Notebookcheck Logo

Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 vs Samsung Exynos 7884B

Qualcomm Snapdragon 660

► remove from comparison Qualcomm SD 660

The Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (SD660) is a fast mid-range ARM-based SoC largely found on Android tablets and smartphones. Announced in mid 2017, the SD660 is the successor to the Snapdragon 625. It features 8 Kryo 260 cores (custom design, 64-Bit capable) that are divided in two clusters. A fast cluster of four cores with up to 2.2 GHz and a power saving efficiency cluster with up to 1.8 GHz. Both clusters can also used together.

In addition to the 8 CPU cores, the SoC integrates a mid range Adreno 512 GPU with a LPDDR4 memory controller (dual-channel 1866 MHz)  and supports Wi-Fi (802.11ac + MIMO, max. 867 Mbps), Bluetooth 5, and LTE (X12 LTE modem with up to 600 Mbps download and 150 Mbps upload).

Performance

In Benchmarks of the Oppo R11, the CPU part of the Snapdragon SD660 performs between former high end Socs like the Snapdragon 821 in the Pixel XL and the Snapdragon 835. The graphics performance is however much lower, as the Adreno 512 is only a slight upgrade of the older Adreno 510 (due to the higher clock speed).

CPU

The Snapdragon 660 is based on a similar concept as ARM's big.LITTLE, which combines a low power CPU cluster (2x Kyro clocked at up to 1.8 GHz) and a performance CPU cluster (2x Kyro clocked at up to 2.2 GHz). The clock speed of each cluster can be individually adjusted (but not per core) and the lowest clock speed is 310 MHz (unverified).

Power Consumption

Thanks to the new 14 nm process, the energy efficiency has been improved noticeably compared to its 20 nm predecessors.

Samsung Exynos 7884B

► remove from comparison Samsung Exynos 7884B

The Samsung Exynos 7884B (also called Exynos 7 Series) is a upper mid-range system-on-a-chip (SoC) for smartphones and tablets. It integrates two big ARM Cortex-A73 cores clocked at up to 1.56 GHz. Furthermore, there are six power efficient Cortex-A53 cores at up to 1.35 GHz, an ARM Mali-G71 MP2 GPU and a LPDDR4x memory controller. Compared to the faster Exynos 7885, the CPU cores of the 7884B are clocked clearly lower. Furthermore, the integrated LTE modem is also slower (150 / 50 Mbit download / upload). 802.11ac WiFi, Bluetooth 5.0 and FM Radio are also in the chip. It is manufactured in 14nm FinFET at Samsung and therefore a rather power efficient SoC.

ModelQualcomm Snapdragon 660Samsung Exynos 7884B
SeriesQualcomm SnapdragonSamsung Exynos
CodenameKryo 260Cortex-A73/-A53
Series: Exynos Cortex-A73/-A53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 compare2.2 GHz8 / 8 cores Kryo 260
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 compare1.8 - 2 GHz8 / 8 cores Kryo 260
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 « 2.2 GHz8 / 8 cores Kryo 260
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 compare1.8 GHz8 / 8 cores Kryo 260
Samsung Exynos 7885 compare2.2 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A73/-A53
Samsung Exynos 7904 compare1.8 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A73/-A53
Samsung Exynos 7884B « 1.56 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A73/-A53
Clock2200 MHz1560 MHz
Cores / Threads8 / 88 / 8
Technology14 nm14 nm
FeaturesAdreno 512 GPU, X12 LTE Modem, Hexagon 680 DSP, Specra ISPARM Mali-G71 MP2, 2x Cortex-A73 (1.6 GHz) + 6x Cortex-A53 (1.35 GHz, big.LITTLE), 2x 32 Bit LPDDR4 Memory Controller
iGPUQualcomm Adreno 512 ( - 850 MHz)ARM Mali-G71 MP2
ArchitectureARMARM
Announced
Manufacturerwww.qualcomm.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - Geekbench 5.5, PCM Work, Sling Shot Physics, Antutu v8 CPU - SD 660
0.5 pt (40%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 15088     avg: 19093     median: 19488.5 (16%)     max: 21016 Points
min: 11287     avg: 12324     median: 12075 (10%)     max: 13610 Points
min: 1554     avg: 1599     median: 1615 (19%)     max: 1628 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Physics
min: 2238     avg: 2695     median: 2752 (31%)     max: 2815 Points
min: 1624     avg: 1674     median: 1629 (19%)     max: 1768 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
100%
1 SD 660 +
min: 294     avg: 322.8     median: 330.5 (14%)     max: 336 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
100%
1 SD 660 +
min: 1304     avg: 1445     median: 1440.5 (3%)     max: 1595 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
100%
1 SD 660 +
min: 313     avg: 321.5     median: 321.5 (1%)     max: 330 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
100%
1 SD 660 +
min: 1127     avg: 1305     median: 1305 (4%)     max: 1483 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1431     avg: 1598     median: 1617 (16%)     max: 1646 Points
min: 1168     avg: 1199     median: 1212 (12%)     max: 1216 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 4895     avg: 5694     median: 5850 (7%)     max: 5913 Points
min: 3590     avg: 3795     median: 3714 (4%)     max: 4082 Points
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1609     avg: 1628     median: 1628 (22%)     max: 1647 Points
1214 Points (17%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 5846     avg: 5860     median: 5859.5 (14%)     max: 5873 Points
3733 Points (9%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Multi-Core
3352 Points (5%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Single-Core
1182 Points (18%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Stream
min: 1038     avg: 1079     median: 1079 (9%)     max: 1120 Points
1355 Points (11%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Memory
min: 2981     avg: 2996     median: 2995.5 (27%)     max: 3010 Points
1965 Points (18%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Floating Point
min: 9892     avg: 10223     median: 10223 (20%)     max: 10554 Points
6392 Points (13%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Integer
min: 5295     avg: 5302     median: 5301.5 (11%)     max: 5308 Points
3201 Points (6%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Total Score
min: 6031     avg: 6141     median: 6141 (16%)     max: 6251 Points
3886 Points (10%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 3796     avg: 4115     median: 3954 (5%)     max: 4769 ms
min: 5546     avg: 5763     median: 5827 (7%)     max: 5917 ms
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
100%
1 SD 660 +
630 ms (7%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 8463     avg: 9973     median: 10070 (9%)     max: 10945 Points
min: 6921     avg: 7152     median: 7065 (6%)     max: 7470 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 47     avg: 57.1     median: 59 (12%)     max: 63 Points
min: 45     avg: 47     median: 48 (10%)     max: 48 Points
AnTuTu v6 - AnTuTu v6 Total Score
min: 105973     avg: 116194     median: 117165 (40%)     max: 120479 Points
min: 61280     avg: 65594     median: 65396 (22%)     max: 70106 Points
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 MEM
min: 6301     avg: 7335     median: 7220.5 (22%)     max: 8424 Points
min: 5587     avg: 6027     median: 6117 (19%)     max: 6377 Points
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 UX
min: 33509     avg: 37799     median: 38669.5 (47%)     max: 39182 Points
min: 24860     avg: 27591     median: 28522 (35%)     max: 29392 Points
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 GPU
min: 21675     avg: 28666     median: 30372.5 (9%)     max: 30829 Points
min: 18113     avg: 20144     median: 18821 (6%)     max: 23499 Points
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 CPU
min: 48764     avg: 63355     median: 64877.5 (40%)     max: 66862 Points
min: 40529     avg: 41795     median: 42004 (26%)     max: 42853 Points
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 Total Score
min: 116346     avg: 137699     median: 140898 (25%)     max: 143551 Points
min: 89089     avg: 95558     median: 95464 (17%)     max: 102121 Points
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 UX
100%
1 SD 660 +
min: 26647     avg: 30836     median: 32596 (27%)     max: 33266 Points
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 MEM
100%
1 SD 660 +
min: 28919     avg: 31931     median: 32883 (27%)     max: 33992 Points
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 GPU
100%
1 SD 660 +
min: 33505     avg: 36822     median: 35936 (7%)     max: 41026 Points
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 CPU
100%
1 SD 660 +
min: 62411     avg: 68266     median: 66442 (24%)     max: 75946 Points
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 Total Score
100%
1 SD 660 +
min: 157877     avg: 167856     median: 161462 (16%)     max: 184230 Points
AndEBench - AndEBench Java
100%
1 SD 660 +
3240 Iter./s (100%)
AndEBench - AndEBench Native
100%
1 SD 660 +
28882 Iter./s (95%)
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 CPU Tests
100%
1 SD 660 +
min: 2487     avg: 125771     median: 186416 (25%)     max: 188411 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 3.0
100%
1 SD 660 +
6514 Points (30%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Computer Vision
min: 3032     avg: 3285     median: 3363 (18%)     max: 3486 Points
2402 Points (13%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage
min: 2889     avg: 4395     median: 4250 (9%)     max: 5913 Points
4488 Points (10%)
min: 5136     avg: 5250     median: 5305 (35%)     max: 5309 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score
min: 6274     avg: 6676     median: 6723 (34%)     max: 7026 Points
min: 6316     avg: 6680     median: 6823 (34%)     max: 6902 Points

Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 → 100% n=25

Average Benchmarks Samsung Exynos 7884B → 74% n=25

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.26
log 25. 07:59:44

#0 checking url part for id 9944 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 11428 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 25 Apr 2024 05:38:32 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 composed specs +0.021s ... 0.022s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.022s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 9944 +0.016s ... 0.038s

#7 got single benchmarks 9944 +0.05s ... 0.088s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 11428 +0.003s ... 0.091s

#9 got single benchmarks 11428 +0.016s ... 0.106s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.106s

#11 min, max, avg, median took s +0.206s ... 0.312s

#12 return log +0.03s ... 0.343s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)