Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Celeron M 585 vs Intel Celeron M 520 vs Intel Celeron M 560

Intel Celeron M 585

► remove from comparison

The Intel Celeron M 585 is a single core processor for cheap entry level laptops. It is based on the Merom architecture but features only one processing core (similar to a Pentium T3400 with a single core and reduced features). Furthermore, other features of the Merom core (like Speedstep and Virtualization) are not activated.

Intel Celeron M 520

► remove from comparison

Basierend auf den Merom kern mit 64 KB L1 Cache (32 KB Daten + 32 KB Instruktionen) und 1024 KB L2 Cache, der mit vollem Prozessortakt läuft.

Verbaut auf Sockel 479, AGTL+ mit 133 MHz (quadpumped 533 MHz)

Intel Celeron M 560

► remove from comparison

The Intel Celeron M 560 is a single core processor for cheap entry level laptops. It is based on the Merom architecture but features only one processing core. Furthermore, other features of the Merom core (like Speedstep and Virtualization) are not activated. The performance is only suited for basic tasks.

ModelIntel Celeron M 585Intel Celeron M 520Intel Celeron M 560
SeriesIntel Celeron MIntel Celeron MIntel Celeron M
CodenameMeromMeromMerom
Series: Celeron M Merom
Intel Celeron M 5702.26 GHz1 / 1 cores
Intel Celeron M 585 « 2.16 GHz1 / 1 cores
Intel Celeron M 5602.13 GHz1 / 1 cores
Intel Celeron M 5752 GHz1 / 1 cores
Intel Celeron M 5502 GHz1 / 1 cores
Intel Celeron M 5401.86 GHz1 / 1 cores
Intel Celeron M 5301.73 GHz1 / 1 cores
Intel Celeron M 5201.6 GHz1 / 1 cores
Intel Celeron M 5702.26 GHz1 / 1 cores
Intel Celeron M 5852.16 GHz1 / 1 cores
Intel Celeron M 5602.13 GHz1 / 1 cores
Intel Celeron M 5752 GHz1 / 1 cores
Intel Celeron M 5502 GHz1 / 1 cores
Intel Celeron M 5401.86 GHz1 / 1 cores
Intel Celeron M 5301.73 GHz1 / 1 cores
Intel Celeron M 520 « 1.6 GHz1 / 1 cores
Intel Celeron M 5702.26 GHz1 / 1 cores
Intel Celeron M 5852.16 GHz1 / 1 cores
Intel Celeron M 560 « 2.13 GHz1 / 1 cores
Intel Celeron M 5752 GHz1 / 1 cores
Intel Celeron M 5502 GHz1 / 1 cores
Intel Celeron M 5401.86 GHz1 / 1 cores
Intel Celeron M 5301.73 GHz1 / 1 cores
Intel Celeron M 5201.6 GHz1 / 1 cores
Clock2160 MHz1600 MHz2130 MHz
FSB667533533
L2 Cache1 MB1 MB1 MB
Cores / Threads1 / 11 / 11 / 1
TDP31 Watt30 Watt30 Watt
Transistors291 Million291 Million
65 nm, 0.95-1.30V65 nm65 nm, 0.95V-1.30V
Die Size143 mm2143 mm2
max. Temp.100 °C100 °C
SocketPPGA478PPGA478
FeaturesEM64T, Execute Disable BitMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, Intel 64, XD-BitMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, Intel 64, XD-Bit
Architecturex86x86x86
$70 U.S.
Announced
Manufacturerark.intel.comwww.intel.comark.intel.com
L1 Cache64 KB

Benchmarks

Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
100%
1 585 +
2062 Points (12%)
97%
1 560 +
2008 Points (12%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
100%
1 585 +
2062 Points (1%)
97%
1 560 +
2008 Points (1%)
wPrime 1.55 - wPrime 1.55 1024m *
100%
1 520 +
3639 s (14%)
wPrime 1.55 - wPrime 1.55 32m *
100%
1 520 +
112 s (59%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
100%
585 +
31.4 s (7%)
98%
520 +
min: 39     avg: 39.2     median: 39.2 (8%)     max: 39.3 s
100%
560 +
29.6 s (6%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
100%
1 520 +
2015 s (9%)
SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS) - SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS)
100%
1 520 +
7400 MIPS (4%)
SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS) - SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS)
100%
1 520 +
5078 MFLOPS (4%)
PCMark 05 - PCMark 05 - Standard
100%
1 520 +
min: 1845     avg: 1942     median: 1942 (4%)     max: 2039 Points

Average Benchmarks Intel Celeron M 585 → 100% n=1

Average Benchmarks Intel Celeron M 520 → 98% n=1

Average Benchmarks Intel Celeron M 560 → 100% n=1

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.26
log 16. 12:31:50

#0 checking url part for id 429 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 321 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 395 +0s ... 0s

#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Tue, 16 Apr 2024 05:37:29 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#5 composed specs +0.016s ... 0.017s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.017s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 429 +0.003s ... 0.02s

#8 got single benchmarks 429 +0.008s ... 0.029s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 321 +0.003s ... 0.032s

#10 got single benchmarks 321 +0.018s ... 0.05s

#11 getting avg benchmarks for device 395 +0.003s ... 0.052s

#12 got single benchmarks 395 +0.009s ... 0.061s

#13 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.061s

#14 min, max, avg, median took s +0.041s ... 0.103s

#15 return log +0s ... 0.103s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)