Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core i3-8145U vs AMD Ryzen 7 3700U

Intel Core i3-8145U

► remove from comparison

The Intel Core i3-8145U is a power efficient dual-core SoC for notebooks and Ultrabooks based on the Whiskey Lake generation and will probably be announced in August 2018. Compared to the similar named Kaby Lake-R processors (e.g. Core i3-8130U), the Whiskey Lake CPUs are now produced in a further improved 14nm process (14nm++) and offer higher clock speeds. The architecture and features are the same. The i3-8145U offers e.g. high Turbo clock speeds of 3.9 GHz (versus 3.4 GHz of the i3-8130U) for a single core (3.7 GHz for 2 cores) but a slightly lower base clock of 2.1 versus 2.2 GHz. The integrated GPU is still named Intel UHD Graphics 620 and the dual-channel memory controller still supports the same RAM speeds as Kaby-Lake-R (DDR4-2400 / LPDDR3-2133). Thermal Velocity Boost is not supported (only in the Core i7-8565U).

The Whiskey Lake SoCs are used with a new PCH produced in 14nm that supports USB 3.1 Gen 2 (10 Gbps) and CNVi WiFi/BT parts.

Architecture

Intel basically uses the same micro architecture compared to Skylake and Kaby Lake, so the per-MHz performance does not differ. That means Whiskey Lake is a Kaby Lake chip manufactured in the improved 14nm++ process.

Performance

Due to the higher Turbo Boost (+12% single core), the Core i3-8145U should be faster than the old Core i3-8130U (Kaby Lake-R). The single core Turbo Boost is similar to the old high end model, the Core i7-7600U. However, the guaranteed base clock of 2.1 GHz is a lot lower (2.8 GHz for the i7-7600U) and also the 2-core Turbo is lower (3.7 versus 3.8 GHz). Therefore, the performance should be similar to the Core i7-7500U (Kaby Lake).

Graphics

The integrated Intel UHD Graphics 620 (Intel Gen 9.5) is untouched from the 8th Gen Kaby Lake chips. With fast dual-channel memory it can reach the performance of a dedicated GeForce 920M.

Contrary to Skylake, Kaby Lake and Whiskey Lake now also supports H.265/HEVC Main 10 with a 10-bit color depth as well as Google's VP9 codec. The dual-core Kaby Lake processors announced in January should also support HDCP 2.2.

Power Consumption

The chip is manufactured in a further improved 14nm process with FinFET transistors (14nm++), the same as the 8th Gen Coffee Lake processors. Intel still specifies the TDP with 15 Watts, which is typical for ULV chips. Depending on the usage scenario, the TDP can vary between 7.5 (cTDP Down) and 25 Watts.

Warning: Above information is partly still based on rumors and leaks and may therefore change till release.

AMD Ryzen 7 3700U

► remove from comparison AMD R7 3700U

The AMD Ryzen 7 3700U is a mobile SoC that was announced in January 2019. It combines four Zen+ cores (8 threads) clocked at 2.3 GHz to 4 GHz with a Radeon RX Vega 10 graphics adapter with 10 CUs (640 shaders) clocked at up to 1,400 MHz. Specified at 15 Watt TDP, the SoC is intended for thin mid-range laptops. In Chromebooks, AMD calles the APU AMD Ryzen 7 3700C, but with the exact same specifications (and performance).

The Picasso SoCs use the Zen+ microarchitecture with slight improvements that should lead to a 3% IPC (performance per clock) improvements.

The integrated dual-channel memory controller supports up to DDR4-2400 memory. As the features of the Picasso APUs are the same compared to the Raven Ridge predecessors, we point to our Raven Ridge launch article.

Performance

The average 3700U in our database is a solid mid-range CPU as of early 2021, its multi-thread benchmark scores matching those of the Core i5-10310U and the Core i5-1035G7 (the Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U is found close nearby as well). This Ryzen 7 is good for more than just binge-watching Netflix and writing e-mails. Just do not expect it to be as fast as a Core i7-11800H.

Thanks to its decent cooling solution and sufficiently high CPU power limits, the ThinkPad E595 is among the fastest laptops powered by the 3700U that we know of. It can be up to 50% faster in CPU-bound workloads than the slowest system featuring the same chip in our database, as of August 2023.

Power consumption

This Ryzen 7 series chip has a default TDP of 15 W (also known as the long-term power limit). This can be changed by a laptop manufacturer to anything between 12 W and 35 W with clock speeds and performance changing accordingly as a result. Either way, that's a little too high to allow for passively cooled designs.

Last but not the least, the Ryzen 7 3700U is manufactured on a 12 nm process for lower-than-average, as of mid-2023, energy efficiency.

ModelIntel Core i3-8145UAMD Ryzen 7 3700U
SeriesIntel Core i3AMD Picasso (Ryzen 3000 APU)
CodenameWhiskey Lake-UPicasso-U (Zen+)
Clock2100 - 3900 MHz2300 - 4000 MHz
L1 Cache256 KB384 KB
L2 Cache1 MB2 MB
L3 Cache4 MB4 MB
Cores / Threads2 / 44 / 8
TDP15 Watt15 Watt
Technology14 nm12 nm
SocketBGA1528FP5
FeaturesDual-Channel DDR4 Memory Controller, HyperThreading, AVX, AVX2, Quick Sync, Virtualization, AES-NIDDR4-2400, PCIe 3, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME
iGPUIntel UHD Graphics 620 (300 - 1000 MHz)AMD Radeon RX Vega 10 ( - 1400 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
Announced
Series: Picasso (Ryzen 3000 APU) Picasso-U (Zen+)
AMD Ryzen 7 3780U compare2.3 - 4 GHz4 / 8 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 3700U « 2.3 - 4 GHz4 / 8 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 3550H compare2.1 - 3.7 GHz4 / 8 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 3500U compare2.1 - 3.7 GHz4 / 8 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 3450U compare2.1 - 3.5 GHz4 / 8 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 3580U compare2.1 - 3.7 GHz4 / 8 cores4 MB L3
Transistors4500 Million
max. Temp.105 °C
Manufacturerwww.amd.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - R7 3700U
26 pt (36%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
296 Points (33%)
min: 285     avg: 339.2     median: 343 (38%)     max: 368 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
657 Points (2%)
min: 1047     avg: 1344     median: 1499 (4%)     max: 1560 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 318     avg: 345.5     median: 351.5 (2%)     max: 361 Points
min: 537     avg: 648     median: 672 (4%)     max: 683 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 139     avg: 147.5     median: 148.5 (45%)     max: 154 Points
min: 127     avg: 138     median: 139 (42%)     max: 146 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
4 Points (5%)
min: 5.02     avg: 7     median: 7.6 (10%)     max: 7.71 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
1.8 Points (44%)
min: 1.23     avg: 1.5     median: 1.6 (40%)     max: 1.67 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
min: 5925     avg: 5939     median: 5939 (36%)     max: 5953 Points
min: 4045     avg: 4411     median: 4410.5 (27%)     max: 4776 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
min: 11790     avg: 12432     median: 12432 (9%)     max: 13074 Points
min: 12881     avg: 15461     median: 15461 (11%)     max: 18041 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
min: 27166     avg: 27205     median: 27205 (19%)     max: 27244 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
min: 7765     avg: 7767     median: 7767 (9%)     max: 7769 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
463.9 s (5%)
450.4 s (5%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
13.1 s (3%)
13.5 s (3%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
1889 Points (3%)
2392 Points (4%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multli Thread 4 runs
min: 12738     avg: 15166     median: 15386.5 (9%)     max: 17153 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 3038     avg: 3423     median: 3492.5 (42%)     max: 3668 MIPS
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
22.6 fps (8%)
27.1 fps (9%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
117.6 fps (27%)
104.8 fps (24%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
2.6 fps (5%)
min: 2.76     avg: 3.3     median: 3.3 (6%)     max: 3.9 fps
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
0.2 GB/s (0%)
0.4 GB/s (0%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
0.4 GB/s (7%)
0.6 GB/s (11%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
2.2 GB/s (6%)
3.8 GB/s (10%)
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 671     avg: 797     median: 703 (5%)     max: 1018 Seconds
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
5158 Points (11%)
4595 Points (10%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
10.5 s (2%)
12.6 s (3%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
24.2 s (1%)
29.6 s (1%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
638 s (3%)
748 s (3%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 4140     avg: 4266     median: 4267.5 (12%)     max: 4389 Points
min: 5060     avg: 5955     median: 5416 (15%)     max: 7250 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
38409 Points (31%)
min: 30752     avg: 31840     median: 31238.5 (25%)     max: 34132 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
37436 Points (30%)
min: 30487     avg: 32042     median: 31393 (25%)     max: 34896 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 46756     avg: 47727     median: 47726.5 (40%)     max: 48697 Points
min: 24397     avg: 31189     median: 30959.5 (26%)     max: 38440 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 3578     avg: 3929     median: 4087 (10%)     max: 4123 Points
min: 2957     avg: 4954     median: 4978 (13%)     max: 7033 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 5322     avg: 5678     median: 5779 (10%)     max: 5934 Points
min: 6380     avg: 8272     median: 8698.5 (16%)     max: 9457 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
1806 Points (8%)
min: 2012     avg: 2427     median: 2224 (9%)     max: 3044 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
995 Points (4%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
2096 Points (7%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 4090     avg: 4210     median: 4118 (41%)     max: 4421 Points
min: 3445     avg: 3785     median: 3843.5 (38%)     max: 4009 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 7780     avg: 8031     median: 7859 (9%)     max: 8455 Points
min: 8907     avg: 10275     median: 10542 (12%)     max: 11107 Points
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Single-Core
4001 Points (54%)
3247 Points (44%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
7471 Points (18%)
9117 Points (22%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Multi-Core
min: 6870     avg: 7287     median: 7420 (13%)     max: 7572 Points
10238 Points (18%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Single-Core
min: 3350     avg: 3389     median: 3360 (66%)     max: 3457 Points
3003 Points (59%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Multi-Core
7690 Points (12%)
10881 Points (17%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Single-Core
3559 Points (53%)
3354 Points (50%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Stream
6013 Points (48%)
7277 Points (59%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Memory
5907 Points (54%)
5738 Points (52%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Floating Point
8016 Points (16%)
12851 Points (25%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Integer
8204 Points (17%)
10434 Points (21%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Total Score
7459 Points (20%)
10025 Points (26%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 1252     avg: 1283     median: 1283 (2%)     max: 1314 ms
min: 1285     avg: 1321     median: 1299 (2%)     max: 1405 ms
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
min: 97     avg: 104.9     median: 104.9 (1%)     max: 112.7 ms
147.3 ms (2%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 28265     avg: 28829     median: 28828.5 (26%)     max: 29392 Points
min: 23657     avg: 26597     median: 27490 (25%)     max: 28301 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 152     avg: 154     median: 154 (32%)     max: 156 Points

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i3-8145U → 100% n=44

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 7 3700U → 119% n=44

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.26
log 25. 11:18:28

#0 checking url part for id 10118 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 11141 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 25 Apr 2024 05:38:32 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 composed specs +0.033s ... 0.034s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.034s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 10118 +0.002s ... 0.036s

#7 got single benchmarks 10118 +0.04s ... 0.077s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 11141 +0.02s ... 0.096s

#9 got single benchmarks 11141 +0.042s ... 0.138s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.138s

#11 min, max, avg, median took s +0.309s ... 0.448s

#12 return log +0.027s ... 0.475s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)