Notebookcheck Logo

AMD Ryzen 7 2700X vs AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U

AMD Ryzen 7 2700X

► remove from comparison AMD R7 2700X

The AMD Ryzen 7 2700X is a high-end desktop processor with 8 cores (16 threads) that was announced early 2018. It is based on the revised Zen+ cores and at launch the fastest Ryzen CPU. The CPU cores clock at 3.7 GHz base and using Precision Boost 2 up to 4.3 GHz. All 8 cores and 16 threads can clock up to 4 GHz. The 8 cores are divided in two cluster (4 cores each with own L3 cache) connected via Infinity Fabric.

Compared to the older first Ryzen generation (e.g., Ryzen 5 1700X), the second generation is manufactured in an improved process (12nm called), offers and improved Precision Boost 2 (especially in partial load of the cores) and faster cache and memory speeds.

See our second generation Ryzen review for detailed benchmarks and information.

AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U

► remove from comparison AMD R7 PRO 3700U

The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U is a mobile SoC for business laptops that was announced in April 2019. It combines four Zen+ cores (8 threads) clocked at 2.3 - 4 GHz with a Radeon RX Vega 10 graphics card with 10 CUs (640 Shaders) clocked at up to 1400 MHz. Specified at 15 Watt TDP, the SoC is intended for thin mid-range laptops. Compared to the similar consumer variant Ryzen 7 3700U, the PRO model features additional management and security features (e.g., full memory encryption) and longer warranty / availability.

The Picasso SoCs use the Zen+ microarchitecture with slight improvements that should lead to a 3% IPS (performance per clock) improvements. Furthermore, the 12nm process allows higher clock rates at similar power consumptions.

The integrated dual-channel memory controller supports up to DDR4-2400 memory. As the features of the Picasso APUs are the same compared to the Raven Ridge predecessors, we point to our Raven Ridge launch article.

AMD states that the Picasso APUs are about 8% faster than the predecessors. Therefore, the Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U should be slightly ahead the Ryzen 7 PRO 2700U.

ModelAMD Ryzen 7 2700XAMD Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U
SeriesAMD Ryzen 7AMD Picasso (Ryzen 3000 APU)
CodenameZen+Zen+
Series: Picasso (Ryzen 3000 APU) Zen+
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X « 3.7 - 4.3 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 2700 compare3.2 - 4.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U « 2.3 - 4 GHz4 / 8 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U compare2.1 - 3.7 GHz4 / 8 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 3 3350U compare2.1 - 3.5 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 3 3300U compare2.1 - 3.5 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U compare2.1 - 3.5 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Clock3700 - 4300 MHz2300 - 4000 MHz
L2 Cache4 MB2 MB
L3 Cache16 MB4 MB
Cores / Threads8 / 164 / 8
TDP105 Watt15 Watt
Transistors4940 Million4500 Million
Technology12 nm12 nm
Die Size213 mm2
SocketAM4 (1331)AM4
FeaturesSSE4.2, SSE4A, AMD-V, AES, AVX2, FMA3, SHAXFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMT
Architecturex86x86
$329 U.S.
Announced
L1 Cache384 KB
iGPUAMD Radeon RX Vega 10 ( - 1400 MHz)
Manufacturerwww.amd.com

Benchmarks

Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
430 Points (48%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
3944 Points (10%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 1740     avg: 1768     median: 1762 (11%)     max: 1801 Points
658 Points (4%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 175.5     avg: 175.7     median: 175.7 (53%)     max: 176 Points
149 Points (45%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
18.7 Points (24%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
2 Points (49%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
5256 Points (32%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
34763 Points (25%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
57811 Points (40%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
8673 Points (11%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
96.6 s (1%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
3.5 s (1%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
4779 Points (8%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multli Thread 4 runs
45814 MIPS (26%)
16735 MIPS (10%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
4647 MIPS (56%)
3680 MIPS (44%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
104.5 fps (36%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
226.7 fps (52%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
3.6 fps (6%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
1 GB/s (0%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
1.6 GB/s (28%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
10.6 GB/s (28%)
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 264     avg: 266.8     median: 266.8 (2%)     max: 269.6 Seconds
785 Seconds (6%)
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
0.6 sec (13%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 10429     avg: 10651     median: 10643 (23%)     max: 10823 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
10.8 s (2%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
23.2 s (1%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
578 s (3%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
min: 55102     avg: 57950     median: 58836.5 (52%)     max: 59792 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 12874     avg: 14926     median: 15098 (41%)     max: 15552 Points
6539 Points (18%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
min: 71788     avg: 75803     median: 76251 (62%)     max: 77677 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
min: 73539     avg: 76030     median: 76288 (62%)     max: 77262 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 74344     avg: 76804     median: 76312 (64%)     max: 79006 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 13090     avg: 14891     median: 15060.5 (38%)     max: 15851 Points
2098 Points (5%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 20189     avg: 21001     median: 20923.5 (37%)     max: 21975 Points
9338 Points (17%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 8241     avg: 8676     median: 8747 (37%)     max: 8954 Points
2706 Points (11%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1131     avg: 1177     median: 1177 (50%)     max: 1223 Points
808 Points (34%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 6372     avg: 7022     median: 7021.5 (13%)     max: 7671 Points
3018 Points (5%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
1126 Points (5%)
839 Points (4%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
7878 Points (25%)
3091 Points (10%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 4999     avg: 5050     median: 5049.5 (50%)     max: 5100 Points
3928 Points (39%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 25919     avg: 27790     median: 27789.5 (31%)     max: 29660 Points
11249 Points (13%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
1278 ms (1%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
27979 Points (25%)
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
211.2 Watt (36%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
219.2 Watt (40%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
8.2 Points per Watt (6%)

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 7 2700X → 100% n=15

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U → 54% n=15

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.26
log 25. 03:14:40

#0 checking url part for id 9978 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 11332 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Tue, 23 Apr 2024 05:40:15 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 composed specs +0.023s ... 0.024s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.024s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 9978 +0.004s ... 0.028s

#7 got single benchmarks 9978 +0.076s ... 0.104s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 11332 +0.003s ... 0.107s

#9 got single benchmarks 11332 +0.012s ... 0.12s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.12s

#11 min, max, avg, median took s +0.249s ... 0.368s

#12 return log +0.033s ... 0.402s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)