Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Celeron M 520 vs Intel Celeron M 575 vs Intel Celeron M 585

Intel Celeron M 520

► remove from comparison

Basierend auf den Merom kern mit 64 KB L1 Cache (32 KB Daten + 32 KB Instruktionen) und 1024 KB L2 Cache, der mit vollem Prozessortakt läuft.

Verbaut auf Sockel 479, AGTL+ mit 133 MHz (quadpumped 533 MHz)

Intel Celeron M 575

► remove from comparison

The Intel Celeron M 575 is a single core processor for cheap entry level laptops. It is based on the Merom architecture but features only one processing core. Furthermore, other features of the Merom core (like Speedstep and Virtualization) are not activated. The performance is only suited for basic tasks.

Intel Celeron M 585

► remove from comparison

The Intel Celeron M 585 is a single core processor for cheap entry level laptops. It is based on the Merom architecture but features only one processing core (similar to a Pentium T3400 with a single core and reduced features). Furthermore, other features of the Merom core (like Speedstep and Virtualization) are not activated.

ModelIntel Celeron M 520Intel Celeron M 575Intel Celeron M 585
SeriesIntel Celeron MIntel Celeron MIntel Celeron M
CodenameMeromMeromMerom
Series: Celeron M Merom
Intel Celeron M 5702.26 GHz1 / 1 cores
Intel Celeron M 5852.16 GHz1 / 1 cores
Intel Celeron M 5602.13 GHz1 / 1 cores
Intel Celeron M 5752 GHz1 / 1 cores
Intel Celeron M 5502 GHz1 / 1 cores
Intel Celeron M 5401.86 GHz1 / 1 cores
Intel Celeron M 5301.73 GHz1 / 1 cores
Intel Celeron M 520 « 1.6 GHz1 / 1 cores
Intel Celeron M 5702.26 GHz1 / 1 cores
Intel Celeron M 5852.16 GHz1 / 1 cores
Intel Celeron M 5602.13 GHz1 / 1 cores
Intel Celeron M 575 « 2 GHz1 / 1 cores
Intel Celeron M 5502 GHz1 / 1 cores
Intel Celeron M 5401.86 GHz1 / 1 cores
Intel Celeron M 5301.73 GHz1 / 1 cores
Intel Celeron M 5201.6 GHz1 / 1 cores
Intel Celeron M 5702.26 GHz1 / 1 cores
Intel Celeron M 585 « 2.16 GHz1 / 1 cores
Intel Celeron M 5602.13 GHz1 / 1 cores
Intel Celeron M 5752 GHz1 / 1 cores
Intel Celeron M 5502 GHz1 / 1 cores
Intel Celeron M 5401.86 GHz1 / 1 cores
Intel Celeron M 5301.73 GHz1 / 1 cores
Intel Celeron M 5201.6 GHz1 / 1 cores
Clock1600 MHz2000 MHz2160 MHz
FSB533667667
L2 Cache1 MB1 MB1 MB
Cores / Threads1 / 11 / 11 / 1
TDP30 Watt31 Watt31 Watt
65 nm65 nm, 0.95-1.365 nm, 0.95-1.30V
FeaturesMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, Intel 64, XD-BitIntel64, Execute Disable BitEM64T, Execute Disable Bit
Architecturex86x86x86
Announced
Manufacturerwww.intel.comark.intel.comark.intel.com
Transistors291 Million291 Million
Die Size143 mm2143 mm2
max. Temp.100 °C100 °C
SocketPPGA478PPGA478
$86 U.S.$70 U.S.

Benchmarks

Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
100%
1 575 +
min: 1914     avg: 1917     median: 1916.5 (12%)     max: 1919 Points
108%
1 585 +
2062 Points (12%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
100%
1 575 +
min: 1914     avg: 1917     median: 1916.5 (1%)     max: 1919 Points
108%
1 585 +
2062 Points (1%)
wPrime 1.55 - wPrime 1.55 1024m *
100%
1 520 +
3639 s (14%)
wPrime 1.55 - wPrime 1.55 32m *
100%
1 520 +
112 s (59%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
100%
1 575 +
min: 879     avg: 898     median: 898 (2%)     max: 917 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
100%
520 +
min: 39     avg: 39.2     median: 39.2 (8%)     max: 39.3 s
102%
575 +
min: 24     avg: 28.9     median: 28.9 (6%)     max: 33.8 s
102%
585 +
31.4 s (7%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
100%
1 575 +
54 s (2%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
100%
1 520 +
2015 s (9%)
SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS) - SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS)
100%
1 520 +
7400 MIPS (4%)
SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS) - SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS)
100%
1 520 +
5078 MFLOPS (4%)
PCMark 05 - PCMark 05 - Standard
100%
1 520 +
min: 1845     avg: 1942     median: 1942 (4%)     max: 2039 Points

Average Benchmarks Intel Celeron M 520 → 100% n=1

Average Benchmarks Intel Celeron M 575 → 102% n=1

Average Benchmarks Intel Celeron M 585 → 102% n=1

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.26
log 25. 00:24:31

#0 checking url part for id 321 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 430 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 429 +0s ... 0s

#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Tue, 23 Apr 2024 05:40:15 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#5 composed specs +0.013s ... 0.014s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.014s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 321 +0.003s ... 0.017s

#8 got single benchmarks 321 +0.017s ... 0.034s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 430 +0.003s ... 0.037s

#10 got single benchmarks 430 +0.012s ... 0.049s

#11 getting avg benchmarks for device 429 +0.003s ... 0.052s

#12 got single benchmarks 429 +0.009s ... 0.061s

#13 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.061s

#14 min, max, avg, median took s +0.045s ... 0.105s

#15 return log +0s ... 0.105s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)