Intel Core i5-4400E vs Intel Core i5-4200H

Intel Core i5-4400E

► remove Intel 4400E

The Intel Core i5-4400E is a dual-core processor for embedded systems launched in mid-2013. It is based on the Haswell architecture and is manufactured in 22nm. Due to Hyper-Threading, the two cores can handle up to four threads in parallel, leading to better utilization of the CPU. Each core offers a base speed of 2.7 GHz, but can dynamically increase clock rates with Turbo Boost up to 3.3 GHz for 1 active core. The memory controller supports ECC.

Haswell is the successor to the Ivy Bridge architecture with improvements on both GPU and CPU performance. The CPUs are produced in 22nm and offer an optimized branch prediction as well as additional execution ports, improving the performance per clock by almost 10 percent. Furthermore, new features like AVX2 and FMA should increase the performance in future applications.

The performance of the Core i5-4400E is similar to the consumer model Core i5-4300M with a slighty lower base clock. Therefore, the 4400E should be comparable to the Ivy Bridge based Core i7-3520M.

The integrated graphics card offers 20 Execution Units (EUs), which represents the GT2 version of the Haswell GPU. Technically, the GPU seems similar to the Intel HD Graphics 4600 found on other Core i5 CPUs, but the clock rate of 400 - 1000 MHz is noticeably lower.

The i5-4400E is rated at a TDP of 37 W including the graphics card, memory controller and VRMs.

Intel Core i5-4200H

► remove Intel 4200H

The Intel Core i5-4200H is a fast dual-core processor for laptops launched in Q4 2013. It is based on the Haswell architecture and is manufactured in 22nm. Due to Hyper-Threading, the two cores can handle up to four threads in parallel leading to better utilization of the CPU. Each core offers a base speed of 2.8 GHz but can dynamically increase clock rates with Turbo Boost up to 3.4 GHz for 1 active core and 3.3 GHz for 2 active cores.

Architecture

Haswell is the successor to the Ivy Bridge architecture with improvements on both GPU and CPU performance. The CPUs are produced in 22nm and offer an optimized branch prediction as well as additional execution ports. Furthermore, new features like AVX2 and FMA should increase the performance in future applications.

Performance

Due to these changes, the performance per clock has been improved by almost 10 percent compared to Ivy Bridge. Therefore, the i5-4200H is slightly faster than the former top model i7-3520M and roughly on par with the Core i5-4330M.

Graphics

The integrated Intel HD Graphics 4600 offers 20 Execution Units (EUs) clocked at 400 MHz up to 1150 MHz with Turbo Boost, making it about 30 % faster than a similarly clocked HD 4000.

Power Consumption

The i5-4200H is rated at a very high TDP of 47 W including the graphics card, memory controller and VRMs. This TDP range is typical of mobile quad-core processors. Therefore, the CPU is suited for laptops 15-inches or greater.

Intel Core i5-4400EIntel Core i5-4200H
Intel Core i5Intel Core i5
HaswellHaswell
: Core i5 Haswell
Intel Core i5-4340M compare2900 - 3600 MHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i5-4210H compare2900 - 3500 MHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i5-4330M compare2800 - 3500 MHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i5-4200H2800 - 3400 MHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i5-4308U compare2800 - 3300 MHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i5-4310M compare2700 - 3400 MHz2 / 43 MB
» Intel Core i5-4400E2700 - 3300 MHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i5-4300M compare2600 - 3300 MHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i5-4210M compare2600 - 3200 MHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i5-4288U compare2600 - 3100 MHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i5-4278U compare2600 - 3100 MHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i5-4200M compare2500 - 3100 MHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i5-4258U compare2400 - 2900 MHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i5-4310U compare2000 - 3000 MHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i5-4360U compare1500 - 3000 MHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i5-4300U compare1900 - 2900 MHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i5-4350U compare1400 - 2900 MHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i5-4210U compare1700 - 2700 MHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i5-4260U compare1400 - 2700 MHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i5-4402E compare1600 - 2700 MHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i5-4200U compare1600 - 2600 MHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i5-4250U compare1300 - 2600 MHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i5-4300Y compare1600 - 2300 MHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i5-4302Y compare1600 - 2300 MHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i5-4202Y compare1600 - 2000 MHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i5-4220Y compare1600 - 2000 MHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i5-4210Y compare1500 - 1900 MHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i5-4200Y compare1400 - 1900 MHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i5-4340M compare2900 - 3600 MHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i5-4210H compare2900 - 3500 MHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i5-4330M compare2800 - 3500 MHz2 / 43 MB
» Intel Core i5-4200H2800 - 3400 MHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i5-4308U compare2800 - 3300 MHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i5-4310M compare2700 - 3400 MHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i5-4400E2700 - 3300 MHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i5-4300M compare2600 - 3300 MHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i5-4210M compare2600 - 3200 MHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i5-4288U compare2600 - 3100 MHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i5-4278U compare2600 - 3100 MHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i5-4200M compare2500 - 3100 MHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i5-4258U compare2400 - 2900 MHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i5-4310U compare2000 - 3000 MHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i5-4360U compare1500 - 3000 MHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i5-4300U compare1900 - 2900 MHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i5-4350U compare1400 - 2900 MHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i5-4210U compare1700 - 2700 MHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i5-4260U compare1400 - 2700 MHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i5-4402E compare1600 - 2700 MHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i5-4200U compare1600 - 2600 MHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i5-4250U compare1300 - 2600 MHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i5-4300Y compare1600 - 2300 MHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i5-4302Y compare1600 - 2300 MHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i5-4202Y compare1600 - 2000 MHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i5-4220Y compare1600 - 2000 MHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i5-4210Y compare1500 - 1900 MHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i5-4200Y compare1400 - 1900 MHz2 / 43 MB
2700 - 3300 MHz2800 - 3400 MHz
128 KB128 KB
512 KB512 KB
3 MB3 MB
2 / 42 / 4
37 47
960 960
22 22
130 mm2130 mm2
100 °C100 °C
FCBGA1364FCBGA1364
Haswell GT2-GPU (400 - 1000 MHz), DDR3(L)-1600 ECC Memory Controller, HyperThreading, AVX, AVX2, AES, Trusted Execution, Quick Sync, VirtualizationHD Graphics 4600 (400 - 1150 MHz), DDR3(L)-1600 Memory Controller, HyperThreading, AVX, AVX2, Quick Sync, Virtualization, AES-NI
iGPUIntel HD Graphics 4600 (400 - 1000 MHz)Intel HD Graphics 4600 (400 - 1150 MHz)
$266 U.S.$257 U.S.
Intel Core i5 4400EIntel Core i5 4200H

Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
100%
1 4200H +
min: 321     avg: 323     median: 323.5 (7%)     max: 325 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
100%
1 4200H +
min: 128     avg: 129     median: 129.5 (56%)     max: 130 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
100%
1 4200H +
min: 3.5     avg: 3.5     median: 3.5 (8%)     max: 3.57 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
100%
1 4200H +
min: 1.46     avg: 1.5     median: 1.5 (57%)     max: 1.47 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
100%
1 4200H +
min: 4773     avg: 5719     median: 5719 (59%)     max: 6665
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
100%
1 4200H +
min: 10668     avg: 10739     median: 10739 (18%)     max: 10810
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
100%
1 4200H +
13739 Points (16%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
100%
1 4200H +
6646 Points (58%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
100%
1 4200H +
499 s (6%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
100%
1 4200H +
15.8 s (3%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
100%
1 4200H +
2469 (25%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
100%
1 4200H +
20.5 fps (12%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
100%
1 4200H +
103 fps (36%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
100%
1 4200H +
0.2 GB/s (0%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
100%
1 4200H +
0.3 GB/s (0%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
100%
1 4200H +
1.9 GB/s (0%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
100%
1 4200H +
4361 Points (29%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
100%
1 4200H +
11.4 s (2%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
100%
1 4200H +
26.1 s (1%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
100%
1 4200H +
595 s (3%)
SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS) - SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS)
100%
1 4200H +
56230 MIPS (27%)
SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS) - SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS)
100%
1 4200H +
41070 MFLOPS (32%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
100%
1 4200H +
11474 Points (16%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
100%
1 4200H +
min: 3928     avg: 4038     median: 4031 (18%)     max: 4163 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
100%
1 4200H +
min: 25321     avg: 29965     median: 25570 (16%)     max: 39005 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
100%
1 4200H +
min: 3339     avg: 3357     median: 3357 (8%)     max: 3376 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
100%
1 4200H +
min: 4829     avg: 4846     median: 4840.5 (15%)     max: 4872 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Stream
100%
1 4200H +
4955 Points (40%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Memory
100%
1 4200H +
4991 Points (45%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Floating Point
100%
1 4200H +
7171 Points (14%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Integer
100%
1 4200H +
6614 Points (13%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Total Score
100%
1 4200H +
6318 Points (17%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Multi-Core
100%
1 4200H +
5977 (11%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Single-Core
100%
1 4200H +
2799 (57%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
100%
1 4200H +
2168 ms (4%)
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
100%
1 4200H +
88.3 ms (1%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
100%
1 4200H +
15140 Points (25%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i5-4200H → NAN% n=

-
-
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2020, 2019
v1.15
Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)