Notebookcheck Logo

AMD 3020e vs AMD Athlon 300U

AMD 3020e

► remove from comparison AMD 3020e

The AMD 3020e (Codename Dali) is a mobile APU that integrates two Zen cores (without SMT, therefore 2 threads) clocked at 1.2 to 2.6 GHz. The TDP is specified at 6 Watt and therefore the chip can be passively cooled. The integrated Radeon graphics card offers 3 CUs at up to 1,000 MHz (Radeon RX Vega 3). The dual channel memory controller supports DDR4-2400.

More information on Raven Ridge product family can be found in our launch article.

Performance

The average 3020e in our database sits close to the Celeron N4100 and the Core m3-8100Y, as far as multi-thread benchmark scores are concerned. Neither of the three is a performance monster, their fairly low power consumption figures being their main advantage.

Much like the two Intel chips, the 3020e will let you binge-watch Netflix and type e-mails but anything tougher than that will bring the APU to its limits quickly.

Your mileage may vary depending on how high the CPU power limits are.

Power consumption

This little APU has a default TDP (also known as the long-term power limit) of 6 W. Which is low and thus good enough for tablets, laptops and mini-PCs featuring no active cooling solution.

The AMD 3020e is built with a 14 nm process leading to low, as of early 2023, energy efficiency.

AMD Athlon 300U

► remove from comparison

The AMD Athlon 300U is a mobile entry level dual core SoC that was announced in January 2019. It combines two Zen cores (with SMT / Hyperthreading so running 4 threads) clocked at 2.4 - 3.3 GHz with a Radeon RX Vega 3 graphics card with 3 CUs (192 Shaders) clocked at up to 1000 MHz. Specified at 15 Watt TDP, the SoC is intended for thin mid-range laptops. It is quite similar to the AMD Ryzen 3 3200U (2.6 - 3.5 GHz).

Compared to the Picasso APUs of the Ryzen 3000 series, the Athlon 300U is still based on the first generation of the 2000 series. Only the PRO variant is based on the new Zen+ microarchitecture that should lead to a 3% IPS (performance per clock) improvement.

The integrated dual-channel memory controller supports up to DDR4-2400 memory. As the features of the Picasso APUs are the same compared to the Raven Ridge predecessors, we point to our Raven Ridge launch article.

In contrast to the faster quad-core Picasso APUs, the Athlon 300U only supports 3 instead of 4 displays in total.

Performance wise, the Athlon 300 should be slightly slower than the Ryzen 3 2200U (2.5 - 3.4 GHz Dual Core with SMT).

ModelAMD 3020eAMD Athlon 300U
SeriesAMD Raven Ridge (Ryzen 2000 APU)AMD Raven Ridge (Ryzen 2000 APU)
CodenameDali (Zen)Zen
Series: Raven Ridge (Ryzen 2000 APU) Zen
AMD Athlon Silver 3050e compare1.4 - 2.8 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
AMD 3020e « 1.2 - 2.6 GHz2 / 2 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 2400G compare3.6 - 3.9 GHz4 / 8 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 2700U compare2.2 - 3.8 GHz4 / 8 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 2700U compare2.2 - 3.8 GHz4 / 8 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 3 2200G compare3.5 - 3.7 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 2600H compare3.2 - 3.6 GHz4 / 8 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 2500U compare2 - 3.6 GHz4 / 8 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U compare2 - 3.6 GHz4 / 8 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen Embedded V1605B compare2 - 3.6 GHz4 / 8 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 3 2300U compare2 - 3.4 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 2300U compare2 - 3.4 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen Embedded R1606G compare2.6 - 3.5 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 3 2200U compare2.5 - 3.4 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 2200U compare2.5 - 3.4 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen Embedded R1505G compare2.4 - 3.3 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
AMD Athlon 300U « 2.4 - 3.3 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Clock1200 - 2600 MHz2400 - 3300 MHz
L1 Cache192 KB192 KB
L2 Cache1 MB1 MB
L3 Cache4 MB4 MB
Cores / Threads2 / 22 / 4
TDP6 Watt15 Watt
Technology14 nm12 nm
FeaturesDDR4-2400, PCIe 3, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SMEXFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMT
iGPUAMD Radeon RX Vega 3 ( - 1000 MHz)AMD Radeon RX Vega 3 ( - 1000 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
Announced
Manufacturerwww.amd.com
Transistors4500 Million
SocketAM4

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - 3020e
18.8 pt (26%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
100%
1 3020e +
943 Points (1%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
100%
1 3020e +
603 Points (26%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
236 Points (26%)
308 Points (34%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
369 Points (1%)
637 Points (2%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
196 Points (1%)
308 Points (2%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
92 Points (28%)
119 Points (36%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
3968 Points (24%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
8724 Points (6%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
903 s (11%)
510 s (6%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
29 s (6%)
15.4 s (3%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
1232 Points (2%)
1623 Points (3%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multli Thread 4 runs
100%
1 3020e +
4963 MIPS (3%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
100%
1 3020e +
2597 MIPS (31%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
12.8 fps (4%)
18.5 fps (6%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
65.3 fps (15%)
88.6 fps (20%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
1.2 fps (2%)
1.8 fps (3%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
0.1 GB/s (0%)
0.2 GB/s (0%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
0.2 GB/s (3%)
0.3 GB/s (5%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
1.1 GB/s (3%)
1.9 GB/s (5%)
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
100%
1 3020e +
2964 Seconds (21%)
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
100%
1 3020e +
1.6 sec (34%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
17 s (4%)
14.1 s (3%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
31.8 s (1%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
879 s (4%)
807 s (4%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
2618 Points (7%)
3427 Points (9%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
24677 Points (20%)
41974 Points (34%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
24593 Points (20%)
41029 Points (33%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
26064 Points (22%)
45359 Points (38%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
2128 Points (5%)
3217 Points (8%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
2961 Points (5%)
4729 Points (8%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
1361 Points (6%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
638 Points (27%)
867 Points (37%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
1188 Points (2%)
1840 Points (3%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
646 Points (3%)
765 Points (3%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
1195 Points (4%)
1552 Points (5%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
2809 Points (28%)
3287 Points (33%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
4803 Points (5%)
6053 Points (7%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Single-Core
3213 Points (44%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
5763 Points (14%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Multi-Core
6134 Points (11%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Single-Core
2919 Points (57%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Multi-Core
6471 Points (10%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Single-Core
3196 Points (48%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Stream
4852 Points (39%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Memory
4449 Points (40%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Floating Point
9250 Points (18%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Integer
6447 Points (13%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Total Score
6868 Points (18%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 1532     avg: 1545     median: 1545 (2%)     max: 1558 ms
1452 ms (2%)
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
133.6 ms (1%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
20692 Points (19%)
22253 Points (20%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
105 Points (22%)
143 Points (30%)
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
100%
1 3020e +
12.6 Watt (2%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
100%
1 3020e +
12.8 Watt (2%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
100%
1 3020e +
15.3 Points per Watt (11%)

Average Benchmarks AMD 3020e → 100% n=30

Average Benchmarks AMD Athlon 300U → 140% n=30

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.26
log 16. 15:08:09

#0 checking url part for id 12720 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 11201 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Tue, 16 Apr 2024 05:37:29 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 composed specs +0.024s ... 0.025s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.025s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 12720 +0.016s ... 0.041s

#7 got single benchmarks 12720 +0.024s ... 0.064s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 11201 +0.003s ... 0.067s

#9 got single benchmarks 11201 +0.01s ... 0.077s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.077s

#11 min, max, avg, median took s +0.236s ... 0.313s

#12 return log +0.023s ... 0.336s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)