AMD 3015e vs AMD Athlon 300U

AMD 3015e

► remove AMD 3015e

The AMD 3015e (Codename Dali) is a mobile APU that integrates two Zen cores (with SMT, therefore 4 threads) clocked at 1.2 to 2.3 GHz. The TDP is specified at 6 Watt and therefore the chip can be passively cooled. The integrated Radeon graphics card offers 3 CUs at up to 600 MHz (Radeon RX Vega 3). The single channel memory controller supports only DDR4-1600. The chip is manufactured in 14nm and officially counted to the 3000 series of mobile processors.

AMD compares the performance of the 3015e against the entry level Intel Celeron N4120 (Quad-Core Atom). The 3015e should be 36% faster in single thread Cinebench R20 test. This is expected as the Atom cores offer a low single thread performance. Multi-thread benchmarks were not provided, so we guess the N4120 will be faster with its 4 cores. In PCMark 10 the 3015e should be 18% faster and in the 3DMark Night Raid the integrated GPU should beat the UHD Graphics 600 in the N4120 by 24%.

More information on Raven Ridge can be found in our launch article.

AMD Athlon 300U

► remove

The AMD Athlon 300U is a mobile entry level dual core SoC that was announced in January 2019. It combines two Zen cores (with SMT / Hyperthreading so running 4 threads) clocked at 2.4 - 3.3 GHz with a Radeon RX Vega 3 graphics card with 3 CUs (192 Shaders) clocked at up to 1000 MHz. Specified at 15 Watt TDP, the SoC is intended for thin mid-range laptops. It is quite similar to the AMD Ryzen 3 3200U (2.6 - 3.5 GHz).

Compared to the Picasso APUs of the Ryzen 3000 series, the Athlon 300U is still based on the first generation of the 2000 series. Only the PRO variant is based on the new Zen+ microarchitecture that should lead to a 3% IPS (performance per clock) improvement.

The integrated dual-channel memory controller supports up to DDR4-2400 memory. As the features of the Picasso APUs are the same compared to the Raven Ridge predecessors, we point to our Raven Ridge launch article.

In contrast to the faster quad-core Picasso APUs, the Athlon 300U only supports 3 instead of 4 displays in total.

Performance wise, the Athlon 300 should be slightly slower than the Ryzen 3 2200U (2.5 - 3.4 GHz Dual Core with SMT).

AMD 3015eAMD Athlon 300U
AMD Raven Ridge (Ryzen 2000 APU)AMD Raven Ridge (Ryzen 2000 APU)
ZenZen
: Raven Ridge (Ryzen 2000 APU) Zen
AMD Ryzen 5 2400G compare3600 - 3900 MHz4 / 84 MB
AMD Ryzen 7 2800H compare3300 - 3800 MHz4 / 84 MB
AMD Ryzen 7 2700U compare2200 - 3800 MHz4 / 84 MB
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 2700U compare2200 - 3800 MHz4 / 84 MB
AMD Ryzen 5 2600H compare3200 - 3600 MHz4 / 84 MB
AMD Ryzen 3 2200G compare3500 - 3700 MHz4 / 44 MB
AMD Ryzen 5 2500U compare2000 - 3600 MHz4 / 84 MB
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U compare2000 - 3600 MHz4 / 84 MB
AMD Ryzen 3 2300U compare2000 - 3400 MHz4 / 44 MB
AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 2300U compare2000 - 3400 MHz4 / 44 MB
AMD Ryzen 3 2200U compare2500 - 3400 MHz2 / 44 MB
AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 2200U compare2500 - 3400 MHz2 / 44 MB
AMD Ryzen Embedded R1505G compare2400 - 3300 MHz2 / 44 MB
AMD Athlon 300U2400 - 3300 MHz2 / 44 MB
AMD Athlon Silver 3050e compare - 2800 MHz2 / 44 MB
AMD 3020e compare1200 - 2600 MHz2 / 24 MB
» AMD 3015e1200 - 2300 MHz2 / 44 MB
AMD Ryzen 5 2400G compare3600 - 3900 MHz4 / 84 MB
AMD Ryzen 7 2800H compare3300 - 3800 MHz4 / 84 MB
AMD Ryzen 7 2700U compare2200 - 3800 MHz4 / 84 MB
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 2700U compare2200 - 3800 MHz4 / 84 MB
AMD Ryzen 5 2600H compare3200 - 3600 MHz4 / 84 MB
AMD Ryzen 3 2200G compare3500 - 3700 MHz4 / 44 MB
AMD Ryzen 5 2500U compare2000 - 3600 MHz4 / 84 MB
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U compare2000 - 3600 MHz4 / 84 MB
AMD Ryzen 3 2300U compare2000 - 3400 MHz4 / 44 MB
AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 2300U compare2000 - 3400 MHz4 / 44 MB
AMD Ryzen 3 2200U compare2500 - 3400 MHz2 / 44 MB
AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 2200U compare2500 - 3400 MHz2 / 44 MB
AMD Ryzen Embedded R1505G compare2400 - 3300 MHz2 / 44 MB
» AMD Athlon 300U2400 - 3300 MHz2 / 44 MB
AMD Athlon Silver 3050e compare - 2800 MHz2 / 44 MB
AMD 3020e compare1200 - 2600 MHz2 / 24 MB
AMD 3015e1200 - 2300 MHz2 / 44 MB
1200 - 2300 MHz2400 - 3300 MHz
192 KB192 KB
1 MB1 MB
4 MB4 MB
2 / 42 / 4
6 15
14 12
105 °C
FT5AM4
XFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMTXFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMT
iGPUAMD Radeon RX Vega 3 ( - 600 MHz)AMD Radeon RX Vega 3 ( - 1000 MHz)
4500

Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
308 Points (52%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
637 Points (6%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
308 Points (7%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
119 Points (52%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
3968 (41%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
8724 (15%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
510 s (6%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
15.4 s (3%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
1623 (17%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
18.5 fps (11%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
88.6 fps (31%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
1.8 fps (6%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
0.2 GB/s (0%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
0.3 GB/s (0%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
1.9 GB/s (0%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
14.1 s (3%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
31.8 s (1%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
807 s (4%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
3427 Points (15%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
41974 Points (27%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
41029 Points (49%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
45359 Points (52%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
3217 Points (8%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
4729 Points (15%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
1361 Points (10%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Stream
4852 Points (39%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Memory
4449 Points (40%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Floating Point
9250 Points (18%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Integer
6447 Points (13%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Total Score
6868 Points (18%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Multi-Core
6134 (11%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Single-Core
2919 (60%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Multi-Core
6471 (10%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Single-Core
3196 (65%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4 64 Bit Single-Core
3213 (50%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4 64 Bit Multi-Core
5763 (14%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1+ 64 Bit Single-Core
3287 (49%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1+ 64 Bit Multi-Core
6053 (11%)
Geekbench 5 - Geekbench 5 64 Bit Single-Core
765 (51%)
Geekbench 5 - Geekbench 5 64 Bit Multi-Core
1552 (9%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
1452 ms (2%)
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
134 ms (1%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
22253 Points (37%)

Average Benchmarks AMD Athlon 300U → NAN% n=

-
-
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2020, 2019
v1.15
Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)