• Translated pages UID: 4063, Title:
  • Translated pages UID: 4064, Title:
    Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 8930AB vs Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Pro APQ8064A vs
    , , , , , ,
    search relation.
    , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
     

    Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 8930AB vs Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Pro APQ8064A vs

    Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 8930AB

    ► remove from comparison Qualcomm 400 8930AB

    The Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 8930AB is a high clocked dual-core ARM based SoC for smartphones. It integrates two Krait 300 CPU cores clocked at max. 1.7 GHz (the MSM8930 offers only Krait 200 cores at 1.2 GHz) and an Adreno 305 GPU. The whole chip is produced in 28nm LP at TSMC.

    Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Pro APQ8064A

    ► remove from comparison Qualcomm S4 Pro APQ8064A

    The Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Pro APQ8064A is a high-end SoC for Android smartphones and tablets, which was introduced in 2012. The chip integrates 4 CPU cores, which are based on the ARMv7-compatible, but by Qualcomm designed Krait architecture. This provides a much higher per-MHz performance than Cortex-A9 chips such as Nvidia's Tegra 3 or the Exynos 4412 from Samsung, but does not quite reach the performance of the Cortex-A15 (for example in the Tegra 4). The memory is accessed via 2 x 32 bit LPDDR2 at up to 533 MHz, which offers a bandwidth of 8.5 GB/s.

    The APQ8064A integrates an Adreno 320 GPU by IMG, which clocks at 400 MHz and offers a performance of over 50 GFLOPS. Thus, the graphics unit is one of the fastest in the SoC market (early 2013) and is only surpassed by a few models such as the PowerVR SGX554MP4 in the iPad 4. Therefore, even the most demanding 3D games in high resolutions will run fluently (Sony Xperia Z with 1080p display).

    Thanks to a dedicated decoder, the SoC can accelerate 1080p video playback up to a frame rate of 30 fps. 3D photos are possible up to a resolution of 20 megapixels. In addition, the chip also integrates a wireless module with Bluetooth 4.0 and WLAN 802.11ac/a/b/g/n. Produced by TSMC in 28 nm (LP), the power consumption should be around 4 watts (estimated, depending on the clock speed).

    Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 8930ABQualcomm Snapdragon S4 Pro APQ8064A
    Qualcomm SnapdragonQualcomm Snapdragon
    ARMv7ARMv7
    Series:
    Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Pro APQ8064A1.5 GHz4 / 4 ARMv7
    Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 MSM89281.6 GHz4 / 4 ARMv7
    Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 APQ80281.6 GHz4 / 4 ARMv7
    Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Pro MSM8960T1.7 GHz2 / 2 ARMv7
    » Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 8930AB1.7 GHz2 / 2 ARMv7
    Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Plus APQ8060A1.5 GHz2 / 2 ARMv7
    Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Plus MSM89601.5 GHz2 / 2 ARMv7
    Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Plus MSM8260A1.7 GHz2 / 2 ARMv7
    Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 MSM89261.2 GHz4 / 4 ARMv7
    Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 MSM82261.2 GHz4 / 4 ARMv7
    Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 APQ80261.2 GHz4 / 4 ARMv7
    Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Plus MSM89301.2 GHz2 / 2 ARMv7
    Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Plus MSM82301.2 GHz2 / 2 ARMv7
    Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Plus MSM82301.2 GHz2 / 2 ARMv7
    Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Plus MSM82271 GHz2 / 2 ARMv7
    Qualcomm Snapdragon S3 MSM86601.7 GHz2 / 2 ARMv7
    Qualcomm Snapdragon S3 MSM82601.5 GHz2 / 2 ARMv7
    Qualcomm Snapdragon S1 QSD82501 GHz1 / 1 ARMv7
    » Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Pro APQ8064A1.5 GHz4 / 4 ARMv7
    Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 MSM89281.6 GHz4 / 4 ARMv7
    Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 APQ80281.6 GHz4 / 4 ARMv7
    Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Pro MSM8960T1.7 GHz2 / 2 ARMv7
    Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 8930AB1.7 GHz2 / 2 ARMv7
    Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Plus APQ8060A1.5 GHz2 / 2 ARMv7
    Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Plus MSM89601.5 GHz2 / 2 ARMv7
    Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Plus MSM8260A1.7 GHz2 / 2 ARMv7
    Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 MSM89261.2 GHz4 / 4 ARMv7
    Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 MSM82261.2 GHz4 / 4 ARMv7
    Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 APQ80261.2 GHz4 / 4 ARMv7
    Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Plus MSM89301.2 GHz2 / 2 ARMv7
    Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Plus MSM82301.2 GHz2 / 2 ARMv7
    Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Plus MSM82301.2 GHz2 / 2 ARMv7
    Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Plus MSM82271 GHz2 / 2 ARMv7
    Qualcomm Snapdragon S3 MSM86601.7 GHz2 / 2 ARMv7
    Qualcomm Snapdragon S3 MSM82601.5 GHz2 / 2 ARMv7
    Qualcomm Snapdragon S1 QSD82501 GHz1 / 1 ARMv7
    1700 MHz1500 - 1700 MHz
    64 KB32 KB
    1 MB2 MB
    2 / 24 / 4
    28 28
    HSPA+, EDGE, GSM, GPRS, GPS, WiFi, Bluetooth, NFC, FMLTE, HSPA+, EDGE, GSM, GPRS, GPS, WiFi, Bluetooth, NFC, FM
    iGPUQualcomm Adreno 305Qualcomm Adreno 320 (400 MHz)
    ArchitectureARMARM

    Benchmarks

    3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
    min: 5181     avg: 6302     median: 6860 (4%)     max: 6864 Points
    67%
     +
    min: 4020     avg: 4586     median: 4586 (3%)     max: 5152 Points
    3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
    min: 5397     avg: 6193     median: 6192.5 (7%)     max: 6988 Points
    65%
     +
    4038 Points (4%)
    3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
    11099 Points (11%)
    Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Stream
    min: 593     avg: 680     median: 716 (6%)     max: 731 Points
    75%
     +
    536 Points (4%)
    Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Memory
    min: 1527     avg: 1894     median: 2034 (18%)     max: 2121 Points
    65%
     +
    1320 Points (12%)
    Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Floating Point
    min: 244     avg: 1983     median: 2853 (6%)     max: 2853 Points
    53%
     +
    1515 Points (3%)
    Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Integer
    min: 898     avg: 1113     median: 1211 (2%)     max: 1229 Points
    55%
     +
    670 Points (1%)
    Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Total Score
    min: 1394     avg: 1740     median: 1907 (5%)     max: 1919 Points
    57%
     +
    1082 Points (3%)
    Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Multi-Core
    min: 1304     avg: 1473     median: 1473 (3%)     max: 1642
    31%
    1  +
    457 (1%)
    Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Single-Core
    min: 485     avg: 498     median: 498 (10%)     max: 511
    91%
    1  +
    454 (9%)
    Linpack Android / IOS - Linpack Multi Thread
    min: 241.643     avg: 296     median: 298.5 (10%)     max: 347.766 MFLOPS
    65%
     +
    min: 183.533     avg: 195     median: 194.6 (7%)     max: 205.691 MFLOPS
    Linpack Android / IOS - Linpack Single Thread
    min: 153.823     avg: 173     median: 171.1 (17%)     max: 193.164 MFLOPS
    50%
     +
    min: 37.712     avg: 85.8     median: 85.8 (8%)     max: 133.919 MFLOPS
    Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
    34416 ms (58%)
    min: 14529     avg: 14855     median: 14854.7 (25%)     max: 15180.4 ms
    173%
     +
    16231 ms (27%)
    Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
    min: 700.8     avg: 1047     median: 1117.5 (12%)     max: 1252.2 ms
    min: 854.1     avg: 1378     median: 1336.9 (15%)     max: 2011.8 ms
    91%
     +
    min: 1154     avg: 1812     median: 1811.7 (20%)     max: 2469.3 ms
    Sunspider - Sunspider 0.9.1 Total Score *
    min: 723.3     avg: 955     median: 954.8 (9%)     max: 1186.3 ms
    98%
     +
    min: 1054.8     avg: 1261     median: 1124.7 (11%)     max: 1604.1 ms
    Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
    0 Points (0%)
    2223 Points (3%)
    Vellamo 3.x - Vellamo 3.x Metal
    723 Points (19%)
    Vellamo 3.x - Vellamo 3.x Multicore Beta
    1230 Points (27%)
    Vellamo 3.x - Vellamo 3.x Browser
    1580 Points (21%)
    Quadrant Standard Edition 2.0 - Quadrant Standard 2.0 Total Score
    6958 points (16%)
    67%
     +
    min: 4202     avg: 4658     median: 4658 (11%)     max: 5114 points
    AnTuTu v3 - AnTuTu v3 CPU
    min: 4032     avg: 5115     median: 5644 (37%)     max: 5669 Points
    42%
     +
    2394 Points (16%)
    AnTuTu v4 - AnTuTu v4 Total Score
    20270 Points (47%)
    73%
    1  +
    14895 Points (35%)
    AnTuTu v5 - AnTuTu v5 Total Score
    25095 Points (25%)
    AndEBench - AndEBench Java
    min: 186     avg: 266     median: 266 (8%)     max: 346 Iter./s
    min: 144     avg: 322     median: 345 (11%)     max: 452 Iter./s
    89%
     +
    236 Iter./s (7%)
    AndEBench - AndEBench Native
    min: 4389     avg: 4822     median: 4821.5 (16%)     max: 5254 Iter./s
    min: 8393     avg: 9636     median: 9432.5 (31%)     max: 11286 Iter./s
    106%
     +
    5123 Iter./s (17%)
    PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile CPU Tests
    min: 4329     avg: 6192     median: 7051 (1%)     max: 7195 Points
    min: 8536     avg: 10282     median: 10517.5 (1%)     max: 11558 Points
    61%
     +
    min: 3723     avg: 4294     median: 4294 (1%)     max: 4865 Points
    PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score
    2735 Points (14%)

    Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 8930AB → 100% n=17

    Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Pro APQ8064A → 128% n=17

    Average Benchmarks → 75% n=17

    - Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
    - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
    * Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
    1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

    v1.16
    log 18. 07:43:52

    #0 checking url part for id 4413 +0s ... 0s

    #1 checking url part for id 3645 +0s ... 0s

    #2 checking url part for id 4062 +0s ... 0s

    #3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

    #4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Wed, 15 Sep 2021 13:09:12 +0200 +0s ... 0s

    #5 composed specs +0.055s ... 0.055s

    #6 did output specs +0s ... 0.055s

    #7 getting avg benchmarks for device 4413 +0s ... 0.056s

    #8 got single benchmarks 4413 +0.008s ... 0.064s

    #9 getting avg benchmarks for device 3645 +0s ... 0.064s

    #10 got single benchmarks 3645 +0.013s ... 0.077s

    #11 getting avg benchmarks for device 4062 +0s ... 0.078s

    #12 got single benchmarks 4062 +0.007s ... 0.084s

    #13 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.084s

    #14 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.015s ... 0.1s

    #15 min, max, avg, median took s +0.008s ... 0.107s

    #16 return log +0s ... 0.107s

    Please share our article, every link counts!
    > Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
    Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)