Intel Core i5-540UM vs Intel Core i5-470UM vs Intel Core i5-560M

Intel Core i5-540UM

► remove

The Intel Core i5-540UM is a Ultra Low Voltage dual-core processor for small and light laptops. It is clocked with 1.2 - 2 GHz (if Turbo Boost is enabled). Each core is based on the Nehalem (Westmere) micro-architecture. Hyperthreading enables the Dual Core CPU to handle 4 threads at once (for a better usage of the pipeline). AES, VT-d and Trusted Execution are activated (compared to the 430UM).

A feature of the new Core i5-540UM is the integrated graphics card (called Intel HD Graphics) and memory controller. Both are on a separate die that is still manufactured in 45nm whereas the CPU die is already manufactured in the new 32nm process.

Due to the integrated memory controller, the HyperThreading and Turbo Boost, the  Core i5-540UM is faster than a similar clocked Core 2 Duo (1.2 GHz) in all (us known) applications and benchmarks. Still the Turbo Boost may not trigger very often (sometimes it is even not activated in the BIOS) and therefore the maximum of 2 GHz may not be important.

The integrated Intel Graphics Media Accelerator HD (GMA HD) graphics card is between 166-500 MHz (Turbo Boost) and therefore the base speed is clearly below the non low voltage versions. The performance should still be faster than the old GMA 4500MHD.

The power consumption of 18 Watt TDP (max.) counts for the whole package and therefore it is clearly better than the 17 Watt TDP of the Core 2 Duo SL-series (CPU alone).

Intel Core i5-470UM

► remove

The Intel Core i5-470UM is a Ultra Low Voltage dual-core processor for small and light laptops. It is clocked with 1.3 - 1.8 GHz (if Turbo Boost is enabled). Each core is based on the Nehalem (Westmere) micro-architecture. Hyperthreading enables the Dual Core CPU to handle 4 threads at once (for a better usage of the pipeline). AES, VT-d and Trusted Execution are deactivated for the 470UM, compared to the i7 UM CPUs.

The faster i5-560UM and i7-660UM are also clocked at 1.3 GHz but feature a higher TurboBoost frequency.

A feature of the Core i5-470UM is the integrated graphics card (called Intel HD Graphics) and memory controller. Both are on a separate die that is still manufactured in 45nm whereas the CPU die is already manufactured in the new 32nm process.

Due to the integrated memory controller, the HyperThreading and Turbo Boost, the  Core i5-470UM is faster than a similar clocked Core 2 Duo (1.3 GHz) in all (us known) applications and benchmarks. Still the Turbo Boost may not trigger very often (sometimes it is even not activated in the BIOS) and therefore the maximum of 1.8 GHz may not be important.

The integrated Intel Graphics Media Accelerator HD (GMA HD) graphics card is clocked between 166-500 MHz (Turbo Boost) and therefore the base speed is clearly below the non low voltage versions. The performance should still be faster than the old GMA 4500MHD.

The power consumption of 18 Watt TDP (max.) counts for the whole package and therefore it is clearly better than the 17 Watt TDP of the Core 2 Duo SL-series (CPU alone).

Intel Core i5-560M

► remove

The Intel Core i5-560M is a high end dual core CPU for laptops and clocks (due to the Turbo Mode) from 2.66 to 3.2 GHz. Each core is based on the Nehalem (Westmere) micro-architecture. Hyperthreading enables the Dual Core CPU to handle 4 threads at once (for a better usage of the pipeline). Compared to the Core i7-580M, the 560M a slightly lower maximum Turbo Boost frequency.

A feature of the new Core i5-560M is the integrated graphics card called GMA HD and memory controller. Both are on a separate die that is still manufactured in 45nm whereas the CPU die is already manufactured in the new 32nm process.

The performance of the Core i5-560M should be a bit beyond the Core i7-620M and therefore the second fastest dual core CPU for laptops in 2010. Compared to the older Core 2 Duo models, the i5-560M should be faster than the T9900. Therefore, the Core i5-560M is a high end dual core cpu which should handle all daily work and gaming tasks. Only the quad core i7 CPUs can be noticeably faster at tasks that require four or more threads (e.g. rendering).

The 32nm cpu cores of the Westmere generation can also process some new instructions to accelerate AES encryptions.

The integrated Intel Graphics Media Accelerator HD (GMA HD) graphics card is known to be clocked up to 500-766 MHz and should be clearly faster than the old GMA 4500MHD. A GeForce 9400M (ION) should still be a faster (especially as Nvidia and ATI cards have a better driver support than Intel up to now). According to rumors, the GMA core will also use the Turbo Mode regulate the clock speed.

The power consumption of 35 Watt TDP (max.) counts for the whole package and therefore it is clearly better than the 35 Watt TDP of the Core 2 Duo T-series (CPU alone). Due to the Turbo Boost, the Core i5 is likely to use the whole TDP of 35 Watt under load and therefore can use more power than a similar specified Core 2 Duo. In Idle mode, the i5 uses clearly less power than the Core 2 Duo CPUs.

Intel Core i5-540UMIntel Core i5-470UMIntel Core i5-560M
Intel Core i5Intel Core i5Intel Core i5
ArrandaleArrandaleArrandale
: Core i5 Arrandale
Intel Core i5-580M2666 - 3333 MHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i5-560M2667 - 3200 MHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i5-480M2666 - 2933 MHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i5-540M2530 - 3066 MHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i5-460M2530 - 2800 MHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i5-520M2400 - 2933 MHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i5-450M2400 - 2660 MHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i5-430M2260 - 2533 MHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i5-560UM1333 - 2130 MHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i5-470UM1333 - 1867 MHz2 / 43 MB
» Intel Core i5-540UM1200 - 2000 MHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i5-520UM1060 - 1866 MHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i5-430UM1200 - 1730 MHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i5-580M2666 - 3333 MHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i5-560M2667 - 3200 MHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i5-480M2666 - 2933 MHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i5-540M2530 - 3066 MHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i5-460M2530 - 2800 MHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i5-520M2400 - 2933 MHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i5-450M2400 - 2660 MHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i5-430M2260 - 2533 MHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i5-560UM1333 - 2130 MHz2 / 43 MB
» Intel Core i5-470UM1333 - 1867 MHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i5-540UM1200 - 2000 MHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i5-520UM1060 - 1866 MHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i5-430UM1200 - 1730 MHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i5-580M2666 - 3333 MHz2 / 43 MB
» Intel Core i5-560M2667 - 3200 MHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i5-480M2666 - 2933 MHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i5-540M2530 - 3066 MHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i5-460M2530 - 2800 MHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i5-520M2400 - 2933 MHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i5-450M2400 - 2660 MHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i5-430M2260 - 2533 MHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i5-560UM1333 - 2130 MHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i5-470UM1333 - 1867 MHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i5-540UM1200 - 2000 MHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i5-520UM1060 - 1866 MHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i5-430UM1200 - 1730 MHz2 / 43 MB
1200 - 2000 MHz1333 - 1867 MHz2667 - 3200 MHz
250025002500
512 KB512 KB512 KB
3 MB3 MB3 MB
2 / 42 / 42 / 4
18 18 35
382+177 382+177 382+177
32 32 32
81+114 mm281+114 mm281+114 mm2
105 °C105 °C
BGA1288BGA1288PGA988
Intel HD Graphics 166-500MHz, DDR3-800 Memory Controller, Turbo Boost, Hyper-Threading, Virtualization Technology VT-x, Intel 64, Idle States, Enhanced Speedstep, Thermal Monitoring, Fast Memory Access, Flex Memory Access, Execute Disable BitIntel HD Graphics 166-500MHz, DDR3-800 Memory Controller, Turbo Boost, Hyper-Threading, Virtualization Technology VT-x, Intel 64, Idle States, Enhanced Speedstep, Thermal Monitoring, Fast Memory Access, Flex Memory Access, Execute Disable BitTurbo Boost, Hyper Threading, Enhanced Speedstep, integrierte GMA HD 500-733MHz, Dual Channel DDR3 memory controller
$250 U.S.$225 U.S.
Intel Core i5 540UMIntel Core i5 470UMIntel Core i5 560M
128 KB

Cinebench R11.5 - CPU Multi 64Bit
1.3 Points (3%)
200%
560M +
2.4 Points (5%)
Cinebench R10 - Rendering Single 32Bit
min: 1906     avg: 1969.5     median: 1972 (20%)     max: 2022 Points
168%
560M +
min: 3263     avg: 3345.8     median: 3306 (34%)     max: 3486 Points
Cinebench R10 - Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
min: 3775     avg: 3987.2     median: 3940 (6%)     max: 4255 Points
189%
560M +
min: 7411     avg: 7487.4     median: 7466 (11%)     max: 7592 Points
Cinebench R10 - Rendering Multiple CPUs 64Bit
min: 4611     avg: 4826.2     median: 4832 (6%)     max: 5036 Points
184%
560M +
min: 8593     avg: 8868.8     median: 8877 (12%)     max: 9127 Points
Cinebench R10 - Rendering Single CPUs 64Bit
min: 2404     avg: 2458.8     median: 2455 (24%)     max: 2524 Points
167%
560M +
min: 4001     avg: 4112.3     median: 4090 (40%)     max: 4268 Points
wPrime 2.0x - 1024m *
min: 980     avg: 1086.8     median: 1072 (13%)     max: 1221 seconds
107%
560M +
min: 536     avg: 555.2     median: 542 (6%)     max: 600 seconds
wPrime 2.0x - 32m *
min: 31     avg: 34.7     median: 34 (7%)     max: 39 seconds
104%
560M +
min: 17     avg: 17.9     median: 17 (3%)     max: 19 seconds
3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 1602     avg: 1684.4     median: 1689 (11%)     max: 1755 Points
184%
560M +
min: 3061     avg: 3103.5     median: 3115 (21%)     max: 3122 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
min: 23     avg: 25     median: 24 (5%)     max: 28 Seconds
102%
560M +
min: 14     avg: 14.4     median: 14 (3%)     max: 15 Seconds
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
min: 55     avg: 56.3     median: 55 (2%)     max: 58 Seconds
101%
560M +
min: 33     avg: 35     median: 35 (1%)     max: 36 Seconds
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M *
min: 1297     avg: 1314.5     median: 1304 (6%)     max: 1353 Seconds
102%
560M +
min: 789     avg: 804.5     median: 806 (4%)     max: 825 Seconds
SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS)
20970 MIPS (10%)
SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS)
16180 MFLOPS (12%)
PCMark 05 - Standard 1024x768
4329 Points (27%)
161%
560M +
min: 6475     avg: 6964     median: 6964 (44%)     max: 7453 Points
Windows 7 Experience Index - Processor
5.5 points (79%)
120%
560M +
6.8 points (97%)
3DMark Vantage - P CPU no PhysX 1280x1024
100%
560M +
min: 8234     avg: 8242.5     median: 8242 (12%)     max: 8251 Points

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i5-470UM → 100%

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i5-560M → 142%

-
-
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.8.1a
Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)