform very well in single core applications like older games.

The Core i7 line has an integrated memory controller for DDR3 bars (1066 or 1333) supporting a maximum of 8 GB. Therefore, the memory performance is very good (compared to older CPUs with external memory controllers). Still, this also leads to the higher TDP of the whole chip. ECC memory is not supported by the 840QM.

The Core micro-architecture is still very similar to the one used in the Core 2 CPUs, therefore the performance per MHz (neglecting the integrated memory controller, hyperthreading and Turbo Boost) is similar.

The power consumption of up to 45 Watt (TDP) is quite high for a laptop CPU and because of the Turbo Mode, the power consumption should reach these high values. Therefore, the CPU is only suited for large laptops.

HiSilicon k3v2 Hi3620

► remove from comparison

Coretex A9 Quad-Core - max 1.5 GHz, im Huawei Mediapad 10 FHD mit 1.2 GHz

ModelIntel Core i7-840QMHiSilicon k3v2 Hi3620
SeriesIntel Core i7
CodenameClarksfield
Series:
Intel Core i7-940XM2.13 - 3.33 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i7-920XM2 - 3.2 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i7-840QM « 1.86 - 3.2 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i7-820QM1.73 - 3.06 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i7-740QM1.73 - 2.93 GHz4 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i7-720QM1.6 - 2.8 GHz4 / 8 cores6 MB L3
HiSilicon Kirin 9000W1.53 - 2.49 GHz12 / 12 cores
UNISOC Tiger T3101.8 - 2 GHz4 / 4 cores
Rockchip RK32881.8 GHz4 / 4 cores
Apple A6x1.4 GHzcores
Apple A61 GHzcores
Apple S52 / 2 cores
HiSilicon k3v2 Hi3620 « 1.2 GHz4 / 4 cores
Rockchip RK3066 1.5 GHz1.5 GHz2 / 2 cores
Amlogic AML8726-MX1.5 GHz2 / 2 cores
Rockchip RK31681.2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Rockchip RK2918 1.2 GHz1.2 GHz1 / 1 cores
ARM Cortex A8 1.2 GHz1.2 GHz1 / 1 cores
Telechips TCC8803 1GHz1 GHz1 / 1 cores
Loongson 2F 900MHz0.9 GHz1 / 1 cores
CSR86700.08 GHzcores
ARM Cortex-M4 cores
HiSilicon Hi6262 cores
DK3.5+STcores
unknown cores
Clock1860 - 3200 MHz1200 MHz
FSB2500
L1 Cache256 KB
L2 Cache1 MB
L3 Cache8 MB
Cores / Threads4 / 84 / 4
TDP45 Watt
Transistors774 Million
Technology45 nm40 nm
Die Size296 mm2
max. Temp.100 °C
SocketRPGA989
Featuresintegrated DDR3-1066/1333 dual-channel memory controller, Turbo Boost, Hyper Threading, Virtualization Technology VT-x / VT-d, Trusted Execution Technology, Intel 64, Idel States, Enhanced Speedstep, Thermal Monitoring, Execute Disable BitARMv7
Architecturex86ARM
$568 U.S.
Announced
Manufacturerark.intel.com

Benchmarks

Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
100%
1 840QM +
min: 3.21     avg: 3.3     median: 3.3 (4%)     max: 3.45 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
100%
1 840QM +
min: 3354     avg: 3426     median: 3438.5 (21%)     max: 3474 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
100%
1 840QM +
min: 9007     avg: 9316     median: 9266 (7%)     max: 9726 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
100%
1 840QM +
min: 11085     avg: 11521     median: 11513 (8%)     max: 11857 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
100%
1 840QM +
min: 4083     avg: 4200     median: 4199 (5%)     max: 4319 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
100%
1 840QM +
min: 476.7     avg: 1014     median: 1282 (15%)     max: 1284 s
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
100%
1 840QM +
min: 15.78     avg: 32     median: 40 (8%)     max: 40.2 s
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
100%
1 840QM +
min: 3435     avg: 3519     median: 3531.5 (8%)     max: 3577 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
100%
1 840QM +
min: 13     avg: 13.1     median: 13 (3%)     max: 13.26 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
100%
1 840QM +
min: 29     avg: 29.4     median: 29 (1%)     max: 30.11 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
100%
1 840QM +
min: 728     avg: 734     median: 737 (3%)     max: 738 s
SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS) - SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS)
100%
1 840QM +
54820 MIPS (26%)
SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS) - SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS)
100%
1 840QM +
38190 MFLOPS (29%)
Windows 7 Experience Index - Win7 CPU
100%
1 840QM +
7.2 Points (92%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
100%
1 840QM +
min: 12224     avg: 14498     median: 12238 (11%)     max: 19033 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
100%
1 840QM +
4686 Points (13%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
min: 3209     avg: 4477     median: 4894 (4%)     max: 5167 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
min: 5354     avg: 5357     median: 5357 (4%)     max: 5360 Points
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Multi-Core
1094 Points (2%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Single-Core
327 Points (6%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Stream
min: 439     avg: 489.9     median: 500 (4%)     max: 547 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Memory
min: 940     avg: 1187     median: 1218 (11%)     max: 1290 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Floating Point
min: 1793     avg: 2360     median: 2351 (5%)     max: 2731 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Integer
min: 1000     avg: 1317     median: 1275 (3%)     max: 1591 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Total Score
min: 1209     avg: 1573     median: 1557 (4%)     max: 1819 Points
Linpack Android / IOS - Linpack Multi Thread
min: 92.3     avg: 133.3     median: 138.1 (5%)     max: 151.8 MFLOPS
Linpack Android / IOS - Linpack Single Thread
min: 37.8     avg: 44.2     median: 46.6 (5%)     max: 48.71 MFLOPS
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
26477 ms (31%)
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
min: 856     avg: 2197     median: 1610 (18%)     max: 4026 ms
Sunspider - Sunspider 0.9.1 Total Score *
min: 1522     avg: 1643     median: 1540 (15%)     max: 2080 ms
Quadrant Standard Edition 2.0 - Quadrant Standard 2.0 Total Score
min: 4404     avg: 4736     median: 4736 (11%)     max: 5068 points
AnTuTu v3 - AnTuTu v3 CPU
min: 4820     avg: 5667     median: 5662 (37%)     max: 6713 Points
AnTuTu v4 - AnTuTu v4 Total Score
14434 Points (34%)
AndEBench - AndEBench Java
min: 92     avg: 191     median: 191 (6%)     max: 290 Iter./s
AndEBench - AndEBench Native
min: 8740     avg: 8897     median: 8897 (29%)     max: 9054 Iter./s
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 CPU Tests
min: 8223     avg: 8737     median: 8678 (1%)     max: 9118 Points

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i7-840QM → 0% n=

Average Benchmarks HiSilicon k3v2 Hi3620 → 0% n=

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.26
log 19. 13:02:10

#0 checking url part for id 975 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 840 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 3613 +0s ... 0s

#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Fri, 19 Apr 2024 05:38:49 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#5 composed specs +0.074s ... 0.074s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.075s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 975 +0.003s ... 0.077s

#8 got single benchmarks 975 +0.017s ... 0.094s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 840 +0.002s ... 0.097s

#10 got single benchmarks 840 +0s ... 0.097s

#11 getting avg benchmarks for device 3613 +0.002s ... 0.1s

#12 got single benchmarks 3613 +0.015s ... 0.115s

#13 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.115s

#14 min, max, avg, median took s +0.096s ... 0.211s

#15 return log +0s ... 0.211s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)