Intel Core i5-470UM vs Intel Core i5-430M vs Intel Core i5-450M

Intel Core i5-470UM

► remove

The Intel Core i5-470UM is a Ultra Low Voltage dual-core processor for small and light laptops. It is clocked with 1.3 - 1.8 GHz (if Turbo Boost is enabled). Each core is based on the Nehalem (Westmere) micro-architecture. Hyperthreading enables the Dual Core CPU to handle 4 threads at once (for a better usage of the pipeline). AES, VT-d and Trusted Execution are deactivated for the 470UM, compared to the i7 UM CPUs.

The faster i5-560UM and i7-660UM are also clocked at 1.3 GHz but feature a higher TurboBoost frequency.

A feature of the Core i5-470UM is the integrated graphics card (called Intel HD Graphics) and memory controller. Both are on a separate die that is still manufactured in 45nm whereas the CPU die is already manufactured in the new 32nm process.

Due to the integrated memory controller, the HyperThreading and Turbo Boost, the  Core i5-470UM is faster than a similar clocked Core 2 Duo (1.3 GHz) in all (us known) applications and benchmarks. Still the Turbo Boost may not trigger very often (sometimes it is even not activated in the BIOS) and therefore the maximum of 1.8 GHz may not be important.

The integrated Intel Graphics Media Accelerator HD (GMA HD) graphics card is clocked between 166-500 MHz (Turbo Boost) and therefore the base speed is clearly below the non low voltage versions. The performance should still be faster than the old GMA 4500MHD.

The power consumption of 18 Watt TDP (max.) counts for the whole package and therefore it is clearly better than the 17 Watt TDP of the Core 2 Duo SL-series (CPU alone).

Intel Core i5-430M

► remove Intel 430M

The Intel Core i5-430M is a fast middle class dual core CPU for laptops and clocks (due to the Turbo Mode) from 2.26 to 2.53 GHz. Each core is based on the Nehalem (Westmere) micro-architecture. Hyperthreading enables the Dual Core CPU to handle 4 threads at once (for a better usage of the pipeline). Compared to the faster Core i7-620M, the 430M only has 3 MB Level 3 Cache, missing VT-d, Trusted Execution, and AES features and a lower clock speed.

A feature of the new Core i5-430M is the integrated graphics card (called Intel HD Graphics) and memory controller. Both are on a separate die that is still manufactured in 45nm whereas the CPU die is already manufactured in the new 32nm process.

Due to the integrated memory controller, the HyperThreading and Turbo Boost, the  Core i5-430M is faster than a similar clocked Core 2 Duo in all (us known) applications and benchmarks. In fact, the 430M even came close to a fast Core 2 Duo T9600 (2.8 GHz) in some benchmarks (e.g. Cinebench 10 Multi Threaded). This means the 430M is a fast middle class - performance CPU and much faster than the top AMD model, the Turion II Ultra M660 (at the time of announcement).

The 32nm cpu cores of the Westmere generation can also process some new instructions to accelerate AES encryptions. Still, these functions are deactivated on the Core i5-430M leading to some performance drawbacks in modern applications that support AES encoding using the new instructions (e.g. the Communications Suite test in the PCMark Vantage boosts up to 70% using AES in the faster Core i5-520M).

The integrated Intel Graphics Media Accelerator HD (GMA HD) graphics card is between 500-766 MHz (Turbo Boost) and is clearly faster than the old GMA 4500MHD. A GeForce 9400M (ION) should still be a faster (especially as Nvidia and ATI cards have a better driver support than Intel up to now). The Turbo Boost can overclock the Intel HD Graphics up to 733 MHz when the cores are not fully used.

The power consumption of 35 Watt TDP (max.) counts for the whole package and therefore it is clearly better than the 35 Watt TDP of the Core 2 Duo T-series (CPU alone).

Intel Core i5-450M

► remove

The Intel Core i5-450M is a dual-core laptop CPU and clocks (due to Turbo Boost) with max. 2.4 - 2.66 GHz. Both cores are based on the Nehalem (Westmere) micro-architecture and due to Hyperthreading the processor is able to work with 4 threads simultaneously. The performance of the i5 is in the mid-range. The i5-450M is similar to the Core i5-520M, but the 450M does not offer AES functions.

A feature of the new Core i5-450M is the integrated graphics card called GMA HD and memory controller. Both are on a separate die that is still manufactured in 45nm whereas the CPU die is already manufactured in the new 32nm process.

The performance of the i5 450M is on average faster than a Core 2 Duo T9500 and due to the Turbo Boost, single threaded applications run even better. Therefore, the Core i5-520M is as fast as high clocked Core 2 Duo CPUs and should handle most gaming and multimedia tasks well.

The integrated Intel Graphics Media Accelerator HD (GMA HD) graphics card is known to be clocked up to 500-766 MHz and should be clearly faster than the old GMA 4500MHD. A GeForce 9400M (ION) should still be a faster (especially as Nvidia and ATI cards have a better driver support than Intel up to now). According to rumors, the GMA core will also use the Turbo Mode regulate the clock speed.

The power consumption of 35 Watt TDP (max.) counts for the whole package and therefore it is clearly better than the 35 Watt TDP of the Core 2 Duo T-series (CPU alone). Due to the Turbo Boost, the Core i5 more likely uses the TDP under load than the older Core 2 Duo CPUs. Without any load, the i5 uses noticable less power.

Intel Core i5-470UMIntel Core i5-430MIntel Core i5-450M
Intel Core i5Intel Core i5Intel Core i5
ArrandaleArrandaleArrandale
: Core i5 Arrandale
Intel Core i5-580M2666 - 3333 MHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i5-560M2667 - 3200 MHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i5-480M2666 - 2933 MHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i5-540M2530 - 3066 MHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i5-460M2530 - 2800 MHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i5-520M2400 - 2933 MHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i5-450M2400 - 2660 MHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i5-430M2260 - 2533 MHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i5-560UM1333 - 2130 MHz2 / 43 MB
» Intel Core i5-470UM1333 - 1867 MHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i5-540UM1200 - 2000 MHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i5-520UM1060 - 1866 MHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i5-430UM1200 - 1730 MHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i5-580M2666 - 3333 MHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i5-560M2667 - 3200 MHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i5-480M2666 - 2933 MHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i5-540M2530 - 3066 MHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i5-460M2530 - 2800 MHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i5-520M2400 - 2933 MHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i5-450M2400 - 2660 MHz2 / 43 MB
» Intel Core i5-430M2260 - 2533 MHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i5-560UM1333 - 2130 MHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i5-470UM1333 - 1867 MHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i5-540UM1200 - 2000 MHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i5-520UM1060 - 1866 MHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i5-430UM1200 - 1730 MHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i5-580M2666 - 3333 MHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i5-560M2667 - 3200 MHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i5-480M2666 - 2933 MHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i5-540M2530 - 3066 MHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i5-460M2530 - 2800 MHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i5-520M2400 - 2933 MHz2 / 43 MB
» Intel Core i5-450M2400 - 2660 MHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i5-430M2260 - 2533 MHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i5-560UM1333 - 2130 MHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i5-470UM1333 - 1867 MHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i5-540UM1200 - 2000 MHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i5-520UM1060 - 1866 MHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i5-430UM1200 - 1730 MHz2 / 43 MB
1333 - 1867 MHz2260 - 2533 MHz2400 - 2660 MHz
250025002500
512 KB512 KB512 KB
3 MB3 MB3 MB
2 / 42 / 42 / 4
18 35 35
382+177 177 382+177
32 32 32
81+114 mm2144 mm281+114 mm2
BGA1288BGA1288, PGA988PGA988
Intel HD Graphics 166-500MHz, DDR3-800 Memory Controller, Turbo Boost, Hyper-Threading, Virtualization Technology VT-x, Intel 64, Idle States, Enhanced Speedstep, Thermal Monitoring, Fast Memory Access, Flex Memory Access, Execute Disable BitTurbo Boost, Hyper Threading, Enhanced Speedstep, integrierte GMA HD 500-733MHz, SSE4.1, SSE4.2HD Graphics (500-766MHz), DDR3-800/1066 Memory Controller (max. 8 GB), Turbo Boost, Hyper-Threading, Virtualization VT-x, Intel 64, Idle States, Enhanced Speedstep, Execute Disable Bit, MMX, SSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2)
Intel Core i5 470UMIntel Core i5 430MIntel Core i5 450M
128 KB128 KB
105 °C105 °C

Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 1.2     avg: 1.3     median: 1.3 (3%)     max: 1.35 Points
159%
430M +
min: 1.56     avg: 2     median: 2 (5%)     max: 2.09 Points
168%
450M +
min: 1.71     avg: 2.1     median: 2.2 (5%)     max: 2.19 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
min: 1906     avg: 1970     median: 1972.5 (20%)     max: 2022
139%
430M +
min: 2573     avg: 2736     median: 2748 (28%)     max: 2953
148%
450M +
min: 2512     avg: 2882     median: 2922.5 (30%)     max: 3020
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
min: 3775     avg: 3987     median: 3940 (7%)     max: 4255
161%
430M +
min: 5073     avg: 6300     median: 6357 (11%)     max: 6591
172%
450M +
min: 5580     avg: 6650     median: 6778.5 (11%)     max: 6945
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
min: 4611     avg: 4826     median: 4832.5 (6%)     max: 5036 Points
160%
430M +
min: 5917     avg: 7558     median: 7717.5 (9%)     max: 7937 Points
167%
450M +
min: 7440     avg: 8070     median: 8094 (9%)     max: 8329 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
min: 2404     avg: 2459     median: 2455 (22%)     max: 2524 Points
137%
430M +
min: 2954     avg: 3350     median: 3372 (30%)     max: 3454 Points
148%
450M +
min: 3012     avg: 3549     median: 3628 (32%)     max: 3690 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
min: 980     avg: 1087     median: 1072.5 (13%)     max: 1221.98 s
106%
430M +
min: 407.388     avg: 727     median: 642 (8%)     max: 1601.62 s
106%
450M +
min: 589     avg: 901     median: 634.3 (7%)     max: 1933.02 s
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
min: 31.5     avg: 34.7     median: 34 (7%)     max: 39.342 s
103%
430M +
min: 12.684     avg: 23.5     median: 20.7 (4%)     max: 54.004 s
103%
450M +
min: 18.85     avg: 28.5     median: 20 (4%)     max: 59.233 s
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 1602     avg: 1684     median: 1689 (11%)     max: 1755 Points
153%
430M +
min: 2330     avg: 2568     median: 2584 (17%)     max: 2654 Points
165%
450M +
min: 2571     avg: 2769     median: 2795 (19%)     max: 2840 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
min: 23.946     avg: 25     median: 24 (5%)     max: 28 s
101%
430M +
min: 16     avg: 17.5     median: 17.7 (4%)     max: 18 s
102%
450M +
min: 16     avg: 16.5     median: 16.4 (4%)     max: 18 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
min: 55     avg: 56.3     median: 55.7 (2%)     max: 58 s
101%
430M +
min: 38     avg: 41.4     median: 41.3 (2%)     max: 43.851 s
101%
450M +
min: 38     avg: 39.6     median: 39.4 (2%)     max: 41.3 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
min: 1297     avg: 1315     median: 1304.5 (6%)     max: 1353 s
102%
430M +
min: 900     avg: 962     median: 962 (4%)     max: 1034 s
102%
450M +
min: 877     avg: 917     median: 913.5 (4%)     max: 984 s
SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS) - SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS)
20970 MIPS (10%)
138%
430M +
min: 27890     avg: 29299     median: 28910 (14%)     max: 31740 MIPS
151%
450M +
min: 30620     avg: 32730     median: 31630 (15%)     max: 37850 MIPS
SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS) - SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS)
16180 MFLOPS (12%)
147%
430M +
min: 22500     avg: 23713     median: 23820 (18%)     max: 26530 MFLOPS
171%
450M +
min: 27000     avg: 29144     median: 27680 (21%)     max: 35580 MFLOPS
PCMark 05 - PCMark 05 - Standard
4329 Points (27%)
151%
430M +
min: 5506     avg: 6342     median: 6525.5 (41%)     max: 6809 Points
147%
450M +
6346 Points (40%)
Windows 7 Experience Index - Win7 CPU
min: 5.4     avg: 5.5     median: 5.6 (71%)     max: 5.6 Points
121%
430M +
min: 6.3     avg: 6.6     median: 6.7 (86%)     max: 6.7 Points
123%
450M +
min: 6.5     avg: 6.8     median: 6.8 (87%)     max: 6.8 Points

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i5-470UM → 100% n=15

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i5-430M → 132% n=15

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i5-450M → 138% n=15

-
-
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.15
Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)