Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core i5-460M vs Intel Core i5-560M vs Intel Core i5-520UM

Intel Core i5-460M

► remove from comparison Intel 460M

The Intel Core i5-460M is a high end dual core CPU for laptops and clocks (due to the Turbo Mode) from 2.53 to 2.8 GHz. Each core is based on the Nehalem (Westmere) micro-architecture. Hyperthreading enables the Dual Core CPU to handle 4 threads at once (for a better usage of the pipeline). Compared to the Core i5-540M, the 460M does not support AES, VT-d and Trusted Execution functions and features a slower Turbo Boost (2.8 versus 3.06 GHz).

A feature of the new Core i5-460M is the integrated graphics card called GMA HD and memory controller. Both are on a separate die that is still manufactured in 45nm whereas the CPU die is already manufactured in the new 32nm process.

The performance of the Core i5-460M is on average faster than a 2.8 GHz Core 2 Duo T9800 and in some benchmarks even faster than the fastest Core 2 Duo T9900 (e.g. 3DMark 06 CPU Score). Therefore, the Core i5-460M is a high end dual core cpu which should handle all daily work and gaming tasks. Only the quad core i7 CPUs can be noticeably faster at tasks that require four or more threads (e.g. rendering).

The integrated Intel Graphics Media Accelerator HD (GMA HD) graphics card is known to be clocked up to 500-766 MHz and should be clearly faster than the old GMA 4500MHD. A GeForce 9400M (ION) should still be a faster (especially as Nvidia and ATI cards have a better driver support than Intel up to now). According to rumors, the GMA core will also use the Turbo Mode regulate the clock speed.

The power consumption of 35 Watt TDP (max.) counts for the whole package and therefore it is clearly better than the 35 Watt TDP of the Core 2 Duo T-series (CPU alone). Due to the Turbo Boost, the Core i5 is likely to use the whole TDP of 35 Watt under load and therefore can use more power than a similar specified Core 2 Duo. In Idle mode, the i5 uses clearly less power than the Core 2 Duo CPUs.

Intel Core i5-560M

► remove from comparison

The Intel Core i5-560M is a high end dual core CPU for laptops and clocks (due to the Turbo Mode) from 2.66 to 3.2 GHz. Each core is based on the Nehalem (Westmere) micro-architecture. Hyperthreading enables the Dual Core CPU to handle 4 threads at once (for a better usage of the pipeline). Compared to the Core i7-580M, the 560M a slightly lower maximum Turbo Boost frequency.

A feature of the new Core i5-560M is the integrated graphics card called GMA HD and memory controller. Both are on a separate die that is still manufactured in 45nm whereas the CPU die is already manufactured in the new 32nm process.

The performance of the Core i5-560M should be a bit beyond the Core i7-620M and therefore the second fastest dual core CPU for laptops in 2010. Compared to the older Core 2 Duo models, the i5-560M should be faster than the T9900. Therefore, the Core i5-560M is a high end dual core cpu which should handle all daily work and gaming tasks. Only the quad core i7 CPUs can be noticeably faster at tasks that require four or more threads (e.g. rendering).

The 32nm cpu cores of the Westmere generation can also process some new instructions to accelerate AES encryptions.

The integrated Intel Graphics Media Accelerator HD (GMA HD) graphics card is known to be clocked up to 500-766 MHz and should be clearly faster than the old GMA 4500MHD. A GeForce 9400M (ION) should still be a faster (especially as Nvidia and ATI cards have a better driver support than Intel up to now). According to rumors, the GMA core will also use the Turbo Mode regulate the clock speed.

The power consumption of 35 Watt TDP (max.) counts for the whole package and therefore it is clearly better than the 35 Watt TDP of the Core 2 Duo T-series (CPU alone). Due to the Turbo Boost, the Core i5 is likely to use the whole TDP of 35 Watt under load and therefore can use more power than a similar specified Core 2 Duo. In Idle mode, the i5 uses clearly less power than the Core 2 Duo CPUs.

Intel Core i5-520UM

► remove from comparison Intel 520UM

The Intel Core i5-520UM is a Ultra Low Voltage dual-core processor for small and light laptops. It is clocked with 1.06 - 1.86 GHz (if Turbo Boost is enabled). Each core is based on the Nehalem (Westmere) micro-architecture. Hyperthreading enables the Dual Core CPU to handle 4 threads at once (for a better usage of the pipeline). Compared to the Core i7-620UM, the i5 offers only 3MB Level 3 cache (i7 4MB) and a lower maximum Turbo Boost frequency. Other Core i5 CPUs (withouth the U in the name) are faster due to the higher clock speed, but need more power.

A feature of the new Core i5-520UM is the integrated graphics card (called Intel HD Graphics) and memory controller. Both are on a separate die that is still manufactured in 45nm whereas the CPU die is already manufactured in the new 32nm process.

Due to the integrated memory controller, the HyperThreading and Turbo Boost, the  Core i5-520UM is faster than a similar clocked Core 2 Duo (1.2 GHz) in all (us known) applications and benchmarks. Still the Turbo Boost may not trigger very often (sometimes it is even not activated in the BIOS) and therefore the maximum of 1.86 GHz is not very important. 

The 32nm cpu cores of the Westmere generation can also process some new instructions to accelerate AES encryptions. Modern applications that support AES encoding can profit significantly using the new instructions (e.g. the Communications Suite test in the PCMark Vantage boosts up to 70% using AES in the faster Core i5-520M).

The integrated Intel Graphics Media Accelerator HD (GMA HD) graphics card is between 166-500 MHz (Turbo Boost) and therefore the base speed is clearly below the non low voltage versions. The performance should still be faster than the old GMA 4500MHD.

The power consumption of 18 Watt TDP (max.) counts for the whole package and therefore it is clearly better than the 17 Watt TDP of the Core 2 Duo SL-series (CPU alone).

ModelIntel Core i5-460MIntel Core i5-560MIntel Core i5-520UM
SeriesIntel Core i5Intel Core i5Intel Core i5
CodenameArrandaleArrandaleArrandale
Series: Core i5 Arrandale
Intel Core i5-580M2.67 - 3.33 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i5-560M2.67 - 3.2 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i5-480M2.67 - 2.93 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i5-540M2.53 - 3.07 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i5-460M « 2.53 - 2.8 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i5-520M2.4 - 2.93 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i5-450M2.4 - 2.66 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i5-430M2.26 - 2.53 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i5-560UM1.33 - 2.13 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i5-470UM1.33 - 1.87 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i5-540UM1.2 - 2 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i5-520UM1.06 - 1.87 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i5-430UM1.2 - 1.73 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i5-580M2.67 - 3.33 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i5-560M « 2.67 - 3.2 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i5-480M2.67 - 2.93 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i5-540M2.53 - 3.07 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i5-460M2.53 - 2.8 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i5-520M2.4 - 2.93 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i5-450M2.4 - 2.66 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i5-430M2.26 - 2.53 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i5-560UM1.33 - 2.13 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i5-470UM1.33 - 1.87 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i5-540UM1.2 - 2 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i5-520UM1.06 - 1.87 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i5-430UM1.2 - 1.73 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i5-580M2.67 - 3.33 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i5-560M2.67 - 3.2 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i5-480M2.67 - 2.93 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i5-540M2.53 - 3.07 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i5-460M2.53 - 2.8 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i5-520M2.4 - 2.93 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i5-450M2.4 - 2.66 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i5-430M2.26 - 2.53 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i5-560UM1.33 - 2.13 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i5-470UM1.33 - 1.87 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i5-540UM1.2 - 2 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i5-520UM « 1.06 - 1.87 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i5-430UM1.2 - 1.73 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Clock2530 - 2800 MHz2667 - 3200 MHz1060 - 1866 MHz
FSB240025002500
L1 Cache128 KB128 KB
L2 Cache512 KB512 KB512 KB
L3 Cache3 MB3 MB3 MB
Cores / Threads2 / 42 / 42 / 4
TDP35 Watt35 Watt18 Watt
Transistors382+177 Million382+177 Million382+177 Million
Technology32 nm32 nm32 nm
Die Size81+114 mm281+114 mm281+114 mm2
max. Temp.105 °C105 °C105 °C
SocketBGA1288, PGA988PGA988BGA1288
Featuresintegrated DDR3 memory controller, GMA HD Graphics, MMX, SSE (1,2,3,3S, 4.1, 3.2), EM64T, VT-xTurbo Boost, Hyper Threading, Enhanced Speedstep, integrierte GMA HD 500-733MHz, Dual Channel DDR3 memory controllerTurbo Boost (1.86 GHz max), Hyper Threading, Enhanced Speedstep, integrated GMA HD 166-500MHz
Architecturex86x86x86
Announced
Manufacturerark.intel.comark.intel.comark.intel.com
$225 U.S.$241 U.S.

Benchmarks

Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
100%
460M +
min: 1.7     avg: 2.2     median: 2.3 (3%)     max: 2.48 Points
105%
560M +
min: 2.36     avg: 2.4     median: 2.4 (3%)     max: 2.42 Points
min: 1.02     avg: 1.2     median: 1.2 (2%)     max: 1.33 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
100%
460M +
min: 2971     avg: 3106     median: 3080 (19%)     max: 3491 Points
107%
560M +
min: 3263     avg: 3346     median: 3306 (20%)     max: 3486 Points
min: 1471     avg: 1981     median: 1942.5 (12%)     max: 2569 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
100%
460M +
min: 6634     avg: 7073     median: 7085 (5%)     max: 7898 Points
105%
560M +
min: 7411     avg: 7487     median: 7466 (5%)     max: 7592 Points
min: 2785     avg: 3670     median: 3778 (3%)     max: 4340 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
100%
460M +
min: 8060     avg: 8437     median: 8468 (6%)     max: 9160 Points
105%
560M +
min: 8593     avg: 8869     median: 8877.5 (6%)     max: 9127 Points
min: 3946     avg: 4600     median: 4632.5 (3%)     max: 5187 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
100%
460M +
min: 3569     avg: 3807     median: 3818.5 (5%)     max: 4034 Points
107%
560M +
min: 4001     avg: 4112     median: 4090 (5%)     max: 4268 Points
min: 2263     avg: 2561     median: 2423.5 (3%)     max: 3135 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
100%
460M +
min: 515     avg: 596     median: 575 (7%)     max: 837 s
100%
560M +
min: 536     avg: 555     median: 542.5 (6%)     max: 600 s
min: 995     avg: 1110     median: 1110 (13%)     max: 1225 s
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
100%
460M +
min: 16.7     avg: 19.4     median: 18.6 (4%)     max: 27 s
100%
560M +
min: 17     avg: 17.9     median: 17.7 (4%)     max: 19.34 s
min: 31.8     avg: 35.2     median: 35.2 (7%)     max: 38.5 s
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
100%
460M +
min: 2770     avg: 2938     median: 2945 (6%)     max: 3142 Points
106%
560M +
min: 3061     avg: 3104     median: 3115.5 (7%)     max: 3122 Points
min: 982     avg: 1429     median: 1492 (3%)     max: 1718 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
100%
460M +
min: 14.09     avg: 16     median: 16 (3%)     max: 18 s
100%
560M +
min: 14     avg: 14.4     median: 14.2 (3%)     max: 15 s
min: 24     avg: 26.7     median: 25 (5%)     max: 31 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
100%
460M +
min: 33.03     avg: 37.3     median: 37 (2%)     max: 42.6 s
100%
560M +
min: 33     avg: 35     median: 35.6 (2%)     max: 36.44 s
min: 56     avg: 62.3     median: 58 (2%)     max: 73 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
100%
460M +
min: 782     avg: 918     median: 880 (4%)     max: 1521 s
100%
560M +
min: 789     avg: 804     median: 806 (4%)     max: 825 s
min: 1303     avg: 1439     median: 1341 (6%)     max: 1674 s
SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS) - SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS)
100%
1 460M +
38480 MIPS (18%)
SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS) - SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS)
100%
1 460M +
28160 MFLOPS (22%)
PCMark 05 - PCMark 05 - Standard
100%
460M +
min: 5942     avg: 6910     median: 6880 (14%)     max: 7682 Points
101%
560M +
min: 6475     avg: 6964     median: 6964 (14%)     max: 7453 Points
min: 2848     avg: 3571     median: 3925 (8%)     max: 3940 Points
Windows 7 Experience Index - Win7 CPU
100%
460M +
min: 6.8     avg: 6.9     median: 6.9 (88%)     max: 6.9 Points
min: 6.7     avg: 6.8     median: 6.8 (87%)     max: 6.9 Points
min: 3.9     avg: 4.7     median: 4.8 (61%)     max: 5.4 Points
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
100%
460M +
min: 6382     avg: 7659     median: 7826 (7%)     max: 7985 Points
105%
560M +
min: 8234     avg: 8243     median: 8242.5 (7%)     max: 8251 Points
min: 3751     avg: 4065     median: 4064.5 (4%)     max: 4378 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
100%
1 460M +
min: 2402     avg: 2583     median: 2587 (7%)     max: 2756 Points

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i5-460M → 100% n=14

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i5-560M → 103% n=14

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i5-520UM → 71% n=14

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.26
log 19. 23:21:57

#0 checking url part for id 1214 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 1266 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 563 +0s ... 0s

#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Fri, 19 Apr 2024 05:38:49 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#5 composed specs +0.027s ... 0.028s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.028s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 1214 +0.003s ... 0.031s

#8 got single benchmarks 1214 +0.111s ... 0.142s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 1266 +0.003s ... 0.145s

#10 got single benchmarks 1266 +0.023s ... 0.169s

#11 getting avg benchmarks for device 563 +0.002s ... 0.171s

#12 got single benchmarks 563 +0.018s ... 0.189s

#13 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.189s

#14 min, max, avg, median took s +0.13s ... 0.319s

#15 return log +0s ... 0.319s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)