Intel Celeron 807 vs Intel Celeron 877 vs Intel Celeron 887

Intel Celeron 807

► remove

The Intel Celeron 807 is a ULV single core processor for entry level laptops. It is based on the Sandy Bridge architecture (2nd generation Core) and features an integrated graphics card (Intel HD Graphics based on the HD Graphics 2000 at 350-950 MHz) and a reduced feature set (compared to the faster Core processors). E.g. Turbo Boost, AES, Virtualization VT-d, Quick Sync, Wireless Display and Clear Video HD are deactivated. Furthermore, some power saving features may be deactivated, leading to a shorter battery runtime compared to Core i3 processors.

Due to the slow clock speed, the performance is rather limited. Compared to other Celerons, the 807 should be faster than a Celeron B720, thanks to Hyper-Threading support.

The integrated dual channel DDR3-1066/1333 memory controller supports up to 16GB.

The 17W TDP rating includes the integrated GPU and memory controller and therefore the 807 is suited for small subnotebooks.

Intel Celeron 877

► remove

The Intel Celeron 877 is an Ultra Low Voltage (ULV) dual core processor for entry-level laptops. It is based on the Sandy Bridge architecture but many of the features like Turbo Boost, AES, VT-d or HyperThreading are deactivated. The Celeron 877 integrates a graphics card called Intel HD Graphics that is based on the HD Graphics 2000 and clocked at 350 to 1000 MHz.

The performance of the Celeron 877 should be faster than a similar clocked Arrandale Pentium CPU and therefore faster than the 1.4 GHz Pentium U5600.

The 17W TDP rating includes the integrated GPU and memory controller and therefore the 877 is suited for small subnotebooks.

Intel Celeron 887

► remove

The Intel Celeron 887 is an Ultra Low Voltage (ULV) dual core processor for entry-level laptops. It is based on the Sandy Bridge architecture but many of the features like Turbo Boost, AES, VT-d or HyperThreading are deactivated. The Celeron 887 integrates a graphics card called Intel HD Graphics that is based on the HD Graphics 2000 and clocked at 350 to 1000 MHz.

The performance of the Celeron 887 is similar to an identical clocked Pentium CPU like the Pentium 987.

The 17W TDP rating includes the integrated GPU and memory controller and therefore the 877 is suited for small subnotebooks.

Intel Celeron 807Intel Celeron 877Intel Celeron 887
Intel CeleronIntel CeleronIntel Celeron
Sandy BridgeSandy BridgeSandy Bridge
: Celeron Sandy Bridge
Intel Celeron B8401.9 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron B8301.8 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron B8201.7 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron B8151.6 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron B8101.6 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron 8871.5 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron B8001.5 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron 8771.4 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron 8671.3 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron B7301.8 GHz1 / 21.5 MB
Intel Celeron 8471.1 GHz2 / 22 MB
» Intel Celeron 8071.5 GHz1 / 21.5 MB
Intel Celeron B7201.7 GHz1 / 11.5 MB
Intel Celeron B7101.6 GHz1 / 11.5 MB
Intel Celeron 7971.4 GHz1 / 11.5 MB
Intel Celeron B8401.9 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron B8301.8 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron B8201.7 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron B8151.6 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron B8101.6 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron 8871.5 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron B8001.5 GHz2 / 22 MB
» Intel Celeron 8771.4 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron 8671.3 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron B7301.8 GHz1 / 21.5 MB
Intel Celeron 8471.1 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron 8071.5 GHz1 / 21.5 MB
Intel Celeron B7201.7 GHz1 / 11.5 MB
Intel Celeron B7101.6 GHz1 / 11.5 MB
Intel Celeron 7971.4 GHz1 / 11.5 MB
Intel Celeron B8401.9 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron B8301.8 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron B8201.7 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron B8151.6 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron B8101.6 GHz2 / 22 MB
» Intel Celeron 8871.5 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron B8001.5 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron 8771.4 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron 8671.3 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron B7301.8 GHz1 / 21.5 MB
Intel Celeron 8471.1 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron 8071.5 GHz1 / 21.5 MB
Intel Celeron B7201.7 GHz1 / 11.5 MB
Intel Celeron B7101.6 GHz1 / 11.5 MB
Intel Celeron 7971.4 GHz1 / 11.5 MB
1500 MHz1400 MHz1500 MHz
64 KB128 KB128 KB
256 KB512 KB512 KB
1.5 MB2 MB2 MB
1 / 22 / 22 / 2
17 17 17
32 32 32
100 °C100 °C100 °C
BGA1023BGA1023BGA1023
HD Graphics, DDR3 Memory Controller, Enhanced Speedstep, Thermal Monitoring, Execute Disable BitHD Graphics, DDR3 Memory Controller, Enhanced Speedstep, Thermal Monitoring, Execute Disable BitHD Graphics, DDR3 Memory Controller, Enhanced Speedstep, Thermal Monitoring, Execute Disable Bit
iGPUIntel HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge) (350 - 950 MHz)Intel HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge) (350 - 1000 MHz)Intel HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge) (350 - 1000 MHz)
Architecturex86x86x86
$70 U.S.$86 U.S.
Intel Celeron 807Intel Celeron 877Intel Celeron 887

Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
100%
1 877 +
1.1 Points (2%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
100%
1 887 +
0.6 Points (18%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
100%
1 887 +
1877 (17%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
100%
1 887 +
3597 (6%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
100%
1 887 +
4497 Points (4%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
100%
1 887 +
2362 Points (18%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
100%
1 887 +
1626 s (19%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
100%
1 887 +
48 s (10%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
100%
1 887 +
986 (6%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
100%
1 887 +
0 GB/s (0%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
100%
1 887 +
0.1 GB/s (0%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
100%
1 887 +
0.1 GB/s (0%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
100%
1 887 +
1414 Points (8%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
100%
1 887 +
28 s (6%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
100%
1 887 +
64 s (3%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
100%
1 887 +
1343 s (6%)
Windows 7 Experience Index - Win7 CPU
100%
1 887 +
5.1 Points (65%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
100%
1 887 +
3383 Points (4%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Celeron 877 → NAN% n=

Average Benchmarks Intel Celeron 887 → NAN% n=

-
-
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.16
Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)