, , , , , ,
search relation.
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
 

Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 vs Samsung Exynos 7885

Qualcomm Snapdragon 660

► remove from comparison Qualcomm SD 660

The Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (SD660) is a fast mid-range ARM-based SoC largely found on Android tablets and smartphones. Announced in mid 2017, the SD660 is the successor to the Snapdragon 625. It features 8 Kryo 260 cores (custom design, 64-Bit capable) that are divided in two clusters. A fast cluster of four cores with up to 2.2 GHz and a power saving efficiency cluster with up to 1.8 GHz. Both clusters can also used together.

In addition to the 8 CPU cores, the SoC integrates a mid range Adreno 512 GPU with a LPDDR4 memory controller (dual-channel 1866 MHz)  and supports Wi-Fi (802.11ac + MIMO, max. 867 Mbps), Bluetooth 5, and LTE (X12 LTE modem with up to 600 Mbps download and 150 Mbps upload).

Performance

In Benchmarks of the Oppo R11, the CPU part of the Snapdragon SD660 performs between former high end Socs like the Snapdragon 821 in the Pixel XL and the Snapdragon 835. The graphics performance is however much lower, as the Adreno 512 is only a slight upgrade of the older Adreno 510 (due to the higher clock speed).

CPU

The Snapdragon 660 is based on a similar concept as ARM's big.LITTLE, which combines a low power CPU cluster (2x Kyro clocked at up to 1.8 GHz) and a performance CPU cluster (2x Kyro clocked at up to 2.2 GHz). The clock speed of each cluster can be individually adjusted (but not per core) and the lowest clock speed is 310 MHz (unverified).

Power Consumption

Thanks to the new 14 nm process, the energy efficiency has been improved noticeably compared to its 20 nm predecessors.

Samsung Exynos 7885

► remove from comparison Samsung Exynos 7885

The Samsung Exynos 7885 (also called Exynos 7 Series) is a upper mid-range system-on-a-chip (SoC) for smartphones and tablets. It was launched early 2018 alongside the Samsung Galaxy A8 2018 series and features two Cortex-A73 cores clocked at up to 2.2 GHz. Furthermore, there are six power efficient Cortex-A53 cores at up to 1.6 GHz, an ARM Mali-G71 MP2 GPU and a LPDDR4x memory controller. The integrated LTE modem supports LTE Cat.12 3CA 600 Mbps download speeds and Cat.13 2CA 150 Mbps upload. 802.11ac WiFi, Bluetooth 5.0 and FM Radio are also in the chip. It is manufactured in 14nm FinFET at Samsung and therefore a rather power efficient SoC.

Qualcomm Snapdragon 660Samsung Exynos 7885
Qualcomm SnapdragonSamsung Exynos
Kryo 260Cortex-A73/-A53
Series: Exynos Cortex-A73/-A53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 compare2.2 GHz8 / 8 Kryo 260
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 compare1.8 - 2 GHz8 / 8 Kryo 260
» Qualcomm Snapdragon 6602.2 GHz8 / 8 Kryo 260
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 compare1.8 GHz8 / 8 Kryo 260
» Samsung Exynos 78852.2 GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A73/-A53
Samsung Exynos 7904 compare1.8 GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A73/-A53
Samsung Exynos 7884B compare1.56 GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A73/-A53
2200 MHz2200 MHz
8 / 88 / 8
14 14
Adreno 512 GPU, X12 LTE Modem, Hexagon 680 DSP, Specra ISPARM Mali-G71 MP2, 2x Cortex-A73 (2.2 GHz) + 6x Cortex-A53 (1.6 GHz, big.LITTLE), 2x 32 Bit LPDDR4 Memory Controller
iGPUQualcomm Adreno 512 ( - 850 MHz)ARM Mali-G71 MP2
ArchitectureARMARM
Qualcomm Snapdragon SD 660Samsung Exynos Exynos 7885

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - Geekbench 5.1, PCM Work, Sling Shot Physics, Antutu v8 CPU - SD 660
26.1 pt (42%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 15088     avg: 19093     median: 19488.5 (20%)     max: 21016 Points
min: 13306     avg: 13610     median: 13610 (14%)     max: 13914 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
min: 2121     avg: 2654     median: 2724 (34%)     max: 2797 Points
min: 1845     avg: 1948     median: 1948 (24%)     max: 2051 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Physics
min: 2238     avg: 2686     median: 2751.5 (40%)     max: 2815 Points
min: 1871     avg: 1937     median: 1937 (28%)     max: 2003 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Stream
min: 1038     avg: 1079     median: 1079 (9%)     max: 1120 Points
1282 Points (10%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Memory
min: 2981     avg: 2996     median: 2995.5 (27%)     max: 3010 Points
2724 Points (25%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Floating Point
min: 9892     avg: 10223     median: 10223 (20%)     max: 10554 Points
8435 Points (17%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Integer
min: 5295     avg: 5302     median: 5301.5 (11%)     max: 5308 Points
4084 Points (8%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Total Score
min: 6031     avg: 6141     median: 6141 (16%)     max: 6251 Points
5054 Points (13%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Multi-Core
4225 (7%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Single-Core
1491 (30%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1609     avg: 1628     median: 1628 (25%)     max: 1647
1532 (24%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 5846     avg: 5860     median: 5859.5 (14%)     max: 5873
4247 (10%)
Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1431     avg: 1598     median: 1617 (20%)     max: 1646
min: 1525     avg: 1526     median: 1525.5 (19%)     max: 1526
Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 4895     avg: 5694     median: 5850 (7%)     max: 5913
min: 4429     avg: 4430     median: 4430 (6%)     max: 4431
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
100%
1 SD 660 +
min: 313     avg: 322     median: 321.5 (17%)     max: 330
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
100%
1 SD 660 +
min: 1127     avg: 1305     median: 1305 (4%)     max: 1483
Geekbench 5.3 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
100%
1 SD 660 +
min: 294     avg: 320     median: 329 (17%)     max: 336
Geekbench 5.3 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
100%
1 SD 660 +
min: 1304     avg: 1395     median: 1424 (8%)     max: 1457
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 3796.2     avg: 4103     median: 3951.1 (7%)     max: 4768.9 ms
min: 4122.8     avg: 4199     median: 4199 (7%)     max: 4275.2 ms
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
100%
1 SD 660 +
630 ms (7%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 8463     avg: 10004     median: 10145 (15%)     max: 10945 Points
min: 9165     avg: 9258     median: 9257.5 (13%)     max: 9350 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 47     avg: 57.9     median: 60 (19%)     max: 63 Points
57 Points (18%)
AnTuTu v6 - AnTuTu v6 Total Score
min: 105973     avg: 116194     median: 117165 (40%)     max: 120479 Points
min: 83284     avg: 85506     median: 85506 (29%)     max: 87728 Points
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 MEM
min: 6301     avg: 7335     median: 7220.5 (22%)     max: 8424 Points
min: 6040     avg: 6117     median: 6117 (19%)     max: 6194 Points
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 UX
min: 33509     avg: 37799     median: 38669.5 (47%)     max: 39182 Points
min: 32150     avg: 33898     median: 33897.5 (42%)     max: 35645 Points
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 GPU
min: 21675     avg: 28666     median: 30372.5 (9%)     max: 30829 Points
min: 25640     avg: 26164     median: 26163.5 (8%)     max: 26687 Points
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 CPU
min: 48764     avg: 63355     median: 64877.5 (40%)     max: 66862 Points
min: 52916     avg: 53606     median: 53606 (33%)     max: 54296 Points
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 Total Score
min: 116346     avg: 137699     median: 140898 (25%)     max: 143551 Points
min: 116746     avg: 119786     median: 119786 (21%)     max: 122826 Points
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 UX
100%
1 SD 660 +
min: 26647     avg: 30836     median: 32596 (27%)     max: 33266 Points
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 MEM
100%
1 SD 660 +
min: 28919     avg: 31931     median: 32883 (27%)     max: 33992 Points
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 GPU
100%
1 SD 660 +
min: 33505     avg: 36822     median: 35936 (7%)     max: 41026 Points
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 CPU
100%
1 SD 660 +
min: 62411     avg: 68266     median: 66442 (24%)     max: 75946 Points
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 Total Score
100%
1 SD 660 +
min: 157877     avg: 167856     median: 161462 (16%)     max: 184230 Points
AndEBench - AndEBench Java
100%
1 SD 660 +
3240 Iter./s (100%)
AndEBench - AndEBench Native
100%
1 SD 660 +
28882 Iter./s (95%)
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile CPU Tests
100%
1 SD 660 +
min: 186416     avg: 187414     median: 187414 (25%)     max: 188411 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Computer Vision
min: 3032     avg: 3285     median: 3363 (18%)     max: 3486 Points
2645 Points (14%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage
min: 2889     avg: 4395     median: 4250 (11%)     max: 5913 Points
3543 Points (10%)
min: 5214     avg: 5301     median: 5300.5 (35%)     max: 5387 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score
min: 6274     avg: 6676     median: 6723 (34%)     max: 7026 Points
min: 5625     avg: 5771     median: 5770.5 (29%)     max: 5916 Points

Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 → 100% n=25

Average Benchmarks Samsung Exynos 7885 → 85% n=25

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2021, 2020
v1.16
log 23. 14:07:43

#0 checking url part for id 9944 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 9936 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Mon, 20 Sep 2021 13:09:15 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#4 composed specs +0.01s ... 0.011s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.011s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 9944 +0.004s ... 0.015s

#7 got single benchmarks 9944 +0.023s ... 0.038s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 9936 +0.001s ... 0.038s

#9 got single benchmarks 9936 +0.008s ... 0.046s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.046s

#11 min, max, avg, median took s +0.034s ... 0.08s

#12 return log +0.004s ... 0.084s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)