Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core i5-8265U vs Intel Core i7-8565U vs Intel Core i7-8665U

Intel Core i5-8265U

► remove from comparison

The Intel Core i5-8265U is a power efficient quad-core SoC for notebooks and Ultrabooks based on the Whiskey Lake generation and will probably be announced in August 2018. Compared to the similar named Kaby Lake-R processors (e.g. Core i5-8250U), the Whiskey Lake CPUs are now produced in a further improved 14nm process (14nm++) and offer higher clock speeds. The architecture and features are the same. The i5-8265U offers e.g. high Turbo clock speeds of 3,9 GHz (versus 3,4 GHz of the i5-8250U) for a single core (3.8 for two cores, 3.7 GHz for all four cores). The integrated GPU is still named Intel UHD Graphics 620 and the dual-channel memory controller still supports the same RAM speeds as Kaby-Lake-R (DDR4-2400 / LPDDR3-2133). Thermal Velocity Boost is not supported (only in the Core i7-8565U).

The Whiskey Lake SoCs are used with a new PCH produced in 14nm that supports USB 3.1 Gen 2 (10 Gbps) and CNVi WiFi/BT parts.

Architecture

Intel basically uses the same micro architecture compared to Skylake and Kaby Lake, so the per-MHz performance does not differ. That means Whiskey Lake is a Kaby Lake chip manufactured in the improved 14nm++ process.

Performance

The performance of the i5-8265U depends on the cooling solution of the laptop and the defined TDP limits for short and long term performance. We already saw big differences for Kaby Lake-R (e.g., i7-8550U benchmarks), especially for long term (sustained) performance. Therefore, it will be interesting to see how the additionalTurbo  clock speed can be made use of. For the Core i7, Intel estimates between 3-11% higher performance to the Kaby-Lake-R generation and that should be similar in the Core i5 (as long as the cooling is sufficient).

Graphics

The integrated Intel UHD Graphics 620 (Intel Gen 9.5) is untouched from the 8th Gen Kaby Lake chips. With fast dual-channel memory it can reach the performance of a dedicated GeForce 920M.

Contrary to Skylake, Kaby Lake and Whiskey Lake now also supports H.265/HEVC Main 10 with a 10-bit color depth as well as Google's VP9 codec. The dual-core Kaby Lake processors announced in January should also support HDCP 2.2.

Power Consumption

The chip is manufactured in a further improved 14nm process with FinFET transistors (14nm++), the same as the 8th Gen Coffee Lake processors. Intel still specifies the TDP with 15 Watts, which is typical for ULV chips. Depending on the usage scenario, the TDP can vary between 7.5 (cTDP Down) and 25 Watts.

Warning: Above information is partly still based on rumors and leaks and may therefore change till release.

Intel Core i7-8565U

► remove from comparison

The Intel Core i7-8565U is a power efficient quad-core SoC for notebooks and Ultrabooks based on the Whiskey Lake generation that was announced in August 2018 (IFA). Compared to the similar named Kaby Lake-R processors (e.g. Core i7-8550U), the Whiskey Lake CPUs are now produced in a further improved 14nm process (14nm++) and offer higher clock speeds. The architecture and features are the same. The i7-8565U offers e.g. high Turbo clock speeds of 4,6 GHz (versus 4 GHz of the i7-8550U) for a single core and 4.1 GHz (versus 3.7 GHz) of all cores (4.1 GHz for 2 cores). The integrated GPU is still named Intel UHD Graphics 620 and the dual-channel memory controller still supports the same RAM speeds as Kaby-Lake-R (DDR4-2400 / LPDDR3-2133). Compared to the slower Core i5-8265U and i3-8145U, the i7 supports Thermal Velocity Boost.

The Whiskey Lake SoCs are used with a new PCH produced in 14nm that supports USB 3.1 Gen 2 (10 Gbps) and CNVi WiFi/BT parts.

Architecture

Intel basically uses the same microarchitecture compared to Skylake and Kaby Lake, so the per-MHz performance does not differ. That means Whiskey Lake is a Kaby Lake chip manufactured in the improved 14nm++ process.

Performance

The performance of the i7-8565U depends on the cooling solution of the laptop and the defined TDP limits for short and long term performance. We already saw big differences for Kaby Lake-R (e.g., i7-8550U benchmarks), especially for long term (sustained) performance. Therefore, it will be interesting to see how the additional Turbo  clock speed can be made use of. It looks like Intel is promoting the i7 to be 3 - 11% faster than the previous i7-8550U, with Cinebench R15 Multi reaching 5% gains.

Graphics

The integrated Intel UHD Graphics 620 (Intel Gen 9.5) is untouched from the 8th Gen Kaby Lake chips. With fast dual-channel memory, it can reach the performance of a dedicated GeForce 920M.

Contrary to Skylake, Kaby Lake and Whiskey Lake now also supports H.265/HEVC Main 10 with a 10-bit color depth as well as Google's VP9 codec. The dual-core Kaby Lake processors announced in January should also support HDCP 2.2.

Power Consumption

The chip is manufactured in a further improved 14nm process with FinFET transistors (14nm++), the same as the 8th Gen Coffee Lake processors. Intel still specifies the TDP with 15 Watts, which is typical for ULV chips. Depending on the usage scenario, the TDP can vary between 7.5 (cTDP Down) and 25 Watts.

Intel Core i7-8665U

► remove from comparison

The Intel Core i7-8665U is a power efficient quad-core SoC for notebooks and Ultrabooks based on the Whiskey Lake generation that was announced in April 2019 as part of two vPro enabled WHL-U processors. Compared to the similar named Kaby Lake-R processors (e.g. Core i7-8550U), the Whiskey Lake CPUs are now produced in a further improved 14nm process (14nm++) and offer higher clock speeds. The architecture and features are the same. The i7-8665U offers e.g. high Turbo clock speeds of 4,8 GHz (versus 4 GHz of the i7-8550U) for a single core. The integrated GPU is still named Intel UHD Graphics 620 and the dual-channel memory controller still supports the same RAM speeds as Kaby-Lake-R (DDR4-2400 / LPDDR3-2133). Compared to the slower Core i5-8265U and i3-8145U, the i7 should support Thermal Velocity Boost (like the Core i7-8565U, the predecessor).

The Whiskey Lake SoCs are used with a new PCH produced in 14nm that supports USB 3.1 Gen 2 (10 Gbps) and CNVi WiFi/BT parts.

Architecture

Intel basically uses the same micro architecture compared to Skylake and Kaby Lake, so the per-MHz performance does not differ. That means Whiskey Lake is a Kaby Lake chip manufactured in the improved 14nm++ process.

Performance

The performance of the i7-8665U depends on the cooling solution of the laptop and the defined TDP limits for short and long term performance. We already saw big differences for Kaby Lake-R (e.g., i7-8550U benchmarks), especially for long term (sustained) performance. Therefore, it will be interesting to see how the additionalTurbo  clock speed can be made use of. Due to the 200 MHz higher Turbo Boost, the 8665U should outperform the i7-8565U (see for benchmarks).

Graphics

The integrated Intel UHD Graphics 620 (Intel Gen 9.5) is untouched from the 8th Gen Kaby Lake chips. With fast dual-channel memory it can reach the performance of a dedicated GeForce 920M.

Contrary to Skylake, Kaby Lake and Whiskey Lake now also supports H.265/HEVC Main 10 with a 10-bit color depth as well as Google's VP9 codec. The dual-core Kaby Lake processors announced in January should also support HDCP 2.2.

Power Consumption

The chip is manufactured in a further improved 14nm process with FinFET transistors (14nm++), the same as the 8th Gen Coffee Lake processors. Intel still specifies the TDP with 15 Watts, which is typical for ULV chips. Depending on the usage scenario, the TDP can vary between 7.5 (cTDP Down) and 25 Watts.

ModelIntel Core i5-8265UIntel Core i7-8565UIntel Core i7-8665U
SeriesIntel Core i5Intel Core i7Intel Core i7
CodenameWhiskey Lake-UWhiskey Lake-UWhiskey Lake-U
Series: Core i7 Whiskey Lake-U
Intel Core i5-8365U1.6 - 4.1 GHz4 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i5-8265U « 1.6 - 3.9 GHz4 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i7-8665U1.9 - 4.8 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i7-8565U « 1.8 - 4.6 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i7-8665U « 1.9 - 4.8 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i7-8565U1.8 - 4.6 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Clock1600 - 3900 MHz1800 - 4600 MHz1900 - 4800 MHz
L1 Cache256 KB256 KB256 KB
L2 Cache1 MB1 MB1 MB
L3 Cache6 MB8 MB8 MB
Cores / Threads4 / 84 / 84 / 8
TDP15 Watt15 Watt15 Watt
Technology14 nm14 nm14 nm
SocketBGA1528BGA1528BGA1528
FeaturesDual-Channel DDR4 Memory Controller, HyperThreading, AVX, AVX2, Quick Sync, Virtualization, AES-NIDual-Channel DDR4 Memory Controller, HyperThreading, AVX, AVX2, Quick Sync, Virtualization, AES-NIDual-Channel DDR4 Memory Controller, HyperThreading, AVX, AVX2, Quick Sync, Virtualization, AES-NI
iGPUIntel UHD Graphics 620 (300 - 1100 MHz)Intel UHD Graphics 620 (300 - 1150 MHz)Intel UHD Graphics 620 (300 - 1150 MHz)
Architecturex86x86x86
Announced
max. Temp.100 °C
Manufacturerark.intel.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i5-8265U
27.9 pt (39%)
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i7-8565U
29.6 pt (41%)
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i7-8665U
30.1 pt (42%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
3500 Points (3%)
2729 Points (3%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
1008 Points (43%)
988 Points (42%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 325     avg: 389.2     median: 397 (44%)     max: 403 Points
min: 342     avg: 409.3     median: 411.5 (46%)     max: 472 Points
min: 379     avg: 427     median: 427 (47%)     max: 472 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 972     avg: 1271     median: 1285.5 (3%)     max: 1564 Points
min: 954     avg: 1257     median: 1181.5 (3%)     max: 1645 Points
min: 1050     avg: 1329     median: 1346 (3%)     max: 1530 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 457     avg: 592     median: 601.5 (4%)     max: 750 Points
min: 452     avg: 612     median: 608.5 (4%)     max: 815 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 111     avg: 155     median: 159 (48%)     max: 164 Points
min: 138.3     avg: 172.5     median: 173 (52%)     max: 193 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 5.22     avg: 6     median: 5.7 (7%)     max: 7.22 Points
4.9 Points (6%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 1.73     avg: 1.8     median: 1.8 (44%)     max: 1.88 Points
1.7 Points (42%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
min: 5841     avg: 6044     median: 6082 (37%)     max: 6209 Points
min: 2682     avg: 6571     median: 6644 (40%)     max: 8906 Points
min: 6716     avg: 6872     median: 6872 (42%)     max: 7028 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
min: 16318     avg: 18952     median: 19418 (14%)     max: 22962 Points
min: 13806     avg: 17608     median: 16760 (12%)     max: 23118 Points
min: 16602     avg: 18427     median: 18426.5 (13%)     max: 20251 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
min: 18924     avg: 21959     median: 21775.5 (15%)     max: 25361 Points
min: 14542     avg: 21376     median: 21661 (15%)     max: 26851 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
min: 7705     avg: 7880     median: 7919 (10%)     max: 7975 Points
min: 5474     avg: 8104     median: 8809.5 (11%)     max: 9435 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
min: 371.4     avg: 402.4     median: 402.4 (5%)     max: 433.3 s
min: 263.3     avg: 353.4     median: 360.2 (4%)     max: 420 s
429.3 s (5%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
min: 9.635     avg: 11     median: 11 (2%)     max: 12.41 s
min: 6.812     avg: 9.5     median: 9.5 (2%)     max: 12.41 s
10 s (2%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
min: 3215     avg: 4040     median: 3988 (6%)     max: 4916 Points
min: 3537     avg: 4129     median: 4291.5 (7%)     max: 4626 Points
3418 Points (5%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multli Thread 4 runs
min: 13731     avg: 16360     median: 16245 (9%)     max: 18802 MIPS
min: 10531     avg: 17993     median: 18860 (11%)     max: 24847 MIPS
min: 14665     avg: 18146     median: 18298 (11%)     max: 20023 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 3780     avg: 4054     median: 4084 (49%)     max: 4195 MIPS
min: 2029     avg: 4558     median: 4737 (57%)     max: 5923 MIPS
min: 4338     avg: 4684     median: 4705.5 (56%)     max: 4988 MIPS
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
min: 31.9     avg: 37.2     median: 39.1 (14%)     max: 40.5 fps
min: 29.35     avg: 33.8     median: 33.7 (12%)     max: 38.8 fps
32 fps (11%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
min: 150.5     avg: 158.7     median: 156 (36%)     max: 169.5 fps
min: 127.5     avg: 144.4     median: 140.9 (33%)     max: 160.2 fps
139 fps (32%)
min: 3.24     avg: 4.7     median: 4.7 (8%)     max: 5.5 fps
min: 3.82     avg: 4.5     median: 4.5 (8%)     max: 5.2 fps
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
min: 0.427     avg: 0.5     median: 0.5 (0%)     max: 0.464 GB/s
min: 0.347     avg: 0.4     median: 0.4 (0%)     max: 0.516 GB/s
0.3 GB/s (0%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
min: 0.708     avg: 0.8     median: 0.8 (14%)     max: 0.789 GB/s
min: 0.567     avg: 0.7     median: 0.7 (12%)     max: 0.869 GB/s
0.5 GB/s (8%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
min: 4.1     avg: 4.3     median: 4.4 (11%)     max: 4.5 GB/s
min: 3.2     avg: 4.2     median: 4 (10%)     max: 5.1 GB/s
2.6 GB/s (7%)
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
1565 Seconds (20%)
min: 687     avg: 821     median: 806.5 (6%)     max: 1175 Seconds
min: 716     avg: 801     median: 754.5 (5%)     max: 978 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 0.72     avg: 0.7     median: 0.7 (16%)     max: 0.754 sec
min: 0.682     avg: 0.8     median: 0.8 (17%)     max: 0.851 sec
0.9 sec (19%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 5637     avg: 6330     median: 6316 (13%)     max: 7439 Points
min: 2813     avg: 5806     median: 6158 (13%)     max: 7928 Points
min: 6202     avg: 6365     median: 6365 (14%)     max: 6528 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
min: 9.762     avg: 10     median: 9.8 (2%)     max: 10.32 s
min: 8.286     avg: 8.5     median: 8.4 (2%)     max: 8.889 s
8 s (2%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
min: 22.12     avg: 22.3     median: 22.2 (1%)     max: 22.43 s
min: 18.9     avg: 19.3     median: 19 (1%)     max: 20.61 s
19 s (1%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
min: 543     avg: 562     median: 552 (2%)     max: 590 s
min: 491.1     avg: 520     median: 508 (2%)     max: 583 s
521 s (2%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
min: 16249     avg: 20521     median: 20544 (18%)     max: 25525 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 4154     avg: 6319     median: 6222 (17%)     max: 8443 Points
min: 3083     avg: 6977     median: 6739 (18%)     max: 9422 Points
min: 6266     avg: 7143     median: 6758 (18%)     max: 8676 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
min: 21036     avg: 38716     median: 38144 (31%)     max: 50513 Points
min: 18314     avg: 43687     median: 46109 (37%)     max: 58024 Points
56356 Points (46%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
min: 21037     avg: 37535     median: 36912 (30%)     max: 48588 Points
min: 19795     avg: 41691     median: 40823 (33%)     max: 57796 Points
56510 Points (46%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 23095     avg: 49269     median: 52630 (44%)     max: 56737 Points
min: 22018     avg: 45134     median: 49602 (42%)     max: 60319 Points
min: 54189     avg: 59812     median: 60829 (51%)     max: 63399 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 3393     avg: 5794     median: 5651 (14%)     max: 8298 Points
min: 2413     avg: 5785     median: 5756 (15%)     max: 8032 Points
min: 5234     avg: 6225     median: 5948 (15%)     max: 7398 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 4640     avg: 7934     median: 8001 (14%)     max: 11278 Points
min: 3409     avg: 8376     median: 8361 (15%)     max: 11865 Points
min: 6860     avg: 8356     median: 8188 (15%)     max: 10574 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 1837     avg: 2540     median: 2657 (11%)     max: 2931 Points
min: 1354     avg: 2953     median: 2841 (12%)     max: 3880 Points
min: 2638     avg: 2872     median: 2723 (11%)     max: 3405 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1024     avg: 1039     median: 1041.5 (44%)     max: 1047 Points
min: 1108     avg: 1136     median: 1135.5 (48%)     max: 1163 Points
1039 Points (44%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 3442     avg: 3669     median: 3624.5 (6%)     max: 3986 Points
min: 2839     avg: 3074     median: 3073.5 (6%)     max: 3308 Points
2671 Points (5%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 986     avg: 1015     median: 1017 (4%)     max: 1041 Points
min: 1103     avg: 1186     median: 1197 (5%)     max: 1229 Points
1196 Points (5%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 2973     avg: 3446     median: 3365 (11%)     max: 3962 Points
min: 2643     avg: 3228     median: 3176 (10%)     max: 3803 Points
3453 Points (11%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 2106     avg: 4387     median: 4514 (45%)     max: 4830 Points
min: 2357     avg: 5053     median: 5142.5 (51%)     max: 5547 Points
min: 4686     avg: 5236     median: 5342.5 (53%)     max: 5574 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 7144     avg: 13600     median: 13295 (15%)     max: 16249 Points
min: 8142     avg: 14179     median: 13888 (15%)     max: 16968 Points
min: 11206     avg: 15544     median: 16347 (18%)     max: 18275 Points
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 4229     avg: 4422     median: 4433 (60%)     max: 4605 Points
min: 4701     avg: 4750     median: 4759 (65%)     max: 4791 Points
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 13168     avg: 13975     median: 14368 (35%)     max: 14390 Points
min: 11576     avg: 13367     median: 13617.5 (33%)     max: 14655 Points
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Multi-Core
min: 12198     avg: 13659     median: 14002 (25%)     max: 14499 Points
min: 10521     avg: 12071     median: 12302.5 (22%)     max: 13703 Points
14277 Points (25%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Single-Core
min: 3470     avg: 3669     median: 3678.5 (72%)     max: 3842 Points
min: 3340     avg: 3882     median: 3851 (75%)     max: 4820 Points
3887 Points (76%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 12221     avg: 13021     median: 13021 (20%)     max: 13821 Points
min: 11720     avg: 12845     median: 12844.5 (20%)     max: 13969 Points
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 3805     avg: 3906     median: 3906 (58%)     max: 4007 Points
min: 4276     avg: 4294     median: 4294 (64%)     max: 4312 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Stream
min: 10592     avg: 10596     median: 10595.5 (85%)     max: 10599 Points
min: 10320     avg: 10618     median: 10617.5 (86%)     max: 10915 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Memory
min: 8582     avg: 8660     median: 8660 (79%)     max: 8738 Points
min: 7885     avg: 8316     median: 8315.5 (75%)     max: 8746 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Floating Point
min: 11914     avg: 12181     median: 12181 (24%)     max: 12448 Points
min: 11135     avg: 11197     median: 11196.5 (22%)     max: 11258 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Integer
min: 12671     avg: 13099     median: 13099 (26%)     max: 13527 Points
min: 10347     avg: 11305     median: 11305 (23%)     max: 12263 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Total Score
min: 11598     avg: 11639     median: 11639 (30%)     max: 11680 Points
min: 10402     avg: 10600     median: 10600 (28%)     max: 10798 Points
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 851     avg: 1141     median: 1194 (1%)     max: 1245 ms
min: 730     avg: 1096     median: 1066 (1%)     max: 2622 ms
min: 1016     avg: 1072     median: 1067.5 (1%)     max: 1136 ms
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
min: 83     avg: 93.5     median: 95.6 (1%)     max: 99.8 ms
min: 80.7     avg: 153.6     median: 152.7 (2%)     max: 228.3 ms
235 ms (3%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 12842     avg: 31246     median: 32120 (29%)     max: 35563 Points
min: 13935     avg: 34603     median: 34884.5 (31%)     max: 49795 Points
min: 30142     avg: 33976     median: 34548 (31%)     max: 36667 Points
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
145.3 Points (42%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 186     avg: 187     median: 187 (39%)     max: 188 Points
min: 176     avg: 208.4     median: 202 (42%)     max: 239 Points
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
1006 Points (39%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
27.4 Watt (5%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
21.9 Points per Watt (16%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i5-8265U → 100% n=43

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i7-8565U → 102% n=43

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i7-8665U → 102% n=43

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.26
log 26. 01:04:39

#0 checking url part for id 10116 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 10082 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 11328 +0s ... 0s

#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 25 Apr 2024 05:38:32 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#5 composed specs +0.03s ... 0.031s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.031s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 10116 +0.024s ... 0.055s

#8 got single benchmarks 10116 +0.224s ... 0.279s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 10082 +0.017s ... 0.296s

#10 got single benchmarks 10082 +0.239s ... 0.535s

#11 getting avg benchmarks for device 11328 +0.015s ... 0.55s

#12 got single benchmarks 11328 +0.03s ... 0.58s

#13 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.58s

#14 min, max, avg, median took s +0.695s ... 1.275s

#15 return log +0s ... 1.275s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)