Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core i3-7100U vs AMD FX-9830P vs AMD A12-9700P

Intel Core i3-7100U

► remove from comparison Intel i3-7100U

The Intel Core i3-7100U is a dual-core processor of the Kaby Lake architecture. It offers two CPU cores clocked at 2.4 GHz (without Turbo Boost) and integrates HyperThreading to work with up to 4 threads at once. The architectural differences are rather small compared to the Skylake generation, therefore the performance per MHz should be very similar. The SoC includes a dual channel DDR4 memory controller and Intel HD Graphics 620 graphics card (clocked at 300 - 1000 MHz). It is manufactured in an improved 14nm FinFET process at Intel. Compare to the old Skylake Core i3-6100U, the i3-7100U offers a 100 MHz improved clock speed.

 Architecture

Intel basically uses the same micro architecture compared to Skylake, so the per-MHz performance does not differ. The manufacturer only reworked the Speed Shift technology for faster dynamic adjustments of voltages and clocks, and the improved 14nm process allows much higher frequencies combined with better efficiency than before.

AMD FX-9830P

► remove from comparison AMD FX-9830P

The AMD FX-9830P is a mobile mainstream SoC from the Bristol-Ridge APU series for notebooks (7th APU generation), which was announced mid 2016. The FX-9830P is the fastest Bristol Ridge APU with a 45-Watt TDP and the successor to the 15-35-Watt FX-8800P from the Carrizo generation. The chip has four CPU cores (two Excavator modules = 4 integer and 2 FP units), a Radeon R7 GPU as well as a dual-channel DDR4-1866 memory controller. Carrizo is a full-fledged SoC and is also equipped with an integrated chipset, which provides all I/0 ports.

Architecture

Bristol Ridge is the successor of the Carrizo architecture and the design is almost identical. Thanks to optimized manufacturing processes and more aggressive Boost behavior, however, the clocks are a bit higher at the same power consumption. The memory controller now also supports DDR4-RAM, in this case up to 2400 MHz. More technical details are available in the following articles:

Performance

Thanks to higher clocks, the FX9830P is slightly ahead of the old 35-Watt top model FX-8800P and competes with the entry-level dual-cores from Intel (Skylake and Kaby Lake). Compared to the Intel model, the AMD chip has a small advantage in multi-thread scenarios, but is beaten when you only stress one or two cores.

This means there is sufficient performance for typical office and web applications as well as light multitasking.

Graphics Card

The integrated Radeon R7 (Bristol Ridge) GPU has 512 active shader units (8 compute cores) clocked at up to 900 MHz (compared to 758 MHz for FX-9800P). Thanks to the better utilization of the clock range as well as faster DDR4-RAm, the GPU can slightly beat its predecessors Radeon R7 (Carrizo) and competes with a dedicated GeForce 920MX in the best-case scenario (dual-channel memory). Many games from 2015/2016 can be played smoothly at low settings. 

Power Consumption

AMD specifies the TDP of the FX-9830P with 25-45 Watts, which is comparable to Intel quad-core processors from the H-series. This means the APU is a good choice for big and heavy notebooks with at least 15 inches.

AMD A12-9700P

► remove from comparison AMD A12-9700P

The AMD A12-9700P is a mainstream SoC from the Bristol-Ridge APU series for notebooks (7th APU generation), which was announced mid 2016. The ULV chip with a TDP of 15 Watts (can be configured to 12 Watts) has four CPU cores (two Excavator modules), a Radeon R7 GPU as well as a dual-channel DDR4-1866 memory controller. Carrizo is a full-fledged SoC and is also equipped with an integrated chipset, which provides all I/0 ports.

Architecture

Bristol Ridge is the successor of the Carrizo architecture and the design is almost identical. Thanks to optimized manufacturing processes and more aggressive Boost behavior, however, the clocks are a bit higher at the same power consumption. The memory controller now also supports DDR4-RAM, in this case up to 1866 MHz. More technical details are available in the following articles:

Performance

The performance of the A12-9700P is between the two 15-Watt processors A10-9600P and FX-9800P, and therefore roughly on par with a 15-Watt Core i3 from the Skylake or Kaby Lake series, respectively. Compared to the Intel model, the AMD chip has a small advantage in multi-thread scenarios, but is beaten when you only stress one or two cores. Due to the TDP limitation, the performance of the A12-9700P will drop significantly under sustained workloads.

This means there is sufficient performance for typical office and web applications as well as light multitasking.

Graphics Card

The integrated Radeon R7 (Bristol Ridge) GPU has 512 active shader units (8 compute cores) clocked at up to 758 MHz. Thanks to the better utilization of the clock range as well as faster DDR4-RAm, the GPU can slightly beat its predecessors Radeon R7 (Carrizo) and competes with a dedicated GeForce 920MX in the best-case scenario (dual-channel memory, low CPU requirements). Many games from 2015/2016 can be played smoothly at low settings. 

Power Consumption

AMD specifies the TDP of the A12-9700P with 15 Watts, which is comparable to Intel's ULV models. This means the CPU is a good choice for thin notebooks starting with a 12-inch screen.

ModelIntel Core i3-7100UAMD FX-9830PAMD A12-9700P
SeriesIntel Kaby LakeAMD Bristol RidgeAMD Bristol Ridge
CodenameKaby LakeBristol RidgeBristol Ridge
Series: Bristol Ridge Bristol Ridge
Intel Core i7-7700K4.2 - 4.5 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i7-77003.6 - 4.2 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Xeon E3-1535M v63.1 - 4.2 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7920HQ3.1 - 4.1 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7700T2.9 - 3.8 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7600K3.8 - 4.2 GHz4 / 4 cores8 MB L3
Intel Xeon E3-1505M v63 - 4 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7820HQ2.9 - 3.9 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7820HK2.9 - 3.9 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7700HQ2.8 - 3.8 GHz4 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i5-75003.4 - 3.8 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7440HQ2.8 - 3.8 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7567U3.5 - 4 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7660U2.5 - 4 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7600U2.8 - 3.9 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7300HQ2.5 - 3.5 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7500T2.7 - 3.3 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7287U3.3 - 3.7 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7560U2.4 - 3.8 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7267U3.1 - 3.5 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7360U2.3 - 3.6 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7500U2.7 - 3.5 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7300U2.6 - 3.5 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7260U2.2 - 3.4 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7200U2.5 - 3.1 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i3-7100H3 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i3-7167U2.8 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7Y751.3 - 3.6 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7Y571.2 - 3.3 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7Y541.2 - 3.2 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i3-7100U « 2.4 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core m3-7Y321 - 3 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Pentium Gold 4415U2.3 GHz2 / 4 cores2 MB L3
Intel Core m3-7Y301 - 2.6 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron 3965U2.2 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Core i3-7020U2.3 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Celeron 3867U1.8 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Celeron 3865U1.8 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Pentium Gold 4425Y1.7 GHz2 / 4 cores2 MB L3
Intel Pentium Gold 4415Y1.6 GHz2 / 4 cores2 MB L3
Intel Pentium Gold 4410Y1.5 GHz2 / 4 cores2 MB L3
Intel Celeron 3965Y1.5 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
AMD FX-9830P « 3 - 3.7 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD PRO A12-9830B3 - 3.7 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD FX-9800P2.7 - 3.6 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD PRO A12-9800B2.7 - 3.6 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD A12-9720P2.7 - 3.6 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD A12-9700P2.5 - 3.4 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD A10-9620P2.5 - 3.4 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD A10-9600P2.4 - 3.3 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD PRO A8-9600B2.4 - 3.3 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD FX-9830P3 - 3.7 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD PRO A12-9830B3 - 3.7 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD FX-9800P2.7 - 3.6 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD PRO A12-9800B2.7 - 3.6 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD A12-9720P2.7 - 3.6 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD A12-9700P « 2.5 - 3.4 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD A10-9620P2.5 - 3.4 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD A10-9600P2.4 - 3.3 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD PRO A8-9600B2.4 - 3.3 GHz4 / 4 cores
Clock2400 MHz3000 - 3700 MHz2500 - 3400 MHz
L1 Cache128 KB
L2 Cache512 KB2 MB2 MB
L3 Cache3 MB
Cores / Threads2 / 44 / 44 / 4
TDP15 Watt25-45 Watt15 Watt
Technology14 nm28 nm28 nm
max. Temp.100 °C90 °C90 °C
SocketBGA1356FP4
FeaturesDual-Channel DDR4 Memory Controller, HyperThreading, AVX, AVX2, Quick Sync, Virtualization, AES-NIDual-Channel DDR3/DDR4-1866 Memory Controller, PCIe 3.0 x8Dual-Channel DDR3/DDR4-1866 Memory Controller, PCIe 3.0 x8
iGPUIntel HD Graphics 620 (300 - 1000 MHz)AMD Radeon R7 (Bristol Ridge) ( - 900 MHz)AMD Radeon R7 (Bristol Ridge) ( - 758 MHz)
Architecturex86x86x86
$281 U.S.
Announced
Manufacturerark.intel.comproducts.amd.comproducts.amd.com
Transistors3100 Million3100 Million
Die Size250 mm2250 mm2

Benchmarks

Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 256     avg: 257     median: 256.5 (2%)     max: 260 Points
301 Points (2%)
min: 222     avg: 225.5     median: 225.5 (1%)     max: 229 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 86     avg: 94.3     median: 95 (29%)     max: 100 Points
93 Points (28%)
min: 78     avg: 79     median: 79 (24%)     max: 80 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
2.9 Points (4%)
3.6 Points (5%)
min: 1.92     avg: 2.3     median: 2.3 (3%)     max: 2.62 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
1 Points (26%)
1.1 Points (27%)
min: 0.76     avg: 0.9     median: 0.9 (21%)     max: 0.94 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
min: 3871     avg: 3874     median: 3874 (23%)     max: 3877 Points
3033 Points (18%)
min: 2262     avg: 2429     median: 2429 (15%)     max: 2596 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
min: 8718     avg: 8758     median: 8757.5 (6%)     max: 8797 Points
9822 Points (7%)
min: 5148     avg: 6168     median: 6168 (4%)     max: 7188 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
min: 635     avg: 640     median: 640 (8%)     max: 645 s
315.9 s (4%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
min: 20.19     avg: 20.3     median: 20.2 (4%)     max: 20.3 s
10.3 s (2%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
1462 Points (2%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
16.7 fps (6%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
84.6 fps (20%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
0.3 GB/s (0%)
0.2 GB/s (0%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
0.5 GB/s (8%)
0.4 GB/s (6%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
2 GB/s (5%)
1.8 GB/s (5%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 3344     avg: 3498     median: 3498 (7%)     max: 3652 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
min: 14.06     avg: 14.9     median: 14.9 (3%)     max: 15.8 s
18.6 s (4%)
19.2 s (4%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
min: 31.64     avg: 34     median: 34 (1%)     max: 36.3 s
43.7 s (2%)
42.1 s (2%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
min: 712     avg: 765     median: 765 (3%)     max: 818 s
870 s (4%)
980 s (4%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
7608 Points (7%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 3121     avg: 3357     median: 3428 (9%)     max: 3595 Points
min: 3051     avg: 3081     median: 3080.5 (8%)     max: 3110 Points
min: 2524     avg: 2527     median: 2527 (7%)     max: 2530 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
min: 19210     avg: 25168     median: 25167.5 (20%)     max: 31125 Points
34521 Points (28%)
25886 Points (21%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
19308 Points (16%)
31580 Points (26%)
25743 Points (21%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
21164 Points (18%)
34398 Points (29%)
27373 Points (23%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 2366     avg: 2620     median: 2729 (7%)     max: 2765 Points
2945 Points (7%)
min: 2283     avg: 2306     median: 2306 (6%)     max: 2329 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 3845     avg: 3885     median: 3885 (7%)     max: 3925 Points
min: 3234     avg: 3787     median: 3787 (7%)     max: 4340 Points
min: 2981     avg: 3125     median: 3124.5 (6%)     max: 3268 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
1069 Points (5%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
3016 Points (30%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
5895 Points (7%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Single-Core
2947 Points (40%)
2158 Points (29%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
5636 Points (14%)
4899 Points (12%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Multi-Core
5136 Points (9%)
min: 5371     avg: 5464     median: 5464 (10%)     max: 5557 Points
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Single-Core
2340 Points (46%)
min: 2062     avg: 2091     median: 2091 (41%)     max: 2120 Points
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Multi-Core
5824 Points (9%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Single-Core
2308 Points (35%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
1528 ms (2%)
2059 ms (2%)
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
341.3 ms (4%)
123.5 ms (1%)
164.9 ms (2%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
24098 Points (22%)
19404 Points (17%)
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
31.9 Watt (6%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
33.3 Watt (6%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i3-7100U → 100% n=16

Average Benchmarks AMD FX-9830P → 112% n=16

Average Benchmarks AMD A12-9700P → 92% n=16

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.26
log 24. 18:52:54

#0 checking url part for id 8153 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 8165 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 8166 +0s ... 0s

#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Tue, 23 Apr 2024 05:40:15 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#5 composed specs +0.037s ... 0.038s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.038s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 8153 +0.002s ... 0.04s

#8 got single benchmarks 8153 +0.05s ... 0.09s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 8165 +0.002s ... 0.092s

#10 got single benchmarks 8165 +0.01s ... 0.103s

#11 getting avg benchmarks for device 8166 +0.003s ... 0.105s

#12 got single benchmarks 8166 +0.012s ... 0.117s

#13 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.117s

#14 min, max, avg, median took s +0.263s ... 0.38s

#15 return log +0s ... 0.38s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)