Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Celeron M 743 vs Intel Celeron M 763

Intel Celeron M 743

► remove from comparison

The Intel Celeron M ULV 743 is an ultra low voltage single core processor for small sub-notebooks / laptops. It performs slightly above the Atom single core lineup and is intended to power cheap CULV laptops.

The Celeron M 743 is based on the Penryn core but support only a stripped down feature set. For example Speedstep is not supported leading to a higher idle power consumption than other laptops with Core 2 / Pentium processors in this TDP range. Furthermore, 64 Bit support and Virtualization in hardware are not supported.

 

Intel Celeron M 763

► remove from comparison

The Intel Celeron M ULV 763 is an ultra low voltage single core processor for small sub-notebooks / laptops. It performs slightly above the Atom single core lineup and is intended to power cheap CULV laptops.

The Celeron M 763 is based on the Penryn core but support only a stripped down feature set. For example Speedstep is not supported leading to a higher idle power consumption than other laptops with Core 2 / Pentium processors in this TDP range. Furthermore, 64 Bit support and Virtualization in hardware are not supported.

ModelIntel Celeron M 743Intel Celeron M 763
SeriesIntel Celeron MIntel Celeron M
CodenamePenrynPenryn
Series: Celeron M Penryn
Intel Celeron M 925 compare2.3 GHz1 / 1
Intel Celeron M 900 compare2.2 GHz1 / 1
Intel Celeron M 7631.4 GHz1 / 1
» Intel Celeron M 7431.3 GHz1 / 1
Intel Celeron M 723 compare1.2 GHz1 / 1
Intel Celeron M 722 compare1.2 GHz1 / 1
Intel Celeron M 925 compare2.3 GHz1 / 1
Intel Celeron M 900 compare2.2 GHz1 / 1
» Intel Celeron M 7631.4 GHz1 / 1
Intel Celeron M 7431.3 GHz1 / 1
Intel Celeron M 723 compare1.2 GHz1 / 1
Intel Celeron M 722 compare1.2 GHz1 / 1
Clock1300 MHz1400 MHz
FSB800800
L1 Cache64 KB64 KB
L2 Cache1 MB1 MB
Cores / Threads1 / 11 / 1
TDP10 Watt10 Watt
Transistors410 Million410 Million
Technology45 nm, 0.775 - 1.1 V45 nm
Die Size107 mm2107 mm2
max. Temp.100 °C100 °C
SocketBGA965BGA965
Architecturex86x86
$107 U.S.$107 U.S.
Announced
ManufacturerIntel Celeron M 743Intel Celeron M 763

Benchmarks

Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
100%
1 743 +
min: 1230     avg: 1303     median: 1324 (12%)     max: 1356 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
100%
1 743 +
1398 Points (9%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
100%
1 743 +
3886 s (46%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
100%
1 743 +
121.8 s (25%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
100%
1 743 +
min: 557     avg: 582     median: 581.5 (1%)     max: 606 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
100%
1 743 +
min: 41     avg: 41.9     median: 41.9 (9%)     max: 42.7 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
100%
1 743 +
min: 95     avg: 98.5     median: 98.5 (4%)     max: 102 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
100%
1 743 +
2252 s (10%)
SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS) - SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS)
100%
1 743 +
min: 5120     avg: 5607     median: 5606.5 (3%)     max: 6093 MIPS
SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS) - SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS)
100%
1 743 +
min: 4410     avg: 4571     median: 4571 (4%)     max: 4732 MFLOPS
PCMark 05 - PCMark 05 - Standard
100%
1 743 +
1913 Points (12%)
Windows 7 Experience Index - Win7 CPU
100%
1 743 +
3.1 Points (40%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Celeron M 743 → NAN% n=

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2022, 2021
v1.18
log 04. 14:36:49

#0 checking url part for id 495 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 1606 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Fri, 30 Sep 2022 13:14:19 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#4 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.002s ... 0.002s

#5 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.003s

#6 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.003s

#7 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.003s

#8 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.003s

#9 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.003s

#10 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.003s

#11 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.003s

#12 composed specs +0s ... 0.004s

#13 did output specs +0s ... 0.004s

#14 getting avg benchmarks for device 495 +0s ... 0.004s

#15 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.004s

#16 got single benchmarks 495 +0.01s ... 0.015s

#17 getting avg benchmarks for device 1606 +0s ... 0.015s

#18 got single benchmarks 1606 +0s ... 0.015s

#19 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.015s

#20 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.015s

#21 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.016s

#22 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.016s

#23 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.017s

#24 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.017s

#25 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.017s

#26 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.018s

#27 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.018s

#28 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.018s

#29 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.018s

#30 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.019s

#31 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.019s

#32 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.019s

#33 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.019s

#34 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.019s

#35 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.02s

#36 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.021s

#37 min, max, avg, median took s +0s ... 0.021s

#38 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.021s

#39 return log +0.004s ... 0.025s

Please share our article, every link counts!
.170
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)