Notebookcheck Logo

AMD Ryzen 7 2800H vs AMD Ryzen 3 2200G

AMD Ryzen 7 2800H

► remove from comparison AMD R7 2800H

The AMD Ryzen 7 2800H is a mobile SoC that was announced late 2018. It is intended for mid-sized to big laptops and combines four Zen cores (8 threads) clocked at 3.3 (base) - 3.8 GHz (boost) with a Radeon RX Vega 11 Mobile graphics card with 11 CUs (704 Shaders). The integrated dual-channel memory controller supports up to DDR4-3200 memory.

Compared to the older Ryzen 7 2700U for slim and light laptops, the 2800H offers a higher TDP (45 Watt versus 15 Watt), higher clocked memory, a higher base clock (3.4 versus 2.2 GHz), and a faster integrated GPU.

More information on Raven Ridge can be found in our launch article.

Performance

While we have not tested a single system built around the 2800H as of August 2023, it's safe to expect the chip to be 10% to 15% faster than Ryzen 3 1200, as far as multi-thread performance is concerned.

Your mileage may vary depending on how high the CPU power limits are, and how competent the cooling solution of your system is.

Power consumption

This Ryzen 7 has a default TDP (also known as the long-term power limit) of 45 W, a value that laptop manufacturers are free to change to anything between 35 W and 54 W with clock speeds and performance changing correspondingly. All the values are rather high, making a high-performance cooling solution with two or three fans pretty much a necessity.

The CPU is built on an old, as of late 2022, 14 nm process for subpar energy efficiency.

AMD Ryzen 3 2200G

► remove from comparison

The AMD Ryzen 3 2200G is a desktop APU that was announced in early 2018. It combines four Zen cores (4 threads as no SMT/HyperThreading support) clocked at 3.5 - 3.7 GHz with a Radeon RX Vega 8 graphics card with 8 CUs (512 of the 704 Shaders on the chip) clocked at up to 1100 MHz. The integrated dual-channel memory controller supports up to DDR-2933. The TDP is specified at 65 Watt and the CPU, GPU and memory are unlocked for overclocking. More information on Raven Ridge can be found in our launch article.

ModelAMD Ryzen 7 2800HAMD Ryzen 3 2200G
SeriesAMD Raven Ridge (Ryzen 2000 APU)AMD Raven Ridge (Ryzen 2000 APU)
CodenameRaven Ridge (Zen)Zen
Clock3300 - 3800 MHz3500 - 3700 MHz
L1 Cache192 KB384 KB
L2 Cache2 MB2 MB
L3 Cache4 MB4 MB
Cores / Threads4 / 84 / 4
TDP45 Watt65 Watt
Transistors4500 Million4500 Million
Technology14 nm14 nm
max. Temp.95 °C
SocketFP5AM4
FeaturesDDR4-2400 RAM, PCIe 3, MMX (+), SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A, AES, AVX, AVX2, FMA3, SHAXFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMT
iGPUAMD Radeon RX Vega 11 ( - 1300 MHz)AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000) ( - 1100 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
Announced
Manufacturerwww.amd.comproducts.amd.com
Series: Raven Ridge (Ryzen 2000 APU) Zen
AMD Ryzen 5 2400G compare3.6 - 3.9 GHz4 / 8 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 2700U compare2.2 - 3.8 GHz4 / 8 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 2700U compare2.2 - 3.8 GHz4 / 8 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 3 2200G « 3.5 - 3.7 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 2600H compare3.2 - 3.6 GHz4 / 8 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 2500U compare2 - 3.6 GHz4 / 8 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U compare2 - 3.6 GHz4 / 8 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen Embedded V1605B compare2 - 3.6 GHz4 / 8 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 3 2300U compare2 - 3.4 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 2300U compare2 - 3.4 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen Embedded R1606G compare2.6 - 3.5 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 3 2200U compare2.5 - 3.4 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 2200U compare2.5 - 3.4 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen Embedded R1505G compare2.4 - 3.3 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
AMD Athlon 300U compare2.4 - 3.3 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - R3 2200G
26.8 pt (37%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
363 Points (40%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
1446 Points (4%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 561     avg: 574     median: 577 (4%)     max: 581 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 142     avg: 145.8     median: 145.6 (44%)     max: 150 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
6.7 Points (9%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
1.7 Points (42%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
4625 Points (28%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
16684 Points (12%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
333 s (4%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
10.8 s (2%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
3229 Points (5%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multli Thread 4 runs
14790 MIPS (8%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
3948 MIPS (47%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
39.7 fps (14%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
184 fps (42%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
4.3 fps (8%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
0.3 GB/s (0%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
0.5 GB/s (8%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
3.1 GB/s (8%)
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 825     avg: 826     median: 826 (6%)     max: 827 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
0.7 sec (15%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
6636 Points (14%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
11.7 s (3%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
26.2 s (1%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
651 s (3%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 6549     avg: 6805     median: 6805 (18%)     max: 7061 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
71141 Points (60%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
5655 Points (14%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
7706 Points (14%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 950     avg: 1087     median: 1086.5 (46%)     max: 1223 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 3391     avg: 4882     median: 4881.5 (9%)     max: 6372 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
959 Points (4%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
3431 Points (11%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 4148     avg: 4249     median: 4249 (42%)     max: 4350 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 11266     avg: 11897     median: 11896.5 (13%)     max: 12527 Points
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Single-Core
4082 Points (56%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
11105 Points (27%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 954     avg: 997     median: 997 (1%)     max: 1040 ms
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
92.7 ms (1%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
34670 Points (31%)
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
95.4 Watt (16%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
69 Watt (13%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
8.4 Points per Watt (6%)

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 3 2200G → 0% n=

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.26
log 28. 14:33:12

#0 checking url part for id 10144 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 9896 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 28 Mar 2024 05:35:32 +0100 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 composed specs +0.025s ... 0.026s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.026s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 10144 +0.002s ... 0.028s

#7 got single benchmarks 10144 +0s ... 0.029s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 9896 +0.016s ... 0.044s

#9 got single benchmarks 9896 +0.01s ... 0.054s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.054s

#11 min, max, avg, median took s +0.117s ... 0.172s

#12 return log +0.02s ... 0.192s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)