Intel Core i5-560UM vs Intel Core i5-450M vs Intel Core i5-480M

Intel Core i5-560UM

► remove

The Intel Core i5-560UM is a Ultra Low Voltage dual-core processor for small and light laptops. It is clocked with 1.3 - 2 GHz (if Turbo Boost is enabled). Each core is based on the Nehalem (Westmere) micro-architecture. Hyperthreading enables the Dual Core CPU to handle 4 threads at once (for a better usage of the pipeline). AES, VT-d and Trusted Execution are activated (compared to the 470UM).

A feature of the Core i5-560UM is the integrated graphics card (called Intel HD Graphics) and memory controller. Both are on a separate die that is still manufactured in 45nm whereas the CPU die is already manufactured in the new 32nm process.

Due to the integrated memory controller, HyperThreading and Turbo Boost, the  Core i5-560UM is faster than a similar clocked Core 2 Duo (1.3 GHz) in all (us known) applications and benchmarks. Still the Turbo Boost may not trigger very often (sometimes it is even not activated in the BIOS) and therefore the maximum of 2.13 GHz may not be important.

The integrated Intel Graphics Media Accelerator HD (GMA HD) graphics card is between 166-500 MHz (Turbo Boost) and therefore the base speed is clearly below the non low voltage versions. The performance should still be faster than the old GMA 4500MHD.

The power consumption of 18 Watt TDP (max.) counts for the whole package and therefore it is clearly better than the 17 Watt TDP of the Core 2 Duo SL-series (CPU alone).

Intel Core i5-450M

► remove

The Intel Core i5-450M is a dual-core laptop CPU and clocks (due to Turbo Boost) with max. 2.4 - 2.66 GHz. Both cores are based on the Nehalem (Westmere) micro-architecture and due to Hyperthreading the processor is able to work with 4 threads simultaneously. The performance of the i5 is in the mid-range. The i5-450M is similar to the Core i5-520M, but the 450M does not offer AES functions.

A feature of the new Core i5-450M is the integrated graphics card called GMA HD and memory controller. Both are on a separate die that is still manufactured in 45nm whereas the CPU die is already manufactured in the new 32nm process.

The performance of the i5 450M is on average faster than a Core 2 Duo T9500 and due to the Turbo Boost, single threaded applications run even better. Therefore, the Core i5-520M is as fast as high clocked Core 2 Duo CPUs and should handle most gaming and multimedia tasks well.

The integrated Intel Graphics Media Accelerator HD (GMA HD) graphics card is known to be clocked up to 500-766 MHz and should be clearly faster than the old GMA 4500MHD. A GeForce 9400M (ION) should still be a faster (especially as Nvidia and ATI cards have a better driver support than Intel up to now). According to rumors, the GMA core will also use the Turbo Mode regulate the clock speed.

The power consumption of 35 Watt TDP (max.) counts for the whole package and therefore it is clearly better than the 35 Watt TDP of the Core 2 Duo T-series (CPU alone). Due to the Turbo Boost, the Core i5 more likely uses the TDP under load than the older Core 2 Duo CPUs. Without any load, the i5 uses noticable less power.

Intel Core i5-480M

► remove Intel 480M

The Intel Core i5-480M is a mid-range dual core CPU for laptops and clocks (due to the Turbo Mode) from 2.66 to 2.9 GHz. Each core is based on the Nehalem (Westmere) micro-architecture. Hyperthreading enables the Dual Core CPU to handle 4 threads at once (for a better usage of the pipeline). Compared to the Core i5-540M, the 480M does most likely not support AES, VT-d and Trusted Execution functions and features a slower Turbo Boost (2.9 versus 3.06 GHz). However, the base clock rate is slightly higher.

A feature of the new Core i5-480M is the integrated graphics card called GMA HD and memory controller. Both are on a separate die that is still manufactured in 45nm whereas the CPU die is already manufactured in the new 32nm process.

The performance of the Core i5-480M is on average faster than a 2.8 GHz Core 2 Duo T9800 and in some benchmarks even faster than the fastest Core 2 Duo T9900 (e.g. 3DMark 06 CPU Score). Therefore, the Core i5-480M is a high end dual core cpu which should handle all daily work and gaming tasks. Only the quad core i7 CPUs can be noticeably faster at tasks that require four or more threads (e.g. rendering).

The integrated Intel Graphics Media Accelerator HD (GMA HD) graphics card is known to be clocked up to 500-766 MHz and should be clearly faster than the old GMA 4500MHD. A GeForce 9400M (ION) should still be a faster (especially as Nvidia and ATI cards have a better driver support than Intel up to now). According to rumors, the GMA core will also use the Turbo Mode regulate the clock speed.

The power consumption of 35 Watt TDP (max.) counts for the whole package and therefore it is clearly better than the 35 Watt TDP of the Core 2 Duo T-series (CPU alone). Due to the Turbo Boost, the Core i5 is likely to use the whole TDP of 35 Watt under load and therefore can use more power than a similar specified Core 2 Duo. In Idle mode, the i5 uses clearly less power than the Core 2 Duo CPUs.

Intel Core i5-560UMIntel Core i5-450MIntel Core i5-480M
Intel Core i5Intel Core i5Intel Core i5
ArrandaleArrandaleArrandale
: Core i5 Arrandale
Intel Core i5-580M2666 - 3333 MHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i5-560M2667 - 3200 MHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i5-480M2666 - 2933 MHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i5-540M2530 - 3066 MHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i5-460M2530 - 2800 MHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i5-520M2400 - 2933 MHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i5-450M2400 - 2660 MHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i5-430M2260 - 2533 MHz2 / 43 MB
» Intel Core i5-560UM1333 - 2130 MHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i5-470UM1333 - 1867 MHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i5-540UM1200 - 2000 MHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i5-520UM1060 - 1866 MHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i5-430UM1200 - 1730 MHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i5-580M2666 - 3333 MHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i5-560M2667 - 3200 MHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i5-480M2666 - 2933 MHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i5-540M2530 - 3066 MHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i5-460M2530 - 2800 MHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i5-520M2400 - 2933 MHz2 / 43 MB
» Intel Core i5-450M2400 - 2660 MHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i5-430M2260 - 2533 MHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i5-560UM1333 - 2130 MHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i5-470UM1333 - 1867 MHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i5-540UM1200 - 2000 MHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i5-520UM1060 - 1866 MHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i5-430UM1200 - 1730 MHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i5-580M2666 - 3333 MHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i5-560M2667 - 3200 MHz2 / 43 MB
» Intel Core i5-480M2666 - 2933 MHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i5-540M2530 - 3066 MHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i5-460M2530 - 2800 MHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i5-520M2400 - 2933 MHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i5-450M2400 - 2660 MHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i5-430M2260 - 2533 MHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i5-560UM1333 - 2130 MHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i5-470UM1333 - 1867 MHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i5-540UM1200 - 2000 MHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i5-520UM1060 - 1866 MHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i5-430UM1200 - 1730 MHz2 / 43 MB
1333 - 2130 MHz2400 - 2660 MHz2666 - 2933 MHz
250025002400
512 KB512 KB512 KB
3 MB3 MB3 MB
2 / 42 / 42 / 4
18 35 35
382+177 382+177 382+177
32 32 32
81+114 mm281+114 mm281+114 mm2
105 °C105 °C105 °C
BGA1288PGA988BGA1288, PGA988
Intel HD Graphics 166-500MHz, DDR3-800 Memory Controller, Turbo Boost, Hyper-Threading, Virtualization Technology VT-x, Intel 64, Idle States, Enhanced Speedstep, Thermal Monitoring, Fast Memory Access, Flex Memory Access, Execute Disable BitHD Graphics (500-766MHz), DDR3-800/1066 Memory Controller (max. 8 GB), Turbo Boost, Hyper-Threading, Virtualization VT-x, Intel 64, Idle States, Enhanced Speedstep, Execute Disable Bit, MMX, SSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2)integrated DDR3 memory controller, GMA HD Graphics (500-766MHz), MMX, SSE (1,2,3,3S, 4.1, 3.2), EM64T, VT-x
$250 U.S.
Intel Core i5 560UMIntel Core i5 450MIntel Core i5 480M
128 KB128 KB

Cinebench R11.5 - CPU Multi 64Bit
1.5 Points (3%)
200%
450M +
min: 1     avg: 2.1     median: 2 (5%)     max: 2 Points
200%
480M +
2.3 Points (5%)
Cinebench R10 - Rendering Single 32Bit
100%
450M +
min: 2512     avg: 2881.9     median: 2922 (30%)     max: 3020 Points
109%
480M +
min: 3130     avg: 3192.3     median: 3191 (33%)     max: 3248 Points
Cinebench R10 - Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
100%
450M +
min: 5580     avg: 6649.5     median: 6778 (10%)     max: 6945 Points
104%
480M +
min: 6939     avg: 7187.4     median: 7080 (11%)     max: 7553 Points
Cinebench R10 - Rendering Multiple CPUs 64Bit
5684 Points (7%)
142%
450M +
min: 7440     avg: 8070.3     median: 8094 (11%)     max: 8329 Points
151%
480M +
min: 8159     avg: 8557.7     median: 8556 (11%)     max: 8969 Points
Cinebench R10 - Rendering Single CPUs 64Bit
2743 Points (26%)
132%
450M +
min: 3012     avg: 3548.6     median: 3628 (35%)     max: 3690 Points
143%
480M +
min: 3831     avg: 3927.9     median: 3912 (38%)     max: 4030 Points
wPrime 2.0x - 1024m *
1965 seconds (23%)
120%
450M +
min: 589     avg: 900.9     median: 634 (7%)     max: 1933 seconds
122%
480M +
min: 539     avg: 563.8     median: 556 (7%)     max: 600 seconds
wPrime 2.0x - 32m *
61 seconds (12%)
110%
450M +
min: 18     avg: 28.5     median: 19 (4%)     max: 59 seconds
110%
480M +
min: 17     avg: 18     median: 17 (3%)     max: 19 seconds
3DMark 06 - CPU
1976 Points (13%)
141%
450M +
min: 2571     avg: 2768.5     median: 2795 (19%)     max: 2840 Points
149%
480M +
min: 2579     avg: 2879.9     median: 2954 (20%)     max: 3093 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
22 Seconds (5%)
101%
450M +
min: 16     avg: 16.6     median: 16 (3%)     max: 18 Seconds
102%
480M +
15 Seconds (3%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
51 Seconds (2%)
101%
450M +
min: 38     avg: 39.6     median: 39 (2%)     max: 41 Seconds
101%
480M +
min: 35     avg: 36.1     median: 36 (2%)     max: 37 Seconds
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M *
1209 Seconds (5%)
101%
450M +
min: 877     avg: 916.6     median: 913 (4%)     max: 984 Seconds
102%
480M +
min: 842     avg: 852.3     median: 851 (4%)     max: 866 Seconds
SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS)
26690 MIPS (13%)
119%
450M +
min: 30620     avg: 32730     median: 31630 (15%)     max: 37850 MIPS
143%
480M +
min: 33210     avg: 38100     median: 38100 (18%)     max: 42990 MIPS
SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS)
19310 MFLOPS (15%)
143%
450M +
min: 27000     avg: 29144     median: 27680 (21%)     max: 35580 MFLOPS
154%
480M +
min: 29000     avg: 29750     median: 29750 (23%)     max: 30500 MFLOPS
PCMark 05 - Standard 1024x768
100%
450M +
6346 Points (40%)
122%
480M +
7718 Points (48%)
Windows 7 Experience Index - Processor
100%
450M +
6.8 points (96%)
100%
480M +
6.9 points (98%)
3DMark Vantage - P CPU no PhysX 1280x1024
100%
450M +
min: 7076     avg: 7488.8     median: 7585 (11%)     max: 7637 Points
103%
480M +
min: 7113     avg: 7764.5     median: 7845 (11%)     max: 8255 Points
3DMark 11 - Performance Physics 1280x720
100%
450M +
2222 points (11%)
123%
480M +
min: 2640     avg: 2744     median: 2741 (14%)     max: 2854 points

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i5-560UM → 100%

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i5-450M → 118%

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i5-480M → 126%

-
-
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.8.1a
Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)