, , , , , ,
search relation.
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
 

Intel Celeron M 575 vs Intel Celeron M 585

Intel Celeron M 575

► remove from comparison

The Intel Celeron M 575 is a single core processor for cheap entry level laptops. It is based on the Merom architecture but features only one processing core. Furthermore, other features of the Merom core (like Speedstep and Virtualization) are not activated. The performance is only suited for basic tasks.

Intel Celeron M 585

► remove from comparison

The Intel Celeron M 585 is a single core processor for cheap entry level laptops. It is based on the Merom architecture but features only one processing core (similar to a Pentium T3400 with a single core and reduced features). Furthermore, other features of the Merom core (like Speedstep and Virtualization) are not activated.

Intel Celeron M 575Intel Celeron M 585
Intel Celeron MIntel Celeron M
MeromMerom
Series: Celeron M Merom
Intel Celeron M 570 compare2.26 GHz1 / 1
Intel Celeron M 5852.16 GHz1 / 1
Intel Celeron M 560 compare2.13 GHz1 / 1
» Intel Celeron M 5752 GHz1 / 1
Intel Celeron M 550 compare2 GHz1 / 1
Intel Celeron M 540 compare1.86 GHz1 / 1
Intel Celeron M 530 compare1.73 GHz1 / 1
Intel Celeron M 520 compare1.6 GHz1 / 1
Intel Celeron M 570 compare2.26 GHz1 / 1
» Intel Celeron M 5852.16 GHz1 / 1
Intel Celeron M 560 compare2.13 GHz1 / 1
Intel Celeron M 5752 GHz1 / 1
Intel Celeron M 550 compare2 GHz1 / 1
Intel Celeron M 540 compare1.86 GHz1 / 1
Intel Celeron M 530 compare1.73 GHz1 / 1
Intel Celeron M 520 compare1.6 GHz1 / 1
2000 MHz2160 MHz
667667
1 MB1 MB
1 / 11 / 1
31 31
291 291
65 0.95-1.365 0.95-1.30V
143 mm2143 mm2
100 °C100 °C
PPGA478PPGA478
Intel64, Execute Disable BitEM64T, Execute Disable Bit
Architecturex86x86
$86 U.S.$70 U.S.
Intel Celeron M 575Intel Celeron M 585

Benchmarks

Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
100%
575 +
min: 1914     avg: 1917     median: 1916.5 (17%)     max: 1919
108%
585 +
2062 (18%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
100%
575 +
min: 1914     avg: 1917     median: 1916.5 (3%)     max: 1919
108%
585 +
2062 (3%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
100%
1 575 +
min: 879     avg: 898     median: 898 (5%)     max: 917 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
100%
575 +
min: 24     avg: 28.9     median: 28.9 (6%)     max: 33.8 s
99%
585 +
31.4 s (7%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
100%
1 575 +
54 s (2%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Celeron M 575 → 100% n=3

Average Benchmarks Intel Celeron M 585 → 105% n=3

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2021, 2020
v1.16
log 16. 21:23:20

#0 checking url part for id 430 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 429 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sat, 12 Jun 2021 13:08:06 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#4 composed specs +0.003s ... 0.004s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.004s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 430 +0s ... 0.004s

#7 got single benchmarks 430 +0.007s ... 0.011s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 429 +0s ... 0.012s

#9 got single benchmarks 429 +0.005s ... 0.017s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.017s

#11 min, max, avg, median took s +0.003s ... 0.02s

#12 return log +0.004s ... 0.024s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)