Notebookcheck Logo

Samsung Exynos 7870 Octa vs Samsung Exynos 7880

Samsung Exynos 7870 Octa

► remove from comparison Samsung 7870 Octa

The Samsung Exynos 7 Octa is a 64-bit SoC for mainstream smartphones and tablets (usually Android based). It was announced in February 2016 and integrates eight Cortex-A53 cores, which are manufactured in a modern 14-nm process. Compared to the previous 28-nm-SoCs, the performance was increased and the power consumption is 30 % lower according to Samsung. The integrated LZE Cat.6 modem reaches transfer rates of up to 300 Mbps (downstream) and 50 Mbps (upstream). The dual-channel memory controller supports LPDDR3-1866 RAM.

The graphics adapter ARM Mali-T830 MP2 (core clock of 700 MHz according to Wikipedia) is also used in combination with the HiSilicon Kirin 650 SoC. Besides OpenGL ES 3.2, it also supports OpenCL 1.2 as well as DirectX 11 (FL 9_3). The performance is sufficient for common Android games from 2016 at medium details.

Samsung Exynos 7880

► remove from comparison Samsung Exynos 7880

The Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7780 is a 64-bit SoC for mainstream smartphones and tablets (usually Android based). It was announced early 2017 and integrates eight Cortex-A53 cores clocked at up to 1.9 GHz. It is manufactured in the modern 14 nm FinFET process at Samsung and integrates an LTE Cat 7 modem. The (dual channel?) memory controller supports LPDDR4 RAM.

Additionally, the SoC integrates GPS, GLONASS and Baido positioning systems, UHD / HEVC (H.265) video de- and encoding and UFS 2.0 / eMMC 5.1 storage.

ModelSamsung Exynos 7870 OctaSamsung Exynos 7880
SeriesSamsung ExynosSamsung Exynos
CodenameA53A53
Series: Exynos A53
Samsung Exynos 78801.9 GHz8 / 8 cores A53
Samsung Exynos 7870 Octa « 1.6 GHz8 / 8 cores A53
Samsung Exynos 7880 « 1.9 GHz8 / 8 cores A53
Samsung Exynos 7870 Octa1.6 GHz8 / 8 cores A53
Clock1600 MHz1900 MHz
Cores / Threads8 / 88 / 8
Technology14 nm14 nm
FeaturesARM Mali-T830 GPU, 8x Cortex-A53 1.6 GHz, LTE Cat.6, 14 nm, dual-channel memory controller LPDDR3-1866ARM Mali-T830 MP3 GPU, 8x Cortex-A53 1.9 GHz, LTE Cat. 7, 14 nm, LPDDR4 memory controller, UHD 40fps recording and palyback with HEVC
iGPUARM Mali-T830 MP2 (700 MHz)ARM Mali-T830 MP3
ArchitectureARMARM
Announced
Manufacturerwww.samsung.comwww.samsung.com

Benchmarks

3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
11467 Points (9%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
11005 Points (9%)
13057 Points (11%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
min: 1595     avg: 1679     median: 1709 (20%)     max: 1776 Points
1705 Points (20%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Physics
min: 1601     avg: 1675     median: 1674 (19%)     max: 1762 Points
1801 Points (21%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 726     avg: 732     median: 732 (7%)     max: 736 Points
773 Points (8%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 3704     avg: 3728     median: 3710 (4%)     max: 3777 Points
4104 Points (5%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 680     avg: 696     median: 682 (9%)     max: 726 Points
775 Points (11%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 3277     avg: 3285     median: 3284.5 (8%)     max: 3292 Points
4098 Points (10%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Multi-Core
4169 Points (7%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Single-Core
753 Points (11%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 6784     avg: 9156     median: 9670 (11%)     max: 11916 ms
6442 ms (8%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 3721     avg: 4164     median: 3880 (3%)     max: 4968 Points
5256 Points (5%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 31     avg: 31.5     median: 31.5 (7%)     max: 32 Points
60603 Points (21%)
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 MEM
min: 4775     avg: 5190     median: 5140.5 (16%)     max: 5703 Points
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 UX
min: 15443     avg: 16057     median: 16019 (20%)     max: 16745 Points
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 GPU
min: 8143     avg: 8405     median: 8393.5 (3%)     max: 8688 Points
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 CPU
min: 31778     avg: 32396     median: 32448 (20%)     max: 32911 Points
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 Total Score
min: 61794     avg: 62047     median: 61818 (11%)     max: 62758 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work 2.0 Battery Life
min: 669     avg: 719     median: 718.5 (14%)     max: 768 min
681 min (13%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Computer Vision
min: 2016     avg: 2023     median: 2024 (11%)     max: 2030 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage
min: 3440     avg: 3508     median: 3536 (8%)     max: 3549 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 2.0
min: 3722     avg: 3800     median: 3799 (25%)     max: 3889 Points
4060 Points (27%)
5035 Points (25%)

Average Benchmarks Samsung Exynos 7870 Octa → 100% n=13

Average Benchmarks Samsung Exynos 7880 → 111% n=13

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.26
log 19. 17:20:50

#0 checking url part for id 8118 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 8474 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Fri, 19 Apr 2024 05:38:49 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 composed specs +0.021s ... 0.022s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.022s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 8118 +0.003s ... 0.025s

#7 got single benchmarks 8118 +0.03s ... 0.056s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 8474 +0.003s ... 0.059s

#9 got single benchmarks 8474 +0.009s ... 0.068s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.068s

#11 min, max, avg, median took s +0.112s ... 0.18s

#12 return log +0.031s ... 0.211s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)