, , , , , ,
search relation.
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
 

Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 APQ8074AB vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974

Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 APQ8074AB

► remove from comparison Qualcomm 801 APQ8074AB

The Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 APQ8074AB is an ARM-based SoC for (mainly android) tabletsIt is built at TSMC in a 28nm HPM (High Performance Mobile) HKMG process and includes 4 Krait 400 cores at up to 2.45 GHz and a Adreno 330 at up to 578 MHz. Furthermore, the SoC integrates a LPDDR3-1866 memory controller as well as WLAN 802.11ac, Bluetooth 4.0 and GPS (but no cellular modem). Compared to the Snapdragon 800 chips like the MSM8974AB, the 801 offers a higher clock rate for GPU and CPU and support for eMMC 5.0.

Processor 

The CPU portion is based on Qualcomm's Krait architecture, which is compatible with the ARMv7 ISA. Compared to the Snapdragon 600 (Krait 300), the new Krait 400 cores of the Snapdragon 801 have been tweaked just slightly with faster L2 cache. Thanks to a clock rate of up to 2.36 GHz and a high performance per MHz somewhere between an ARM Cortex-A9 and a Cortex-A15, the Snapdragon 801 offers very strong CPU performance. The S801 competes with the Nvidia Tegra 4, Samsung Exynos 5420 and Apple A7 and is therefore one of the fastest ARM SoCs on the market in the beginning of 2014 (till the Snapdragon 805 arrives).

Graphics

Another difference between the Snapdragon 600 and 800/801 is the graphics unit. While the S600 implements an Adreno 320 (400 to 450 MHz), the S800 and S801 features the faster Adreno 330 (APQ8074AB: 578 MHz). Both GPUs offer the same amount of texture units (8 TMUs), but the Adreno 330 has 50 percent more shaders (probably 6x SIMD16 vs. 4x SIMD16 of the previous generation)In conjunction with the higher memory bandwidth, the performance is significantly better. As a result, the Adreno 330 is slightly faster than the Mali-T628 (Exynos 5420) and comparable to the PowerVR G6430 (Apple A7). Depending on the device and cooling, however, the performance may vary. The GPU supports OpenGL ES 3.0 as well as OpenCL 1.2.

Features 

Furthermore, the MSM8974AC supports the wireless technologies Bluetooth 4.0 as well as WLAN (IEEE 802.11a/b/g/n/ac 2.4/5 GHz). However, the APQ8074AB does not offer an integrated cellular modem.

The Snapdragon 801 can encode and play UHD 4K videos in 3840x2160 at 30 FPS (120 Mbps H.264 High Profile) simultaneously via dedicated hardware. Moreover, it supports both USB 2.0 and 3.0 and cameras up to 55 megapixels and stereoscopic 3D.

Power Consumption

Thanks to the new 28nm HPM HKMG process, the energy efficiency has been improved significantly compared to its LP 28nm S600 predecessor. Depending on the field of application, the maximum power consumption should be about 4 W. This should be similar to comparable ARM SoCs currently in the market. However, the APQ8074AB will likely need a little more power than the slightly lower clocked MSM8974.

Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974

► remove from comparison Qualcomm 800 MSM8974

The Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 is an ARM-based SoC for tablets and smartphonesIt is built at TSMC in a 28nm HPM (High Performance Mobile) HKMG process, whereas the Snapdragon 600 was manufactured in 28nm LP. In addition to 4 CPU cores with a clock speed of up to 2.3 GHz, the chip also integrates an Adreno 330 GPU up to 450 MHz, an LPDDR3-1600 memory controller and various radio modules (UMTS/LTE, WiFi, Bluetooth, GPS).

Processor 

The CPU portion is based on Qualcomm's Krait architecture, which is compatible with ARMv7 ISA. Compared to the Snapdragon 600 (Krait 300), the new Krait 400 cores of the Snapdragon 800 have been tweaked just slightly with faster L2 cache. Thanks to a clock rate of up to 2.3 GHz and a high performance per MHz somewhere between an ARM Cortex-A9 and a Cortex-A15, the Snapdragon 800 offers very strong CPU performance. The S800 competes with the Nvidia Tegra 4, Samsung Exynos 5420 and Apple A7 and is therefore one of the fastest ARM SoCs on the market as of 2013.

Graphics

Another difference between the Snapdragon 600 and 800 is the graphics unit. While the S600 implements an Adreno 320 (400 to 450 MHz), the S800 features the faster Adreno 330 (450 MHz). Both GPUs offer the same amount of texture units (8 TMUs), but the Adreno 330 has 50 percent more shaders (probably 6x SIMD16 vs. 4x SIMD16 of the previous generation). In conjunction with the higher memory bandwidth, the performance is significantly better. As a result, the Adreno 330 is slightly faster than the Mali-T628 (Exynos 5420) and the PowerVR G6430 (Apple A7). Depending on the device and cooling, however, the performance may vary. The GPU supports OpenGL ES 3.0 as well as OpenCL 1.2.

Features 

Furthermore, the MSM8974 supports many wireless technologies: Bluetooth 4.0, WLAN, IEEE 802.11a/b/g/n/ac (2.4/5 GHz), GSM (GPRS, EDGE), W-CDMA/UMTS (HSDPA, HSUPA, HSPA+, cat.29 DC-HSPA+), MBMS, cat.4 LTE, CDMA2000 (1X RTT, 1 × EV-DO Rel.0/Rev.A/Rev.B, 1× EV-DO Rev.A MC, 1× Adv Rev.A/Rev.B) and TD-SCDMA. 

The MSM8974 can encode and play UHD 4K videos in 3840x2160 at 30 FPS (120 Mbps H.264 High Profile) sumiltaneously via dedicated hardware. Moreover, it supports both USB 2.0 and 3.0 and cameras up to 55 megapixels and stereoscopic 3D.

Power Consumption

Thanks to the new 28nm HPM HKMG process, the energy efficiency has been improved significantly compared to its LP 28nm S600 predecessor. Depending on the field of application, the maximum power consumption should be about 3 W for smartphones or 4 W or greater for tablets. This should be similar to comparable ARM SoCs currently in the market.

Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 APQ8074ABQualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974
Qualcomm SnapdragonQualcomm Snapdragon
Krait 400Krait 400
Series: Snapdragon Krait 400
Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 MSM8974AC compare2.45 GHz4 / 4 Krait 400
» Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 APQ8074AB2.36 GHz4 / 4 Krait 400
Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 MSM8974AB compare2.36 GHz4 / 4 Krait 400
Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 MSM8974AA compare2.26 GHz4 / 4 Krait 400
Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM89742.3 GHz4 / 4 Krait 400
Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 MSM8974AC compare2.45 GHz4 / 4 Krait 400
Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 APQ8074AB2.36 GHz4 / 4 Krait 400
Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 MSM8974AB compare2.36 GHz4 / 4 Krait 400
Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 MSM8974AA compare2.26 GHz4 / 4 Krait 400
» Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM89742.3 GHz4 / 4 Krait 400
2360 MHz2300 MHz
4x 32 KB4x 32 KB
2 MB2 MB
4 / 44 / 4
28 28
Adreno 330 (578 MHz), 802.11a/b/g/n/ac (2.4/5 GHz), Bluetooth 4.0, 2x 32 Bit LPDDR3-1866 Memory Controller (14.9 GB/s)Adreno 330 (450 MHz), LTE cat.4, UMTS, MBMS, GSM, CDMA2000, tD-SCDMA, 802.11a/b/g/n/ac (2.4/5 GHz), Bluetooth 4.0, 2x 32 Bit LPDDR3-1600 Memory Controller (12.8 GB/s)
iGPUQualcomm Adreno 330 (578 MHz)Qualcomm Adreno 330 (450 MHz)
ArchitectureARMARM

Benchmarks

3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
min: 5061     avg: 12899     median: 14737 (9%)     max: 17059 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
min: 5104     avg: 7863     median: 7865 (8%)     max: 10619 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
16678 Points (17%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Physics
817 Points (12%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Stream
1786 Points (14%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Memory
3857 Points (35%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Floating Point
5973 Points (12%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Integer
2692 Points (5%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Total Score
3982 Points (10%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Multi-Core
2327 (4%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Single-Core
915 (19%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Multi-Core
2809 (4%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Single-Core
926 (19%)
Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
991 (12%)
Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
2330 (3%)
Linpack Android / IOS - Linpack Multi Thread
600 MFLOPS (20%)
Linpack Android / IOS - Linpack Single Thread
348 MFLOPS (34%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
7427 ms (12%)
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
1047 ms (11%)
Sunspider - Sunspider 0.9.1 Total Score *
524 ms (5%)
min: 558     avg: 763     median: 758 (7%)     max: 1087.2 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
4127 Points (6%)
min: 2714     avg: 3981     median: 4089.5 (6%)     max: 5416 Points
Vellamo 3.x - Vellamo 3.x Metal
min: 1178     avg: 1349     median: 1345 (36%)     max: 1526 Points
Vellamo 3.x - Vellamo 3.x Multicore Beta
min: 1541     avg: 1696     median: 1692.5 (38%)     max: 1856 Points
Vellamo 3.x - Vellamo 3.x Browser
min: 2443     avg: 2662     median: 2660 (35%)     max: 2884 Points
Quadrant Standard Edition 2.0 - Quadrant Standard 2.0 Total Score
17321 points (40%)
min: 11103     avg: 18016     median: 19594 (45%)     max: 21610 points
AnTuTu v3 - AnTuTu v3 CPU
15386 Points (100%)
AnTuTu v4 - AnTuTu v4 Total Score
32525 Points (76%)
AnTuTu v5 - AnTuTu v5 Total Score
min: 32731     avg: 37780     median: 38083 (38%)     max: 43075 Points
AnTuTu v6 - AnTuTu v6 Total Score
34400 Points (12%)
AndEBench - AndEBench Java
469 Iter./s (14%)
AndEBench - AndEBench Native
17744 Iter./s (58%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Computer Vision
2403 Points (13%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage
2186 Points (6%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 2.0
3699 Points (24%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score
min: 3525     avg: 3905     median: 3950 (20%)     max: 4241 Points

Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 APQ8074AB → 100% n=18

Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 → 104% n=18

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2021, 2020
v1.16
log 21. 16:59:10

#0 checking url part for id 5921 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 4338 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Mon, 20 Sep 2021 13:09:15 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#4 composed specs +0.014s ... 0.014s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.014s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 5921 +0s ... 0.015s

#7 got single benchmarks 5921 +0.006s ... 0.02s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 4338 +0s ... 0.021s

#9 got single benchmarks 4338 +0.027s ... 0.048s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.048s

#11 min, max, avg, median took s +0.023s ... 0.071s

#12 return log +0.004s ... 0.074s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)