Intel Core i7-740QM vs Intel Core i7-820QM

Intel Core i7-740QM

► remove Intel 740QM

The Intel Core i7-740QM is a fast quad-core CPU for laptops. Compared to the Core i7-720QM, the 740QM features a higher clock rate. It features 4 cores and Hyperthreading. Therefore, 8 threads can be worked on simultaneously. Compared to the faster Core i7 mobile CPUs, the 740QM only features 6MB L3 Cache (the faster ones 8 MB).

Because of the Turbo Mode, the CPU can be clocked with up to 2.93 GHz (1 core only) and therefore fast for single core applications like older games. Thanks to the 4 cores (and 8 threads), modern multi-threaded applications also profit from this CPU greatly (altough when using all cores, the clock speed remains low).

The Core i7 7xx line has an integrated memory controller for DDR3 bars (1066 or 1333). Therefore, the memory performance is very good (compared to older CPUs with external memory controllers). Still this also leads to the higher TDP of the whole chip.

The performance depends on the used thread count. If all cores are fully used, the performance of the 740QM is on a level with the fast Core i5-2520M (Sandy Bridge). If only a single core / thread is fully used, the performance depends on the Turbo Boost. Benchmarks indicate a performance on a level of the Core i5-480M.

The power consumption of up to 45 Watt (TDP) is quite high for a laptop CPU and because of the Turbo Mode, the power consumption could reach these high values. Therefore, only large laptops with good cooling solutions can house this CPU.

Intel Core i7-820QM

► remove Intel 820QM

The Intel Core i7 820QM is a high end quad core CPU in 2009. It features 4 cores (quad core CPU) and Hyperthreading. Therefore, 8 threads can be worked on simultaneously.

Because of the Turbo Mode, the CPU is clocked with up to 3.06 GHz and therefore can perform very well in single core applications like older games.

The Core i7 line has an integrated memory controller for DDR3 bars (1066 or 1333). Therefore, the memory performance is very good (compared to older CPUs with external memory controllers). Still, this also leads to the higher TDP of the whole chip.

The Core micro-architecture is still very similar to the one used in the Core 2 CPUs, therefore the performance per MHz (neglecting the integrated memory controller, hyperthreading and Turbo Boost) is similar.

The power consumption of up to 45 Watt (TDP) is quite high for a laptop CPU and because of the Turbo Mode, the power consumption should reach these high values. Therefore, the CPU is only suited for large laptops.

 

Intel Core i7-740QMIntel Core i7-820QM
Intel Core i7Intel Core i7
ClarksfieldClarksfield
: Core i7 Clarksfield
Intel Core i7-940XM (compare)2130 - 3333 MHz4 / 88 MB
Intel Core i7-920XM (compare)2000 - 3200 MHz4 / 88 MB
Intel Core i7-840QM (compare)1860 - 3200 MHz4 / 88 MB
Intel Core i7-820QM1730 - 3060 MHz4 / 88 MB
» Intel Core i7-740QM1730 - 2930 MHz4 / 86 MB
Intel Core i7-720QM (compare)1600 - 2800 MHz4 / 86 MB
Intel Core i7-940XM (compare)2130 - 3333 MHz4 / 88 MB
Intel Core i7-920XM (compare)2000 - 3200 MHz4 / 88 MB
Intel Core i7-840QM (compare)1860 - 3200 MHz4 / 88 MB
» Intel Core i7-820QM1730 - 3060 MHz4 / 88 MB
Intel Core i7-740QM1730 - 2930 MHz4 / 86 MB
Intel Core i7-720QM (compare)1600 - 2800 MHz4 / 86 MB
1730 - 2930 MHz1730 - 3060 MHz
25002500
256 KB256 KB
1 MB1 MB
6 MB8 MB
4 / 84 / 8
45 45
774 774
45 45
296 mm2296 mm2
100 °C100 °C
PGA988RPGA989
Turbo Boost max. 2.93GHz
$546 U.S.$546 U.S.
Intel Core i7 740QMIntel Core i7 820QM

Cinebench R11.5 - CPU Multi 64Bit
min: 2     avg: 3.1     median: 3 (7%)     max: 3 Points
min: 2     avg: 3.1     median: 2 (5%)     max: 3 Points
Cinebench R10 - Rendering Single 32Bit
min: 2933     avg: 3094.8     median: 3082 (34%)     max: 3313 Points
min: 3075     avg: 3456.6     median: 3271 (36%)     max: 4185 Points
Cinebench R10 - Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
min: 8364     avg: 8865     median: 8930 (14%)     max: 9486 Points
min: 8341     avg: 9174.4     median: 8559 (13%)     max: 11966 Points
Cinebench R10 - Rendering Multiple CPUs 64Bit
min: 10265     avg: 10893.6     median: 10926 (14%)     max: 11680 Points
min: 10222     avg: 10497.8     median: 10317 (14%)     max: 11311 Points
Cinebench R10 - Rendering Single CPUs 64Bit
min: 3725     avg: 3878.1     median: 3873 (37%)     max: 4171 Points
min: 3709     avg: 3952.2     median: 3987 (39%)     max: 4101 Points
wPrime 2.0x - 1024m *
min: 427     avg: 730.3     median: 519 (6%)     max: 1460 seconds
min: 423     avg: 1139.7     median: 1361 (16%)     max: 1411 seconds
wPrime 2.0x - 32m *
min: 13     avg: 16     median: 15 (3%)     max: 19 seconds
min: 13     avg: 35.2     median: 42 (8%)     max: 43 seconds
3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 3158     avg: 3334.5     median: 3318 (22%)     max: 3609 Points
min: 3053     avg: 3226.1     median: 3149 (21%)     max: 3629 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
min: 14     avg: 14.6     median: 14 (3%)     max: 15 Seconds
14 Seconds (3%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
min: 32     avg: 33.8     median: 33 (1%)     max: 35 Seconds
min: 31     avg: 31.7     median: 32 (1%)     max: 32 Seconds
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M *
min: 784     avg: 812.7     median: 809 (4%)     max: 861 Seconds
min: 765     avg: 787.3     median: 780 (3%)     max: 817 Seconds
SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS)
min: 43330     avg: 47420     median: 47420 (23%)     max: 51510 MIPS
SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS)
min: 35310     avg: 40900     median: 36100 (28%)     max: 51290 MFLOPS
PCMark 05 - Standard 1024x768
min: 6675     avg: 6831     median: 6831 (43%)     max: 6987 Points
7734 Points (49%)
Windows 7 Experience Index - Processor
7.1 points (101%)
7.2 points (102%)
3DMark Vantage - P CPU no PhysX 1280x1024
min: 10808     avg: 11460.8     median: 11601 (16%)     max: 12016 Points
min: 10851     avg: 11569.7     median: 11251 (16%)     max: 12631 Points
3DMark 11 - Performance Physics 1280x720
min: 4204     avg: 4406.4     median: 4450 (23%)     max: 4533 points
4002 points (21%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i7-740QM → 100%

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i7-820QM → 96%

-
-
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2019, 2018
v1.8.1a
Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)