Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core i3-3130M vs Intel Core i3-3229Y vs Intel Core i3-3110M

Intel Core i3-3130M

► remove from comparison Intel 3130M

The Intel Core i3-3130M is a dual-core processor for laptops based on the Ivy Bridge architecture. Due to Hyperthreading, the two cores can handle up to four threads in parallel leading to better utilization of the CPU. Each core offers a base speed of 2.6 GHz, Turbo Boost is not supported. As its Sandy-Bridge-based predecessors, it offers a 3 MB L3-Cache.

Ivy Bridge is an enhanced die shrink of the Sandy Bridge architecture with improvements on both GPU and CPU performance. The CPUs are produced in 22nm (versus 32nm Sandy Bridge CPUs) and are the first to introduce 3D transistors for increased energy efficiency when compared to similarly clocked Sandy Bridge processors. Other new features are integrated PCI Express 3.0 and  DDR3(L)-1600 support.

The performance of the Core i3-3130M is slightly above a similarly clocked Sandy Bridge processor due to slight architectural improvements. As a result, overall performance should be about 10-15 % faster compared to the old i3-2370M. Thanks to their Turbo Boost, Core-i5-models like the i5-3210M are significantly faster.

The integrated Intel HD Graphics 4000 offers 16 Execution Units (EUs) clocked at 650 MHz up to 1100 MHz with Turbo Boost. Therefore, the performance should be similar to the AMD Radeon HD 6620G.

Just like most other Ivy Bridge dual-cores, the i3-3130M is rated at a TDP of 35 W. Therefore, even smaller laptops can use the Core i3.

Intel Core i3-3229Y

► remove from comparison

The Intel Core i3-3229Y is an ULV-processor for ultrabooks and tablets based on the Ivy Bridge architecture. Due to Hyperthreading, the two cores can handle up to four threads in parallel leading to better utilization of the CPU. Each core offers a clock speed of 1.4 GHz (no Turbo Boost). As other dual core Core i3, the 3229Y offers a 3 MB L3 cache.

Ivy Bridge is an enhanced die shrink of the Sandy Bridge architecture with improvements on both GPU and CPU performance. The CPUs are produced in 22nm (versus 32 nm Sandy Bridge CPUs) and are the first to introduce 3D transistors for increased energy efficiency when compared to similarly clocked Sandy Bridge processors. The Core i3 is compatible with dual-channel DDR3L-1600 or DDR3-1600 RAM but, unlike some of the Core i5 and Core i7 Ivy Bridge family CPUs, does not support PCI-Express 3.0.

The integrated Intel HD Graphics 4000 features 16 Execution Units (EUs) clocked at 350 MHz up to 850 MHz with Turbo Boost, delivering a performance comparable with an AMD Radeon HD 6520G.

Performance

The average 3229Y in our database matches the Core i3-2357M, a substantially more power-hungry chip of the previous generation, in multi-thread performance, highlighting the progress Intel has managed to make gen-to-gen. The Core i3 is capable of handling most day-to-day tasks without major slowdowns, as of late 2021.

Your mileage may vary depending on how competent the cooling solution of your system is.

Power consumption

This little Core i3 series chip has a default TDP of 13 W which it is very likely to abide by, considering there is no Turbo Boost support here. Either way, an active cooling solution will be required to dissipate the heat.

The i3-3229Y is made with one of the very old 22 nm Intel processes for very, very low, as of 2022, energy efficiency.

Intel Core i3-3110M

► remove from comparison Intel 3110M

The Intel Core i3-3110M is a dual-core processor for laptops based on the Ivy Bridge architecture. Due to Hyperthreading, the two cores can handle up to four threads in parallel leading to better utilization of the CPU. Each core offers a base speed of 2.4 GHz, Turbo Boost is not supported. As its Sandy-Bridge-based predecessors, it offers a 3 MB L3-Cache.

Ivy Bridge is an enhanced die shrink of the Sandy Bridge architecture with improvements on both GPU and CPU performance. The CPUs are produced in 22nm (versus 32nm Sandy Bridge CPUs) and are the first to introduce 3D transistors for increased energy efficiency when compared to similarly clocked Sandy Bridge processors. Other new features are integrated PCI Express 3.0 and  DDR3(L)-1600 support.

The performance of the Core i3-3110M is slightly above a similarly clocked Sandy Bridge processor due to the architectural improvements. As a result, overall performance is about 5 % faster compared to the old i3-2370M. Thanks to their Turbo Boost, Core-i5-models like the i5-3210M are significantly faster (10 - 30 %).

The integrated Intel HD Graphics 4000 offers 16 Execution Units (EUs) clocked at 650 MHz up to 1000 MHz with Turbo Boost. Therefore, the performance is slightly below an AMD Radeon HD 6620G.

Just like most other Ivy Bridge dual-cores, the i3-3110M is rated at a TDP of 35 W. Therefore, even smaller laptops can use the Core i3.

ModelIntel Core i3-3130MIntel Core i3-3229YIntel Core i3-3110M
SeriesIntel Core i3Intel Core i3Intel Core i3
CodenameIvy BridgeIvy Bridge-YIvy Bridge
Series: Core i3 Ivy Bridge
Intel Core i3-3130M « 2.6 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i3-3120M2.5 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i3-3110M2.4 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i3-3227U1.9 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i3-3217U1.8 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i3-3130M2.6 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i3-3120M2.5 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i3-3110M « 2.4 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i3-3227U1.9 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i3-3217U1.8 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Clock2600 MHz1400 MHz2400 MHz
L1 Cache128 KB128 KB128 KB
L2 Cache512 KB512 KB512 KB
L3 Cache3 MB3 MB3 MB
Cores / Threads2 / 42 / 42 / 4
TDP35 Watt13 Watt35 Watt
Technology22 nm22 nm22 nm
max. Temp.90 °C105 °C90 (PGA), 105 (BGA) °C
SocketFCBGA1023, FCPGA988BGA1023FCBGA1023, FCPGA988
FeaturesHD Graphics 4000 (650-1100MHz), DDR3-1600 Memory Controller, HyperThreading, AVX, Quick Sync, VirtualizationDDR3-1600/DDR3L-1600 RAM, PCIe 2, 5 GT/s bus, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVXHD Graphics 4000 (650-1000MHz), DDR3-1600 Memory Controller, HyperThreading, AVX, Quick Sync, Virtualization VT-x
iGPUIntel HD Graphics 4000 (650 - 1100 MHz)Intel HD Graphics 4000 (350 - 850 MHz)Intel HD Graphics 4000 (650 - 1000 MHz)
Architecturex86x86x86
$225 U.S.$250 U.S.$225 U.S.
Announced
Manufacturerark.intel.comark.intel.comark.intel.com

Benchmarks

Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
100%
1 3110M +
min: 204     avg: 209     median: 209 (1%)     max: 214 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
100%
1 3110M +
min: 78     avg: 81.5     median: 81.5 (25%)     max: 85 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
100%
1 3229Y +
min: 1.04     avg: 1.2     median: 1.2 (2%)     max: 1.41 Points
194%
1 3110M +
min: 2.22     avg: 2.4     median: 2.4 (3%)     max: 2.41 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
100%
1 3229Y +
min: 0.4     avg: 0.5     median: 0.5 (12%)     max: 0.59 Points
198%
1 3110M +
min: 0.52     avg: 0.9     median: 1 (24%)     max: 1.01 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
100%
1 3229Y +
min: 1763     avg: 1870     median: 1869.5 (11%)     max: 1976 Points
179%
1 3110M +
min: 1799     avg: 3114     median: 3346 (20%)     max: 3361 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
100%
1 3229Y +
min: 3271     avg: 3740     median: 3739.5 (3%)     max: 4208 Points
197%
1 3110M +
min: 7136     avg: 7311     median: 7353 (5%)     max: 7421 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
100%
1 3229Y +
min: 3874     avg: 4675     median: 4674.5 (3%)     max: 5475 Points
195%
1 3110M +
min: 8753     avg: 9066     median: 9126 (6%)     max: 9226 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
100%
1 3229Y +
min: 2226     avg: 2355     median: 2355 (3%)     max: 2484 Points
180%
1 3110M +
min: 3180     avg: 4053     median: 4243 (5%)     max: 4286 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
100%
1 3229Y +
min: 1221     avg: 1285     median: 1285 (15%)     max: 1349 s
108%
1 3110M +
min: 645     avg: 737     median: 702 (8%)     max: 904 s
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
100%
1 3229Y +
min: 38.38     avg: 41.2     median: 41.2 (8%)     max: 44 s
104%
1 3110M +
min: 20.8     avg: 23.2     median: 22.1 (4%)     max: 28.9 s
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
100%
1 3229Y +
1256 Points (2%)
105%
1 3110M +
1314 Points (2%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
100%
1 3229Y +
7.9 fps (3%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
100%
1 3229Y +
43 fps (10%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
100%
1 3229Y +
0.1 GB/s (0%)
85%
1 3110M +
0.1 GB/s (0%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
100%
1 3229Y +
min: 0.101     avg: 0.1     median: 0.1 (2%)     max: 0.124 GB/s
88%
1 3110M +
0.1 GB/s (2%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
100%
1 3229Y +
min: 0.11     avg: 0.1     median: 0.1 (0%)     max: 0.139 GB/s
95%
1 3110M +
0.1 GB/s (0%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
100%
1 3229Y +
min: 1326     avg: 1556     median: 1556 (3%)     max: 1786 Points
192%
1 3110M +
min: 2776     avg: 2951     median: 2988 (6%)     max: 3033 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
100%
1 3229Y +
min: 22     avg: 24     median: 24 (5%)     max: 26 s
102%
1 3110M +
min: 15.89     avg: 16     median: 16 (3%)     max: 16.05 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
100%
1 3229Y +
min: 60     avg: 61.5     median: 61.5 (3%)     max: 63 s
101%
1 3110M +
min: 35.69     avg: 36     median: 36 (2%)     max: 36.32 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
100%
1 3229Y +
min: 1401     avg: 1424     median: 1424 (6%)     max: 1447 s
103%
1 3110M +
min: 819     avg: 838     median: 829 (4%)     max: 875 s
SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS) - SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS)
100%
1 3229Y +
28000 MIPS (13%)
157%
1 3110M +
min: 40590     avg: 44095     median: 44095 (21%)     max: 47600 MIPS
SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS) - SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS)
100%
1 3229Y +
17000 MFLOPS (13%)
175%
1 3110M +
min: 29180     avg: 29685     median: 29685 (23%)     max: 30190 MFLOPS
Windows 7 Experience Index - Win7 CPU
100%
1 3110M +
6.9 Points (88%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
100%
1 3229Y +
4555 Points (4%)
176%
1 3110M +
min: 7542     avg: 7936     median: 8014.5 (7%)     max: 8128 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
100%
1 3229Y +
1795 Points (5%)
165%
1 3110M +
min: 2340     avg: 2846     median: 2955 (8%)     max: 3060 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
100%
1 3229Y +
min: 5239     avg: 9842     median: 9842 (8%)     max: 14445 Points
253%
1 3110M +
min: 16217     avg: 24184     median: 24902 (20%)     max: 28216 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
100%
1 3229Y +
min: 801     avg: 1055     median: 1054.5 (3%)     max: 1308 Points
222%
1 3110M +
min: 2162     avg: 2291     median: 2344 (6%)     max: 2356 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
100%
1 3229Y +
1802 Points (3%)
183%
1 3110M +
min: 3113     avg: 3255     median: 3292 (6%)     max: 3322 Points

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i3-3229Y → 0% n=

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i3-3110M → 0% n=

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.26
log 19. 16:18:25

#0 checking url part for id 3733 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 3651 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 3304 +0s ... 0s

#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Fri, 19 Apr 2024 05:38:49 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#5 composed specs +0.028s ... 0.029s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.029s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 3733 +0.003s ... 0.032s

#8 got single benchmarks 3733 +0.001s ... 0.033s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 3651 +0.003s ... 0.036s

#10 got single benchmarks 3651 +0.012s ... 0.047s

#11 getting avg benchmarks for device 3304 +0.003s ... 0.05s

#12 got single benchmarks 3304 +0.049s ... 0.099s

#13 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.099s

#14 min, max, avg, median took s +0.198s ... 0.297s

#15 return log +0s ... 0.297s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)