Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Celeron M 560 vs Intel Celeron M 540 vs Intel Celeron M 575

Intel Celeron M 560

► remove from comparison

The Intel Celeron M 560 is a single core processor for cheap entry level laptops. It is based on the Merom architecture but features only one processing core. Furthermore, other features of the Merom core (like Speedstep and Virtualization) are not activated. The performance is only suited for basic tasks.

Intel Celeron M 540

► remove from comparison

The Celeron M 540 is an entry level processor for laptops that was released in Q3 2017. It is based on the Merom core and is produced in 65nm.

Intel Celeron M 575

► remove from comparison

The Intel Celeron M 575 is a single core processor for cheap entry level laptops. It is based on the Merom architecture but features only one processing core. Furthermore, other features of the Merom core (like Speedstep and Virtualization) are not activated. The performance is only suited for basic tasks.

show full text
ModelIntel Celeron M 560Intel Celeron M 540Intel Celeron M 575
SeriesIntel Celeron MIntel Celeron MIntel Celeron M
CodenameMeromMeromMerom
Series: Celeron M Merom
Intel Celeron M 5702.26 GHz1 / 1 cores
Intel Celeron M 5852.16 GHz1 / 1 cores
Intel Celeron M 560 « 2.13 GHz1 / 1 cores
Intel Celeron M 5752 GHz1 / 1 cores
Intel Celeron M 5502 GHz1 / 1 cores
Intel Celeron M 5401.86 GHz1 / 1 cores
Intel Celeron M 5301.73 GHz1 / 1 cores
Intel Celeron M 5201.6 GHz1 / 1 cores
Intel Celeron M 5702.26 GHz1 / 1 cores
Intel Celeron M 5852.16 GHz1 / 1 cores
Intel Celeron M 5602.13 GHz1 / 1 cores
Intel Celeron M 5752 GHz1 / 1 cores
Intel Celeron M 5502 GHz1 / 1 cores
Intel Celeron M 540 « 1.86 GHz1 / 1 cores
Intel Celeron M 5301.73 GHz1 / 1 cores
Intel Celeron M 5201.6 GHz1 / 1 cores
Intel Celeron M 5702.26 GHz1 / 1 cores
Intel Celeron M 5852.16 GHz1 / 1 cores
Intel Celeron M 5602.13 GHz1 / 1 cores
Intel Celeron M 575 « 2 GHz1 / 1 cores
Intel Celeron M 5502 GHz1 / 1 cores
Intel Celeron M 5401.86 GHz1 / 1 cores
Intel Celeron M 5301.73 GHz1 / 1 cores
Intel Celeron M 5201.6 GHz1 / 1 cores
Clock2130 MHz1860 MHz2000 MHz
FSB533533667
L1 Cache64 KB
L2 Cache1 MB1 MB1 MB
Cores / Threads1 / 11 / 11 / 1
TDP30 Watt30 Watt31 Watt
Transistors291 Million291 Million
65 nm, 0.95V-1.30V65 nm65 nm, 0.95-1.3
Die Size143 mm2143 mm2
max. Temp.100 °C100 °C
SocketPPGA478PPGA478
FeaturesMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, Intel 64, XD-BitMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, Intel 64, XD-BitIntel64, Execute Disable Bit
Architecturex86x86x86
Announced
Manufacturerark.intel.comwww.intel.comark.intel.com
$86 U.S.

Benchmarks

Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
100%
560 +
2008 Points (12%)
87%
540 +
1744 Points (11%)
95%
575 +
min: 1914     avg: 1917     median: 1916.5 (12%)     max: 1919 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
100%
560 +
2008 Points (1%)
0 Points (0%)
95%
575 +
min: 1914     avg: 1917     median: 1916.5 (1%)     max: 1919 Points
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
100%
1 540 +
min: 795     avg: 803     median: 802.5 (2%)     max: 810 Points
112%
1 575 +
min: 879     avg: 898     median: 898 (2%)     max: 917 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
100%
560 +
29.6 s (6%)
99%
540 +
33 s (7%)
100%
575 +
min: 24     avg: 28.9     median: 28.9 (6%)     max: 33.8 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
100%
1 540 +
82 s (4%)
101%
1 575 +
54 s (2%)
PCMark 05 - PCMark 05 - Standard
100%
1 540 +
2231 Points (5%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Celeron M 560 → 100% n=3

Average Benchmarks Intel Celeron M 540 → 62% n=3

Average Benchmarks Intel Celeron M 575 → 97% n=3

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.26
log 19. 12:59:46

#0 checking url part for id 395 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 341 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 430 +0s ... 0s

#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Fri, 19 Apr 2024 05:38:49 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#5 composed specs +0.009s ... 0.011s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.011s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 395 +0.003s ... 0.013s

#8 got single benchmarks 395 +0.009s ... 0.022s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 341 +0.004s ... 0.026s

#10 got single benchmarks 341 +0.015s ... 0.041s

#11 getting avg benchmarks for device 430 +0.003s ... 0.044s

#12 got single benchmarks 430 +0.01s ... 0.055s

#13 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.055s

#14 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.021s ... 0.076s

#15 min, max, avg, median took s +0.031s ... 0.106s

#16 return log +0s ... 0.106s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)