Intel Core i5-4300M vs Intel Core i5-4200H

Intel Core i5-4300M

► remove Intel 4300M

The Intel Core i5-4300M is a fast dual-core processor for laptops launched in Q2/2013. It is based on the Haswell architecture and is manufactured in 22nm. Due to Hyper-Threading, the two cores can handle up to four threads in parallel leading to better utilization of the CPU. Each core offers a base speed of 2.6 GHz but can dynamically increase clock rates with Turbo Boost up to 3.3 GHz for 1 active core or 3.2 GHz for 2 active cores.

Haswell is the successor to the Ivy Bridge architecture with improvements on both GPU and CPU performance. The CPUs are produced in 22nm and offer an optimized branch prediction as well as additional execution ports. Furthermore, new features like AVX2 and FMA should increase the performance in future applications.

Due to these changes, the performance per clock has been improved by almost 10 percent compared to Ivy Bridge. Therefore, the i5-4300M is about as fast as the former top model i7-3520M.

The integrated Intel HD Graphics 4600 offers 20 Execution Units (EUs) clocked at 400 MHz up to 1250 MHz with Turbo Boost, making it about 30 % faster than a similarly clocked HD 4000.

The i5-4300M is rated at a TDP of 37 W including the graphics card, memory controller and VRMs. Therefore, the CPU is suited for laptops 14-inches or greater.

Intel Core i5-4200H

► remove Intel 4200H

The Intel Core i5-4200H is a fast dual-core processor for laptops launched in Q4 2013. It is based on the Haswell architecture and is manufactured in 22nm. Due to Hyper-Threading, the two cores can handle up to four threads in parallel leading to better utilization of the CPU. Each core offers a base speed of 2.8 GHz but can dynamically increase clock rates with Turbo Boost up to 3.4 GHz for 1 active core and 3.3 GHz for 2 active cores.

Architecture

Haswell is the successor to the Ivy Bridge architecture with improvements on both GPU and CPU performance. The CPUs are produced in 22nm and offer an optimized branch prediction as well as additional execution ports. Furthermore, new features like AVX2 and FMA should increase the performance in future applications.

Performance

Due to these changes, the performance per clock has been improved by almost 10 percent compared to Ivy Bridge. Therefore, the i5-4200H is slightly faster than the former top model i7-3520M and roughly on par with the Core i5-4330M.

Graphics

The integrated Intel HD Graphics 4600 offers 20 Execution Units (EUs) clocked at 400 MHz up to 1150 MHz with Turbo Boost, making it about 30 % faster than a similarly clocked HD 4000.

Power Consumption

The i5-4200H is rated at a very high TDP of 47 W including the graphics card, memory controller and VRMs. This TDP range is typical of mobile quad-core processors. Therefore, the CPU is suited for laptops 15-inches or greater.

Intel Core i5-4300MIntel Core i5-4200H
Intel Core i5Intel Core i5
HaswellHaswell
: Core i5 Haswell
Intel Core i5-4340M (compare)2900 - 3600 MHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i5-4210H (compare)2900 - 3500 MHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i5-4330M (compare)2800 - 3500 MHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i5-4200H2800 - 3400 MHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i5-4308U (compare)2800 - 3300 MHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i5-4310M (compare)2700 - 3400 MHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i5-4400E (compare)2700 - 3300 MHz2 / 43 MB
» Intel Core i5-4300M2600 - 3300 MHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i5-4210M (compare)2600 - 3200 MHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i5-4288U (compare)2600 - 3100 MHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i5-4278U (compare)2600 - 3100 MHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i5-4200M (compare)2500 - 3100 MHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i5-4258U (compare)2400 - 2900 MHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i5-4310U (compare)2000 - 3000 MHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i5-4360U (compare)1500 - 3000 MHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i5-4300U (compare)1900 - 2900 MHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i5-4350U (compare)1400 - 2900 MHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i5-4210U (compare)1700 - 2700 MHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i5-4260U (compare)1400 - 2700 MHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i5-4402E (compare)1600 - 2700 MHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i5-4200U (compare)1600 - 2600 MHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i5-4250U (compare)1300 - 2600 MHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i5-4300Y (compare)1600 - 2300 MHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i5-4302Y (compare)1600 - 2300 MHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i5-4202Y (compare)1600 - 2000 MHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i5-4220Y (compare)1600 - 2000 MHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i5-4210Y (compare)1500 - 1900 MHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i5-4200Y (compare)1400 - 1900 MHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i5-4340M (compare)2900 - 3600 MHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i5-4210H (compare)2900 - 3500 MHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i5-4330M (compare)2800 - 3500 MHz2 / 43 MB
» Intel Core i5-4200H2800 - 3400 MHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i5-4308U (compare)2800 - 3300 MHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i5-4310M (compare)2700 - 3400 MHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i5-4400E (compare)2700 - 3300 MHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i5-4300M2600 - 3300 MHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i5-4210M (compare)2600 - 3200 MHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i5-4288U (compare)2600 - 3100 MHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i5-4278U (compare)2600 - 3100 MHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i5-4200M (compare)2500 - 3100 MHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i5-4258U (compare)2400 - 2900 MHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i5-4310U (compare)2000 - 3000 MHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i5-4360U (compare)1500 - 3000 MHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i5-4300U (compare)1900 - 2900 MHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i5-4350U (compare)1400 - 2900 MHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i5-4210U (compare)1700 - 2700 MHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i5-4260U (compare)1400 - 2700 MHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i5-4402E (compare)1600 - 2700 MHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i5-4200U (compare)1600 - 2600 MHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i5-4250U (compare)1300 - 2600 MHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i5-4300Y (compare)1600 - 2300 MHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i5-4302Y (compare)1600 - 2300 MHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i5-4202Y (compare)1600 - 2000 MHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i5-4220Y (compare)1600 - 2000 MHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i5-4210Y (compare)1500 - 1900 MHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i5-4200Y (compare)1400 - 1900 MHz2 / 43 MB
2600 - 3300 MHz2800 - 3400 MHz
128 KB128 KB
512 KB512 KB
3 MB3 MB
2 / 42 / 4
37 47
960 960
22 22
130 mm2130 mm2
100 °C100 °C
rPGAFCBGA1364
HD Graphics 4600 (400 - 1250 MHz), DDR3(L)-1600 Memory Controller, HyperThreading, AVX, AVX2, Quick Sync, Virtualization, vPro, AES-NIHD Graphics 4600 (400 - 1150 MHz), DDR3(L)-1600 Memory Controller, HyperThreading, AVX, AVX2, Quick Sync, Virtualization, AES-NI
iGPUIntel HD Graphics 4600 (400 - 1250 MHz)Intel HD Graphics 4600 (400 - 1150 MHz)
$227 U.S.$257 U.S.
Intel Core i5 4300MIntel Core i5 4200H

Cinebench R15 - CPU Multi 64Bit
min: 313     avg: 313.5     median: 313 (7%)     max: 314 Points
min: 321     avg: 323.3     median: 323 (7%)     max: 325 Points
Cinebench R15 - CPU Single 64Bit
min: 126     avg: 126.5     median: 126 (58%)     max: 127 Points
min: 128     avg: 129.3     median: 129 (59%)     max: 130 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - CPU Multi 64Bit
3.3 Points (8%)
3.5 Points (8%)
Cinebench R11.5 - CPU Single 64Bit
1.4 Points (70%)
1.5 Points (73%)
Cinebench R10 - Rendering Single 32Bit
min: 4624     avg: 4690.3     median: 4721 (52%)     max: 4726 Points
min: 4773     avg: 5719     median: 5719 (63%)     max: 6665 Points
Cinebench R10 - Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
min: 9554     avg: 10217     median: 10388 (16%)     max: 10709 Points
min: 10668     avg: 10739     median: 10739 (16%)     max: 10810 Points
Cinebench R10 - Rendering Multiple CPUs 64Bit
min: 12110     avg: 13073.3     median: 13448 (18%)     max: 13662 Points
13739 Points (18%)
Cinebench R10 - Rendering Single CPUs 64Bit
min: 6076     avg: 6220.3     median: 6183 (60%)     max: 6402 Points
6646 Points (64%)
wPrime 2.0x - 1024m *
499.5 seconds (6%)
wPrime 2.0x - 32m *
15.8 seconds (3%)
WinRAR - Result
2469 KB/s (29%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - Pass 2
20.5 fps (1%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - Pass 1
103 fps (38%)
TrueCrypt - Serpent Mean 100MB
0.2 GB/s (9%)
TrueCrypt - Twofish Mean 100MB
0.3 GB/s (10%)
TrueCrypt - AES Mean 100MB
1.9 GB/s (10%)
3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 4039     avg: 4147.5     median: 4147 (28%)     max: 4256 Points
4361 Points (29%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
11.4 Seconds (2%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
26.1 Seconds (1%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M *
595.2 Seconds (3%)
SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS)
56230 MIPS (27%)
SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS)
41070 MFLOPS (32%)
Windows 7 Experience Index - Processor
7.1 points (101%)
3DMark Vantage - P CPU no PhysX 1280x1024
min: 10179     avg: 10794.5     median: 10794 (15%)     max: 11410 Points
11474 Points (16%)
3DMark 11 - Performance Physics 1280x720
min: 3523     avg: 3999.7     median: 4230 (22%)     max: 4246 points
min: 3928     avg: 4038.3     median: 4031 (21%)     max: 4163 points
3DMark - Ice Storm Standard Physics 1280x720
min: 30501     avg: 36516     median: 39346 (25%)     max: 39701 Points
min: 25321     avg: 29965.3     median: 25570 (16%)     max: 39005 Points
3DMark - Cloud Gate Standard Physics 1280x720
min: 2791     avg: 3131.3     median: 3184 (8%)     max: 3365 Points
min: 3339     avg: 3357.3     median: 3357 (8%)     max: 3376 Points
3DMark - Fire Strike Physics 1920x1080
min: 4103     avg: 4526     median: 4708 (14%)     max: 4767 Points
min: 4829     avg: 4845.5     median: 4840 (15%)     max: 4872 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Stream
4955 Points (40%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Memory
4991 Points (45%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Floating Point
7171 Points (12%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Integer
6614 Points (11%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Total Score
6318 Points (15%)
Geekbench 3 - 32 Bit Multi-Core Score
5977 Points (7%)
Geekbench 3 - 32 Bit Single-Core Score
2799 Points (57%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score *
2233 ms (4%)
2168.4 ms (4%)
Sunspider - 1.0 Total Score *
87.1 ms (1%)
88.3 ms (1%)
Octane V2 - Total Score
15140 Points (29%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i5-4300M → 100%

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i5-4200H → 101%

-
-
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2019, 2018
v1.8.1a
Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)