Intel Core i5-7300HQ vs Intel Core i5-7440HQ

Intel Core i5-7300HQ

► remove Intel 7300HQ

The Intel Core i5-7300HQ is a quad-core processor for notebooks based on the Kaby Lake architecture and was announced in January 2017. Compared to the faster Core i7 models, the Core i5 does not support Hyper Threading and has lower clocks. The CPU cores run at 2.5 - 3.5 GHz (4 cores up to 3.1, 2 cores up to 3.3 GHz). The processor is also equipped with the HD Graphics 630 GPU as well as a dual-channel memory controller (DDR3L-1600/DDR4-2400). It is manufactured in a 14nm process with FinFET transistors.

Architecture

Intel basically uses the same micro architecture compared to Skylake, so the per-MHz performance does not differ. The manufacturer only reworked the Speed Shift technology for faster dynamic adjustments of voltages and clocks, and the improved 14nm process allows much higher frequencies combined with better efficiency than before.

Performance

The performance should be quite similar to the old Core i5-6440HQ (2.6 - 3.5 GHz, Skylake) that offers the same per-MHz performance and only 100 MHz higher core speed. The performance is therefore sufficient even for demanding tasks.

Graphics

The integrated Intel HD Graphics 630 has 24 Execution Units (similar to previous HD Graphics 530) running at 350 - 1000 MHz (i7 models up to 1100). The performance depends a lot on the memory configuration; it should be comparable to a dedicated Nvidia GeForce 920M in combination with fast DDR4-2133 dual-channel memory.

Contrary to Skylake, Kaby Lake now supports hardware decoding for H.265/HEVC Main 10 with a 10-bit color depth as well as Google's VP9 codec. The dual-core Kaby Lake processors, which were announced in January, should also support HDCP 2.2.

Power Consumption

The chip is manufactured in an improved 14nm process with FinFET transistors, which improves the efficiency even further. Intel still specifies the TDP with 45 Watts, but it can also be reduced to 35 Watts by the notebook manufacturers (cTDP down). This will obviously affect the performance, because the Turbo Boost cannot be maintained for longer periods.

Intel Core i5-7440HQ

► remove Intel 7440HQ

The Intel Core i5-7440HQ is a quad-core processor for notebooks based on the Kaby Lake architecture and was announced in January 2017. Compared to the faster Core i7 models, the Core i5 does not support Hyper Threading and has lower clocks. The CPU cores run at 2.8 - 3.8 GHz (4 cores up to 3.4, 2 cores up to 3.6 GHz). The processor is also equipped with the HD Graphics 630 GPU as well as a dual-channel memory controller (DDR3L-1600/DDR4-2400). It is manufactured in a 14nm process with FinFET transistors.

Architecture

Intel basically uses the same micro architecture compared to Skylake, so the per-MHz performance does not differ. The manufacturer only reworked the Speed Shift technology for faster dynamic adjustments of voltages and clocks, and the improved 14nm process allows much higher frequencies combined with better efficiency than before.

Performance

Due to the higher clock speeds, the performance of the i5-7440HQ is clearly faster than the old Core i5-6440HQ with 2.6 - 3.5 GHz. The performance is therefore sufficient even for demanding tasks.

Graphics

The integrated Intel HD Graphics 630 has 24 Execution Units (similar to previous HD Graphics 530) running at 350 - 1000 MHz (i7 models up to 1100). The performance depends a lot on the memory configuration; it should be comparable to a dedicated Nvidia GeForce 920M in combination with fast DDR4-2133 dual-channel memory.

Contrary to Skylake, Kaby Lake now supports hardware decoding for H.265/HEVC Main 10 with a 10-bit color depth as well as Google's VP9 codec. The dual-core Kaby Lake processors, which were announced in January, should also support HDCP 2.2.

Power Consumption

The chip is manufactured in an improved 14nm process with FinFET transistors, which improves the efficiency even further. Intel still specifies the TDP with 45 Watts, but it can also be reduced to 35 Watts by the notebook manufacturers (cTDP down). This will obviously affect the performance, because the Turbo Boost cannot be maintained for longer periods.

Intel Core i5-7300HQIntel Core i5-7440HQ
Intel Core i5Intel Core i5
Kaby LakeKaby Lake
: Core i5 Kaby Lake
Intel Core i5-7440HQ2800 - 3800 MHz4 / 46 MB
» Intel Core i5-7300HQ2500 - 3500 MHz4 / 46 MB
Intel Core i5-7287U (compare)3300 - 3700 MHz2 / 44 MB
Intel Core i5-7360U (compare)2300 - 3600 MHz2 / 44 MB
Intel Core i5-7267U (compare)3100 - 3500 MHz2 / 44 MB
Intel Core i5-7300U (compare)2600 - 3500 MHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i5-7260U (compare)2200 - 3400 MHz2 / 44 MB
Intel Core i5-7200U (compare)2500 - 3100 MHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i5-7Y57 (compare)1200 - 3300 MHz2 / 44 MB
Intel Core i5-7Y54 (compare)1200 - 3200 MHz2 / 44 MB
» Intel Core i5-7440HQ2800 - 3800 MHz4 / 46 MB
Intel Core i5-7300HQ2500 - 3500 MHz4 / 46 MB
Intel Core i5-7287U (compare)3300 - 3700 MHz2 / 44 MB
Intel Core i5-7360U (compare)2300 - 3600 MHz2 / 44 MB
Intel Core i5-7267U (compare)3100 - 3500 MHz2 / 44 MB
Intel Core i5-7300U (compare)2600 - 3500 MHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i5-7260U (compare)2200 - 3400 MHz2 / 44 MB
Intel Core i5-7200U (compare)2500 - 3100 MHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i5-7Y57 (compare)1200 - 3300 MHz2 / 44 MB
Intel Core i5-7Y54 (compare)1200 - 3200 MHz2 / 44 MB
2500 - 3500 MHz2800 - 3800 MHz
256 KB256 KB
1 MB1 MB
6 MB6 MB
4 / 44 / 4
45 45
14 14
100 °C100 °C
Dual-Channel DDR4 Memory Controller, HyperThreading, AVX, AVX2, Quick Sync, Virtualization, AES-NIDual-Channel DDR4 Memory Controller, HyperThreading, AVX, AVX2, Quick Sync, Virtualization, AES-NI
iGPUIntel HD Graphics 630 (300 - 1000 MHz)Intel HD Graphics 630 (300 - 1000 MHz)
$250 U.S.$250 U.S.

Cinebench R15 - CPU Multi 64Bit
min: 501     avg: 512.2     median: 513 (12%)     max: 520 Points
554 Points (13%)
Cinebench R15 - CPU Single 64Bit
min: 129     avg: 141.1     median: 142 (65%)     max: 149 Points
158 Points (72%)
Cinebench R11.5 - CPU Multi 64Bit
min: 5.38     avg: 5.8     median: 5.9 (22%)     max: 5.93 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - CPU Single 64Bit
min: 1.49     avg: 1.5     median: 1.5 (62%)     max: 1.68 Points
Cinebench R10 - Rendering Single 32Bit
min: 4920     avg: 5318.8     median: 5434.5 (59%)     max: 5581 Points
Cinebench R10 - Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
min: 17197     avg: 17956.1     median: 18064.5 (36%)     max: 18304 Points
Cinebench R10 - Rendering Multiple CPUs 64Bit
min: 21912     avg: 22624.7     median: 22845 (30%)     max: 23117 Points
Cinebench R10 - Rendering Single CPUs 64Bit
min: 6594     avg: 6810.7     median: 6700 (65%)     max: 7138 Points
wPrime 2.0x - 1024m *
min: 331.085     avg: 346.7     median: 348.1 (4%)     max: 351.3 seconds
318.9 seconds (4%)
wPrime 2.0x - 32m *
min: 10.979     avg: 11.3     median: 11.1 (2%)     max: 12.409 seconds
10.2 seconds (2%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - Pass 2
min: 34     avg: 34.1     median: 34.1 (1%)     max: 34.2 fps
36 fps (1%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - Pass 1
min: 160     avg: 160.9     median: 160.8 (60%)     max: 162 fps
182 fps (67%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - 4k Preset
4.7 fps (26%)
TrueCrypt - Serpent Mean 100MB
0.2 GB/s (11%)
TrueCrypt - Twofish Mean 100MB
0.4 GB/s (12%)
TrueCrypt - AES Mean 100MB
2.3 GB/s (12%)
Blender 2.79 *
900.5 Seconds (10%)
3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 6266     avg: 6279     median: 6279 (44%)     max: 6292 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
min: 10.676     avg: 10.8     median: 10.7 (2%)     max: 11.294 Seconds
9.9 Seconds (2%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
min: 24.377     avg: 24.5     median: 24.5 (1%)     max: 24.894 Seconds
25.6 Seconds (1%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M *
min: 590     avg: 603.8     median: 596.3 (3%)     max: 654.006 Seconds
524 Seconds (2%)
3DMark 11 - Performance Physics 1280x720
min: 5382     avg: 6022.3     median: 6042 (33%)     max: 6627 points
6583 points (35%)
3DMark - Ice Storm Standard Physics 1280x720
min: 42492     avg: 50667.4     median: 52482 (34%)     max: 53471 Points
52071 Points (33%)
3DMark - Ice Storm Extreme Physics 1920x1080
min: 39401     avg: 48909.2     median: 50273 (60%)     max: 53025 Points
51726 Points (62%)
3DMark - Ice Storm Unlimited Physics 1280x720 offscreen
min: 46577     avg: 50186.4     median: 50280 (58%)     max: 52451 Points
3DMark - Cloud Gate Standard Physics 1280x720
min: 4269     avg: 4697.1     median: 4722 (12%)     max: 4855 Points
5243 Points (13%)
3DMark - Fire Strike Physics 1920x1080
min: 6020     avg: 6672.1     median: 6733 (25%)     max: 6881 Points
7343 Points (27%)
Geekbench 3 - 32 Bit Multi-Core Score
min: 9728     avg: 9773.3     median: 9752 (31%)     max: 9840 Points
Geekbench 3 - 32 Bit Single-Core Score
min: 3163     avg: 3184.3     median: 3195 (66%)     max: 3195 Points
Geekbench 4.0 - Compute OpenCL Score
min: 72902     avg: 81105     median: 83205 (29%)     max: 87208 Points
Geekbench 4.0 - 64 Bit Multi-Core Score
min: 8085     avg: 9720.3     median: 10525 (38%)     max: 10551 Points
Geekbench 4.0 - 64 Bit Single-Core Score
min: 3387     avg: 3823.3     median: 4022 (70%)     max: 4061 Points
Geekbench 4.3 - 64 Bit Single-Core Score
min: 3387     avg: 3862     median: 4040 (64%)     max: 4159 Points
Geekbench 4.3 - 64 Bit Multi-Core Score
min: 8081     avg: 10065     median: 11039 (30%)     max: 11075 Points
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score *
min: 955     avg: 1039.9     median: 1044.1 (2%)     max: 1131.7 ms
Octane V2 - Total Score
min: 31952     avg: 33838     median: 33589 (67%)     max: 36008 Points
Power Consumption - Prime95 V28,10 Stress Power Consumption (external Monitor) ultra *
100%
1 7300HQ +
47.6 Watt (13%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption (external Monitor) ultra *
100%
1 7300HQ +
41.3 Watt (11%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i5-7300HQ → 100%

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i5-7440HQ → 105%

-
-
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2019, 2018
v1.8.1a
Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)