, , , , , ,
search relation.
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
 

Intel Core i5-540UM vs Intel Core i5-460M vs Intel Core i5-450M

Intel Core i5-540UM

► remove from comparison

The Intel Core i5-540UM is a Ultra Low Voltage dual-core processor for small and light laptops. It is clocked with 1.2 - 2 GHz (if Turbo Boost is enabled). Each core is based on the Nehalem (Westmere) micro-architecture. Hyperthreading enables the Dual Core CPU to handle 4 threads at once (for a better usage of the pipeline). AES, VT-d and Trusted Execution are activated (compared to the 430UM).

A feature of the new Core i5-540UM is the integrated graphics card (called Intel HD Graphics) and memory controller. Both are on a separate die that is still manufactured in 45nm whereas the CPU die is already manufactured in the new 32nm process.

Due to the integrated memory controller, the HyperThreading and Turbo Boost, the  Core i5-540UM is faster than a similar clocked Core 2 Duo (1.2 GHz) in all (us known) applications and benchmarks. Still the Turbo Boost may not trigger very often (sometimes it is even not activated in the BIOS) and therefore the maximum of 2 GHz may not be important.

The integrated Intel Graphics Media Accelerator HD (GMA HD) graphics card is between 166-500 MHz (Turbo Boost) and therefore the base speed is clearly below the non low voltage versions. The performance should still be faster than the old GMA 4500MHD.

The power consumption of 18 Watt TDP (max.) counts for the whole package and therefore it is clearly better than the 17 Watt TDP of the Core 2 Duo SL-series (CPU alone).

Intel Core i5-460M

► remove from comparison Intel 460M

The Intel Core i5-460M is a high end dual core CPU for laptops and clocks (due to the Turbo Mode) from 2.53 to 2.8 GHz. Each core is based on the Nehalem (Westmere) micro-architecture. Hyperthreading enables the Dual Core CPU to handle 4 threads at once (for a better usage of the pipeline). Compared to the Core i5-540M, the 460M does not support AES, VT-d and Trusted Execution functions and features a slower Turbo Boost (2.8 versus 3.06 GHz).

A feature of the new Core i5-460M is the integrated graphics card called GMA HD and memory controller. Both are on a separate die that is still manufactured in 45nm whereas the CPU die is already manufactured in the new 32nm process.

The performance of the Core i5-460M is on average faster than a 2.8 GHz Core 2 Duo T9800 and in some benchmarks even faster than the fastest Core 2 Duo T9900 (e.g. 3DMark 06 CPU Score). Therefore, the Core i5-460M is a high end dual core cpu which should handle all daily work and gaming tasks. Only the quad core i7 CPUs can be noticeably faster at tasks that require four or more threads (e.g. rendering).

The integrated Intel Graphics Media Accelerator HD (GMA HD) graphics card is known to be clocked up to 500-766 MHz and should be clearly faster than the old GMA 4500MHD. A GeForce 9400M (ION) should still be a faster (especially as Nvidia and ATI cards have a better driver support than Intel up to now). According to rumors, the GMA core will also use the Turbo Mode regulate the clock speed.

The power consumption of 35 Watt TDP (max.) counts for the whole package and therefore it is clearly better than the 35 Watt TDP of the Core 2 Duo T-series (CPU alone). Due to the Turbo Boost, the Core i5 is likely to use the whole TDP of 35 Watt under load and therefore can use more power than a similar specified Core 2 Duo. In Idle mode, the i5 uses clearly less power than the Core 2 Duo CPUs.

Intel Core i5-450M

► remove from comparison

The Intel Core i5-450M is a dual-core laptop CPU and clocks (due to Turbo Boost) with max. 2.4 - 2.66 GHz. Both cores are based on the Nehalem (Westmere) micro-architecture and due to Hyperthreading the processor is able to work with 4 threads simultaneously. The performance of the i5 is in the mid-range. The i5-450M is similar to the Core i5-520M, but the 450M does not offer AES functions.

A feature of the new Core i5-450M is the integrated graphics card called GMA HD and memory controller. Both are on a separate die that is still manufactured in 45nm whereas the CPU die is already manufactured in the new 32nm process.

The performance of the i5 450M is on average faster than a Core 2 Duo T9500 and due to the Turbo Boost, single threaded applications run even better. Therefore, the Core i5-520M is as fast as high clocked Core 2 Duo CPUs and should handle most gaming and multimedia tasks well.

The integrated Intel Graphics Media Accelerator HD (GMA HD) graphics card is known to be clocked up to 500-766 MHz and should be clearly faster than the old GMA 4500MHD. A GeForce 9400M (ION) should still be a faster (especially as Nvidia and ATI cards have a better driver support than Intel up to now). According to rumors, the GMA core will also use the Turbo Mode regulate the clock speed.

The power consumption of 35 Watt TDP (max.) counts for the whole package and therefore it is clearly better than the 35 Watt TDP of the Core 2 Duo T-series (CPU alone). Due to the Turbo Boost, the Core i5 more likely uses the TDP under load than the older Core 2 Duo CPUs. Without any load, the i5 uses noticable less power.

Intel Core i5-540UMIntel Core i5-460MIntel Core i5-450M
Intel Core i5Intel Core i5Intel Core i5
ArrandaleArrandaleArrandale
Series: Core i5 Arrandale
Intel Core i5-580M2.67 - 3.33 GHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i5-560M2.67 - 3.2 GHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i5-480M2.67 - 2.93 GHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i5-540M2.53 - 3.07 GHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i5-460M2.53 - 2.8 GHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i5-520M2.4 - 2.93 GHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i5-450M2.4 - 2.66 GHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i5-430M2.26 - 2.53 GHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i5-560UM1.33 - 2.13 GHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i5-470UM1.33 - 1.87 GHz2 / 43 MB
» Intel Core i5-540UM1.2 - 2 GHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i5-520UM1.06 - 1.87 GHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i5-430UM1.2 - 1.73 GHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i5-580M2.67 - 3.33 GHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i5-560M2.67 - 3.2 GHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i5-480M2.67 - 2.93 GHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i5-540M2.53 - 3.07 GHz2 / 43 MB
» Intel Core i5-460M2.53 - 2.8 GHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i5-520M2.4 - 2.93 GHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i5-450M2.4 - 2.66 GHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i5-430M2.26 - 2.53 GHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i5-560UM1.33 - 2.13 GHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i5-470UM1.33 - 1.87 GHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i5-540UM1.2 - 2 GHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i5-520UM1.06 - 1.87 GHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i5-430UM1.2 - 1.73 GHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i5-580M2.67 - 3.33 GHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i5-560M2.67 - 3.2 GHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i5-480M2.67 - 2.93 GHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i5-540M2.53 - 3.07 GHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i5-460M2.53 - 2.8 GHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i5-520M2.4 - 2.93 GHz2 / 43 MB
» Intel Core i5-450M2.4 - 2.66 GHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i5-430M2.26 - 2.53 GHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i5-560UM1.33 - 2.13 GHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i5-470UM1.33 - 1.87 GHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i5-540UM1.2 - 2 GHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i5-520UM1.06 - 1.87 GHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i5-430UM1.2 - 1.73 GHz2 / 43 MB
1200 - 2000 MHz2530 - 2800 MHz2400 - 2660 MHz
250024002500
512 KB512 KB512 KB
3 MB3 MB3 MB
2 / 42 / 42 / 4
18 35 35
382+177 382+177 382+177
32 32 32
81+114 mm281+114 mm281+114 mm2
105 °C105 °C105 °C
BGA1288BGA1288, PGA988PGA988
Intel HD Graphics 166-500MHz, DDR3-800 Memory Controller, Turbo Boost, Hyper-Threading, Virtualization Technology VT-x, Intel 64, Idle States, Enhanced Speedstep, Thermal Monitoring, Fast Memory Access, Flex Memory Access, Execute Disable Bitintegrated DDR3 memory controller, GMA HD Graphics, MMX, SSE (1,2,3,3S, 4.1, 3.2), EM64T, VT-xHD Graphics (500-766MHz), DDR3-800/1066 Memory Controller (max. 8 GB), Turbo Boost, Hyper-Threading, Virtualization VT-x, Intel 64, Idle States, Enhanced Speedstep, Execute Disable Bit, MMX, SSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2)
Architecturex86x86x86
$250 U.S.
Intel Core i5 540UMIntel Core i5 460MIntel Core i5 450M
128 KB128 KB

Benchmarks

Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
100%
1 460M +
min: 1.7     avg: 2.2     median: 2.3 (5%)     max: 2.48 Points
95%
1 450M +
min: 1.71     avg: 2.1     median: 2.2 (4%)     max: 2.19 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
100%
1 460M +
min: 2971     avg: 3106     median: 3080 (28%)     max: 3491
95%
1 450M +
min: 2512     avg: 2882     median: 2922.5 (26%)     max: 3020
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
100%
1 460M +
min: 6634     avg: 7073     median: 7085 (11%)     max: 7898
96%
1 450M +
min: 5580     avg: 6650     median: 6778.5 (11%)     max: 6945
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
100%
1 460M +
min: 8060     avg: 8437     median: 8468 (8%)     max: 9160 Points
96%
1 450M +
min: 7440     avg: 8070     median: 8094 (8%)     max: 8329 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
100%
1 460M +
min: 3569     avg: 3807     median: 3818.5 (27%)     max: 4034 Points
95%
1 450M +
min: 3012     avg: 3549     median: 3628 (26%)     max: 3690 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
100%
1 460M +
min: 515.201     avg: 596     median: 575 (7%)     max: 836.6 s
99%
1 450M +
min: 589     avg: 901     median: 634.3 (7%)     max: 1933.02 s
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
100%
1 460M +
min: 16.704     avg: 19.4     median: 18.6 (4%)     max: 27 s
100%
1 450M +
min: 18.85     avg: 28.5     median: 20 (4%)     max: 59.233 s
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
100%
1 460M +
min: 2770     avg: 2938     median: 2945 (16%)     max: 3142 Points
95%
1 450M +
min: 2571     avg: 2769     median: 2795 (15%)     max: 2840 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
100%
1 460M +
min: 14.087     avg: 16     median: 16 (3%)     max: 18 s
100%
1 450M +
min: 16     avg: 16.5     median: 16.4 (4%)     max: 18 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
100%
1 460M +
min: 33.025     avg: 37.3     median: 37 (2%)     max: 42.6 s
100%
1 450M +
min: 38     avg: 39.6     median: 39.4 (2%)     max: 41.3 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
100%
1 460M +
min: 781.78     avg: 918     median: 880 (4%)     max: 1521 s
100%
1 450M +
min: 877     avg: 917     median: 913.5 (4%)     max: 984 s
SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS) - SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS)
100%
1 460M +
38480 MIPS (18%)
82%
1 450M +
min: 30620     avg: 32730     median: 31630 (15%)     max: 37850 MIPS
SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS) - SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS)
100%
1 460M +
28160 MFLOPS (22%)
98%
1 450M +
min: 27000     avg: 29144     median: 27680 (21%)     max: 35580 MFLOPS
PCMark 05 - PCMark 05 - Standard
100%
1 460M +
min: 5942     avg: 6910     median: 6880 (43%)     max: 7682 Points
92%
1 450M +
6346 Points (40%)
Windows 7 Experience Index - Win7 CPU
100%
1 460M +
min: 6.8     avg: 6.9     median: 6.9 (88%)     max: 6.9 Points
99%
1 450M +
min: 6.5     avg: 6.8     median: 6.8 (87%)     max: 6.8 Points
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
100%
1 460M +
min: 6382     avg: 7659     median: 7826 (9%)     max: 7985 Points
97%
1 450M +
min: 7076     avg: 7489     median: 7585 (9%)     max: 7637 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
100%
1 460M +
min: 2402     avg: 2583     median: 2587 (9%)     max: 2756 Points
86%
1 450M +
2222 Points (8%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i5-460M → NAN% n=

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i5-450M → NAN% n=

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.16
log 24. 16:25:54

#0 checking url part for id 999 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 1214 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 964 +0s ... 0s

#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 22 Jul 2021 13:08:31 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.01s ... 0.01s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.01s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 999 +0s ... 0.011s

#8 got single benchmarks 999 +0.005s ... 0.016s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 1214 +0s ... 0.016s

#10 got single benchmarks 1214 +0.049s ... 0.065s

#11 getting avg benchmarks for device 964 +0s ... 0.066s

#12 got single benchmarks 964 +0.041s ... 0.107s

#13 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.107s

#14 min, max, avg, median took s +0.017s ... 0.123s

#15 return log +0s ... 0.123s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)